MedPath

Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Received First-Line Sunitinib

Completed
Conditions
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT04076787
Lead Sponsor
Pfizer
Brief Summary

This is a retrospective, longitudinal cohort study that assessed clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who received sunitinib as first-line treatment.

Detailed Description

Clear cell mRCC patients who initiated sunitinib as first-line treatment between 2010 and 2018 were identified from the IMDC database. Patients were classified as favorable, intermediate, or poor prognostic risk group according to IMDC criteria. Overall survival, time to treatment discontinuation, and physician-assessed tumor response were evaluated.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1769
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosed with mRCC
  • Initiated treatment post mRCC diagnosis and received sunitinib as first-line therapy
  • Age 18 years or over at the time of mRCC diagnosis
  • Actively treated at an IMDC clinical center
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Initiated first line sunitinib treatment before 2010
  • Had non-clear cell mRCC
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Poor IMDC risk groupSunitinibThe cohort of mRCC patients receiving sunitinib as first-line treatment and classified as poor IMDC risk group for having 3 or more individual risk factors
Favorable IMDC risk groupSunitinibThe cohort of mRCC patients receiving sunitinib as first-line treatment and classified as favorable IMDC risk group for having 0 individual risk factor
Intermediate IMDC risk groupSunitinibThe cohort of mRCC patients receiving sunitinib as first-line treatment and classified as intermediate IMDC risk group for having 1 or 2 individual risk factors
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Overall Survival60 months

Overall survival was defined as the time between index date and death due to any cause or end of data availability. The index date was defined as the date of initiation of first-line sunitinib therapy.

Time to First-Line Sunitinib Treatment Discontinuation60 months

Time to treatment discontinuation was defined as the time between index date and either discontinuation of first-line sunitinib therapy due to any reason including disease progression, death, toxicity, both disease progression and toxicity, other or end of data availability. The index date was defined as the date of initiation of first-line sunitinib therapy.

Number of Participants Who Discontinued First-Line Sunitinib Treatment60 months

In this outcome measure, participants who discontinued treatment due to any reason like disease progression, death, toxicity, both disease progression and toxicity, other or end of data availability are reported.

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR)60 months

Percentage of participants with OR based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Confirmed responses are those that persist on repeat imaging study at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR are defined as the disappearance of all lesions (target and/or non target). Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeter. PR are those with at least 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters.

Percentage of Participants With Progressive Disease60 months

Progressive disease (PD) was defined as an increase in visible disease. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) progressive disease: - at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on the study. This includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression.

Percentage of Participants With Stable Disease60 months

Stable disease was defined as no change in size of visible disease. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), stable disease neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. Progressive disease: - at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on the study. PR are those with at least 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum diameters.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Calgary

🇨🇦

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath