Patient Education Bundle vs. Nurses Feedback and Coaching to Prevent Missed Doses of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis: A Crossover, Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 9,657
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Missed doses of VTE prophylaxis
研究概览
简要总结
VTE associated harm is underappreciated among hospitalized patients and may be associated with missed doses of VTE prophylaxis medications. In order to ensure best practices, and administer a defect-free VTE prevention nurses must understand and educate patients on the importance of the VTE prophylaxis. We propose to conduct a randomized trial comparing the effect of a validated, real-time patient education bundle (PEB), to a program of nurse feedback and coaching (NFC) provided by nurse leaders.
详细描述
Missed doses of prescribed Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) pharmacologic prophylaxis is a significant problem. Data on patients admitted to The Johns Hopkins Hospital found approximately 12% of prescribed doses of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis were not administered. There were several reasons for these missed doses. The leading reason (nearly 60% of missed doses) was patient or family member refusal for any reason.
Based on data collected by the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission (HSCRC) in the Maryland hospital-acquired conditions (MHAC) program, during 2011 half of patients who developed confirmed VTE at The Johns Hopkins Hospital were not administered one or more doses of prescribed VTE prophylaxis. These data indicate that missed or refused doses of VTE prophylaxis represent a significant and under-recognized contributor to sub-optimal VTE prophylaxis that will erode the beneficial impact of current efforts to improve rates of VTE prophylaxis ordering by physicians.
As part of a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)-funded project, the investigators have developed a registry of missed doses of VTE prophylaxis that includes data on missed doses of VTE prophylaxis.
Primary hypothesis Both interventions (PEB and NFC) will improve medication administration (as measured by missed doses)
Secondary hypotheses
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
Within strata, a coin toss (ERH) will be used to randomize floors into either the Patient education bundle arm or the Nurse feedback arm. The VTE prophylaxis medication non-administration dataset provided to the biostatistical team (i.e. outcomes assessors) for analysis will be blinded by treatment arm and department.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
Missed doses of VTE prophylaxis
时间窗: 1 year
Proportion of VTE prophylaxis doses not administered
次要结局
- Patient refused doses of VTE prophylaxis(1 year)
- Missed doses of VTE prophylaxis for reasons other than patient refusal(1 year)
- Patient satisfaction(1 year)
- Nurse Satisfaction(1 year)
- VTE events (all VTE, DVT, PE)(1 year)