MedPath

Feasibility Clinical Study of the Alma System in Treating Primary Postpartum Hemorrhage

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Postpartum Haemorrhage (PPH)
PPH
Postpartum Hemorrhage (Primary)
Registration Number
NCT06646653
Lead Sponsor
ResQ Medical Ltd
Brief Summary

Feasibility clinical study of the Alma System in treating primary postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).

Detailed Description

10 subjects, first in woman trial with ethics committee oversight. Women who experienced postpartum hemorrhage will be treated with the Alma System, which aims to rapidly reduce or stop the bleeding by targeting the primary cause: uterine atony.

The primary objective is to verify the safety of the Alma System in humans by: 1. Ensuring the absence of serious adverse events (SAEs) related to the use of the Alma System during and after the procedure. 2. Evaluating any observable damage to the uterus, cervix, or vagina due to the use of the Alma System. 3. Evaluating the occurrence of uterine inversion or folding during the use of the Alma System.

The secondary objectives include evaluating: 1. The ability to easily place the Alma System trans-vaginally. 2. The ability to connect the Alma System to a vacuum source and maintain the desired negative pressure. 3. The ability of the Alma System to contract the uterus to a level that reduces or stops blood loss and avoids further non-surgical and surgical intervention. 4. The time from insertion and start of negative pressure to a visible reduction in blood loss.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
10
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Adult Female, 18 years of age or older at time of consent.
  2. Subject or her legally authorized representative is able to understand and provide consent to participate in the clinical investigation.
  3. Subjects who present with an atonic uterus for at least 10 minutes after expulsion of placenta with failure to obtain contraction and/or Subjects who have lost blood post-vaginal delivery > = 500 ml and lost blood post-cesarian delivery > = 1000 ml and according to the Investigator's judgment, require an intervention.
  4. Failed first-line intervention of uterotonics and uterine massage/bimanual uterine massage to stop bleeding.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Subjects who do not provide informed consent to participate in the clinical investigation.

  2. Subjects who deliver at a uterus size < 34 weeks.

  3. Subjects who have lost > 1000 ml of blood for vaginal birth and > 2000 ml for caesarian delivery.

  4. Subjects who have abnormal PT, PTT and INR.

  5. Subjects who present with retained placenta, uterine lacerations, or for any other conditions outside of atonic post-partum hemorrhage.

  6. PPH that the investigator determines to require more aggressive treatment, including any of the following:

    • Hysterectomy;
    • B-lynch suture;
    • Uterine artery embolization or ligation;
    • Hypogastric ligation;
    • Known uterine anomaly;
    • Ongoing intrauterine pregnancy.
  7. Placental abnormality including any of the following:

    • Known placenta accreta;
    • Retained placenta with known risk factors for placenta accreta (e.g., history of prior uterine surgery, including prior c-section and placenta previa);
    • Retained placenta without easy manual removal.
  8. Known uterine rupture

  9. Unresolved uterine inversion.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Rate of related SAEs6 weeks

Rate of device related SAEs up to six weeks following device treatment

Rate of Damage to Cervix, Uterus or VaginaProcedure

Rate of any observable damage to cervix, uterus or vagina during or immediately after device procedure

Rate of Occurrence of Uterine Inversion or FoldingProcedure

Rate of occurrence of uterine inversion or folding during or immediately after device procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Rate of Uterine ContractionProcedure

Rate of uterine contraction to a level that reduces or stops blood flow

Time to Visible Reduction in Blood FlowProcedure

Time from insertion and start of negative pressure to visible reduction in blood flow

User Feedback on Connection to VacuumProcedure

Rate of positive user feedback on connection to vacuum and maintenance of desired negative pressure

User Feedback on Placement of AlmaProcedure

Rate of positive user feedback on device placement transvaginally

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University Clinical Hospital of Mostar

🇧🇦

Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina

University Clinical Hospital of Mostar
🇧🇦Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Vajdana Tomic, Prof.
Contact

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.