Smart Digital Denture Conversion (SDDC), a Technique for Full Arch Immediate Loading
- Conditions
- Complete Edentulism
- Interventions
- Procedure: digital denture conversionProcedure: conventional denture conversion
- Registration Number
- NCT06233552
- Lead Sponsor
- Ain Shams University
- Brief Summary
This study presents a smart digital approach to design and construct a screw retained immediately loaded full arch implant supported bridge based on the pre-treatment complete denture.
- Detailed Description
After intra oral scanning of the ridge form, implant positions, the denture is used to scan the intermaxillary relation and tooth positions and the fixed interim is designed and milled from PMMA. This technique is applicable when a single arch is treated or for bimaxillary implant rehabilitation cases. In this study 30 patients were grouped into two groups; group I in which a converted denture was made conventionally and Group II in which a converted denture was made digitally. General satisfaction, chair side working time, and esthetic outcome of the prostheses were recorded and quantified with a verbal rating scale following insertion of implant-supported prosthesis.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
- -Nonsmokers
- Free from any systemic disease
- Non-bruxers
- With sufficient quality and quantity of bone
- Prepared to comply with the follow-up and maintenance program
-
- Patients with bad oral hygiene.
- Patients with limited mouth opening.
- Vulnerable groups.
- Uncooperative patients.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description digital denture conversion digital denture conversion An alternative workflow for construction of the fixed interim requires impressions, model production, and jaw relation records then digitizing all these data then designing and milling the restoration. conventional denture conversion conventional denture conversion a conventional denture conversion will be done following the conventional fabrication technique.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Patient general satisfaction questionnaire through study completion within 6 months General satisfaction with a verbal rating scale range from 0 to 5, as 0 denotes the lowest value (worst) and 5 the highest value (best), following insertion of implant-supported prosthesis.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method chair side working time questionnaire through study completion within 6 months the procedure working time with a verbal rating scale range from 0 to 5, as 0 denotes the lowest value (worst) and 5 the highest value (best), following insertion of implant-supported prosthesis.
esthetic satisfaction questionnaire through study completion within 6 months esthetic outcome of the prostheses with a verbal rating scale range from 0 to 5, as 0 denotes the lowest value (worst) and 5 the highest value (best), following insertion of implant-supported prosthesis.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ain Shams University
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt