跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05433701
NCT05433701进行中(未招募)不适用

A Phase III Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial to Compare Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Unresectable, Small (≤ 3 cm) Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Jonggi Choi2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 178 人开始时间: 2022年8月29日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
发起方
入组人数
178
试验地点
2
主要终点
Local progression-free survival rate, per-protocol (PP)

研究概览

简要总结

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality and the sixth most prevalent cancer in the world. Standard treatments for early-stage HCCs include resection, liver transplantation, and percutaneous ablation, with 5-year survival rates of over 50 percent. Less than one-third of patients, however, are candidates for hepatic resection, and the use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may be significantly limited in cases with unfavorable tumor location and poor visibility on images, which increase the risk of technical failures and complications after RFA.

Recent advancements in radiotherapy and imaging have made it possible to deliver optimal radiation doses on the tumor site while minimizing exposure to normal organs. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a method of high-precision radiation therapy that concentrates high-dose radiation to HCC in a short period of time to maximize the therapeutic effect on the tumor and minimize the side effects on normal tissues. Prospective and retrospective studies on SBRT for HCC have demonstrated its efficacy for local tumor control in small HCC. On the basis of these promising clinical results, a number of studies have compared the efficacy of RFA and SBRT. However, there is no strong evidence from randomized controlled trials comparing SBRT and RFA.

In order to evaluate and compare the local efficacy and clinical outcomes of SBRT and RFA in patients with recurrent HCC, we conduct this non-inferiority trial.

详细描述

A total of 178 subjects are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups (89 patients in the body stereotactic radiotherapy group and 89 patients in the radiofrequency ablation group). If the assigned treatment method is technically infeasible, patients are allowed to be treated with the other method.

  • RFA: When localization of the lesion is difficult under image guidance, when it is difficult to secure a safe needle path, when there is a risk of collateral thermal damage to adjacent organs, and when it is difficult to prevent it.
  • SBRT: When irradiation with 45 Gy (daily dose of 15 Gy) is infeasible due to the maximum tolerance dose of normal organs.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • patient over the age of 18
  • primary or recurrent HCC that is not suitable for surgery
  • HCCs with a longest diameter of ≤3cm and ≤2 lesions
  • no evidence of intrahepatic or extrahepatic residual disease except for target lesions
  • Child-Pugh class A or B hepatic function
  • no macroscopic vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis
  • written informed consent

排除标准

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score 3 or 4
  • uncontrolled ascites, variceal bleeding, or hepatic encephalopathy
  • previous history of liver transplantation
  • an active gastric or duodenal ulcer within 3 months before screening
  • pregnant woman
  • uncontrolled other malignancies except for HCC within 2 years before screening
  • platelet count <50,000/µl
  • Patients who are judged by the researcher to be difficult to conduct clinical research

结局指标

主要结局

Local progression-free survival rate, per-protocol (PP)

时间窗: At year 2

Local progression-free survival rate, PP

次要结局

  • Progression-free survival rate, PP(At year 2)
  • Progression-free survival rate, intention-to-treat (ITT)(At year 2)
  • Intrahepatic progression-free survival rate, ITT(At year 2)
  • Adverse reaction rate, ITT(At year 2)
  • Local progression-free survival rate according to the tumor location, ITT(At year 2)
  • Intrahepatic progression-free survival rate, PP(At year 2)
  • Progression-free survival rate, ITT(At year 2)
  • Overall survival rate, ITT(At year 2)
  • Local progression-free survival rate according to the tumor location, PP(At year 2)
  • Adverse reaction rate ≥ Gr 3, ITT(At year 2)
  • Adverse reaction rate, PP(At year 2)
  • Adverse reaction rate ≥ Gr 3, PP(At year 2)
  • Change of Child-Pugh score , PP(At year 2)
  • Change of Child-Pugh score, ITT(At year 2)

研究者

发起方
Jonggi Choi
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Jonggi Choi

Professor

Asan Medical Center

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

进行中(未招募)
3 期
Efficacy and safety of DMX-200 in patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosisFocal segmental glomerulosclerosisUrological and Genital Diseases
ISRCTN72772236Dimerix Bioscience Pty Ltd286
已完成
不适用
A Multi - Center Study Of PET Imaging With [F-18] FLT & [F-18] FDG in Cancer Patients for Treatment EvaluationHead and Neck CancerLung Cancer
NCT00847509Siemens Molecular Imaging49
进行中(未招募)
1 期
A clinical study that will test whether cobimetinib plus atezolizumab and atezolizumab alone are effective and safe in patients with colorectal cancer that has spread when compared to regorafenibThe patient population are patients with metastatic or locally advanced unresectable colorectal adenocarcinoma that have received at least two lines of chemotherapy in this setting. The patients must have received 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. Patients who have received an anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR are eligible.MedDRA version: 20.0 Level: PT Classification code 10052358 Term: Colorectal cancer metastatic System Organ Class: 10029104 - Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)MedDRA version: 20.0 Level: PT Classification code 10061451 Term: Colorectal cancer System Organ Class: 10029104 - Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
EUCTR2016-000202-11-BEF. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd.363
进行中(未招募)
1 期
A clinical study that will test whether cobimetinib plus atezolizumab and atezolizumab alone are effective and safe in patients with colorectal cancer that has spread when compared to regorafenibThe patient population are patients with metastatic or locally advanced unresectable colorectal adenocarcinoma that have received at least two lines of chemotherapy in this setting. The patients must have received 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and irinitecan. Patients who have received an anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR are eligible.MedDRA version: 19.0Level: PTClassification code 10052358Term: Colorectal cancer metastaticSystem Organ Class: 10029104 - Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)MedDRA version: 19.0Level: PTClassification code 10061451Term: Colorectal cancerSystem Organ Class: 10029104 - Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
EUCTR2016-000202-11-DEF. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd.360
进行中(未招募)
1 期
A clinical study that will test whether cobimetinib plus atezolizumab and atezolizumab alone are effective and safe in patients with colorectal cancer that has spread when compared to regorafenibThe patient population are patients with metastatic or locally advanced unresectable colorectal adenocarcinoma that have received at least two lines of chemotherapy in this setting. The patients must have received 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. Patients who have received an anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR are eligible.MedDRA version: 20.0Level: PTClassification code 10052358Term: Colorectal cancer metastaticSystem Organ Class: 10029104 - Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)MedDRA version: 20.0Level: PTClassification code 10061451Term: Colorectal cancerSystem Organ Class: 10029104 - Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
EUCTR2016-000202-11-GBF. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd.363