MedPath

High Gastrointestinal Bleed Risk Outcomes in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) in France

Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Atrial Fibrillation
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT05038228
Lead Sponsor
Pfizer
Brief Summary

This study is a retrospective analysis of observational cohorts using data from prospectively collected administrative/claims data to investigate treatment patterns, and safety and effectiveness outcomes in patients with NVAF with high risk of gastrointestinal bleed who initiate anticoagulant treatment with a Vitamin-K Antagonists (VKAs) or direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1
Inclusion Criteria

Patients covered by the French national health insurance general scheme With at least one reimbursement of AC treatment (apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, or VKAs) Aged ≥18 years as of the index date With a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) prior to or on the index date With at least one risk factor for gastrointestinal bleeding

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with different types of AC treatment at the index date Patients with a diagnosis or procedure code indicative of rheumatic mitral valvular heart disease or valve replacement procedure Individuals with a diagnosis of VTE during the 12 months prior to or on the index date

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
NVAF High GI bleed riskVitamin K antagonist (VKA)NVAF patients with a high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding
NVAF High GI bleed riskApixabanNVAF patients with a high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding
NVAF High GI bleed riskRivaroxabanNVAF patients with a high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding
NVAF High GI bleed riskDabigatranNVAF patients with a high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Bleeding leading to hospitalization2016-2019

The follow-up period will be from the index date to death or end of study (31 December 2019). For the comparative analyses of clinical outcomes the follow-up period will be from the day after index date to the earliest of an outcome of interest (separately for each outcome); treatment discontinuation, treatment switch, death, or end of study.

Stroke2016-2019

The follow-up period will be from the index date to death or end of study (31 December 2019). For the comparative analyses of clinical outcomes the follow-up period will be from the index date to the earliest of an outcome of interest (separately for each outcome); treatment discontinuation, treatment switch, death, or end of study.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Pfizer Investigator

🇬🇧

London, United Kingdom

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath