High Gastrointestinal Bleed Risk Outcomes in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) in France
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT05038228
- Lead Sponsor
- Pfizer
- Brief Summary
This study is a retrospective analysis of observational cohorts using data from prospectively collected administrative/claims data to investigate treatment patterns, and safety and effectiveness outcomes in patients with NVAF with high risk of gastrointestinal bleed who initiate anticoagulant treatment with a Vitamin-K Antagonists (VKAs) or direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1
Patients covered by the French national health insurance general scheme With at least one reimbursement of AC treatment (apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, or VKAs) Aged ≥18 years as of the index date With a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) prior to or on the index date With at least one risk factor for gastrointestinal bleeding
Patients with different types of AC treatment at the index date Patients with a diagnosis or procedure code indicative of rheumatic mitral valvular heart disease or valve replacement procedure Individuals with a diagnosis of VTE during the 12 months prior to or on the index date
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description NVAF High GI bleed risk Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) NVAF patients with a high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding NVAF High GI bleed risk Apixaban NVAF patients with a high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding NVAF High GI bleed risk Rivaroxaban NVAF patients with a high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding NVAF High GI bleed risk Dabigatran NVAF patients with a high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Bleeding leading to hospitalization 2016-2019 The follow-up period will be from the index date to death or end of study (31 December 2019). For the comparative analyses of clinical outcomes the follow-up period will be from the day after index date to the earliest of an outcome of interest (separately for each outcome); treatment discontinuation, treatment switch, death, or end of study.
Stroke 2016-2019 The follow-up period will be from the index date to death or end of study (31 December 2019). For the comparative analyses of clinical outcomes the follow-up period will be from the index date to the earliest of an outcome of interest (separately for each outcome); treatment discontinuation, treatment switch, death, or end of study.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Pfizer Investigator
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom