跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03628001
NCT03628001Unknown不适用

A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study Comparing Sems Placement With and and Without Biliary Sphincterectomy in Patients With Malignant Biliary Obstruction (ES vs noES-1)

Istituto Clinico Humanitas2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 400 人开始时间: 2015年1月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
400
试验地点
2
主要终点
Number and type of complications after ERCP.

研究概览

简要总结

Background and rationale Placement of biliary self expanding metal stent (SEMS) is indicated when malignant common bile duct obstruction is encountered.

Currently, there is still controversy regarding the use of endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) before the placement of biliary stents. EST may facilitate insertion of self expandable metal stent (SEMS) and also help avert the development of pancreatitis from stent-related occlusion of the pancreatic duct. On the other hand, ES is also independently associated with pancreatitis, bleeding, and perforation.

Latest European guidelines indicate that EST is not necessary for inserting single plastic or metal biliary stents, nevertheless a more recent meta analysis showed that ES may decrease the rate of PEP.

Population and patient selection criteria All the patient referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) due to malignant bile duct obstruction.

Study design and study duration Prospective randomized, multicenter study. 18 months.

Description of study treatment/product/intervention All the patients will be randomly assigned to undergo ERCP with (Group A) or without (Group B) ES before biliary SEMS placement.

All the endoscopic procedures will be performed by experienced endoscopist in the endoscopy suite.

All the procedure will be conducted under deep sedation. SEMS placed will be fully covered.

Objectives To assess the need for EST before SEMS placement in patients with malignant bile duct obstruction.

To evaluate immediate (periprocedural) and delayed (30 days) post ERCP complications including pancreatitis, SEMS migration, bleeding and perforation.

Statistical methods, data analysis A sample size analysis to detect superiority at 5% significance level and a power of 80% showed that 500 patients had to be enrolled in each group.

Continuous variables such age will be reported in terms of their mean and range, and t-test will be done to test their main difference.

X square test or Fisher exact test will be carried out for statistical analysis to compare rates of total complications between the two groups and rates of pancreatitis, bleeding, stent migration and perforation.

Wilcoxon Mann-Withney test will be used for comparison of means between 2 continuous variables. A single-tailed P value of less than 0,05 is considered significant.

Study time table Project starting date: 15-7-2015 Project completion of patients accrual: 15-10-2016 Project completion of data collection: 15-11-2016 Project data analysis: 15-2-2017 Project presentation of scientific report: 15-4-2017

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Sequential
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
  • Malignant bile duct obstruction
  • Signed written informed consent
  • Age > 18

排除标准

  • Inability to provide inform consent
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Suspected perforation of the GI tract
  • Anatomical alterations due to previous surgery (Billroth surgery)
  • Coagulation alterations

结局指标

主要结局

Number and type of complications after ERCP.

时间窗: 18 Months

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验