MedPath

Study: Manometry With & Without Lidocaine

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Normal
Interventions
Behavioral: 4% Lidocaine Spray
Behavioral: 2% Viscous Lidocaine
Registration Number
NCT03349112
Lead Sponsor
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether subjects report a difference in comfort with High Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry (HRPM) conducted following application of lidocaine as an anesthetic as compared to HRPM conducted without anesthetic.

Detailed Description

High resolution pharyngeal manometry (HRPM) is used for assessing swallowing pressure along the length of the pharynx and upper esophageal sphincter. Pressure measurements in the region of the velopharynx, tongue base, and upper esophageal sphincter are obtained by passing a catheter with pressure sensors through the patient's nose and past the upper esophageal sphincter. Patients are presented various volumes of liquid to swallow and potentially asked to perform postural strategies such as a head turn or chin tuck during swallowing while the catheter is in place. Clinically, approximately 90% of patients report various discomfort associated with the procedure. Discomfort can result in patient refusal to participate or an inaccurate picture of a patient's swallowing pressures. Conversely, use of anesthesia can potentially alter swallowing physiology.

Recent studies have studied the effects of lidocaine on penetration/aspiration and subject discomfort during flexible endoscopic evaluations, yet findings are inconclusive or contradictive. Investigators aim to determine whether subjects report a difference in comfort with HRPM conducted following application of lidocaine as an anesthetic as compared to HRPM conducted without anesthetic.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
36
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Healthy male and female adults 18-65.
  2. All races.
  3. Able to consent for self.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. History of dysphagia.
  2. History of previous pharyngeal or esophageal manometry.
  3. History of facial fracture or abnormalities precluding passage of catheter through nares.
  4. History of esophageal pathology including previous resection or perforation.
  5. Pregnant
  6. Known lidocaine allergy or sensitivity

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Anesthetized2% Viscous LidocaineA study team member will apply 1 mL of 2% viscous lidocaine to each nares prior to the passage of the catheter, Participants in this group will additionally receive .8 mL of a 4% Lidocaine spray to both nares prior to HRPM.
Anesthetized4% Lidocaine SprayA study team member will apply 1 mL of 2% viscous lidocaine to each nares prior to the passage of the catheter, Participants in this group will additionally receive .8 mL of a 4% Lidocaine spray to both nares prior to HRPM.
Non-Anesthetized2% Viscous LidocaineA study team member will apply 1 mL of 2% viscous lidocaine to each nares prior to the passage of the catheter. Randomized participants in this group will not receive .8 mL of a 4% Lidocaine spray prior to HRPM .
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
A quantifiable difference of perceived comfort reduction during HRPM with or without lidocaine as assessed through analysis of a visual analog scale.Assessing the change of the visual analog scale between two procedural study visits. Data will be reported at study completion, an average of 1 year.

Following HRPM without additional lidocaine and following HRPM with additional lidocaine, the subject will be asked to rate their level of comfort during the procedure using a visual analog scale.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Wisconsin - Madison

🇺🇸

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath