Comfort Comparison of Intravitreal Injection Eyelid Retraction Techniques
- Conditions
- PainIntravitreal Injection
- Registration Number
- NCT04144985
- Lead Sponsor
- New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation
- Brief Summary
This study evaluated the discomfort associated with eyelid retraction during intravitreal injections. Participants had eyelid retraction with one of three methods: eyelid speculum, unimanual eyelid retraction method or with a cotton tipped applicator eyelid retraction technique. All participants were given a pain survey immediately after the injection to evaluate their discomfort level.
- Detailed Description
Comfort is an important factor in compliance and satisfaction during medical care With the millions of intravitreal injections done each year, even small improvements in participants' experiences could lead to significant benefit. During the process eye injections, the method of eyelid retraction has been shown to be one of the most significant sources of discomfort.
Many ophthalmologists use an eyelid speculum to retract the eyelids, but potentially more comfortable methods exist. The purpose of our study was to test the comfort eyelid retraction with an eyelid speculum to that of the unimanual eyelid retraction method and a cotton tipped applicator eyelid retraction technique.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 99
- Adult participants receiving an intravitreal injection
- iodine allergy
- prior ocular surgery other than uncomplicated cataract surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain Associated with Different Eyelid Retraction Technique 1 minute Within one minute of the injection, the participant was given a standard 100mm long visual analog scale (VAS) and asked to rate their pain from 0mm (no pain) to 100mm (the worst pain) regarding the process of the intravitreal injection.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Difference in Pain in Treatment Naive Participants 1 minute Visual analog scale (VAS) of pain was compared between participant that had prior intravitreal injections and those that were treatment naive. Within one minute of the injection, the participant was given a standard 100mm long visual analog scale (VAS) and asked to rate their pain from 0mm (no pain) to 100mm (the worst pain) regarding the process of the intravitreal injection.
Associations of Hemoglobin A1c and Ocular Pain 1 minute Visual analog scale (VAS) of pain was compared to participants with different hemoglobin A1c level. Within one minute of the injection, the participant was given a standard 100mm long visual analog scale (VAS) and asked to rate their pain from 0mm (no pain) to 100mm (the worst pain) regarding the process of the intravitreal injection.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Kings County Hospital
🇺🇸Brooklyn, New York, United States
Kings County Hospital🇺🇸Brooklyn, New York, United States