Edentulous Sites Augmented With Collagen Matrix or CTG
- Conditions
- Edentulous Alveolar Ridge
- Registration Number
- NCT04915677
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Turin, Italy
- Brief Summary
Ridge deformities can complicate prosthetic rehabilitation, especially in situations where optimal esthetic outcomes are desired. Simpler, less invasive and predictable treatments are needed in order to obtain soft tissue augmentation at edentulous ridges. Autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) has always been regarded as the treatment of choice, but heterologous volume stable collagen matrix (VCMX) is emerging as a reliable alternative. The principal aim of the present RCT will be to compare the volumetric buccal soft tissue changes at edentulous areas after augmentation procedure using VCMX or SCTG. Parameters related to periodontal health at adjacent teeth and patient reported outcomes (PROMs) will be also assessed as secondary outcomes. Proving the non- inferiority of VCMX compared to SCTG would provide the specialists and general clinicians with an easier, less invasive and better tolerated technique for soft tissue augmentation at edentulous ridges and for improving aesthetic and cleansability of the prosthetic rehabilitation.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 28
- Intercalated mono-edentulous area ridge defects to be rehabilitated with fixed partial bridge
- At least 18 years old
- At least 6 months from tooth extraction at the study area.
- Systemic diseases which could influence the outcome of the therapy (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes mellitus);
- Smoking ≥ 10 cigarettes a day;
- Pregnant or nursing women;
- Chronic use of corticosteroids or other anti-inflammatory or immune-modulator drugs;
- Patients who need use of medications affecting bone metabolism or oral mucosa;
- Presence of a congruous FDP at the edentulous area;
- History of soft tissue augmentation surgery in the study area;
- Active periodontitis
- Uncompliant patients
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Volumetric buccal soft tissue changes (-5 to +5 mm with positive values representing an increase in volume) 6 months Mean linear change in mm from baseline to 6 months follow-up
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain (VAS scale)(0-10 with higher values indicating worse outcomes) 2 weeks Subjective pain experienced by the patient expressed in a VAS scale
Mucosal recession at adjacent sites (0-15 mm with higher values indicating worse outcomes) 6 months The distance between the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and the mucosal margin
Change in Probing Pocket Depth (PD) at adjacent teeth (0-15 mm with higher values representing worse outcomes) 6 months The distance between cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and the base of the pocket
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Turin
🇮🇹Turin, Italy
University of Turin🇮🇹Turin, ItalyGiacomo Baima, DDSContact00393497254708giacomo.baima@unito.it