Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02893449
NCT02893449CompletedNot Applicable

Improvement of Social Adaptation After Pre-operative Cognitive Remediation in Parkinson's Patients Profiting From a Bilateral Subthalamic Stimulation

Central Hospital, Nancy, France3 sites in 1 country73 target enrollmentStarted: April 1, 2009Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
73
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
Global score of the SAS SR (social adjustment scale self report) scale

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Main objective:

To assess the impact of a structured program of preoperative cognitive remediation on postoperative social adaptation in patients suffering from Parkinson's disease profiting from bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation.

Secondary objectives:

To assess in the same patients the impact of structured program of preoperative cognitive remediation on quality of life, mood, anxiety, apathy and psychologic, social and professional functioning depending on psychiatric symptomatology after intervention.

Detailed Description

Prospective, longitudinal, controlled, multicentric, randomised, open study.

Subjects: 3 groups of 40 patients (n=120): one group of patients profiting from a structured program of preoperative cognitive remediation (SICRPPD group: Specific Individual Cognitive Remediation Program in Parkinson's Disease), one group of patients profiting from a preoperative non structured accompaniment (ICM group: Intensive Care Management), one control group (CG group: Control Group).

Required sample size: The sample size of 40 patients/group will allow to demonstrate with a significance threshold of 5% and a power of 80% a difference of evolution of the global SAS SR score of 0.75 SD between 2 of the 3 groups. For an intended SD of 0.2 units, the threshold corresponds to a difference of 0.15 units, minimal significant change.

Intervention: The structured program of preoperative cognitive remediation is divided in 3 parts: one interview with the patient to do a building of the subjective theories (difficulties due to the disease, hope relative to the intervention), a study meeting of the cognitive remediation possibilities and a cognitive remediation meeting with the patient. The spouse will be included in the program.

Evaluation tools: Patients will be met before and after the intervention for clinical evaluations and scales making: For the psychiatric evaluation: Mini International Neuropsychiatric Inventory (M.I.N.I.), Starkstein Apathy Scale, Montgomery and Asberg depression scale (MADRS), global functioning evaluation scale (EGF) and Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA)/ For the social adaptation evaluation: Social Adjustment scale Self Report (SAS SR)/ For quality of life evaluation: 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39)/ For the daily life activities, 'motor' symptomatology and treatment complications evaluation: Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS, parties II, III, et IV).

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Men or women suffering from idiopathic Parkinson's disease for which the indication of treatment by deep cerebral stimulation is retained
  • •Obtained informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Absence of social security
  • •Patient unable to be compliant
  • •Major patient under guardianship

Arms & Interventions

SICRPPD group

Other

(Specific Individual Cognitive Remediation Program in Parkinson's Disease). Group of patients profiting from a structured program of preoperative cognitive remediation

Intervention: Deep brain stimulation (Procedure)

SICRPPD group

Other

(Specific Individual Cognitive Remediation Program in Parkinson's Disease). Group of patients profiting from a structured program of preoperative cognitive remediation

Intervention: Social adaptation (Behavioral)

ICM group: Intensive Care Management

Other

Group of patients profiting from a preoperative non structured support

Intervention: Intensive care management (Behavioral)

ICM group: Intensive Care Management

Other

Group of patients profiting from a preoperative non structured support

Intervention: Deep brain stimulation (Procedure)

CG group: Control Group

Other

No supplementary support

Intervention: Deep brain stimulation (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Global score of the SAS SR (social adjustment scale self report) scale

Time Frame: 6 months (after surgery)

Global score of the SAS SR (social adjustment scale self report) scale

Time Frame: 3 months (after surgery)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Quality of life(6 months)
  • Coping with disease(6 months)
  • Perception of deep brain stimulation(6 months)
  • Global Assessment of Functioning(6 months)
  • Disease perception(6 months)
  • Anxiety(6 months)
  • Apathy(6 months)
  • Mood(6 months)
  • Quality of life(3 months)
  • Anxiety(3 months)
  • Apathy(3 months)
  • Mood(3 months)
  • Global Assessment of Functioning(3 months)
  • Disease perception(3 months)
  • Perception of deep brain stimulation(3 months)
  • Coping with disease(3 months)

Investigators

Sponsor
Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials