跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06257108
NCT06257108已完成不适用

Clinical Performance of Bulk-Fill Composite Using With Adhesives With or Without Chlorhexidine

Uşak University0 个研究点目标入组 40 人开始时间: 2016年1月15日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
40
主要终点
Clinical evaluation

研究概览

简要总结

This study aims to evaluate the clinical success of chlorhexidine-containing dentin bonding agent in primary molars with a 12-month follow-up. The research question is:

Is there a difference between the clinical evaluation results of deciduous teeth restored with dentin bonding agents containing and not containing chlorhexidine?

A total of 40 patients aged 5-9 years with at least two dentin caries in primary molars were included in the study. The study involved a split-mouth design in which the standard bond and chlorhexidine-containing bond as the adhesive agents. Bulk Fill composite was used as the restorative material for the restoration of primary molars with class II cavity. The evaluation of clinical success was performed by a calibrated observer according to the FDI criteria at months 3, 6, 9, and 12 after restoration.

详细描述

This study aims to evaluate the clinical success of chlorhexidine-containing dentin bonding agent in primary molars with a 12-month follow-up. A total of 40 patients aged 5-9 years with at least two dentin caries (D1 Level) in primary molars were included in the study. The study involved a split-mouth design in which Ultradent PQ1 Bond and Ultradent Peak Universal Bond were used as the bonding agents and Tetric N Ceram Bulk Fill composite was used as the restorative material for the restoration of primary molars with class II cavity. The evaluation of clinical success was performed by a calibrated observer according to the FDI criteria at months 3, 6, 9, and 12 after restoration.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
5 Years 至 9 Years(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • (1) age between 5-9 years; (2) no systemic health problems (3) presence of at least one interproximal carious lesion not exceeding half of the dentin structure (D1 level) in the right and left sides of the mouth; (4) cooperation without issues (scoring 3 or 4 on the Frankl scale); and (5) patient and parent's willingness to attend follow-up appointments throughout the study.

排除标准

  • (1) the presence of pulp vitality with no clinical and/or radiological signs requiring endodontic treatment, (2) no previous treatment on the selected teeth, (3) Radiographically, the caries should not extend to one-third of the pulp, indicating only the need for a Class II restoration, (4) the presence of adjacent teeth mesial and distal to the selected tooth and an opposing tooth in the oral cavity, (5) the absence of physiological or pathological root resorption.

结局指标

主要结局

Clinical evaluation

时间窗: The treatments will be assessed using the same method over a 12-month period with 3-month intervals.

Following the completion of the restorations, a proficient observer, unaware of the utilized material, will assess the respective tooth based on the World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria (reference). This evaluation will be conducted using a mirror and probe under illumination, with teeth being dried using air/water spray. The assigned scores will categorize the restorations as successful (Score 1), exhibiting minor defects (Score 2), showing acceptable defects (Score 3), needing repair (Score 4), or necessitating replacement (Score 5).

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Uşak University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验