A Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of PK101 in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT04858659
- Lead Sponsor
- PMG Pharm Co., Ltd
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and the safety of PK101 in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
- Detailed Description
The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of PK101 compared with PK101-002 at Week 8 in osteoarthritis. Also evaluates the safety of PK101.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 354
- Patients ≥40 and of age
- Patients who meets the American College Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and has lasted for at least three months after diagnosis of one-sided or bilateral knee osteoarthritis.
- Radiographic evidence of grade 1 ~ 3 osteoarthritis based on the Kellgren & Lawrence radiographic entry criteria at visit 1
- Score of 100mm pain VAS ≤ 80mm at visit 1
- Written consent form voluntarily
- Score of 100mm pain VAS ≥ 40mm at visit 3
- Patients with an individual medication compliance of 70% or more of the IP administered during the Run-in period
-
Patients who has a history of hypersensitivity to components of IP, NSAIDs including COX-2 inhibitors, a history of hypersensitivity to aspirin, or allergic reactions to sulfonamides
-
Patients with inflammatory, infectious, metabolic, septic arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis other than osteoarthritis
-
Patients with a condition that can affect the joints
-
Patients who have undergone arthroscopic surgery within 1 year , knee joint surgery within 5 years, synoviorthesis within 3 months prior to visit 1 to the target knee, or who have planned surgery during the trial period
-
Patients who have used corticosteroids as follows:
- Inj. of corticosteroid, including intraarticular administration, into the target knee within 3 months prior to visit 1
- Oral corticosteroid administration within 1 month prior to visit 1
-
Patients who have intraarticular injected hyaluronic acid or cell therapy products, gene therapy products, etc. for the treatment of osteoarthritis within 3 months prior to visit 1
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description PK101 group PK101 - PK101 group PK101-002 placebo - PK101-002 group PK101 placebo - PK101-002 group PK101-002 -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change during activity in 100mm Pain VAS baseline through week 8 Visual Analogue Scale, 0 mm no pain, 100 mm worst pain ever
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in WOMAC(Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index using the Visual Analogue Scale, Version 3.1) sub scale & total score baseline through week 4, 8 Assessment of pain, stiffness and physical function. Score range 0-500 mm for Pain, 0-200 mm for Stiffness, and 0-1700 mm for Physical Function. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.
Change during activity in 100mm Pain VAS baseline through week 4 Visual Analogue Scale, 0 mm no pain, 100 mm worst pain ever
Change in PGA baseline through week 8 PGA for disease severity (Patient's Global Assessment, 1=Very good, 2=Good, 3=Fair, 4=Poor, 5=Very Poor)
Change in SF-36 sub scale & PCS, MCS as measured by Health Survey(Short Form, SF-36 v2, Physical Component Summary, Mental Component Summary) baseline through week 8 The SF-36 v2 is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient's health, consisting of 2 components(the PCS and the MCS) included 8 subscales.
Patients rated their QoL using a 2-6 point Likert Scale. Score is converting the original score to 0\~100 points.
The lower score means poor health status, and the higher score, the better.Change at rest in 100mm Pain VAS baseline through week 4, 8 Visual Analogue Scale, 0 mm no pain, 100 mm worst pain ever
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Jeonbuk National University Hospital
🇰🇷Jeonju, Korea, Republic of