Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03427957
NCT03427957CompletedNot Applicable

Evaluation of a New Hysteroscopic Grasper for Endometrial Biopsy in Post-menopausal Patients With Vaginal Bleeding and/or Endometrial Thickness

Università degli Studi dell'Insubria4 sites in 1 country75 target enrollmentStarted: June 1, 2019Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
75
Locations
4
Primary Endpoint
Duration of the hysteroscopy

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy is usually performed through the classic spoon grasper. Recently, a new hysteroscopic grasper with knurled terminal end and cutting jaws was designed, in order to improve feasibility of the procedure, reduce its duration and the discomfort for the patients.

This study aims to compare the outcomes of the three hysteroscopic graspers for endometrial biopsy in post-menopausal patients.

Detailed Description

Diagnostic hysteroscopy is currently the gold standard method to evaluate uterine cavity and tubal ostia, allowing also the visualization of vaginal walls and the cervical canal. Compared to the other available diagnostic techniques, hysteroscopy has the advantage of directly visualization the anatomical area to be investigated and allows to perform biopsy. The possibility of hysteroscopy-guided biopsy sampling is particularly important in order to get histological diagnosis. As recently suggested, the hysteroscopic biopsy of the endometrium has diagnostic accuracy of 90% for post-menopausal endometrial cancer.

Currently, most diagnostic hysteroscopies are performed in outpatient setting, without anesthesia, using modern hysteroscopes with a 1.67 mm working channel. In particular, endometrial biopsy is usually performed through the classic spoon grasper or alligator grasper. Recently, a new hysteroscopic grasper with knurled terminal end and cutting jaws was designed, in order to improve feasibility of the procedure, reduce its duration and the discomfort for the patients.

This study aims to compare the outcomes of the three hysteroscopic graspers for endometrial biopsy in post-menopausal patients.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Masking Description

Patients will be blinded to the type of grasper used to perform hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
45 Years to 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Physiologic menopause
  • Vaginal bleeding or endometrial thickness (>5 mm)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Hormonal replacement therapies
  • Other known causes of vaginal/cervical bleeding
  • Suspected or known cancer(s)
  • Premature or iatrogenic menopause
  • Uterine cervix stenosis

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Duration of the hysteroscopy

Time Frame: During the hysteroscopy

Duration of the hysteroscopic procedure, expressed in minutes and seconds.

Pain perceived by the patient

Time Frame: During the hysteroscopy

Subjective evaluation of the pain perceived by the patient during the procedure, expressed through a 0-10 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, where 0 means "No pain" and 10 "The worst imaginable pain".

Secondary Outcomes

  • Number of attempts(During the hysteroscopy)
  • Size of the specimen(During the hysteroscopy)
  • Feasibility assessment by the operator(During the hysteroscopy)
  • Precision(During the hysteroscopy)

Investigators

Sponsor
Università degli Studi dell'Insubria
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Antonio Simone Laganà

Medical Doctor

Università degli Studi dell'Insubria

Study Sites (4)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials