跳至主要内容
临床试验/ACTRN12614000236695
ACTRN12614000236695尚未招募未知

HFS ONE: Is high frequency spinal cord stimulation more effective than sham treatment during a 20 day trial period for lumbar spine pain and leg pain? A randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled cross over trial.

Dr Simon Tame0 个研究点目标入组 17 人开始时间: 2014年3月5日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
未知
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
17

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomised controlled trial
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Blinded (masking used)

入排标准

年龄范围
25 Years 至 75 Years(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Persistent Back +/- leg pain for over 6 months
  • MRI or CT scan in the last 5 years
  • No other treatment available for treating the pain
  • Informed consent
  • The requirement of having a CT or MRI of the lumbosacral spine in the last 5 years is designed to screen rare situations where lumbar spine surgery may be indicated or likely to be indicated and potentially curative. An example is severe spinal canal stenosis. Leg pain from severe spinal canal stenosis should prompt a surgical assessment and possible surgical decompression in preference to a spinal cord stimulation trial. Another example is high grade spondylolisthesis where both back pain and leg pain can respond well to surgical treatment.

排除标准

  • Spinal surgery is required.
  • Contraindication to the procedure such as bleeding or immunological disorder that may increase risk of infection.
  • Severe psychological or psychiatric disorder.
  • Patients being treated as part of a workers compensation claim (participation in research studies is not permitted).

研究者

发起方
Dr Simon Tame

相似试验