Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06424275
NCT06424275Enrolling By InvitationNot Applicable

Prostate Cancer Awareness and Initiative for Screening in the European Union

European Association of Urology Research Foundation5 sites in 4 countries20,000 target enrollmentStarted: June 1, 2024Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Enrolling By Invitation
Sponsor
Enrollment
20,000
Locations
5
Primary Endpoint
Compliance with risk assessment

Study Overview

Brief Summary

PRAISE-U was initiated on the 1st of April 2023 and is set to last for three years. This collaborative effort involves 25 institutions across 12 countries, all driven by a shared objective: to rationalize prostate cancer screening in Europe and enhance patient outcomes. PRAISE-U advocates for EU member states to offer exceptional clinical standards, incorporating cutting-edge personalized approaches to enable timely detection of prostate cancer in individuals who can benefit from early treatment. To assess the functionality, feasibility, and long-term viability of a risk-based algorithm, the consortium will collaborate with pilot sites in Spain, Poland, Ireland, and Lithuania.

Detailed Description

The project has several key deliverables that are instrumental in its success. In the early phase of the project, the consortium will prepare a living state-of-play document - a comprehensive review of diverse screening strategies for prostate cancer in the EU, as well their harm/benefit and cost effectiveness. At a later stage, clinical performance indicators of screening effectiveness will be established, and a protocol for implementation of population-based quality assured prostate cancer screening program will be developed. While the protocol will follow a standardized approach, it will also allow for flexibility to accommodate the unique characteristics of each country's healthcare system. The pilot studies will run for 12 months, and all collected data will be used to estimate pre-defined key performance indicators that will be included in the final report. This deliverable will be used to perform a thorough evaluation of how well the screening program worked during the pilot phase and how site characteristics and diagnostic algorithms are associated with performance. The reach, acceptability, and adoption of the screening programme, its cost-effectiveness, as well as attitudes of participants and physicians, will be the research outcomes of interest.

The project aims to have short-term and long-term effects on prostate cancer screening in EU member states. In the short-term (1-3 years), the focus is on advancing population-based risk-adapted prostate cancer screening and increasing awareness among key stakeholders. This will be achieved by providing evidence-based information on the benefits and drawbacks of risk-adapted screening, leading to improved knowledge and future endorsement by healthcare professionals. In the medium-term (4-9 years), the goal is to reduce costs by eliminating ineffective opportunistic screening and implementing an organized risk-based screening algorithm. Ultimately, in the long-term (10+ years), the project aims to decrease the burden of prostate cancer and improve quality of life by reducing mortality rates and the number of advanced/metastatic cases through effective screening practices. PRAISE-U is an important step in assessing how screening for prostate cancer may reduce the burden of the disease for every man in the European Union.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Case Only
Time Perspective
Prospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
50 Years to 69 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 50-69 years old.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Previous diagnosis of prostate cancer.
  • Unable to provide written informed consent.
  • Had prostate biopsy or MRI within the past six months.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Compliance with risk assessment

Time Frame: 1 year

The proportion of individuals from the screened population undergoing risk assessment (as per protocol of the programme).

Tumour grade distribution

Time Frame: 1 year

Proportion of prostate cancers detected after positive screening test reported as ISUP grade (group) 1, 2, 3 and 4-5.

Crude Incidence rate

Time Frame: 1 year

The number of new cases of PCa arising in a specified population (expressed per 100,000) within a time frame of 12-months.\]

Incidence of clinically significant prostate cancer in each pilot site (with clinically significant prostate cancer defined as ISUP grade group ≥2).

Time Frame: 1 year

Opportunistic testing

Time Frame: 1 year

The proportion of individuals screened outside the population-based screening programme.

Participation rate

Time Frame: 1 year

The proportion of invited individuals who have undergone a screening test within a given time- frame following an active invitation.

PPV of screening test to detect any prostate cancer (6.1) and clinically significant prostate cancers (6.2)

Time Frame: 1 year

The proportion of individuals who have histopathologically confirmed clinically significant PCa to all those who had positive test results (with PSA result of \>3 ng/ml) (including healthy subjects who were incorrectly diagnosed as clinically significant PCa).

False positive rate to detect any PCa (7.1) and clinically significant PCa (7.2)

Time Frame: 1 year

The proportion of screened individuals who received a positive screening result in which no clinically significant cancer was detected after workup and diagnostic procedures.

Detection rate of PCa

Time Frame: 1 year

The proportion of individuals with a screen positive test who underwent further assessment with histopathologically proven cancer detected \[expressed per 1,000 individuals screened\].

Complications in screening procedure

Time Frame: 1 year

The proportion of individuals reporting at least one complication incurred during the screening procedure.

Cause-specific mortality

Time Frame: 1 year

The mortality from prostate cancer (primary cause of death only) per 100,000 target population in a defined 12-month period

Examination coverage

Time Frame: 1 year

The proportion of eligible individuals from the target population who had the recommended screening test within a given time frame

Retention rate

Time Frame: 1 year

The proportion of eligible individuals re-screened after a negative screening within a specified interval.

Invitation coverage

Time Frame: 1 year

The proportion of eligible individuals from the target population personally invited for screening within a given time frame.

Test result

Time Frame: 1 year

The results of the screening test.

Compliance with further assessment

Time Frame: 1 year

The proportion of individuals referred for diagnostic work up based on elevated PSA and risk assessment (as per protocol of the programme) attending all workup and diagnostic procedures assigned.

Compliance with treatment

Time Frame: 1 year

The proportion of individuals with cancer diagnosed within the screening program referred for treatment who initiated treatment (including active surveillance, when applicable).

Interval cancer rate

Time Frame: 1 year

The proportion of individuals with a negative screening test or a positive screening test but negative further assessment results who were diagnosed with prostate cancer prior to the next screening round.

Compliance with biopsy

Time Frame: 1 year

Proportion of eligible men who underwent biopsy

Active surveillance

Time Frame: 1 year

The proportion of patients recommended AS due to low/low-intermediate risk PCa who accepted and initiated AS.

Delay time

Time Frame: 1 year

Time from PSA test sample collection to histopathological confirmation of a malignant diagnosis (further disaggregated by different procedures) to treatment initiation

Radiologist's assessment of MRI

Time Frame: 1 year

Radiologist's assessment of MRI

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
European Association of Urology Research Foundation
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (5)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials