跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2021/03/031714
CTRI/2021/03/031714尚未招募不适用

To compare the ease of intubation through an I-gel versus Ambu Auragain : A prospective randomised study

Government Medical College Patiala1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2021年6月3日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
100
试验地点
1
主要终点
To compare the efficacy of I-gel and AAG in terms of number of attempts taken for effective supraglottic airway device placement,time to achieve effective ventilation after supraglottic airway device placement,number of attempts for endotracheal intubation,intubating time and number of cases in which fiberoptic bronchoscope is required

研究概览

简要总结

The present prospective randomised study will be conducted in 100 patients  of age group 20-60 yearsof ASA physical status I and II posted for elective surgery under General Anaesthesia at GMC Patiala. Patients will  be randomly allocated into two groups:Group I (I-gel) and group A (Ambu Auragain). After induction of anaesthesia an adequate sized I-gel or Ambu Auragain  concordant to patient’s weight will be inserted.After ensuring correct placement of supraglottic airway device by auscultation,lubricated endotracheal tube will be inserted.While leaving ETT in trachea ,SAD will be removed.In case of difficulty help of fiberoptic scope will be taken.The efficacy of I-gel and AAG will be compared in terms of number of attempts taken for effective SAD placement, time to achieve effective ventilation after SAD placement ,number of attempts for endotracheal intubation,intubating time,number of cases in which fiberoptic scope is used,haemodynamics and complications.The data obtained will be analysed statistically.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Computer generated randomization
盲法
Not Applicable

入排标准

年龄范围
20.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • ASA physical status I/II Age group 20-60 years.

排除标准

  • Anticipated difficult airway History of gastroesophageal reflux disease Any contraindications to use of muscle relaxants Increased risk of aspiration Oropharyngeal pathology Poor lung compliance.

结局指标

主要结局

To compare the efficacy of I-gel and AAG in terms of number of attempts taken for effective supraglottic airway device placement,time to achieve effective ventilation after supraglottic airway device placement,number of attempts for endotracheal intubation,intubating time and number of cases in which fiberoptic bronchoscope is required

时间窗: Time taken for supraglottic Airway Device(SAD) placement. | Time taken for intubation through SAD. | Total intubation time.

次要结局

  • To compare haemodynamics and complications with the use of I-gel and AAG as conduit for endotracheal intubation(To compare haemodynamics with the use of I-gel and AAG as conduit for endotracheal intubation)

研究者

申办方类型
Government medical college

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验