跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00233363
NCT00233363已完成2 期

An Exploratory Study of Rebamipide to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety in the Treatment of Dry Mouth in Patients With Sjögren's Syndrome

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 104 人开始时间: 2005年4月15日最近更新:
适应症
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
2 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
104
试验地点
1
主要终点
Overall Improvement Rate in Dry Mouth Symptoms

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to exploratively investigate the clinical efficacy of rebamipide on dry mouth in patients with Sjögren's syndrome in comparison with placebo.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients with Sjögren's syndrome (Revised Japanese criteria for Sjögren's syndrome (1999): 1998 research report on immunological intractable diseases specified by the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare)
  • Patients aged 20 years or older at time of consent
  • Patients with dry mouth
  • Patients with decreased salivation

排除标准

  • Patients who have developed dry mouth clearly due to a cause other than Sjögren's syndrome
  • Patients in whom Saxon test cannot be performed (artificial tooth, tooth implant, etc.)
  • Patients who have received rebamipide within 3 months prior to obtaining informed consent
  • Patients who are pregnant, possibly pregnant, or lactating
  • Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to rebamipide
  • Patients who have received any other investigational drug within 3 months prior to obtaining informed consent
  • Patients who are otherwise judged inappropriate for inclusion in the study by the investigator or subinvestigator

结局指标

主要结局

Overall Improvement Rate in Dry Mouth Symptoms

时间窗: Weeks 2, 4, and 8

At visits to the study site at two, four, and eight weeks after the start of administration, subjects self-assessed the overall change in their dry mouth symptoms in comparison with their symptoms before the start of treatment on the following four-grade scale: (1) Markedly improved (clearly better), (2) Improved (better) , (3) Unchanged (almost no difference), and (4) Aggravated (worse). The improvement rate was calculated by defining improvement as an assessment of either (1) Markedly improved or (2) Improved.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Industry

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验