Adjunct MMA embolization versus conventional burr hole for CSDH
- Conditions
- Chronic subdural hematomachronic subdural hematomamiddle meningeal artery embolizationMMA embolizationCSDHendovascular CSDH treatment
- Registration Number
- TCTR20221014001
- Lead Sponsor
- Faculty of medicine, Thammasat university
- Brief Summary
This study suggests that adjunctive MMAE is a promising addition to surgical drainage for the treatment of CSDH. MMAE shows acceptable safety and is associated with significant hematoma reduction and a potential decrease in recurrent cases compared to SDA. These findings warrant further exploration through a randomized trial to validate the efficacy of MMAE in CSDH management.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
All patients with age >= 18 years old who diagnosed with chronic subdural hematoma
1.Had previous brain surgery within 3 months
2.GCS < 5 or NIHSS < 5
3.CSDH from brain tumor, vascular diseases
4.Pregnancy
5.chronic kidney disease or ongoing dialysis
6.infratentorium intracerebral hemorrhage
7.bed ridden or vegetative state
8.Patients with dangerous ECA anastomoses
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Subdural hematoma thickness Post-op, 14, 30, 90, 180 days Subdural hematoma from CT brain,Subdural hematoma volume Post-op, 14, 30, 90, 180 days 3D-computer assisted software
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method recurrence 6 months Subdural hematoma from CT brain,complications 6 months any complication related to procedures