跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01161121
NCT01161121已完成1 期

Utilization of Lexiscan (Regadenoson)in the Cardiac Catheterization Lab to Achieve Maximal Hyperemia for Coronary Physiologic Assessment With Fractional Flow Reserve

St. Louis University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 46 人开始时间: 2010年7月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
1 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
46
试验地点
2
主要终点
Difference in FFR Between IV Adenosine and IV Regadenoson

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to determine if regadenoson is as safe and effective as adenosine when used in the cardiac catheterization lab during measurement of coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve. The study hypothesis is the assessment of Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in the catheterization lab can be performed with equivalent accuracy when hyperemia is induced with IV Regadenoson compared with IV Adenosine without compromising patient safety.

详细描述

Patients with clinical indications to be assessed by fractional flow reserve (FFR) will be included. Following diagnostic angiography in the catheterization lab, the patient will have a guide catheter placed in the artery to be assessed followed by placing a pressure guidewire down the coronary vessel and past the lesion of interest. FFR will be measured in the traditional manner, with intravenous adenosine infusing at 140 mcg/kg/min until maximal steady state hyperemia is reached. At this point, the FFR will be recorded as Pd (distal pressure from the pressure wire in the coronary artery) divided by Pa (proximal pressure from the guide catheter). The adenosine infusion will then be stopped and the patient's hemodynamics allowed to return to baseline. Once baseline state is again achieved, an intravenous bolus of regadenson (0.4 mg) will be given and FFR will be remeasured as the lowest steady state Pd/Pa. Patients will be enrolled at two sites, The University of Florida - where FFR will be measured alone, and Saint Louis University, where coronary flow will be measured simultaneously to evaluate the effect of regadenoson on coronary flow velocity as compared to adenosine. The primary endpoint of the study will be to compare the FFR achieved with adeonsine to that obtained with regadenoson.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • male or female patients greater than 18 years old (If female, pt. must be post-menopausal, surgically sterile, or be non-pregnant as determined by a negative urine or serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (B-HCG) pregnancy test within 24 hours prior to enrollment.
  • Provided written consent approved by Institutional Review Board and provided Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization
  • Have at least one coronary stenosis (greater or equal to 40% but less than 70& narrowing by visual inspection) and technically accessible coronary artery into which the pressure wire may be introduced.

排除标准

  • ST elevation myocardial infarction
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Pregnancy
  • Total vessel occlusion
  • Extremely tortuous coronary arteries
  • Second and third degree heart block without pacemaker
  • Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and active bronchospasm
  • Less than age 18 years
  • Have received theophylline, aminophylline, pentoxifylline or dipyridamole within 12 hours of FFR measurement.
  • Has severe 3 vessel disease defined by >80% luminal narrowing by visual inspection
  • Known hypersensitivity to adenosine or regadenoson
  • Recent uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmia
  • History of greater than Type I atrioventricular block, symptomatic resting bradycardia, sick sinus syndrome (without permanent pacemaker)
  • History of heart transplantation

研究组 & 干预措施

Adenosine then Regadenoson

Experimental

Adenosine infusion will be compared to Regadenoson for efficacy and safety/side effects. Arterial blood pressure, coronary pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation and coronary flow, FFR, and coronary flow velocity will be assessed. Safety will be assessed by monitoring for any side effects such as chest pain, headache, flushing, nausea, or arrhythmias. Adenosine infusion will be administered at 140 mcg/kg for 2 minutes and once mean coronary flow velocity returns to within 15% of pre-dose value, Regadenoson IV bolus 0.4 mg/5 ml will be administered followed by a 5 cc normal saline flush.

干预措施: adenosine (Drug)

Adenosine then Regadenoson

Experimental

Adenosine infusion will be compared to Regadenoson for efficacy and safety/side effects. Arterial blood pressure, coronary pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation and coronary flow, FFR, and coronary flow velocity will be assessed. Safety will be assessed by monitoring for any side effects such as chest pain, headache, flushing, nausea, or arrhythmias. Adenosine infusion will be administered at 140 mcg/kg for 2 minutes and once mean coronary flow velocity returns to within 15% of pre-dose value, Regadenoson IV bolus 0.4 mg/5 ml will be administered followed by a 5 cc normal saline flush.

干预措施: regadenoson (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Difference in FFR Between IV Adenosine and IV Regadenoson

时间窗: At maximal, steady-state hyperemia

FFR (as calculated by the ratio of lowest Pd/Pa at maximal hyperemia) was compared between hyperemia achieved with adenosine and with regadenoson

次要结局

  • Heart Rate Changes With Drug(During drug infusion and until restoration of baseline hemodynamics)
  • Side Effects of Medication Administration(During drug infusion and until restoration of baseline hemodynamics)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Michael J. Lim

Director, Division of Cardiology

St. Louis University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparison of Intravenous Adenosine Infusion With... | 临床试验