MedPath

Effect of Motor Imagery With Virtual Reality in Patients With Stroke

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Stroke
Interventions
Other: Three-dimensional immersive virtual reality application
Other: Conventional physiotherapy
Other: Motor imagery
Registration Number
NCT04215679
Lead Sponsor
Abant Izzet Baysal University
Brief Summary

Virtual reality applications in hemiplegia rehabilitation are gaining popularity. It is claimed that, apart from implementing a function, imagining that function can trigger synaptic connections.

Detailed Description

Although the effects of non-three-dimensional virtual reality and motor imagination on the brain have been investigated in a study, such comparison has not been made between the three-dimensional virtual reality and motor imagery.

Considering these situations, the aim of this study is to compare the effect of three-dimensional (immersive) virtual reality and motor imagery on upper extremity functional recovery after stroke.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
36
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosed as stroke patient.
  • Speaks, reads and writes in Turkish.
  • Hand functions at 4, 5, 6 levels according to Brunnstrom.
  • Mini mental test score to be at least 24.
  • Volunteer for participation.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Neurological, orthopedic problems other than stroke.
  • To have motion sickness that cannot continue 3D application.
  • Individuals neglecting the affected side

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Three-dimensional immersive virtual reality applicationThree-dimensional immersive virtual reality application25 stroke patients between the ages of 18-80, stroke duration of less than 2 months and not more than 2 years whose mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores equal or above the 25 will be included in this study. Oculus Rift and Leap motion will be used to create an immersive interactive environment. Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Functional independence scale, self-care questionnaire,Action Research Arm Test, Fugl meyer upper extremity motor evaluations will be applied just before the rehabilitation program, after the application and at the end of 6 weeks.
Conventional physiotherapyConventional physiotherapy25 stroke patients between the ages of 18-80, stroke duration of less than 2 months and not more than 2 years whose MMSE scores equal or above the 25 will be included in this study. Oculus Rift and Leap motion will be used to create an immersive interactive environment. Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Functional independence scale, self-care questionnaire,Action Research Arm Test, Fugl meyer upper extremity motor evaluations will be applied just before the rehabilitation program, after the application and at the end of 6 weeks.
Motor imageryMotor imagery25 stroke patients between the ages of 18-80, stroke duration of less than 2 months and not more than 2 years whose MMSE scores equal or above the 25 will be included in this study. Oculus Rift and Leap motion will be used to create an immersive interactive environment. Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Functional independence scale, self-care questionnaire,Action Research Arm Test, Fugl meyer upper extremity motor evaluations will be applied just before the rehabilitation program, after the application and at the end of 6 weeks.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Jebsen Hand Function Test6 weeks

The test consists of 7 subtitles and is an objective and standardized test. The test consists of 7 subtitles: "writing a standard sentence", "flipping 5 cards", "picking up small objects", "feeding simulation", "arranging backgammon checkers", "carrying large light objects" and "carrying large heavy objects". The score of the test is the completion time of the test and is recorded in seconds

Action Reach Arm Test (ARAT)6 weeks

This scale is scored between 0-57 points and consists of 4 headings: gross grip, fine grip, fingertip grip, and gross motion. Each part is calculated over 3 points. 3 points mean that the test is done in a normal way, 2 points show the difficulty and abnormally long time for doing it, 1 point means that individual can partially complete the test and 0 points can not complete the test. The higher the score, the better the level.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Stroke impact scale (SIS)6 weeks

Turkish validity was done by Hantal et al. in 2014. It is a 9-stage scale that is scored between 0-57 points, with a higher score indicating a better condition and a lower score indicating a higher severity of stroke. Scoring is done separately for each title

Kinesthetic and visual imagery questionnaire6 weeks

It was developed in 2007 by Malouin et al. In this method, the participant is told about the desired movement and is asked to do so. Then the participant is asked to imagine as if he was watching the movement without making any movement. It is scored between 1-5 points. 1: no image, 5: as clear as the original. At the other stage, he is asked to imagine himself by feeling what he is doing and is scored between 1 and 5 points. 1 point: no sense, 5 points mean intense feeling as if he is making the move. The scale assesses both visual and kinesthetic imagery with each dimension being scored from 5 to 25 with higher scores indicating greater imagery clarity or intensity.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Abant Izzet Baysal University

🇹🇷

Bolu, Merkez, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath