Effect of Motor Imagery With Virtual Reality in Patients With Stroke

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Stroke

• Registration Number: NCT04215679
• Lead Sponsor: Abant Izzet Baysal University

Brief Summary

Virtual reality applications in hemiplegia rehabilitation are gaining popularity. It is claimed that, apart from implementing a function, imagining that function can trigger synaptic connections.

Detailed Description

Although the effects of non-three-dimensional virtual reality and motor imagination on the brain have been investigated in a study, such comparison has not been made between the three-dimensional virtual reality and motor imagery.

Considering these situations, the aim of this study is to compare the effect of three-dimensional (immersive) virtual reality and motor imagery on upper extremity functional recovery after stroke.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2019-12-30
• Study First Submitted QC: 2019-12-30
• Study First Posted: 2020-01-02
• Study Start: 2021-12-01
• Status Verified: 2025-06
• Last Update Submitted: 2025-06-19
• Last Update Posted: 2025-06-22
• Primary Completion: 2026-03-01
• Study Completion: 2026-05-01

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 36

Inclusion Criteria

• Diagnosed as stroke patient.
• Speaks, reads and writes in Turkish.
• Hand functions at 4, 5, 6 levels according to Brunnstrom.
• Mini mental test score to be at least 24.
• Volunteer for participation.

Exclusion Criteria

• Neurological, orthopedic problems other than stroke.
• To have motion sickness that cannot continue 3D application.
• Individuals neglecting the affected side

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Jebsen Hand Function Test	6 weeks	The test consists of 7 subtitles and is an objective and standardized test. The test consists of 7 subtitles: "writing a standard sentence", "flipping 5 cards", "picking up small objects", "feeding simulation", "arranging backgammon checkers", "carrying large light objects" and "carrying large heavy objects". The score of the test is the completion time of the test and is recorded in seconds
Action Reach Arm Test (ARAT)	6 weeks	This scale is scored between 0-57 points and consists of 4 headings: gross grip, fine grip, fingertip grip, and gross motion. Each part is calculated over 3 points. 3 points mean that the test is done in a normal way, 2 points show the difficulty and abnormally long time for doing it, 1 point means that individual can partially complete the test and 0 points can not complete the test. The higher the score, the better the level.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Stroke impact scale (SIS)	6 weeks	Turkish validity was done by Hantal et al. in 2014. It is a 9-stage scale that is scored between 0-57 points, with a higher score indicating a better condition and a lower score indicating a higher severity of stroke. Scoring is done separately for each title
Kinesthetic and visual imagery questionnaire	6 weeks	It was developed in 2007 by Malouin et al. In this method, the participant is told about the desired movement and is asked to do so. Then the participant is asked to imagine as if he was watching the movement without making any movement. It is scored between 1-5 points. 1: no image, 5: as clear as the original. At the other stage, he is asked to imagine himself by feeling what he is doing and is scored between 1 and 5 points. 1 point: no sense, 5 points mean intense feeling as if he is making the move. The scale assesses both visual and kinesthetic imagery with each dimension being scored from 5 to 25 with higher scores indicating greater imagery clarity or intensity.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Abant Izzet Baysal University; 🇹🇷 Bolu, Merkez, Turkey