MedPath

Comparison of Two Binasal Short Prongs in Providing Nasal CPAP to preterm babies

Not Applicable
Conditions
Health Condition 1: J960- Acute respiratory failureHealth Condition 2: J988- Other specified respiratory disorders
Registration Number
CTRI/2020/03/024097
Lead Sponsor
Dr Pradeep Kumar Debata
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Open to Recruitment
Sex
Not specified
Target Recruitment
0
Inclusion Criteria

1.All inborn preterm neonates between 28-34 weeks of gestation and

2. weigh >1000 grams and

3. who require respiratory support within 6 hours of life due to respiratory distress syndrome

Exclusion Criteria

1. Major congenital malformations including chromosomal anomalies, which interfere with respiration or putting the newborn on nCPAP

2. Those needing intubation after birth

3. Perinatal asphyxia (APGAR score of <5 at 5min) or encephalopathy due to any reason

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
nCPAP failure within 72 hours of lifeTimepoint: February 2020 TO January 2021
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To compare the incidence of nasal trauma with two different types of bi-nasal short prongs when used a primary mode of support for nCPAP delivery in preterm neonates between 28-34 weeks of gestation and weighing more than and equal to 1000gm with respiratory distress.Timepoint: February 2020 TO January 2021
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath