Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06405711
NCT06405711Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of an Defocus Lens in Slowing the Progression of Myopia:a Prospective Study

Tianjin Eye Hospital1 site in 1 country138 target enrollmentStarted: May 1, 2024Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Enrollment
138
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Cycloplegic objective refraction

Study Overview

Brief Summary

To confirm the efficacy of DIMS lenses in controlling myopia progression, we planned a prospective, single-centre, randomised, double-blind, controlled, non-inferiority clinical study.

Detailed Description

Prior to the trial, subjects signed an informed consent form, screened and qualified subjects were enrolled, and subjects received framed spectacles for correction of myopic refractive error in both eyes, and were fitted with framed spectacles by the investigator according to the standard fitting procedure specified in this protocol. Subjects were randomized to Trial Group A (strong high order aberration group) and Trial Group B (medium high order aberration group) and Control Group (HOYA MiYOSMART).

The index of effectiveness in this clinical trial was to assess the effectiveness of the test group of lenses in slowing the rate of myopia progression by examining the subject's objective optometric values after ciliary muscle paralysis. The basic examination of this clinical trial included slit lamp examination, eye axis examination, fundus examination, corneal topography, best-corrected visual acuity, binocular visual function, refractive status and best-corrected visual acuity after ciliary muscle paralysis, and intraocular pressure measurements, etc. The spectacle fitting was also recorded, as well as the subjective feeling of the subjects when wearing the lenses.

Each subject was followed up for 12 months, and the efficacy and safety of the test product for delaying the progression of myopia was evaluated by the investigator at 1 week ± 1 day (telephone follow-up), 1 month ± 15 days (telephone follow-up), 3 months ± 15 days, 6 months ± 15 days, and 12 months ± 30 days after wearing the lenses.

During the course of this clinical trial, the lenses were replaced due to loss, breakage, change in refraction or poor vision with the lenses, etc., after evaluation by the investigator, and the changes were recorded.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
8 Years to 13 Years (Child)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • The subjects had spherical RE of -1.00 to -6.00 D, astigmatism ≤ 1.50 D, anisometropia ≤ 1.50 D
  • the best corrected visual acuity in the left and right eyes subjective optometry is greater than or equal to 1.0

Exclusion Criteria

  • Candidate subjects were excluded from the study if they had strabismus, ocular limitations, or systemic abnormalities affecting vision and ocular motility

Arms & Interventions

Test group A (strong higher-order aberrations group)

Experimental

Simultaneous myopic defocus and strong higher-order aberrations lenses

Intervention: frame lens (Device)

Test group B (medium higher-order aberrations group)

Experimental

Both myopic defocus and medium higher-order aberrations lenses

Intervention: frame lens (Device)

control groups(HOYA MiYOSMART)

Active Comparator

HOYA MiYOSMART lenses

Intervention: frame lens (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Cycloplegic objective refraction

Time Frame: 12 months

Cycloplegic objective refraction was measured with an autorefractor (Topcon KR8900, Japan)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Axial Length(12 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials