MedPath

Drainage After Rectal Excision for Rectal Cancer

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Pelvic Drainage
Randomized Clinical Trial
Rectal Cancer Surgery
Multicenter Study
Interventions
Procedure: No pelvic drainage
Procedure: Laying and management of the drain (strictly randomized arm with drainage)
Registration Number
NCT01269567
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Brief Summary

After rectal excision, the rate of anastomotic leak and abscess is higher than after colic surgery. In order to limit and avoid the risk of pelvic sepsis after rectal excision, a prophylactic pelvic drainage is usually used. If current data have confirmed the uselessness of drainage in colic surgery, the question stay in abeyance in rectal surgery. This practice had never been evaluated in patients with rectal excision and low anastomosis (patients with a high risk of pelvic sepsis)

Detailed Description

After rectal excision, the rate of anastomotic leak and abscess is higher than after colic surgery. In order to limit and avoid the risk of pelvic sepsis after rectal excision, a prophylactic pelvic drainage is usually used. If current data have confirmed the uselessness of drainage in colic surgery, the question stay in abeyance in rectal surgery. This practice had never been evaluated in patients with rectal excision and low anastomosis (patients with a high risk of pelvic sepsis) The aim of the study is to assess the impact of pelvic drainage vs. non pelvic drainage on risk of pelvic sepsis after rectal excision for cancer with infraperitoneal anastomosis. The principal objective is to compare the rate of pelvic sepsis until 30 days between the 2 groups of patients who had a rectal excision with and without pelvic drainage. It is a randomized clinical trial of superiority, multicentric, without blinding, in 2 parallel groups with ratio (1:1): distribution of the number of patients in the groups.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
494
Inclusion Criteria
  • Rectal adenocarcinoma, histopathologically proved, with or without neoadjuvant treatment
  • Stapler or manual infraperitoneal anastomosis
  • With or without stoma
  • With bowel preparation
  • Open or laparoscopic approach
  • Stage T1-T4 Nx Mx
  • Age 18 years old or older
  • Information of the patient and signature of informed consent
  • Affiliation to a regime of social insurance
Exclusion Criteria
  • Colonic cancer (> 15 cm from anal verge)
  • Abdominoperineal resection
  • Associated resection (prostate, seminal bladder, vagina...)
  • Simultaneous liver resection
  • Total coloproctectomy
  • Emergency
  • Infected rectal tumour
  • Pregnant women, suitable to be, or current suckling
  • Persons deprived of freedom or under guardianship
  • Persons under protection of justice
  • Impossibility to accept the medical follow-up of the study for geographic , social or psychic reasons.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
No drainageNo pelvic drainageRectal excision without aspiration pelvic drainage
DrainageLaying and management of the drain (strictly randomized arm with drainage)Rectal excision with aspiration pelvic drainage
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pelvic sepsiswithin the first 30 days after surgery

Pelvic sepsis until 30 days after rectal excision is the primary end point. It is defined as the occurrence of an anastomotic leak revealed by peritonitis or discharge of gas, stools or pus, the vagina or the abdominal wound, and/or a pelvic abscess, between J0 and J30.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Peri-operative mortalityup to 30 days after surgery

Peri-operative mortality (hospital mortality and/or until 30 days after surgery if the patient is already going out of hospital)

Overall sepsisup to 30 days after surgery

Overall sepsis until 30 days (pelvic sepsis, wound abscess, urinary infection, pneumopathy, blood-poisoning)

Surgical morbidity according to Dindo classificationwithin the first 6 months after surgery

Surgical morbidity according to Dindo classification

Rate of closure of stomawithin the first 6 months after surgery

Rate of closure of stoma at 6 months

Re-surgery during the hospitalizationduring the hospitalization

Trial Locations

Locations (22)

Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud

🇫🇷

Lyon, France

Service de Chirurgie Digestive - Hôpital A. Michallon

🇫🇷

La Tronche, France

Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Viscérale - CHU Timone

🇫🇷

Marseille, France

Service de Chirurgie Digestive - CHU de Nantes - Hôtel Dieu

🇫🇷

Nantes, France

CH de BEAUVAIS

🇫🇷

Beauvais, France

Département de Chirurgie Oncologique - Centre Oscar Lambret

🇫🇷

Lille, France

CHRU Lille

🇫🇷

Lille, France

CHU d'AMIENS

🇫🇷

Amiens, France

Département de Chirurgie Oncologique - CRLC Val d'Aurelle

🇫🇷

Montpellier, France

Service de Chirurgie Viscérale - CHU Pontchaillou

🇫🇷

Rennes, France

Service de Chirurgie Générale et Digestive - Hôpital Saint-Antoine

🇫🇷

Paris, France

Service de Chirurgie Digestive - Hôpital des Diaconnesses - La Croix Saint-Simon

🇫🇷

Paris, France

Service de Chirurgie Digestive - Hôpital Purpan - Pavillon Dieulafoy

🇫🇷

Toulouse, France

CHU Poitiers

🇫🇷

Poitiers, France

CHRU de Strasbourg

🇫🇷

Strasbourg, France

Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Générale - Brabois

🇫🇷

Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France

APHP- Saint Joseph

🇫🇷

Paris, France

Service de Chirurgie Digestive - Hôpital Saint-André - CHU de Bordeaux

🇫🇷

Bordeaux, France

Service de Chirurgie Générale et Digestive - Hôpital Beaujon

🇫🇷

Clichy, France

APHP-Kremlin Bicetre

🇫🇷

Le Kremlin-bicetre, France

Département de Chirurgie Oncologique - Institut Paoli Calmette

🇫🇷

Marseille, France

Service de Chirurgie Digestive - CHU Charles Nicolle

🇫🇷

Rouen, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath