Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02002923
NCT02002923
Unknown
Phase 2

Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus Botulinum Toxin Injection Plus Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation1 site in 1 country160 target enrollmentJune 2013

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Pulmonary vein isolation
Conditions
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Sponsor
Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation
Enrollment
160
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Freedom of AF or other atrial arrhythmias
Last Updated
10 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The investigators have conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized study to assess the comparative safety and efficacy of two different treatment strategies, PVI only versus PVI plus BT injection, in patients with persistent and paroxysmal AF. Results were assessed after follow-up of at least 1 years with the use of an implanted monitoring device (IMD).

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
June 2013
End Date
December 2015
Last Updated
10 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Persistent and paroxysmal AF

Exclusion Criteria

  • congestive heart failure
  • LV ejection fraction \< 35%
  • left atrial diameter \> 60 mm

Arms & Interventions

PVI only

Intervention: Pulmonary vein isolation

PVI+BT injection

Intervention: Pulmonary vein isolation

PVI+BT injection

Intervention: Botulinum Toxin

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Freedom of AF or other atrial arrhythmias

Time Frame: 1 year

Secondary Outcomes

  • serious adverse events(1 year)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials