Computed Tomography Versus Standard 2D Mammography Versus 3D Tomosynthesis
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Interventions
- Radiation: Tomosynthesis Breast ScanningRadiation: Breast CT Scanning
- Registration Number
- NCT01852032
- Lead Sponsor
- University of California, Davis
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the imaging performance of an investigational breast computed tomography (CT) scanner, built at UC Davis, with that of an FDA-Approved breast tomosynthesis scanner (capable of producing standard 2-D mammography and 3-D tomosynthesis images), built by Hologic, Incorporated, in a group of patients with suspected breast cancer.
- Detailed Description
The primary aim of this study is the comparison of Beta values of several different CT and Tomosynthesis views (Beta of CT Sagittal View, Beta of CT Coronal View, Beta of CT Axial View, Beta of Tomosynthesis Craniocaudal View, Beta of Tomosynthesis Medial Lateral Oblique View). Lower Beta values correspond to better image quality (less noise, increased cancer detection).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 23
- 35 years of age or older
- While male patients will not be explicitly excluded, it is expected that all patients in this study will be women
- Diagnostic findings from prior mammography suspicious for, or highly suggestive of, breast malignancy -BIRADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) categories 4 and 5
- Scheduled for ultrasound or stereotactic core biopsy
- Ability to lie still on a table top for up to 10 minutes, longer than the typical breast CT duration.
- Ability to understand risks, procedures, and benefits involved
- Recent breast biopsy
- History of breast augmentation implant
- Pregnant or Positive urine pregnancy test (UPT) or currently breast-feeding
- History of moderate or severe adverse reaction to iodinated contrast injection
- Recent serum creatinine ≥ 1.5 mg/dL
- History of Diabetes Mellitus
- Currently taking Glucophage or Glucovance (Metformin)
- History of chronic asthma
- History of allergy to iodine
- Multiple food and/or drug allergy
- Renal disease
- History of pulmonary disease, phobia of breath holding, or other condition that could prevent the subject from being able to perform the 16 second breath hold
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Breast cancer Patients Tomosynthesis Breast Scanning Tomosynthesis Breast Scanning is done and breast CT Scanning is done. Breast cancer Patients Breast CT Scanning Tomosynthesis Breast Scanning is done and breast CT Scanning is done.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Beta of CT Axial View Day 1 frequency range corresponding to noise power spectrum (NPS) where beta = NPS(f) = af\^-B.
beta is calculated as noise corresponding to frequency. The values of the exponent, beta, range from 1.5 to 3.5 Lower Beta values correspond to better image quality (less noise, increased cancer detection).Beta of CT Coronal View Day 1 frequency range corresponding to noise power spectrum (NPS) where beta = NPS(f) = af\^-B.
beta is calculated as noise corresponding to frequency. The values of the exponent, beta, range from 1.5 to 3.5 Lower Beta values correspond to better image quality (less noise, increased cancer detection).Beta of Tomosynthesis Craniocaudal View Day 1 frequency range corresponding to noise power spectrum (NPS) where beta = NPS(f) = af\^-B.
beta is calculated as noise corresponding to frequency. The values of the exponent, beta, range from 1.5 to 3.5 Lower Beta values correspond to better image quality (less noise, increased cancer detection).Beta of CT Sagittal View Day 1 frequency range corresponding to noise power spectrum (NPS) where beta = NPS(f) = af\^-B.
beta is calculated as noise corresponding to frequency. The values of the exponent, beta, range from 1.5 to 3.5 Lower Beta values correspond to better image quality (less noise, increased cancer detection).Beta of Tomosynthesis Medial Lateral Oblique View Day 1 frequency range corresponding to noise power spectrum (NPS) where beta = NPS(f) = af\^-B.
beta is calculated as noise corresponding to frequency. The values of the exponent, beta, range from 1.5 to 3.5 Lower Beta values correspond to better image quality (less noise, increased cancer detection).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
UC Davis Medical Center
🇺🇸Sacramento, California, United States