How do Attitude About Pay for Performance Differ Among Different Anesthesia Care Provider and Over Time

Completed

• Conditions: Attitude

• Registration Number: NCT01116960
• Lead Sponsor: University of Oklahoma

Brief Summary

The investigators hypothesize that common objections to P4P relate to potential loss of autonomy or concerns about adverse effects on patient care.

Detailed Description

We seek to establish baseline attitudes about Pay for Performance (P4P) in the OUHSC Dept of Anesthesiology and determine what differences exist between faculty, CRNAs and residents. We plan to resurvey annually to determine if attitudes change as the department implements a P4P program. We hope that by understanding the attitudes of anesthesia care providers, we can alleviate their concerns. We hope to account for their concerns as we develop and modify our P4P program. We believe that acceptance of the general idea of P4P is important if individuals are to maintain job satisfaction.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2007-04
• Primary Completion: 2010-03
• Study Completion: 2010-03
• Study First Submitted: 2010-05-03
• Study First Submitted QC: 2010-05-04
• Study First Posted: 2010-05-05
• Status Verified: 2017-05
• Last Update Submitted: 2017-05-01
• Last Update Posted: 2017-05-04

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 100

Inclusion Criteria

• All anesthesia care providers in the department

Exclusion Criteria

• locum faculty members and CRNAs

Study & Design

• Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Design: Not specified

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Univeristy of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center; 🇺🇸 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Univeristy of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Dept. Anesthesiology; 🇺🇸 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States