New Mammographic Techniques Versus MRI in Assessment of Breast Lesions
Completed
- Conditions
- Breast Diseases
- Registration Number
- NCT06089148
- Lead Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Brief Summary
Value of New Mammography Techniques in Comparison to Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Breast in the Detection and Diagnosis of Breast lesions
- Detailed Description
Combined use of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM), and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), may be a reasonable alternative to MRI.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 40
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method sensitivity, specificity of'tomosynthesis and contrast enhanced mammography and MRI breast are measured in assessment of breast lesions and their pre-operative assessment of breast cancer 1year diagnostic
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie contrast-enhanced digital mammography's diagnostic accuracy for breast lesions?
How does the combination of CEDM and DBT compare to DCE-MRI in detecting early-stage breast cancer subtypes?
Which biomarkers are most predictive of response to contrast-enhanced imaging modalities in dense breast tissue?
What adverse events are associated with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI versus new mammographic techniques in breast cancer screening?
Are there alternative imaging combinations to CEDM and DBT that outperform MRI in breast lesion characterization?