Ultrasound-guided Intermediate Cervical Block Versus Superficial Cervical Block for Carotid : a Randomised Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 86
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- cervical block success
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of this prospective, randomised, controlled study is to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical block to superficial block for carotid endarterectomy.
Patients scheduled for carotide endarterectomy under regional anaesthesia (ropivacaine 4.75 mg/ml) are randomised into 2 groups according to the technique of anaesthesia performed: superficial cervical block (Control group) or, ultrasound guided intermediate cervical block (Echo group). Main outcome is cervical block success, defined by surgery performed under regional anaesthesia without supplemental topical lidocaine. Secondary outcomes are rate of conversion to general anaesthesia, total dose of supplemental topical lidocaine and block-related complications.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •patient scheduled for elective carotid artery endarterectomy under regional anaesthesia
排除标准
- •indication for general anaesthesia
- •known bleedind diathesis
- •past medical allergy to local anaesthesic
- •severe chronic pulmonary disease
- •contralateral diaphragmatic motion abnormalities
- •previous cervical ipsilateral surgery
- •age < 18 years
结局指标
主要结局
cervical block success
时间窗: surgery time
carotid artery endarterectomy performed under regional anaesthesia without supplemental topical lidocaine.
次要结局
- percentage of conversion to general anaesthesia(surgery time)