Percutaneous Mitral Valve Replacement EvaLuation Utilizing IDE Early Feasibility Study (PRELUDE)
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Mitral Valve Regurgitation
- Sponsor
- Caisson Interventional LLC
- Enrollment
- 20
- Locations
- 13
- Primary Endpoint
- Number of patients without Major Adverse Events (MAEs)
- Last Updated
- 6 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and performance of the Caisson Interventional Transcatheter MitralValve Replacement (TMVR) system for the treatment of severe symptomatic MitralValve Regurgitation (MR).
Detailed Description
The treatment guidelines for valvular heart disease indicate that surgical correction of primary mitral valve regurgitation (MR) is a Class I recommendation. Further, recent evidence indicates that valve replacement is at least as effective as repair in both primary and secondary MR patients. However, many patients are not referred for surgery as they are considered to be too high of a risk to undergo on pump, open-heart procedures. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement has made treatment of stenosed aortic valves available to high-risk surgical patients who would have otherwise been medically managed. Percutaneous mitral valve (MV) replacement offers similar advantages. Currently, the only approved percutaneous treatment for MR is MitraClip. MitraClip is limited to a specific population of high risk surgical patients with valvular prolapses that are amenable to repair by the edge to edge technique. The feasibility of percutaneous MV replacement has been shown in animal studies, the implantation of aortic valves at the mitral position, and early evaluations of purpose made transcatheter MVs in humans. To meet this medical need, Caisson Interventional has developed a percutaneous delivery system for a bioprosthetic mitral valve. As with patients with aortic valve (AV) deficiencies, this device can be used to provide needed therapy to patients who might not otherwise receive treatment beyond medical therapy. This study will provide initial information on the safety and performance of this system.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Has severe mitral regurgitation
- •New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II, III, IVa or heart failure
- •High risk for cardiovascular surgery
Exclusion Criteria
- •Excessive calcification or thickening of mitral valve annulus, severe mitral stenosis, fused commissures, valvular vegetation or mass
- •Left ventricular end diastolic dimension \> 7cm
- •Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction
- •Severe right ventricular dysfunction
- •Stroke within 90 days; transischemic attack or myocardial infarction within 30 days of the index procedure
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Number of patients without Major Adverse Events (MAEs)
Time Frame: 30 days
Freedom from major adverse events including death, stroke, myocardial infarction and surgical reintervention through 30 days
Secondary Outcomes
- Number of patients with successful delivery and implantation of the prosthetic valve (technical success)(Intraoperative)
- Number of living, stroke-free patients with prosthetic valve in place (device success)(30 days)