MedPath

Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-eluting Balloons for Below the Knee Peripheral Arterial Disease

Phase 1
Conditions
Peripheral Arterial Disease
Interventions
Device: Conventional balloon angioplasty
Device: Drug eluting balloon angioplasty
Registration Number
NCT02772224
Lead Sponsor
Shanghai 10th People's Hospital
Brief Summary

Comparing the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) for the treatment of below-the-knee peripheral arterial occlusive disease with conventional balloon angioplasty (BA).

Detailed Description

Over the past decade, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) has established its position in the treatment of below the knee arterial occlusive disease with intermittent claudication and/or critical limb ischemia. However, the efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with conventional balloons, is limited by the high 12-month restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates. Local delivery of newer anti-proliferative drug via drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) has recently shown promising results in the treatment of femoropopliteal disease, and in the BTK area, a reduction in 3-month binary restenosis has been observed compared with historical controls treated with PTA. Drug eluting balloon has three potential advantages: (1) homogenous drug transfer to the vessel wall; (2) highest drug concentrations at the vessel wall at the time of injury; and (3) absence of a stent or delivery polymer.

This study sought to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of new drug (Paclitaxel)-eluting balloons (DEB) for the treatment of below the knee peripheral arterial disease.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
180
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Patients with Peripheral vascular disease with or without diabetes.
  2. Rutherford class 2-6.
  3. Target lesions with a diameter reduction of at least 50% on angiography, and without past history of any intervention.
  4. Target vessel with 2.0--10.0mm in diameter and having a lesion of about 4cm-20cm in length.
  5. Written informed consent signed by the patients or representatives
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Previous bypass surgery or stent placement at the ipsilateral lower limb
  2. History of intolerance to antiplatelet therapy, heparin, or contrast media.
  3. Bleeding diathesis;
  4. Active systemic bacterial infection;
  5. Severely impaired renal function (serum creatinine level > 2.5 mg/dL.
  6. Expected survival time of less than 24 months

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Conventional balloon angioplastyConventional balloon angioplastyConventional balloon angioplasty
Drug eluting balloon angioplastyDrug eluting balloon angioplastyPaclitaxel coated balloon angioplasty
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Restenosis rate12 months

The primary study endpoint was the occurrence of \> 50% of restenosis in the treated vessel after 12 months as assessed by digital substraction angiography (DSA).

Peak systolic velocity ratio12 months

Peak systolic velocity ratio ≥ 2.4 by Doppler's ultrasonography was the end point of the study for the patient who did not undergo angiography after 12 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Rutherford scaleImmediately after procedure

Clinical success is to be defined as an improvement in Rutherford scale of at least one category after the procedure.

ABI valueImmediately after procedure

Hemodynamic success is to be defined as an improvement of ABI value by ≥ 0.1 after the procedure and lack of deterioration \> 0.15 in relation to the maximal value recorded before the procedure.

Residual stenosisImmediately after procedure

The technical success of the procedure is to be defined as PTA of a lesion with \>30 % residual stenosis and lack of flow rate-limiting dissection immediately after treatment.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Shanghai Tenth people's hospital, Tongji university

🇨🇳

Shanghai, Shanghai, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath