Perfusion Imaging and CT -Understanding Relative Efficacy
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Interventions
- Device: 64 Channel VCT
- Registration Number
- NCT00486447
- Lead Sponsor
- GE Healthcare
- Brief Summary
To determine the relative efficacy of Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) and Single Positron Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) in patients with an intermediate risk of CAD.
- Detailed Description
This study is a prospective, multi-center, within-subject comparative study. One hundred fifty (150) subjects with CATH procedures are needed in the study. Approximately 300 subjects who meet all of the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be enrolled. The study population will consist of subjects with symptoms suspected of and at intermediate-risk for ischemic heart disease, which are referred for MPS for a definitive diagnosis of CAD.
Each subject will undergo the following procedures:
* A Myocardial Perfusion Study (MPS) procedure, as standard of care;
* An IV contrast-enhanced cardiac CT (CCTA) procedure;
* A CATH procedure when the MPS and/or cardiac CT examination is deemed positive or equivocal and at the discretion of the referring physicians, as a standard-of-care procedure.
When both the MPS and CCTA are normal, the subject is not required to undergo a CATH procedure, but will enter into follow-up. The research staff at each site will perform follow-up for each subject at 12 months (± 15 days) and 24 months (± 15 days) and 36 months (± 15 days) after the completion of the cardiac CT procedure.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 249
- Patients with an intermediate probability risk for coronary artery disease.
- Subject has symptoms of suspected ischemic heart disease.
- Subject is at intermediate risk for coronary artery disease
-
The subject has undergone a prior CCTA within 6 months prior to entering the study.
-
The subject has a documented history of CAD by CATH, myocardial infarction (MI), metal stent placement in any of the coronary vessels, or a previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedure
-
The subject has hemodynamic or active clinical instability:
- Acute chest pain (sudden onset);
- Cardiac shock;
- Unstable blood pressure (BP);
- Severe congestive heart failure or acute pulmonary edema.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Imaging 64 Channel VCT General imaging subjects receiving CT exams
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease Using Diagnostic Catheterization for Standard of Truth. through study completion, an expected average of 1 year Number of subjects with CT for detection purposes
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical Outcomes - EKG, Laboratory Workup, Changes in Medical Management, Downstream Cardiac Testing, Significant Coronary Interventions, and Major Cardiac Events & Long-term Outcomes (Non-fatal MI and Cardiac-related Death). 1 year outcomes after initial MPS exam
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
GE Healthcare
🇺🇸Waukesha, Wisconsin, United States