MedPath

Mental and Physical Well-Being of Frontline Health Care Workers During Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Healthy
Interventions
Behavioral: Stress First Aid
Registration Number
NCT04723576
Lead Sponsor
RAND
Brief Summary

Study to support the mental and physical well-being of US health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and ensure high-quality care for patients through Stress First Aid.

Detailed Description

The goal of the project is to support the mental and physical well-being of U.S. health care workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure high-quality care for patients, by establishing the effectiveness of a tailored Stress First Aid (SFA) intervention, compared to usual care (UC). The RAND Corporation will conduct a cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) with three cohorts containing matched pairs in approximately 40 diverse sites (hospitals and clinics) to evaluate whether SFA for HCWs improves mental and physical well-being compared to UC. Sequential roll-out of the intervention to three cohorts will allow investigators to quickly incorporate lessons learned and stakeholder feedback from each iteration into subsequent trainings, and share actionable findings given the urgency due to the pandemic. The end result will be an SFA toolkit tailored for HCWs that can be implemented and scaleable across multiple settings. The proposed SFA intervention addresses an important and compelling clinical care delivery challenge during COVID-19 by improving the mental well-being of HCWs, who will benefit directly and be better equipped to provide higher quality, more sustained, and more patient-centered care to patients. The specific aims of the project are to: (1) test the comparative effectiveness of SFA versus UC on mental and physical well-being (quantitative); (2) understand and document any UC activities to support HCW well-being prior to implementing SFA across sites; and (3) assess the experiences of HCWs and sites with SFA (acceptability, likelihood of uptake, lessons learned) and impact on HCW well-being (qualitative).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
7444
Inclusion Criteria
  • Health care workers and patient-facing support staff (e.g., front desk staff)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Non-English speaking

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Stress First AidStress First AidThe cRCT will be comprised of three cohorts of matched pairs representing approximately 40 diverse sites (12-15 pairs of hospitals hospitals and 5-7 pairs of clinics/practices) to determine whether SFA for frontline HCWs improves mental and physical well-being compared to Usual Care (UC). Each pair will be assigned to either SFA or UC using a simple 1:1 randomization. SFA sites will implement SFA through a "train-the-trainer" model.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
PTSD Symptom SeverityPre-Intervention (Baseline) and Post-Intervention (29 to 53 days from Baseline)

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders (PCL-5). The PCL-5 is a 20-item measure of PTSD symptom severity. Each item is rated on 0-4 frequency scale. Items are summed to create a total score ranging from 0-80 where a higher score indicates worse outcomes.

Psychological DistressPre-Intervention (Baseline) and Post-Intervention (29 to 53 days from Baseline)

Kessler 6 Distress Scale (K-6) for general psychological distress in the past 30 days. This is a 6-item inventory. Each of the items is scored from "none of the time" (0) to "all of the time" (4). Items are summed for a total score ranging from 0-24 where a higher score indicates worse outcomes.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Sleep-Related ImpairmentPre-Intervention (Baseline) and Post-Intervention (29 to 53 days from Baseline)

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Related Impairment (SRI) includes 4 items to assess sleep impairment over the past seven days. Each of the items are rated from 1-5 (not at all to very much). Items are summed into a scale ranging from 4-20 where a higher score indicates worse outcomes.

Workplace StressPre-Intervention (Baseline) and Post-Intervention (29 to 53 days from Baseline)

American Psychological Association's (APA) Stress in the Workplace survey; 3 items rated on a 1-5 scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree. A summed scale is formed ranging from 3-15 in which a higher score indicates worse outcomes/more stress.

ResiliencePre-Intervention (Baseline) and Post-Intervention (29 to 53 days from Baseline)

Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CDRISC); a brief (2-item) version of the scale with items rated from 0-4 (not true at all to true nearly all the time). Items are summed into a total scale ranging from 0-8 in which a higher score indicates better outcomes.

BurnoutPre-Intervention (Baseline) and Post-Intervention (29 to 53 days from Baseline)

Dolan single item with 5 responses options ranging from 1\[I enjoy my work. I haven symptoms of burnout.\] to 5 \[I feel completely burned out.\]; We created a binary indicator to measure the percent of participants who reported experiencing symptoms of burnout.

Moral DistressPre-Intervention (Baseline) and Post-Intervention (29 to 53 days from Baseline)

We used the Moral Distress Thermometer, a single item sliding scale with responses rated on a 0-10 scale (none to worst possible) where a higher score indicates worse outcomes.

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Vizient Inc.

🇺🇸

Irving, Texas, United States

Clinical Directors Network, Inc

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath