Small Molecule
C25H23N9O6S
180384-56-9
Clazosentan is a potent, highly selective, intravenously administered small molecule antagonist of the endothelin-A (ETA) receptor.[1] It was developed as a targeted therapy to prevent cerebral vasospasm and its ischemic consequences following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), a life-threatening form of stroke.[3] The drug's mechanism is rooted in its ability to block the action of endothelin-1, the body's most powerful endogenous vasoconstrictor, which is released in large quantities after aSAH and is a key mediator of arterial narrowing in the brain.[2]
The clinical development of Clazosentan is characterized by a significant and persistent paradox: while the drug has unequivocally demonstrated a powerful, dose-dependent ability to reduce the incidence and severity of angiographic vasospasm, this success on a key pathophysiological marker has not consistently translated into improved long-term neurological function or reduced all-cause mortality in large, global clinical trials.[4] This disconnect highlights the multifactorial nature of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after aSAH, suggesting that large-vessel vasospasm is only one component of a more complex secondary injury cascade.
This complex efficacy profile has led to a unique and divergent global regulatory landscape. Despite extensive investigation in multiple Phase III trials, Clazosentan has not received marketing approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the European Medicines Agency (EMA).[8] In stark contrast, based on positive results from dedicated regional registration studies, the drug has been approved and is marketed as PIVLAZ in Japan and South Korea for the prevention of vasospasm and its complications.[10] This report provides a comprehensive analysis of Clazosentan, detailing its chemical properties, pharmacology, clinical trial history, safety profile, and the factors underpinning its complex journey from bench to bedside.
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a devastating cerebrovascular event caused by the rupture of an intracranial aneurysm, leading to the extravasation of blood into the subarachnoid space.[11] Even after the ruptured aneurysm is surgically or endovascularly secured to prevent re-bleeding, patients remain at high risk for secondary brain injury. The most significant of these complications is delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), which typically occurs between 3 and 14 days after the initial hemorrhage and is a leading cause of poor neurological outcome and mortality in aSAH survivors.[6]
For decades, the primary driver of DCI was believed to be cerebral vasospasm—a prolonged, severe, and often unpredictable narrowing of the large-capacitance cerebral arteries.[13] This vasospasm can critically reduce cerebral blood flow, leading to ischemic strokes and profound neurological deficits.[2] While vasospasm is a major contributor, it is now understood that DCI is a multifactorial process also involving microvascular dysfunction, cortical spreading depolarizations, and neuroinflammation.[9] Nonetheless, the prevention and treatment of large-vessel vasospasm remain a central goal of neurocritical care for aSAH patients.
The molecular rationale for targeting vasospasm with Clazosentan is compelling and centers on the peptide endothelin-1 (ET-1). Following aSAH, the breakdown of red blood cells in the cerebrospinal fluid triggers a massive and sustained release of ET-1 from the vascular endothelium.[4] ET-1 is the most potent endogenous vasoconstrictor identified, exerting its effects by binding to two G protein-coupled receptor subtypes: the endothelin-A (ETA) receptor and the endothelin-B (ETB) receptor.[9]
The ETA receptor is located predominantly on vascular smooth muscle cells. Its activation by ET-1 initiates a phosphatidylinositol-calcium second messenger cascade, resulting in a powerful and long-lasting contraction of the vessel wall.[1] Studies have consistently shown that ET-1 levels are markedly elevated in the cerebrospinal fluid of aSAH patients and that the severity of vasospasm correlates with these levels.[4] This direct link established the ETA receptor as a high-priority therapeutic target for a drug designed to prevent aSAH-induced vasospasm.
Clazosentan was specifically developed as a selective, competitive antagonist of the ETA receptor.[2] As a small molecule formulated for continuous intravenous infusion, it was designed for use in the critical care setting during the peak window of vasospasm risk. By blocking the binding of ET-1 to its receptor on cerebral arteries, Clazosentan is intended to directly counteract the primary vasoconstrictive stimulus, thereby preventing or reversing vasospasm, preserving cerebral blood flow, and ultimately reducing the incidence of DCI and improving patient outcomes.[2]
Clazosentan is identified by a variety of names and codes used throughout its development and in different regulatory jurisdictions.
Clazosentan is a synthetic, achiral small molecule.[1]
The fundamental identifiers and computed physicochemical properties of Clazosentan are summarized in Table 1. These properties, particularly its low water solubility and high polar surface area, dictate its formulation for intravenous use and influence its pharmacokinetic behavior. The molecule violates Lipinski's Rule of Five, primarily due to its high polar surface area and hydrogen bond acceptor count, which is not uncommon for highly specific, targeted inhibitors designed for intravenous administration.[1]
Table 1: Key Identifiers and Physicochemical Properties of Clazosentan
| Property | Value | Source(s) |
|---|---|---|
| DrugBank ID | DB06677 | 1 |
| CAS Number | 180384-56-9 | 1 |
| UNII | 3DRR0X4728 | 1 |
| InChIKey | LFWCJABOXHSRGC-UHFFFAOYSA-N | 1 |
| SMILES | CC1=CN=C(C=C1)S(=O)(=O)NC2=C(C(=NC(=N2)C3=CC(=NC=C3)C4=NNN=N4)OCCO)OC5=CC=CC=C5OC | [15, 18] |
| Water Solubility | 0.0428 mg/mL | 1 |
| logP | 2.03 (ALOGPS), 2.83 (Chemaxon) | 1 |
| pKa (Strongest Acidic) | 3.53 | 1 |
| pKa (Strongest Basic) | 2.11 | 1 |
| Polar Surface Area | 200.11 Ų | 1 |
| Rule of Five Violation | Yes | 1 |
Clazosentan is formulated as a concentrate for solution for infusion and is administered exclusively via continuous intravenous infusion, typically using a constant infusion pump.[2] This route of administration is necessary due to its poor oral bioavailability and the need to maintain steady-state plasma concentrations in the critically ill target patient population.[1] Dosing in clinical trials and practice is specified as a constant rate, such as 5 mg/h, 10 mg/h, or 15 mg/h, administered for up to 14-15 days post-aSAH.[6]
The sole pharmacological target of Clazosentan is the human Endothelin-1 receptor, also known as the Endothelin-A (ETA) receptor.[1] This receptor is encoded by the EDNRA gene and is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily.[1] In the vasculature, ETA receptors are densely expressed on smooth muscle cells. Upon binding of the endogenous ligand ET-1, the receptor activates G proteins of the Gq/11 family, which in turn stimulate phospholipase C. This leads to the generation of inositol trisphosphate ($IP_3$) and diacylglycerol (DAG), culminating in an increase in intracellular calcium concentration and subsequent smooth muscle cell contraction and vasoconstriction.[1]
Clazosentan functions as a potent, competitive, and highly selective antagonist of the ETA receptor.[2] It binds to the ETA receptor with high affinity, in the nanomolar range, thereby preventing the endogenous vasoconstrictor ET-1 from binding and activating the receptor.[5] A key feature of Clazosentan is its selectivity; it exhibits an approximately 1000-fold greater affinity for the ETA receptor compared to the ETB receptor.[5] This selectivity is clinically important because ETB receptors have a dual role: those on smooth muscle cells also mediate vasoconstriction, but those on endothelial cells mediate the release of vasodilators like nitric oxide. By selectively blocking only the ETA receptor, Clazosentan is designed to inhibit the primary pathological vasoconstrictor pathway while potentially sparing the vasodilatory functions of the ETB receptor.
The primary and intended pharmacodynamic effect of Clazosentan is the inhibition of ET-1-mediated vasoconstriction.[17] In the setting of aSAH, where ET-1 levels are pathologically elevated, this antagonism directly counteracts the stimulus for cerebral vasospasm.[2] This leads to a relaxation of arterial smooth muscle, or a prevention of its contraction, resulting in vasodilation. The ultimate physiological goal is to improve or maintain adequate cerebral blood flow to brain regions at risk of ischemia.[3] Clinical trials have robustly confirmed this pharmacodynamic effect, demonstrating a clear, dose-dependent reduction in the incidence and severity of angiographically confirmed cerebral vasospasm in aSAH patients treated with Clazosentan.[4]
The pharmacokinetic profile of Clazosentan has been well-characterized in healthy volunteers and in the target patient population, defining its absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) properties.
As Clazosentan is administered exclusively by intravenous infusion, absorption is complete and instantaneous.[2] Following administration, the drug distributes within the body with a volume of distribution at steady state ($V_{ss}$) of approximately 18 to 21.5 L.[5] This volume is comparable to that of the extracellular fluid, indicating that the drug primarily remains within the plasma and interstitial fluid compartments with limited penetration into tissues.[5] Plasma concentrations decline in a biphasic manner upon cessation of the infusion.[25]
A defining characteristic of Clazosentan's pharmacokinetics is its elimination pathway, which is largely independent of metabolic enzymes.[5]
The clinical development of Clazosentan is a compelling narrative of scientific success on a surrogate endpoint that did not consistently translate to success on clinical outcomes. This journey, marked by large-scale trials with divergent results, provides crucial lessons on the complexities of treating secondary brain injury after aSAH.
The CONSCIOUS-1 trial (NCT00111085) was a Phase IIb, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to identify the optimal dose of Clazosentan for preventing vasospasm.[4] The study enrolled 413 patients with aSAH whose aneurysms were secured by either surgical clipping or endovascular coiling. Patients were randomized to receive a continuous intravenous infusion of Clazosentan at 1, 5, or 15 mg/h, or a matching placebo, for up to 14 days.[4]
The primary endpoint was the incidence of moderate or severe angiographic vasospasm, assessed by a blinded central review of digital subtraction angiography performed 7 to 11 days after the hemorrhage.[4] The results were unequivocally positive and demonstrated a powerful, dose-dependent effect. The incidence of moderate or severe vasospasm was 66% in the placebo group. This was reduced significantly in all Clazosentan arms, with the most profound effect seen in the 15 mg/h group, where the incidence was only 23%. This corresponded to a 65% relative risk reduction compared to placebo, a result that was highly statistically significant ($p<0.0001$).[4] While the trial was not powered for clinical outcomes, it successfully established proof-of-concept for the drug's mechanism and identified effective doses, paving the way for Phase III studies.[4]
Building on the success of CONSCIOUS-1, two large Phase III trials were initiated to determine if the reduction in vasospasm translated into improved clinical outcomes. The program was designed with separate trials for patients based on the method of aneurysm repair.
The CONSCIOUS-2 trial (NCT00558311) enrolled 1,157 patients with aSAH whose aneurysms were secured by surgical clipping.[13] Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive Clazosentan at a dose of 5 mg/h or placebo.[13] The primary endpoint was a composite of vasospasm-related morbidity and all-cause mortality at 6 weeks, which included death, new vasospasm-related cerebral infarcts, delayed ischemic neurological deficit (DIND), or the need for rescue therapy.[27]
The trial failed to meet its primary endpoint.[13] The event rate was 21% in the Clazosentan group compared to 25% in the placebo group. This represented a non-significant relative risk reduction of 17% ($p=0.10$).[13] Furthermore, there was no improvement in long-term functional outcome as measured by the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) at 12 weeks; in fact, there was a non-significant trend toward worse outcomes in the treatment group.[27] These disappointing results led to the premature termination of the parallel CONSCIOUS-3 trial.[6]
The CONSCIOUS-3 trial (NCT00940095) enrolled patients with aSAH whose aneurysms were secured by endovascular coiling.[6] Patients were randomized to receive Clazosentan at 5 mg/h, 15 mg/h, or placebo.[6] Although halted early, 571 patients were treated.[6]
The results were mixed and dose-dependent. The 5 mg/h dose arm showed no significant benefit over placebo. However, the 15 mg/h dose of Clazosentan significantly reduced the primary composite endpoint of vasospasm-related morbidity and all-cause mortality. The event rate was only 15% in the 15 mg/h group compared to 27% in the placebo group, a statistically significant result (odds ratio 0.474; $p=0.007$).[6] Despite this success on the primary endpoint, the trial once again failed to demonstrate a benefit in long-term functional outcome. There was no significant improvement in GOSE scores at 12 weeks for either dose of Clazosentan compared to placebo.[6]
The REACT trial (NCT03585270) was a subsequent Phase 3 study designed to test Clazosentan 15 mg/h in a population deemed to be at the highest risk for vasospasm: patients with thick and diffuse subarachnoid clots on their admission CT scan.[16] The primary endpoint was more focused: the occurrence of clinical deterioration due to DCI within 14 days.[32]
Despite the enriched high-risk population and a targeted clinical endpoint, the REACT trial also failed to demonstrate a significant benefit.[16] The rate of clinical deterioration due to DCI was 15.8% in the Clazosentan group versus 17.2% in the placebo group, a difference that was not statistically significant ($p=0.734$).[32] This negative result largely ended the pursuit of regulatory approval for Clazosentan in the United States and Europe.[16]
In contrast to the global trial program, dedicated Phase 3 studies conducted in Japan yielded positive results. Two registration trials (JapicCTI163369 and JapicCTI163368) evaluated Clazosentan 10 mg/h in Japanese patients after aSAH treated by coiling or clipping.[11] Both studies demonstrated that Clazosentan significantly reduced the occurrence of the composite endpoint of cerebral vasospasm-related morbidity and all-cause mortality compared to placebo ($p<0.01$ for both studies).[11] Based on this robust regional data, Clazosentan was approved by the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) in 2022.[10]
This regional success suggests that the drug's benefit may be more apparent in specific contexts. The discrepancy between the global and Japanese trial results could stem from several factors. The incidence of aSAH is at least twice as high in Japan, which may be linked to genetic or pathophysiological differences where ET-1-mediated vasospasm plays a more dominant and critical role in determining outcomes.[11] Alternatively, more uniform patient characteristics and highly standardized protocols of care within the Japanese healthcare system may have reduced variability, allowing a clearer signal of the drug's effect to emerge. This provides compelling evidence that a sub-population of aSAH patients exists who can derive significant benefit from Clazosentan, even if that group was not readily identifiable within the more heterogeneous global trial populations.
Table 2: Summary of Major Phase II/III Clinical Trials of Clazosentan
| Trial Name | Phase | NCT ID | Patient Population (Aneurysm Securement) | N | Dosing Arms (IV) | Primary Endpoint | Primary Endpoint Result | Functional Outcome (GOSE/mRS) Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONSCIOUS-1 | IIb | NCT00111085 | aSAH (Clipping or Coiling) | 413 | 1, 5, 15 mg/h vs. Placebo | Angiographic Vasospasm | Significant Reduction (65% RRR at 15 mg/h; $p<0.0001$) | No significant effect |
| CONSCIOUS-2 | III | NCT00558311 | aSAH (Clipping) | 1157 | 5 mg/h vs. Placebo | Vasospasm-related Morbidity/All-cause Mortality | Not Met (17% RRR; $p=0.10$) | No significant effect |
| CONSCIOUS-3 | III | NCT00940095 | aSAH (Coiling) | 571 | 5, 15 mg/h vs. Placebo | Vasospasm-related Morbidity/All-cause Mortality | Met for 15 mg/h (OR 0.474; $p=0.007$) | No significant effect |
| REACT | III | NCT03585270 | High-Risk aSAH (Clipping or Coiling) | 409 | 15 mg/h vs. Placebo | Clinical Deterioration due to DCI | Not Met ($p=0.734$) | No significant effect |
| Japanese Program | III | JapicCTI163368/9 | aSAH (Clipping or Coiling) | N/A | 10 mg/h vs. Placebo | Vasospasm-related Morbidity/All-cause Mortality | Met ($p<0.01$ for both studies) | N/A |
The entire clinical development program of Clazosentan is defined by a critical disconnect: the drug's powerful and reproducible effect on a surrogate endpoint (angiographic vasospasm) did not reliably predict its effect on patient-centered clinical outcomes (neurological function and survival). The CONSCIOUS-1 trial provided definitive proof that blocking the ETA receptor effectively prevents the narrowing of large cerebral arteries.[4] However, the subsequent failures of CONSCIOUS-2 and REACT to improve clinical outcomes, and the mixed results of CONSCIOUS-3, strongly imply that DCI and poor outcomes after aSAH are not solely the result of large-vessel vasospasm.[6] Other pathophysiological mechanisms not targeted by Clazosentan—such as microcirculatory constriction, inflammation, apoptosis, and cortical spreading depolarizations—must play a significant role in the secondary brain injury that ultimately determines a patient's functional status.[9] Therefore, while preventing angiographic vasospasm is a valid mechanistic goal, it appears to be an insufficient strategy on its own to improve overall outcomes in a broad, unselected population of aSAH patients. The drug's failure in global trials should not be seen as a failure of the ET-1 hypothesis, but rather as a lesson that DCI is a more complex syndrome than previously appreciated, requiring a multi-pronged therapeutic approach.
The safety profile of Clazosentan has been extensively documented in clinical trials involving over 2,000 patients.[11] While generally manageable in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting, treatment with Clazosentan is associated with a higher incidence of specific adverse events compared to placebo, most of which are mechanistically related to its vasodilatory properties.[7]
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials confirmed that adverse events were significantly increased by Clazosentan compared to placebo (Risk Ratio 1.54).[7] The most consistently reported treatment-emergent adverse events of special interest are hypotension, pulmonary complications, and anemia.[6]
Table 3: Summary of Common and Serious Adverse Events (vs. Placebo in CONSCIOUS-3)
| Adverse Event | Placebo (n=189) | Clazosentan 5 mg/h (n=194) | Clazosentan 15 mg/h (n=188) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pulmonary Complications | 21% | 36% | 37% |
| Anemia | 10% | 13% | 13% |
| Hypotension | 7% | 11% | 16% |
| Data derived from the CONSCIOUS-3 trial.[6, 38] |
The development of Clazosentan was initiated by Actelion, with early involvement from Vanguard Medica Ltd., and is now spearheaded by Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, a company that spun off from Actelion's R&D division.[5] The drug's journey through global regulatory systems has been markedly divergent, reflecting the complex and conflicting clinical trial data.
The FDA granted Clazosentan Orphan Drug Designation for the "Treatment of cerebral vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage" on February 16, 2006.[8] This status provides incentives for the development of drugs for rare diseases. However, following the repeated failure of large Phase III trials (CONSCIOUS-2 and REACT) to meet their primary clinical endpoints, the path to approval in the U.S. was effectively closed.[16] Consequently, the Orphan Drug Designation was officially withdrawn or revoked on September 19, 2023.[8] To date, Clazosentan is not approved by the FDA for any indication.[8]
Similar to the U.S., Clazosentan received an Orphan Designation (EU/3/03/182) from the European Commission on December 12, 2003, for the "treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage".[21] The sponsorship was transferred from Actelion to Idorsia in 2017.[41] While this designation remains, it is not a marketing authorization, and it requires that the drug's benefit be confirmed at the time of an approval application.[41] Given the negative outcomes of the large global trials, an application for marketing authorization has not been successfully pursued, and Clazosentan is not approved for use in the European Union.[9]
The regulatory story in Asia is entirely different. Based on a dedicated Japanese Phase 3 program that demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in vasospasm-related morbidity and mortality, the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) approved Clazosentan on January 20, 2022.[10] It is marketed under the brand name PIVLAZ for the prevention of cerebral vasospasm, vasospasm-related cerebral infarction, and cerebral ischemic symptoms after aSAH.[11] Following this success, the drug was also approved in South Korea in December 2023.[9] This regional success, standing in stark contrast to the setbacks in the West, underscores the possibility that clinical, genetic, or systemic factors present in the Japanese patient population allow the drug's benefit to be more clearly realized.
Clazosentan presents a nuanced risk-benefit profile. The primary, proven benefit is a potent and reliable reduction in the incidence and severity of angiographic cerebral vasospasm following aSAH.[4] In certain patient populations and at an adequate dose (10-15 mg/h), this can translate to a reduction in a composite endpoint of vasospasm-related clinical complications.[6] The risks are significant but manageable within an ICU setting, consisting primarily of hypotension, pulmonary complications from fluid shifts, and anemia, all of which are direct consequences of the drug's powerful vasodilatory mechanism.[6] The central limitation of the drug is the consistent failure to demonstrate an improvement in long-term, patient-centered functional outcomes or all-cause mortality in broad, heterogeneous global populations.[6] Therefore, the benefit is currently confined to a specific set of vasospasm-related events, while the risks are systemic and the impact on overall recovery remains unproven in most populations studied.
The cumulative evidence suggests that Clazosentan is not a universal treatment for all aSAH patients. Its clinical niche appears to be in patients where large-vessel, ET-1-mediated cerebral vasospasm is the dominant, rate-limiting factor in their potential for neurological decline. The REACT trial's focus on patients with a high clot burden was a rational attempt to identify this group, though it was unsuccessful.[32] The success in Japan strongly suggests that a responsive phenotype exists, potentially defined by genetic predisposition, specific clinical characteristics, or the nature of the initial hemorrhage.[11] In clinical practice, its use should be considered for patients at the highest risk of severe vasospasm, where the potential benefit of preventing ischemic events directly related to arterial narrowing outweighs the risks of systemic side effects. It should be viewed as an adjunct to, not a replacement for, comprehensive neurocritical care, including the use of standard therapies like nimodipine.[9]
The story of Clazosentan leaves several critical questions unanswered, pointing toward future research directions.
Clazosentan stands as a landmark molecule in neurocritical care pharmacology—a triumph of rational drug design that successfully targets a key pathophysiological mechanism. Its clinical development journey serves as a profound and cautionary lesson: success on a well-established surrogate endpoint like angiographic vasospasm does not guarantee improvement in overall patient outcomes, especially in a complex, multifactorial disease like DCI. While its development has stalled in Western countries, its approval and use in Japan and South Korea confirm that it holds tangible value for a specific, yet-to-be-fully-defined, patient population. Clazosentan remains an important, albeit niche, therapeutic tool, whose story has fundamentally advanced our understanding of secondary brain injury after aSAH and will shape the design of future neuroprotective trials.
Published at: October 31, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.