Small Molecule
C14H22N2O
252870-53-4
Ispronicline is an investigational small molecule drug developed for the treatment of cognitive and neurological disorders.[1][ Throughout its development, it has been referred to by several names and codes, which are essential for navigating the scientific and clinical literature. A comprehensive understanding of its identity and chemical properties provides the foundation for interpreting its pharmacological and clinical profile.]
The compound was assigned the International Nonproprietary Name (INN) and United States Adopted Name (USAN) of Ispronicline.[1] During its preclinical and clinical development phases, it was known by several developmental codes, most prominently TC-1734 (by Targacept), AZD-3480 (by AstraZeneca), and RJR-1734 (by R.J. Reynolds).[2] The IUPAC nomenclature for the molecule is (2S,4E)-5-(5-isopropoxypyridin-3-yl)-N-methylpent-4-en-2-amine, with minor variations such as (E,2S)-N-methyl-5-(5-propan-2-yloxy-3-pyridinyl)pent-4-en-2-amine also appearing in chemical databases.[2][ For unambiguous identification, a set of regulatory and database identifiers has been assigned, which are consolidated in Table 1.]
Ispronicline is a small molecule with the chemical formula $C_{14}H_{22}N_{2}O$ and a molar mass of approximately 234.34 g·mol⁻¹.[2] Its structure features a pyridine ring linked to an amine-containing pentene chain, with specific stereochemistry and double bond geometry that are critical for its biological activity. As a research chemical, it is described as an oily liquid, colorless to light yellow in appearance.[4] For laboratory use and long-term stability, it requires storage under dry, dark conditions at refrigerated ($0 - 4$ °C) or frozen ($-20$ °C) temperatures.[4] The compound exhibits good solubility in organic solvents like dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) but requires specific formulations involving co-solvents such as PEG300 and Tween-80 for preparation of aqueous solutions suitable for in vivo administration.[5]
Table 1: Ispronicline - Key Identifiers and Physicochemical Properties | |
---|---|
Attribute | Value |
Generic Name (INN/USAN) | Ispronicline |
Developmental Codes | TC-1734, AZD-3480, RJR-1734 1 |
DrugBank ID | DB16205 2 |
CAS Number | 252870-53-4 2 |
PubChem CID | 9824145 2 |
IUPAC Name | (2S,4E)-5-(5-isopropoxypyridin-3-yl)-N-methylpent-4-en-2-amine 3 |
Drug Type | Small Molecule 1 |
Molecular Formula | $C_{14}H_{22}N_{2}O$ 2 |
Molar Mass | 234.343 g·mol⁻¹ 3 |
SMILES | CC@@HNC |
InChIKey | RPCVIAXDAUMJJP-PZBABLGHSA-N |
Physical Appearance | Oily liquid |
[The therapeutic rationale for Ispronicline was grounded in the well-established role of the cholinergic system in cognitive processes and the pathological loss of cholinergic neurons and receptors in neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Ispronicline was developed as a next-generation therapeutic designed to directly and selectively modulate this system, aiming for enhanced efficacy and improved tolerability over previous approaches.]
[Ispronicline's primary mechanism of action is as a partial agonist at neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). Specifically, it targets the $\alpha4\beta2$ nAChR subtype, which is the most abundantly expressed nAChR in the mammalian central nervous system (CNS) and is critically involved in modulating the release of neurotransmitters like acetylcholine and dopamine, thereby influencing attention, learning, and memory.]
[The designation as a "partial agonist" is a key feature of its design. Unlike full agonists (e.g., nicotine), which maximally activate the receptor, a partial agonist produces a submaximal response. This characteristic is intended to provide a ceiling effect, stimulating cholinergic neurotransmission to a therapeutic level while mitigating the risk of overstimulation that can lead to receptor desensitization—a prolonged, functionally inactive state—and a higher incidence of adverse effects. This approach was conceived to create a wider therapeutic window compared to earlier, non-selective full agonists.]
[Ispronicline's pharmacological profile is distinguished by its high affinity and remarkable selectivity for its target receptor.]
[This selectivity profile represents a deliberate and successful exercise in rational drug design. Earlier attempts to harness the pro-cognitive effects of nicotinic stimulation were often thwarted by poor tolerability, including cardiovascular and gastrointestinal side effects, which are largely mediated by the activation of peripheral nAChRs such as the $\alpha3\beta4$ subtype found in autonomic ganglia. By engineering a molecule with a strong preference for the central $\alpha4\beta2$ receptor, the developers aimed to uncouple the desired CNS effects from the undesirable peripheral effects, a hypothesis that was later validated by the drug's favorable safety profile in human trials.]
[Preclinical studies provided a robust body of evidence supporting Ispronicline's potential as a CNS therapeutic. The compound demonstrated a triad of beneficial effects:]
Further in vivo[ evidence confirmed that Ispronicline effectively penetrates the CNS and engages its target. Administration to rats resulted in the induction of c-Fos, an immediate early gene product used as a marker of neuronal activation, in specific forebrain regions like the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus. This provided direct physiological evidence of the drug's central activity following systemic administration.]
[Phase I clinical studies in healthy volunteers provided essential data on the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) of Ispronicline, defining its behavior in the human body and guiding the design of subsequent efficacy trials.]
[Ispronicline was developed for oral administration and exhibited pharmacokinetic properties consistent with a CNS-active drug.]
[The pharmacokinetic data revealed two critical characteristics that influenced Ispronicline's clinical development. First, a high degree of interindividual variability was observed across all pharmacokinetic parameters. This variability is a significant challenge in drug development, as it can lead to inconsistent drug exposure and, consequently, variable efficacy and tolerability across a patient population. The proactive decision to exclude CYP2D6 poor metabolizers from the ADHD trial was a direct strategic response to mitigate this known variability in a small, exploratory study, thereby increasing the chance of detecting a clear efficacy signal. However, this design choice also means that the positive results from that specific trial may not be fully generalizable to a broader population that includes individuals with different metabolic phenotypes.]
[Second, a striking disconnect emerged between the drug's pharmacokinetic profile and its pharmacodynamic effects. While the pharmacokinetic half-life in humans was only a few hours, preclinical studies in rodents reported that the cognition-enhancing effects could last for 18 to 48 hours. This temporal disparity suggests that Ispronicline's mechanism of action is not reliant on continuous receptor occupancy. Instead, it points toward a "hit-and-run" mechanism, where a short period of receptor engagement by the drug triggers durable downstream effects, such as lasting changes in synaptic plasticity or neural circuit function, that persist long after the drug has been cleared from the body. This has important implications for dosing strategies, suggesting that once-daily administration could be sufficient despite the short half-life.]
[Ispronicline underwent a broad Phase II clinical development program, exploring its efficacy in three distinct CNS indications: Age-Associated Memory Impairment (AAMI), Alzheimer's Disease (AD), and adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The program yielded a complex and divergent set of results, with clear evidence of efficacy in some conditions but a decisive failure in its lead indication.]
Table 2: Summary of Key Phase II Clinical Trials for Ispronicline | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Indication | NCT Identifier | Study Design | Patient Population | Doses Studied | Primary Endpoint(s) | Key Outcome Summary |
Age-Associated Memory Impairment (AAMI) | NCT00109564 | Double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover | 76 elderly subjects with AAMI | 50-150 mg/day | CDR computerized test battery | Positive: Significant improvement in attention and episodic memory, most marked at 50 mg. |
Alzheimer's Disease (AD) | NCT00501111, NCT01466088 | Double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group | 567 patients with mild-to-moderate AD | 5, 20, 35/100 mg/day | ADAS-Cog | Negative/Inconclusive: Failed to meet primary endpoint; neither Ispronicline nor active control (donepezil) separated from placebo. |
Adult ADHD | NCT00683462 | Double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-way crossover | 24 adults with ADHD | 5, 50 mg/day | Stop Signal Task (SST), CAARS-INV | Positive: Significant improvement on both cognitive (SST) and clinical (CAARS) measures at 50 mg. |
[The initial clinical validation for Ispronicline's pro-cognitive effects came from studies in subjects with AAMI, a condition characterized by subjective memory complaints associated with normal aging. A Phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study (NCT00109564) evaluated ascending oral doses (50-150 mg) administered once daily for three weeks. Efficacy was measured using the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerized test battery, a sensitive tool for detecting changes in cognitive domains.]
[The results were highly encouraging. A beneficial effect on cognition was observed, with the most pronounced improvements seen at the 50 mg dose, particularly on measures of attention and episodic memory. A separate 16-week, parallel-group study in AAMI subjects reinforced these findings, showing that the 50 mg dose was statistically superior to placebo on the CDR Power of Attention and Quality of Episodic Memory factors, as well as on a subjective Subject Global Impression (SGI) scale. The 25 mg dose demonstrated a weaker signal, primarily on attention. These studies provided the first human proof-of-concept for Ispronicline as a cognition-enhancing agent.]
[Based on the promising AAMI data and the strong mechanistic rationale, Ispronicline advanced into a large, pivotal Phase IIb dose-finding study for mild-to-moderate AD. This 12-week, randomized, parallel-group trial enrolled 567 patients and was designed to rigorously assess efficacy. It included five arms: three doses of Ispronicline (5 mg, 20 mg, and a 35/100 mg titration), an active comparator (donepezil 10 mg), and placebo. The primary outcome measure was the change from baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), the standard cognitive endpoint for AD clinical trials.]
[The trial ultimately failed to meet its primary endpoint. At the end of 12 weeks, no dose of Ispronicline demonstrated a statistically significant improvement over placebo on the ADAS-Cog score. Critically, the active comparator, donepezil—an approved and effective treatment for AD—also failed to separate from placebo on this primary measure. While some positive signals were observed on secondary endpoints (e.g., MMSE, ADCS-CGIC) for the 20 mg dose, the failure on the primary endpoint led to the study being deemed "inconclusive" and failing to establish proof-of-concept.]
[The failure of the active control in this study is a crucial detail. The purpose of an active comparator is to validate a trial's methodology and sensitivity; if a trial cannot detect the effect of a known-effective drug, its results regarding an investigational drug are uninterpretable. This suggests that the trial's failure may have been due to methodological issues, such as patient selection, rather than a true lack of efficacy of Ispronicline. A post-hoc analysis excluding patients with very mild disease (who have little room for measurable cognitive decline) showed a trend toward improvement for both Ispronicline and donepezil, lending further support to the idea that the trial design may have obscured a real treatment effect. Nevertheless, this ambiguous result from a large and expensive trial proved to be a fatal blow to the development program.]
[In parallel, Ispronicline was evaluated as a novel, non-stimulant treatment for adult ADHD. An exploratory Phase II trial (NCT00683462) used a rigorous 3-way crossover design in 24 adults, comparing two doses of Ispronicline (5 mg/day and 50 mg/day) against placebo. The study employed co-primary endpoints to capture both cognitive and clinical effects: the Stop Signal Task (SST), a measure of response inhibition, and the investigator-rated Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS-INV).]
[The results were unequivocally positive. The 50 mg/day dose led to statistically significant improvements on both primary endpoints. Participants showed improved performance on the SST, indicating enhanced executive control, and a significant reduction in their total ADHD symptom score on the CAARS-INV. Significant benefits were also seen on subscales measuring inattention, memory problems, and emotional lability/impulsivity. The 5 mg dose was ineffective. This trial provided strong evidence that Ispronicline, at an appropriate dose, could be a viable therapeutic option for adult ADHD.]
[A key strength of Ispronicline, demonstrated consistently across its entire clinical program, was its favorable safety and tolerability profile. This outcome validated the core drug design principle of achieving CNS effects while minimizing peripheral side effects through receptor subtype selectivity.]
[In Phase I studies with healthy volunteers and Phase II studies across diverse patient populations, Ispronicline was consistently reported as safe and well-tolerated at therapeutic doses. Tolerability was favorable for doses up to 100-150 mg, with adverse events becoming more common at higher dose levels.]
[The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were CNS-related and generally of mild to moderate intensity.]
[Objective safety monitoring revealed no signals of concern. Comprehensive assessments, including clinical laboratory tests (hematology, biochemistry), urinalysis, vital signs, and cardiovascular monitoring via electrocardiograms (ECG) and Holter monitoring, showed no clinically significant changes attributable to Ispronicline treatment. The absence of cardiovascular effects was particularly significant, confirming that the high selectivity for central $\alpha4\beta2$ nAChRs over peripheral subtypes successfully avoided the side effects that had limited the development of earlier nicotinic agonists.]
[The development of Ispronicline was ultimately discontinued despite a successful rational design, a strong preclinical profile, a favorable safety record, and positive proof-of-concept data in two clinical indications. The decision to halt the program provides a compelling case study in the complexities and strategic risks of modern pharmaceutical development, particularly in the challenging field of neuroscience.]
[The primary driver for the discontinuation was the outcome of the large and costly Phase IIb trial in mild-to-moderate AD. The failure to meet the primary endpoint of a statistically significant improvement on the ADAS-Cog created an insurmountable barrier to progression. In the high-risk, high-cost landscape of AD drug development, an "inconclusive" result is often a functional failure, as it provides an insufficient basis to justify the immense financial investment required for a global Phase III program. The drug's performance was not demonstrably superior to the existing standard of care, donepezil, which itself failed to show efficacy in the trial, making the path forward untenable.]
[Ispronicline's failure in AD was not an isolated event but rather reflective of broader challenges that have plagued this therapeutic area.]
[The discontinuation of Ispronicline presents a paradox. A drug with a validated mechanism, excellent safety, and statistically significant, positive clinical data in both AAMI and adult ADHD was abandoned. This highlights a potential pitfall of a "lead indication" development strategy, where failure in a high-value but high-risk indication (AD) can lead to the termination of a program, leaving potentially viable treatments for other conditions unexplored.]
[In conclusion, Ispronicline stands as a testament to successful rational drug design. Its molecular architecture achieved the intended goal of selective central nAChR modulation with an excellent safety profile. It demonstrated clear biological activity and therapeutic potential in human studies of age-related cognitive decline and adult ADHD. However, its development was ultimately derailed by an ambiguous result in a pivotal AD trial, a trial whose own methodological validity is questionable. The story of Ispronicline is a cautionary tale of how a promising therapeutic candidate can fall victim not to its own flaws, but to the profound scientific, strategic, and financial challenges inherent in developing drugs for neurodegenerative diseases. Its potential as a safe and effective non-stimulant treatment for ADHD remains a significant, and likely permanent, unanswered question in neuropharmacology. The compound's history is documented across numerous patents related to its chemical structure and therapeutic use, and in key publications that detail its preclinical and clinical journey.]
Published at: October 19, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.