Biotech
2072873-06-2
Sintilimab is a fully human immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) monoclonal antibody that functions as an immune checkpoint inhibitor by targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) receptor. Developed through a strategic collaboration between China-based Innovent Biologics and the global pharmaceutical firm Eli Lilly and Company, Sintilimab is engineered for high-affinity binding and sustained receptor occupancy. Its mechanism of action involves blocking the interaction between PD-1 on T-cells and its ligands (PD-L1 and PD-L2), thereby restoring the host's anti-tumor immune response.
Marketed in China as TYVYT®, Sintilimab has achieved significant clinical and commercial success, securing numerous approvals from the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) for a wide range of high-incidence malignancies. These include classical Hodgkin's lymphoma, non-small cell lung cancer (both squamous and non-squamous subtypes), hepatocellular carcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, gastric cancer, and endometrial cancer. Its inclusion in China's National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL) for most of these indications has cemented its position as a cornerstone of immuno-oncology therapy in the country.
This success in China stands in stark contrast to its regulatory experience in the United States. In March 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Complete Response Letter for Sintilimab's application in non-small cell lung cancer. The decision was based on the agency's view that the pivotal clinical trial, conducted exclusively in China, lacked applicability to the diverse U.S. patient population and utilized a comparator arm that did not reflect the current U.S. standard of care. This outcome highlights a critical divergence in regulatory philosophies between major global markets and underscores the challenges facing pharmaceuticals developed outside of traditional Western clinical trial ecosystems. Sintilimab thus serves as a key case study in the complexities of global drug development and the imperative for multiregional, diverse clinical data to support worldwide registration.
Sintilimab is a high-purity, biotech-derived therapeutic agent classified as a fully human immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) kappa isotype monoclonal antibody.[1] It is produced using recombinant DNA technology in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells.[2] In China, the drug is marketed under the brand name TYVYT® (sintilimab injection).[5] As an antineoplastic agent, it belongs to the therapeutic class of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.[4]
Table 1: Sintilimab Drug Profile Summary
Attribute | Details | Source(s) |
---|---|---|
Name | Sintilimab | 1 |
Brand Name (China) | TYVYT® | 5 |
DrugBank ID | DB15765 | 1 |
Type | Biotech; Fully Human IgG4 Monoclonal Antibody | 1 |
CAS Number | 2072873-06-2 | 1 |
Synonyms/Codes | IBI 308, LY-3342901, Anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody IBI308, Xindili Dankang | 1 |
UNII | 8FU7FQ8UPK | 1 |
KEGG | D12119 | 1 |
Target | Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1/PDCD1/CD279) | 3 |
Developers | Innovent Biologics, Eli Lilly and Company | 1 |
The development of Sintilimab is the result of a landmark strategic collaboration between Innovent Biologics, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Suzhou, China, and Eli Lilly and Company, a global pharmaceutical leader.[1] The partnership, initiated in March 2015, was a groundbreaking agreement for the co-development and co-commercialization of oncology medicines, including Sintilimab, in China.[7] This collaboration made TYVYT® the only PD-1 antibody in the Chinese market to be branded by both a domestic and a global pharmaceutical company, a significant commercial distinction.[6]
Building on their success in China, the alliance was expanded in August 2020. Under the expanded agreement, Lilly obtained an exclusive license for Sintilimab in all geographies outside of China, with plans to pursue registration in the U.S. and other markets.[7] This move signaled a clear ambition to establish Sintilimab as a global therapeutic agent, leveraging Innovent's development and Lilly's global regulatory and commercialization expertise.
Sintilimab's therapeutic effect is derived from its function as an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Its primary molecular target is the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) receptor, which is expressed on the surface of activated T-cells.[2] In many cancers, tumor cells and other cells within the tumor microenvironment upregulate the expression of PD-1 ligands, namely PD-L1 and PD-L2.[4] The binding of these ligands to the PD-1 receptor on T-cells initiates an inhibitory signaling cascade that suppresses T-cell proliferation, cytokine production, and cytotoxic activity, effectively allowing the tumor to evade immune surveillance.[4]
Sintilimab physically binds to the PD-1 receptor, thereby acting as a competitive antagonist that blocks the interaction between PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2.[3] This blockade releases the "brakes" on the T-cell, restoring its endogenous anti-tumor capabilities and reactivating the immune system to recognize and eliminate cancer cells.[2]
In a competitive immuno-oncology landscape, the molecular engineering of an antibody can provide a critical therapeutic advantage. Sintilimab was developed to be a "me-better" agent rather than a "me-too" drug, a strategy reflected in its distinct binding properties. It demonstrates a very high binding affinity for the human PD-1 receptor, with a dissociation constant (KD) value of 74 pM.[3]
Structural analysis has revealed that Sintilimab binds to a unique conformational epitope on PD-1. This interaction is characterized by highly complementary, hydrophobic surfaces formed by the antibody's complementarity-determining regions (CDRs). The interactive surface area on Sintilimab is reportedly almost double that of the first-generation PD-1 inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab.[17] This unique structural engagement is believed to confer a significantly slower off-rate from the PD-1 receptor compared to these other agents.[17] A slower off-rate could theoretically translate to a more sustained PD-1 blockade on T-cells, potentially leading to a more durable and potent anti-tumor immune response from a single dose. These molecular-level distinctions form a core part of the drug's value proposition, positioning it as a potentially superior therapeutic option.
The favorable binding kinetics of Sintilimab translate to potent pharmacodynamic activity. In vitro, Sintilimab has been shown to induce high levels of interferon-gamma (IFN−γ) and interleukin-2 (IL−2) secretion in primary T-cell assays, indicative of robust T-cell activation.[3] In vivo studies using humanized mouse models have demonstrated that Sintilimab achieves high and sustained PD-1 receptor occupancy, exceeding 90% in both peripheral T-cells and critical tumor-infiltrating T-cells (TILs).[3] This high level of target engagement resulted in more effective tumor growth inhibition in preclinical models compared to comparator agents.[3]
While comprehensive human pharmacokinetic data is not fully detailed in the available materials, some key aspects can be summarized. The recommended dosage for its initial approval in China was 200 mg administered as an intravenous infusion every 3 weeks, a regimen that has been maintained in many subsequent combination therapy trials.[18] A Phase I clinical trial (NCT04177290) was conducted to confirm the PK similarity between Sintilimab produced via two different manufacturing processes, though specific results like half-life in humans were not reported.[21]
Preclinical data in PD-1 knockout mice indicated a serum half-life of 35.6 hours.[22] In cynomolgus monkeys, Sintilimab exhibited PK characteristics typical of an IgG antibody.[23] Importantly, the potential for immunogenicity appears low; in a study involving 381 human subjects, only 0.52% tested positive for anti-drug antibodies (ADA), suggesting that ADA-mediated clearance is unlikely to be a significant clinical issue.[22]
The clinical validation of Sintilimab is built upon a comprehensive and ambitious series of studies, primarily under the "ORIENT" program. This program has systematically evaluated Sintilimab's efficacy and safety across a broad spectrum of high-incidence cancers, both as a monotherapy and, more frequently, as a backbone for combination regimens. This strategic approach has been instrumental in securing its numerous regulatory approvals in China.
Table 2: Summary of Key Phase III Clinical Trials (ORIENT Series)
Trial ID (NCT) | Indication | Phase | Primary Endpoint | Key Result (HR or %) |
---|---|---|---|---|
ORIENT-1 (NCT03114683) | Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma (r/r cHL) | II | ORR | 80.4% |
ORIENT-11 (NCT03607539) | 1L Non-Squamous NSCLC | III | PFS | HR: 0.482 |
ORIENT-12 (NCT03629925) | 1L Squamous NSCLC | III | PFS | HR: 0.536 |
ORIENT-15 (NCT03748134) | 1L Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC) | III | OS | HR: 0.63 |
ORIENT-16 (NCT03745170) | 1L Gastric/GEJ Adenocarcinoma | III | OS | HR: 0.77 |
ORIENT-31 (NCT03802240) | EGFR-mutated NSCLC post-TKI | III | PFS | HR: 0.464 (4-drug vs. chemo) |
The ORIENT-1 trial (NCT03114683) was the pivotal, single-arm, Phase II study that led to Sintilimab's first regulatory approval.[17] In heavily pre-treated patients who had failed at least two prior lines of systemic chemotherapy, Sintilimab monotherapy demonstrated a high degree of efficacy. The primary endpoint, Objective Response Rate (ORR) assessed by an Independent Radiological Review Committee (IRRC), was 80.4%.[17] The Disease Control Rate (DCR) was an exceptional 97.8%.[17] Long-term follow-up data at a median of 26.7 months confirmed the durability of these responses, showing a median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) of 18.6 months and a 2-year Overall Survival (OS) rate of 96.3%.[25] The treatment was well-tolerated, with Grade 3-4 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring in 25% of patients.[24]
Following its initial success, the clinical development program for Sintilimab strategically pivoted to establishing it as a first-line therapy in combination with standard chemotherapy for NSCLC, the most common cancer type. This "combination is king" approach proved highly effective, embedding Sintilimab into the standard of care by demonstrating superiority over chemotherapy alone.
The ORIENT-15 trial (NCT03748134), a global, randomized, Phase III study, established Sintilimab plus chemotherapy as a new first-line standard of care for advanced or metastatic ESCC.[35] The study met its primary endpoint of OS, demonstrating that the Sintilimab-chemotherapy combination significantly prolonged median OS to 16.7 months compared to 12.5 months for chemotherapy alone (HR 0.63,
p<0.001).[14] A significant benefit in median PFS was also observed (7.2 months vs. 5.7 months; HR 0.56,
p<0.001).[14]
The ORIENT-16 trial (NCT03745170) successfully demonstrated the benefit of adding Sintilimab to first-line chemotherapy (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) for unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma.[37] The trial met its primary endpoint of OS for both the overall patient population and a prespecified subgroup with higher PD-L1 expression. In the intent-to-treat population, the median OS was 15.2 months for the Sintilimab arm versus 12.3 months for the placebo arm (HR 0.77,
p=0.009).[38] The benefit was more pronounced in patients with a PD-L1 Combined Positive Score (CPS) of 5 or greater, with a median OS of 18.4 months versus 12.9 months (HR 0.66,
p=0.002).[38]
Based on the results of the FRUSICA-1 Phase II study, Sintilimab in combination with the TKI fruquintinib received conditional NMPA approval for patients with advanced endometrial cancer who have failed prior systemic therapy.[41] The combination regimen demonstrated an ORR of 35.6%, a median PFS of 9.5 months, and a median OS of 21.3 months in this difficult-to-treat population.[41]
The clinical development of Sintilimab continues at a rapid pace, with a robust pipeline exploring its use in numerous other malignancies. This broad lifecycle management strategy includes ongoing trials in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (Phase II), glioblastoma, cancer of unknown primary, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, ovarian cancer, and various solid tumors, often testing novel combination strategies with other targeted agents, immunotherapies, or locoregional treatments.[44]
Across its extensive clinical development program, Sintilimab has demonstrated a safety profile that is generally manageable and consistent with the known toxicities of the PD-1 inhibitor class.[3] Several analyses and real-world studies suggest that Sintilimab may have a comparable or even more favorable safety profile when compared to other PD-1 inhibitors like nivolumab and pembrolizumab, a potential advantage that may be linked to its fully human IgG4 structure designed to minimize off-target effects.[10]
The most frequently reported adverse events in patients receiving Sintilimab are immune-mediated and reflect the on-target mechanism of T-cell activation. Common TEAEs reported across multiple clinical trials include pyrexia (fever), thyroid dysfunction (hypothyroidism), rash, asthenia (fatigue), and elevations in liver enzymes.[1] When used in combination with chemotherapy, hematologic toxicities such as anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia are also highly prevalent.[14]
As with all immune checkpoint inhibitors, the therapeutic activation of the immune system can lead to inflammatory side effects in various organ systems, known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). While most irAEs are low-grade (Grade 1-2) and manageable, some can be severe, life-threatening, and require prompt intervention.[51]
The management of irAEs is guided by their severity. For mild (Grade 1) events, treatment with Sintilimab may often continue with close monitoring. For moderate (Grade 2) to severe (Grade 3-4) irAEs, the standard approach involves withholding or permanently discontinuing Sintilimab and initiating systemic corticosteroids (e.g., prednisone at 1-2 mg/kg/day or equivalent). A slow taper of corticosteroids over at least 4-6 weeks is crucial to prevent recurrence. In cases that are refractory to steroids, other immunosuppressive agents or treatments such as intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) may be considered.[16]
Sintilimab's journey in China has been a story of remarkable regulatory and commercial success. It received its first approval from the NMPA in December 2018 for the treatment of relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin's lymphoma.[5] This was followed by an unprecedented series of rapid approvals for first-line indications in several of China's most prevalent cancers.
A key factor in its commercial success was its early and broad inclusion in China's National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL). In 2019, TYVYT® became the first and only PD-1 inhibitor to be included in the NRDL, dramatically improving its accessibility and affordability.[7] As of late 2024, seven of its eight approved indications are covered by the NRDL, making it the only PD-1 inhibitor reimbursed for the first-line treatment of five major cancer types.[42]
Table 3: NMPA Approved Indications for Sintilimab (TYVYT®)
Approval Date | Indication | Line of Therapy | Treatment Regimen | NRDL Status | Supporting Trial |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 2018 | Relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin's lymphoma (r/r cHL) | After ≥2 lines of systemic chemotherapy | Monotherapy | Yes | ORIENT-1 |
Feb 2021 | Non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) | First-line (EGFR/ALK wild-type) | + Pemetrexed & Platinum Chemotherapy | Yes | ORIENT-11 |
Jun 2021 | Squamous NSCLC | First-line | + Gemcitabine & Platinum Chemotherapy | Yes | ORIENT-12 |
Jun 2021 | Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) | First-line | + Bevacizumab Biosimilar (BYVASDA®) | Yes | ORIENT-32 |
Jun 2022 | Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC) | First-line | + Cisplatin & Paclitaxel/5-FU Chemotherapy | Yes | ORIENT-15 |
Jun 2022 | Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (G/GEJ) Adenocarcinoma | First-line | + Fluorouracil & Platinum Chemotherapy | Yes | ORIENT-16 |
May 2023 | EGFR-mutated Non-squamous NSCLC | Post-EGFR-TKI Progression | + Bevacizumab Biosimilar & Chemotherapy | Yes | ORIENT-31 |
Dec 2024 | Advanced Endometrial Cancer (pMMR) | Post-systemic therapy | + Fruquintinib | Conditional | FRUSICA-1 |
The attempt to bring Sintilimab to the U.S. market resulted in a significant regulatory setback that highlights a fundamental "globalization gap" in pharmaceutical development. In May 2021, the FDA accepted the Biologics License Application (BLA) for Sintilimab plus chemotherapy for first-line nonsquamous NSCLC, based on the positive ORIENT-11 trial.[29] However, in March 2022, the agency issued a Complete Response Letter (CRL), formally denying the application.[11]
The rejection was not based on a failure of the drug itself, but on the context and applicability of the clinical evidence provided. The FDA's Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) had previously voted 14-to-1 against approval, citing several critical deficiencies in the application.[13] The core issues were:
This divergence illustrates two different regulatory philosophies. The NMPA's approval of the ORIENT-11 data reflects a focus on addressing national health needs with robust, locally generated data. The FDA's rejection reflects a globalist and comparative framework, requiring new drugs to demonstrate their value against the current, best-available therapy in a patient population representative of the U.S. The FDA ultimately recommended that the sponsors conduct a new, multiregional clinical trial directly comparing Sintilimab to the U.S. standard of care.[13]
Table 4: Comparative Analysis of FDA BLA Submission (ORIENT-11) vs. U.S. Standard of Care (KEYNOTE-189)
Attribute | ORIENT-11 (Sintilimab) | KEYNOTE-189 (Pembrolizumab) |
---|---|---|
Patient Population | 100% Asian (China only) | Multiregional, diverse ethnicity |
Comparator Arm | Placebo + Chemotherapy | Placebo + Chemotherapy |
Primary Endpoint | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | Overall Survival (OS) & PFS |
Median OS Result | Not Reached vs. 16.8 mo (Updated) | 22.0 mo vs. 10.7 mo |
Median PFS Result | 8.9 mo vs. 5.0 mo (HR 0.482) | 9.0 mo vs. 4.9 mo (HR 0.48) |
Sintilimab's regulatory engagement in Europe is in its early stages and it does not currently have marketing authorization. On February 28, 2020, the EMA granted Sintilimab an orphan drug designation for the treatment of Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, a rare malignancy.[59] This designation provides incentives and regulatory support for the development of drugs for rare diseases but is not an approval for marketing.[60] Additionally, in April 2021, the EMA granted a waiver for a Paediatric Investigation Plan (PIP) for Sintilimab in lung cancer, indicating some level of regulatory interaction for this indication.[62]
Sintilimab operates in a highly competitive global market for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, which includes well-entrenched blockbuster drugs such as pembrolizumab (Keytruda) and nivolumab (Opdivo). In China, it also competes with other domestically developed PD-1 inhibitors like camrelizumab and tislelizumab.
Direct comparative data is crucial for assessing a drug's relative performance. The CTONG1901 trial (NCT04252365) was a randomized Phase II study that provided the first head-to-head comparison of Sintilimab versus pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC.[63] The results demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety between the two agents. The ORR for patients receiving any Sintilimab-based regimen was 52.9%, compared to 32.4% for pembrolizumab-based regimens, a difference that was not statistically significant (
p=0.14). Key secondary endpoints, including DCR, PFS, and OS, were also found to be comparable between the two drugs.[64] This trial provides important evidence suggesting that Sintilimab is a non-inferior alternative to a global standard of care.
In the absence of multiple large head-to-head trials, indirect comparisons and meta-analyses provide valuable context. A meta-analysis that evaluated six different PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for first-line non-squamous NSCLC concluded that Sintilimab, when combined with chemotherapy, showed a comparable efficacy and safety profile to combinations involving pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and tislelizumab.[66] Similarly, a real-world study conducted in China found no significant differences in ORR or median PFS among first-line NSCLC patients treated with camrelizumab, pembrolizumab, tislelizumab, or sintilimab.[63] Multiple reviews also suggest that Sintilimab has similar anti-tumor effects to nivolumab and pembrolizumab, but with the potential for a more favorable safety profile.[10]
Sintilimab represents a major achievement in pharmaceutical development, showcasing the ability to create a highly effective, molecularly distinct immuno-oncology agent that can achieve market dominance within a major national healthcare system. Its success in China is a direct result of a well-executed clinical strategy that focused on generating robust data in high-incidence cancers through combination therapy trials, coupled with a strategic partnership that facilitated rapid regulatory approvals and broad reimbursement access through the NRDL.
However, the global trajectory of Sintilimab has been fundamentally altered by the FDA's 2022 Complete Response Letter. This decision has established a clear and challenging precedent, indicating that clinical data generated from a single, non-diverse population will not be sufficient for U.S. approval, especially in therapeutic areas with established standards of care. This "globalization gap" underscores the increasing complexity and cost of developing drugs for a multi-polar world with divergent regulatory expectations.
The future for Sintilimab will likely follow a dual path. In China, it is poised to continue its expansion through further label extensions and the development of novel combination therapies, solidifying its role as a standard-of-care backbone. Its global future, particularly in the U.S. and E.U., is contingent upon the willingness of its developers to invest in new, costly, and lengthy multiregional clinical trials that are designed to meet the specific evidentiary requirements of Western regulators. The journey of Sintilimab will therefore remain a critical case study for the global pharmaceutical industry, illustrating both the immense potential of emerging biopharma ecosystems and the significant hurdles that remain in translating national success into a global therapeutic reality.
Published at: July 18, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.