C21H16F4N4O2S
915087-33-1
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer, Metastatic Castration Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mCSPC), Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Enzalutamide is a pivotal second-generation, nonsteroidal antiandrogen (NSAA) that has fundamentally altered the therapeutic paradigm for patients with advanced prostate cancer.[1] As a potent and highly specific androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibitor, its mechanism of action is multifaceted, involving the blockade of androgen binding, prevention of AR nuclear translocation, and impairment of AR-DNA interaction.[1] This comprehensive inhibition of the primary oncogenic driver in prostate cancer has translated into remarkable clinical efficacy across a broad spectrum of disease states. Enzalutamide has demonstrated significant improvements in survival and delayed disease progression in metastatic and non-metastatic settings, as well as in both castration-sensitive and castration-resistant prostate cancer.[1] Marketed under the brand name Xtandi®, it is recognized as a cornerstone therapy, typically administered orally once daily in conjunction with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).[1] Its clinical utility is, however, balanced by a distinct and significant safety profile characterized by fatigue, cardiovascular events, and an increased risk of falls and fractures, which necessitates proactive and vigilant clinical management.[5]
Enzalutamide is classified as a small molecule androgen receptor inhibitor.[7] Its development represented a significant evolution from first-generation NSAAs, such as bicalutamide, by offering substantially higher binding affinity for the AR—approximately eight times greater—and a more complete blockade of the AR signaling pathway without the partial agonist activity that limited the efficacy of its predecessors.[1] This mechanistic superiority has established enzalutamide as a "second-generation" agent, capable of inducing apoptosis in prostate cancer cells and demonstrating efficacy in settings where older agents have failed.[7] Its profound impact on the management of prostate cancer is underscored by its inclusion on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines for malignant neoplasms of the prostate.[2]
The trajectory of enzalutamide's clinical development and regulatory approvals reflects a major strategic shift in oncology. The drug's journey began with an initial approval in 2012 for patients in the most advanced, refractory setting: metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) following chemotherapy.[4] Success in this population led to its systematic evaluation and subsequent approval in progressively earlier stages of the disease. This includes pre-chemotherapy mCRPC, non-metastatic CRPC (where the goal shifted from prolonging life to delaying the onset of metastasis), and ultimately into castration-sensitive disease states.[4] This timeline demonstrates a clear and successful trend of moving a highly effective agent to earlier lines of therapy. The underlying principle is that targeting the primary driver of prostate cancer—the AR pathway—more potently and earlier in the disease course can yield deeper and more durable responses, delaying progression to more aggressive, resistant states and ultimately improving long-term outcomes like overall survival. This represents a fundamental paradigm shift from the historical approach of reserving the most potent therapies for later, more desperate stages of the disease.
Enzalutamide, originally developed under the code MDV3100, is marketed globally under the brand name Xtandi® by Astellas Pharma and Pfizer, following a collaboration established in 2009.[1] It has secured regulatory approval from major health authorities worldwide, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and others, for a range of prostate cancer indications.[4]
A precise understanding of a drug's physicochemical properties is fundamental to its clinical pharmacology and application. Enzalutamide is a well-characterized small molecule with specific identifiers, chemical features, and formulations that dictate its behavior in vivo.
To ensure unambiguous reference, enzalutamide is cataloged under multiple standard identifiers. Its developmental code was MDV3100 (also cited as MDV-3100 or HC-1119).[2] The systematic IUPAC chemical name is 4-(3-(4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-5,5-dimethyl-4-oxo-2-thioxoimidazolidin-1-yl)-2-fluoro-N-methylbenzamide.[1] Key database identifiers are summarized in Table 1.
Enzalutamide possesses a molecular formula of C21H16F4N4O2S and a molecular weight of 464.44 g/mol.[9] Structurally, it is a complex thiohydantoin derivative, belonging to several chemical classes, including benzamides, imidazolidinones, nitriles, and organofluorine compounds.[2] It presents as a white to off-white, crystalline, non-hygroscopic solid.[15]
A critical property influencing its formulation and pharmacokinetics is its solubility. Enzalutamide is practically insoluble in water, with an aqueous solubility of ≤2.0 μg/mL across the physiological pH range.[16] However, it is soluble in organic solvents such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and dimethylformamide (DMF).[14] This combination of low aqueous solubility and high membrane permeability across Caco-2 monolayers classifies enzalutamide as a Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) Class 2 drug.[17] The BCS Class 2 designation is a defining physicochemical characteristic that directly informs its formulation science, oral bioavailability, and potential for food-drug interactions. Drugs with low solubility often require advanced formulation technologies to improve their dissolution rate and subsequent absorption. The initial formulation of enzalutamide as a liquid-filled soft gelatin capsule containing a solution in caprylocaproyl macrogolglycerides is a classic example of a lipid-based strategy designed to enhance the solubilization of a lipophilic, poorly soluble compound in the gastrointestinal tract.[16] For many BCS Class 2 drugs, administration with food, particularly high-fat meals, can increase absorption by stimulating bile flow and enhancing drug solubilization. However, dedicated clinical studies for enzalutamide have demonstrated that while food may alter the rate of absorption (Cmax), it does not have a clinically significant effect on the overall extent of absorption (AUC).[18] This indicates that the formulation is sufficiently robust to overcome major food-related absorption variability, a desirable clinical characteristic that simplifies administration instructions and improves convenience for patients.[6]
Enzalutamide is available for oral administration in two primary dosage forms: liquid-filled soft gelatin capsules and film-coated tablets.[6] The capsules are available in a 40 mg strength, while the tablets are available in both 40 mg and 80 mg strengths.[2] The development of a tablet formulation subsequent to the initial capsule likely represents a product life-cycle management strategy aimed at improving patient convenience, potentially by reducing the pill burden from four capsules to two tablets for the standard daily dose. Regardless of the formulation, administration instructions are consistent: the capsules or tablets must be swallowed whole with water and must not be chewed, crushed, dissolved, or opened, to ensure the integrity of the formulation and predictable drug release.[20]
Table 1: Drug Identification and Physicochemical Properties
Property | Value | Source(s) |
---|---|---|
Generic Name | Enzalutamide | 1 |
Brand Name | Xtandi® | 1 |
DrugBank ID | DB08899 | 1 |
CAS Number | 915087-33-1 | 1 |
IUPAC Name | 4-(3-(4-cyano-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-5,5-dimethyl-4-oxo-2-thioxoimidazolidin-1-yl)-2-fluoro-N-methylbenzamide | 1 |
Molecular Formula | C21H16F4N4O2S | 9 |
Molecular Weight | 464.44 g/mol | 9 |
Chemical Class | Thiohydantoin derivative, Nonsteroidal Antiandrogen (NSAA) | 1 |
Physical Appearance | White to off-white crystalline solid | 15 |
Solubility | Practically insoluble in water; Soluble in DMSO, DMF | 14 |
BCS Class | Class 2 (Low Solubility, High Permeability) | 17 |
Available Formulations | Liquid-filled soft gelatin capsules; Film-coated tablets | 6 |
Available Strengths | Capsules: 40 mg; Tablets: 40 mg, 80 mg | 6 |
The clinical efficacy of enzalutamide is rooted in its potent and distinct pharmacological properties. Its mechanism of action represents a more complete inhibition of the androgen receptor signaling pathway compared to its predecessors, and its pharmacodynamic effects on the endocrine system and central nervous system are critical to understanding both its therapeutic benefit and its side effect profile.
Enzalutamide is a potent, selective, and silent antagonist of the androgen receptor (AR), the primary driver of prostate cancer growth.[1] Its designation as a second-generation NSAA stems from its significantly enhanced efficacy over first-generation agents like bicalutamide, which is attributable to both a higher binding affinity and a more comprehensive mechanism of action that lacks the partial agonist activity seen with older drugs.[1]
The superiority of enzalutamide is not merely a quantitative improvement in potency but a qualitative advancement in its mechanism. While first-generation agents primarily act as competitive antagonists at the ligand-binding site, they can exhibit partial agonist properties and may not fully prevent the nuclear translocation of the AR.[1] Enzalutamide overcomes these limitations through a multi-step inhibitory process that effectively shuts down the entire downstream signaling cascade, which explains its efficacy in castration-resistant states where the AR pathway is often hyperactivated.[3] This multifaceted mechanism includes:
This comprehensive blockade of the AR signaling pathway culminates in decreased proliferation and increased apoptosis (programmed cell death) of prostate cancer cells, leading to tumor regression in preclinical models and robust clinical activity, even in cell lines resistant to bicalutamide.[7]
The pharmacodynamic effects of enzalutamide extend beyond the tumor cell to systemic hormonal and neurological systems.
Hormonal Effects and the Necessity of Castration: A key pharmacodynamic consequence of enzalutamide's potent AR blockade is a paradoxical surge in the very hormones it is designed to inhibit when used as a monotherapy. By blocking ARs in the pituitary gland, enzalutamide disrupts the negative feedback loop that testosterone normally exerts to suppress the secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH).[1] Without this feedback, the pituitary releases more LH, which in turn stimulates the testes to produce more testosterone. Clinical studies of enzalutamide monotherapy have documented dramatic increases in circulating levels of LH (over 300%), testosterone (over 100%), DHT (over 50%), and estradiol (over 70%).[1] This physiological response underscores the absolute necessity of co-administering enzalutamide with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analog or after bilateral orchiectomy in most clinical settings. This concomitant medical or surgical castration suppresses testicular androgen production, preventing a hormonal surge that could potentially overcome the drug's receptor blockade and fuel tumor growth.[5]
Exposure-Response Relationship: The standard 160 mg once-daily dose has been shown to be effective across a wide range of patient exposures. An exposure-response analysis from a pivotal phase III trial found that all quartiles of patients, grouped by their steady-state trough drug concentrations, derived a uniform survival benefit relative to placebo. No specific plasma concentration threshold was identified above which efficacy was improved, suggesting that the 160 mg dose achieves sufficient AR saturation and clinical benefit for the vast majority of patients.[17]
Central Nervous System Effects: Enzalutamide and its active metabolite are known to cross the blood-brain barrier.[16] The drug's primary neurological toxicity, a lowered seizure threshold, is believed to result from off-target inhibition of the GABA-gated chloride channel in the central nervous system.[1] This mechanism is also thought to contribute to other observed CNS-related side effects, such as anxiety, insomnia, and cognitive disturbances.[1]
The pharmacokinetic profile of enzalutamide is characterized by robust oral absorption, extensive distribution, primary hepatic metabolism via a key cytochrome P450 enzyme, and a notably long elimination half-life for both the parent drug and its active metabolite. These properties are central to its dosing schedule and drug interaction profile.
Absorption: Following oral administration, enzalutamide is well absorbed, with an estimated absolute bioavailability of at least 84.2%.[16] Peak plasma concentrations (Tmax) are typically reached within 1 to 2 hours after dosing.[16] A key clinical advantage is the lack of a significant food effect; while a high-fat meal can delay absorption, it does not meaningfully alter the overall extent of exposure (AUC), allowing for convenient administration with or without food.[17]
Distribution: Enzalutamide exhibits extensive extravascular distribution, as indicated by its large apparent volume of distribution (V/F) of approximately 110 L.[16] Both enzalutamide and its principal active metabolite, N-desmethyl enzalutamide, are capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier, a property consistent with the observed central nervous system side effects.[16] The drug is highly bound to plasma proteins, with protein binding measuring 97-98% for enzalutamide and 95% for its metabolites.[18] It is not a substrate for the major efflux drug transporters P-glycoprotein (P-gp) or Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP).[16]
Metabolism: Enzalutamide is cleared from the body almost exclusively through extensive hepatic metabolism.[7] The primary metabolic pathway involves oxidation mediated by the cytochrome P450 enzyme
CYP2C8. The enzyme CYP3A4/5 plays a secondary, lesser role in its metabolism.[16] This heavy reliance on CYP2C8 for clearance is the basis for its most critical drug-drug interactions.
Metabolites: Two major metabolites are found in human plasma:
Elimination and Half-Life: The products of hepatic metabolism are eliminated primarily via renal excretion. Following a radiolabeled dose, 71% is recovered in the urine (mostly as the inactive carboxylic acid metabolite) and 14% is recovered in the feces.[7]
The elimination half-lives of both enzalutamide and its active metabolite are notably long. This characteristic is a double-edged sword: it allows for convenient once-daily dosing but also means that adverse effects, once they develop, can be slow to resolve after dose interruption. The time required for a drug to be eliminated from the body is approximately five half-lives; for the active metabolite of enzalutamide, this could be longer than 40 days. This slow washout period is a critical consideration for clinicians managing toxicity, as patients must be counseled that side effects like fatigue may not resolve quickly after stopping the drug.
Steady State and Accumulation: The long half-life dictates that steady-state plasma concentrations are not achieved until approximately day 28 of continuous dosing.[17] This implies that the full therapeutic effect, and potentially the full extent of side effects, may not become apparent for the first month of treatment. With once-daily administration, enzalutamide accumulates approximately 8.3-fold relative to a single dose.[16]
Special Populations:
The primary reliance on CYP2C8 for metabolism makes enzalutamide uniquely vulnerable to strong inhibitors of this specific enzyme, representing a critical and potentially overlooked interaction pathway. While many clinicians are highly attuned to interactions involving the more ubiquitous CYP3A4 enzyme, the central role of CYP2C8 for enzalutamide clearance is its Achilles' heel. The FDA label and European prescribing information provide stern warnings and specific dose-reduction mandates when co-administration with strong CYP2C8 inhibitors (e.g., gemfibrozil) is unavoidable.[21] Quantitative data show that gemfibrozil can increase the systemic exposure (AUC) of enzalutamide by over 300%, a massive increase that would almost certainly elevate the risk of toxicity.[26] This underscores the critical need for heightened vigilance and thorough medication review by a pharmacist to identify and manage this specific interaction.
Table 2: Summary of Key Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Enzalutamide and N-desmethyl Enzalutamide
Parameter | Enzalutamide | N-desmethyl Enzalutamide | Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|
Bioavailability | ≥84.2% | N/A (Metabolite) | 16 |
Tmax (Time to Peak) | 1–2 hours | Slower to form | 16 |
Food Effect on AUC | No clinically significant effect | No clinically significant effect | 18 |
Protein Binding | 97–98% | 95% | 18 |
Volume of Distribution (V/F) | ~110 L | N/A | 16 |
Primary Metabolic Enzyme | CYP2C8 (major), CYP3A4/5 (minor) | N/A (Metabolite) | 16 |
Half-life (t1/2) | 5.8 days | 7.8–8.6 days | 7 |
Time to Steady State | ~28 days | ~28 days | 17 |
Primary Route of Elimination | Hepatic metabolism, renal excretion of metabolites | Hepatic metabolism, renal excretion of metabolites | 7 |
The clinical development of enzalutamide has been marked by a series of successful pivotal trials, systematically establishing its efficacy across a remarkably broad range of advanced prostate cancer disease states. This consistent and robust evidence base validates the central role of potent AR signaling inhibition as a therapeutic strategy throughout the disease continuum. In nearly every clinically relevant stage of advanced prostate cancer, enzalutamide has demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in major endpoints such as overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), or radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS). This consistent success suggests that even as the cancer evolves to become castration-resistant or metastasizes, its dependence on the AR signaling pathway remains a critical and exploitable vulnerability. This positions enzalutamide not as a niche drug for a specific stage, but as a foundational agent that can be deployed at multiple points in a patient's treatment journey.
Post-Chemotherapy (AFFIRM Trial): Enzalutamide's initial FDA approval was secured based on the results of the AFFIRM trial, which enrolled 1,199 men with mCRPC whose disease had progressed after treatment with docetaxel chemotherapy.[4] The trial demonstrated a significant OS benefit, which was the primary endpoint. Beyond survival, a pre-planned secondary analysis of AFFIRM revealed critical benefits related to bone health. In this population, where bone metastases are nearly ubiquitous, enzalutamide significantly reduced the risk of skeletal-related events (SREs)—such as radiation to the bone or spinal cord compression—by 31% compared to placebo. It also significantly delayed the median time to the first SRE to 16.7 months versus 13.3 months for placebo.[28] Furthermore, treatment with enzalutamide led to significant improvements in pain control and overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL).[28]
Chemotherapy-Naïve (PREVAIL Trial): Following its success in the post-chemotherapy setting, the indication was expanded based on the PREVAIL trial, which studied 1,717 men with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC.[11] PREVAIL demonstrated powerful efficacy, with enzalutamide significantly reducing the risk of death by 29% (Hazard Ratio 0.71) and the risk of radiographic progression or death by an impressive 83% (HR 0.17) compared to placebo.[7] Final analysis reported a median OS of 35.3 months for the enzalutamide arm versus 31.3 months for the placebo arm.[29] A key practical benefit was a 17-month delay in the median time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy for patients receiving enzalutamide, preserving quality of life by postponing more toxic treatments.[13]
PROSPER Trial: Enzalutamide's role expanded into the pre-metastatic setting with the PROSPER trial. This study randomized 1,401 men with NM-CRPC and a rapidly rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (doubling time ≤ 10 months), a population at high risk for developing metastases.[12] The primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival (MFS). Enzalutamide demonstrated a profound benefit, nearly tripling the median MFS from 14.7 months with placebo to 36.6 months (HR 0.29), representing a 71% reduction in the risk of metastasis or death.[12] Importantly, this MFS benefit translated into a significant overall survival advantage in the final analysis, with a median OS of 67.0 months for enzalutamide versus 56.3 months for placebo (HR 0.73).[29]
ARCHES and ENZAMET Trials: The efficacy of enzalutamide was next proven in the castration-sensitive setting, where the goal is to intensify initial ADT.
The ENZAMET trial's design provides nuanced data that helps deconstruct the benefits of "triplet" versus "doublet" therapy. While the overall trial was positive for enzalutamide, exploratory subgroup analyses suggested that the magnitude of the OS benefit was less pronounced in patients who also received docetaxel (HR 0.82) compared to the overall cohort (HR 0.70).[35] The benefit appeared greatest in patients with low-volume disease who did not receive chemotherapy. This suggests that for patients with low-volume mCSPC, potent hormonal therapy (ADT plus enzalutamide) may be a highly effective and sufficient strategy. Conversely, for patients with high-volume disease, the data supports the use of triplet therapy (ADT plus docetaxel plus enzalutamide) to achieve the best outcomes.[36] This challenges a "one-size-fits-all" approach to treatment intensification and supports a more personalized strategy based on disease volume and patient fitness for chemotherapy.
EMBARK Trial: The most recent indication expansion was based on the EMBARK trial, which targeted a very early disease state: men with high-risk BCR following definitive local therapy (prostatectomy or radiation) who were not yet castrate-resistant.[4] The trial had three arms: enzalutamide plus leuprolide (combination), enzalutamide monotherapy, and placebo plus leuprolide (ADT alone). Both enzalutamide-containing arms demonstrated superior MFS compared to ADT alone. The combination arm showed a 58% lower risk of metastasis or death, while the monotherapy arm showed a 37% lower risk.[29] The combination therapy also resulted in a statistically significant improvement in overall survival.[37] These results established a new standard of care for this high-risk population, offering a way to intervene early to prevent or delay metastatic progression.
Table 3: Summary of Pivotal Phase 3 Clinical Trials for Enzalutamide
Trial Name (Acronym) | Indication | Patient Population | N | Treatment Arms | Primary Endpoint | Key Result (HR [95% CI]; p-value) | Key Secondary Endpoint (OS) | Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFFIRM | mCRPC | Post-docetaxel | 1,199 | Enzalutamide vs. Placebo | Overall Survival (OS) | HR 0.63 [0.53, 0.75]; p<0.001 | N/A (Primary) | 4 |
PREVAIL | mCRPC | Chemotherapy-naïve | 1,717 | Enzalutamide vs. Placebo | Co-primary: rPFS & OS | rPFS: HR 0.19 [0.15, 0.23]; p<0.001 | OS: HR 0.71 [0.60, 0.84]; p<0.001 | 4 |
PROSPER | NM-CRPC | High-risk (PSADT ≤10 mo) | 1,401 | Enzalutamide vs. Placebo | Metastasis-Free Survival (MFS) | HR 0.29 [0.24, 0.35]; p<0.001 | OS: HR 0.73 [0.61, 0.89]; p=0.001 | 4 |
ARCHES | mCSPC | Metastatic, hormone-sensitive | 1,150 | Enzalutamide + ADT vs. Placebo + ADT | Radiographic PFS (rPFS) | HR 0.39 [0.30, 0.50]; p<0.001 | OS: HR 0.66 [0.53, 0.81]; p<0.001 | 4 |
ENZAMET | mCSPC | Metastatic, hormone-sensitive | 1,125 | Enzalutamide + SoC vs. NSAA + SoC | Overall Survival (OS) | HR 0.70 [0.58, 0.84]; p<0.001 | N/A (Primary) | 4 |
EMBARK | nmCSPC | High-risk BCR | 1,068 | Enza + ADT vs. Enza mono vs. ADT | Metastasis-Free Survival (MFS) | Enza+ADT vs ADT: HR 0.42 [0.30, 0.61]; p<0.001 | OS (Enza+ADT): HR 0.59 [0.39, 0.89]; p=0.01 | 4 |
While enzalutamide has demonstrated profound efficacy, its use is associated with a distinct and clinically significant safety profile. A thorough understanding of its adverse reactions, warnings, and precautions is essential for appropriate patient selection, counseling, and proactive management to maintain quality of life and ensure treatment adherence.
Across pivotal clinical trials, a consistent pattern of common adverse reactions has emerged. The most frequently reported events (generally occurring in ≥10% of patients) are systemic, musculoskeletal, and gastrointestinal in nature. These include asthenia/fatigue, which is particularly prominent and reported in up to 51% of patients, back pain, musculoskeletal pain, arthralgia, hot flush, diarrhea, peripheral edema, headache, and hypertension.[5] Other common side effects include decreased appetite, dizziness, constipation, and upper respiratory tract infections.[5]
The FDA-approved prescribing information for enzalutamide includes several important warnings and precautions highlighting the most serious potential risks of therapy.
Seizure: Enzalutamide is associated with a risk of seizure, as it can lower the seizure threshold.[1] In pooled data from randomized trials, seizures occurred in 0.6% of patients receiving enzalutamide.[30] The risk is elevated in patients with predisposing factors, such as a prior history of seizure, traumatic brain injury, stroke, brain tumors, or concomitant use of medications known to lower the seizure threshold; in a study dedicated to this higher-risk population, 2.2% of patients experienced a seizure.[1] Patients must be counseled on this risk and advised to avoid activities where a sudden loss of consciousness could cause serious harm to themselves or others. If a patient develops a seizure during treatment, enzalutamide should be permanently discontinued.[5]
Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES): Rare cases of PRES, a neurological disorder characterized by rapidly evolving symptoms including seizure, headache, lethargy, confusion, and visual disturbances, have been reported.[20] A diagnosis requires confirmation by brain imaging (preferably MRI), and the condition necessitates permanent discontinuation of enzalutamide.[5]
Ischemic Heart Disease: Clinical trials have demonstrated an increased risk of ischemic heart disease. Pooled data from five randomized, placebo-controlled studies showed that ischemic heart disease occurred more commonly in patients on the enzalutamide arm compared to placebo (3.5% vs 2.0%).[30] The incidence of severe (Grade 3-4) ischemic events was 1.8% with enzalutamide versus 1.1% with placebo, and these events led to death in 0.4% of patients on enzalutamide compared to 0.1% on placebo.[5] This risk necessitates careful monitoring for signs and symptoms of ischemic heart disease and optimization of cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia.[21]
Falls and Fractures: The safety profile of enzalutamide reveals a clinically significant cascade of related toxicities. The drug's direct CNS effects, particularly fatigue and dizziness, act as a primary catalyst for an increased risk of falls. In an elderly patient population already predisposed to bone density loss from concomitant ADT, these falls translate into a high rate of fractures. This is not three separate side effects, but one interconnected geriatric syndrome that requires a multi-pronged management approach. Across clinical trials, falls were reported in 11-13% of patients treated with enzalutamide compared to 4% with placebo, and fractures occurred in 10% of patients versus 4% with placebo.[6] This elevated risk requires clinicians to evaluate patients for fall and fracture risk at baseline and throughout treatment, and to consider the use of bone-targeted agents (e.g., denosumab, bisphosphonates) according to established treatment guidelines.[5]
Hypersensitivity: Hypersensitivity reactions, including edema of the face, tongue, or lips, have been observed.[21] More severe reactions, such as pharyngeal edema, have been reported in post-marketing cases. Patients should be advised to discontinue the drug and seek immediate medical care if symptoms of hypersensitivity occur. Serious reactions warrant permanent discontinuation of enzalutamide.[21]
Embryo-Fetal Toxicity: Enzalutamide can cause fetal harm and loss of pregnancy when administered to a pregnant female. Although not indicated for use in women, this warning is critical for patient counseling. Males with female partners of reproductive potential must be advised to use effective contraception (e.g., a condom plus another effective method) during treatment and for 3 months following the final dose.[5]
Dysphagia or Choking: A specific warning has been added regarding the potential for swallowing problems or choking, which may be related to the size of the oral formulations.[20]
Beyond the formal warnings, several other adverse events are common and can significantly impact quality of life. These include cognitive and psychiatric effects such as memory impairment, anxiety, and visual hallucinations [1];
endocrine effects like gynecomastia and breast tenderness [1]; and
hematologic effects such as neutropenia.[1]
The choice between enzalutamide and other novel hormonal agents like abiraterone may be influenced by a patient's specific comorbidities, particularly cardiovascular health. While both drugs carry cardiovascular risks, their profiles differ. Enzalutamide is more directly associated with hypertension and ischemic events.[43] In contrast, abiraterone's risk is often mediated by a secondary mineralocorticoid excess (causing hypertension, hypokalemia, and fluid retention), which necessitates co-administration with prednisone to mitigate.[45] Real-world data and meta-analyses suggest that abiraterone may be associated with a higher short-term risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and heart failure compared to enzalutamide.[46] This distinction allows for a more personalized risk-benefit assessment; for instance, a patient with pre-existing heart failure might be a poorer candidate for abiraterone, whereas a patient with a history of seizures would be a poorer candidate for enzalutamide.
Table 4: Adverse Reactions Reported in ≥5% of Patients in Pooled Clinical Trials
System Organ Class | Adverse Reaction | Frequency Category | Enzalutamide (%) | Placebo (%) | Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
General Disorders | Asthenia/Fatigue | Very Common | 51 | 46 | 7 |
Peripheral Edema | Very Common | 15 | 12 | 7 | |
Musculoskeletal | Back Pain | Very Common | 29 | 26 | 7 |
Arthralgia | Very Common | 21 | 17 | 7 | |
Musculoskeletal Pain | Very Common | 15 | 12 | 7 | |
Muscular Weakness | Common | 9 | 6 | 6 | |
Nervous System | Headache | Very Common | 12 | 6 | 5 |
Dizziness/Vertigo | Very Common | 12 | 7 | 5 | |
Falls | Very Common | 13 | 5 | 6 | |
Cognitive Impairment | Common | 5 | 2 | 1 | |
Seizure | Rare | 0.6 | 0 | 1 | |
Gastrointestinal | Diarrhea | Very Common | 22 | 18 | 1 |
Constipation | Very Common | 23 | 18 | 39 | |
Vascular | Hot Flush | Very Common | 20 | 10 | 5 |
Hypertension | Very Common | 14 | 5 | 6 | |
Metabolism | Decreased Appetite | Very Common | 19 | 16 | 5 |
Psychiatric | Insomnia | Common | 9 | 6 | 1 |
Anxiety | Common | 6 | 4 | 1 | |
Reproductive System | Gynecomastia | Common | N/A | N/A | 1 |
Note: Frequencies and percentages are drawn from various pooled analyses and individual trial reports; direct comparison may vary based on the specific study population and duration. "N/A" indicates data was not presented in a comparable format in the provided sources. |
Effective management of enzalutamide-associated adverse events is crucial for maintaining patient quality of life, ensuring treatment adherence, and maximizing the drug's therapeutic potential. Strategies often involve a combination of non-pharmacologic interventions, supportive care medications, and, when necessary, dose modification.
Fatigue (Asthenia): As the most common adverse event, fatigue requires a proactive management approach.[39] Non-pharmacologic strategies are the first line of defense and include educating the patient on the importance of pacing daily activities, incorporating gentle physical exercise (which has been shown to paradoxically improve cancer-related fatigue), and ensuring adequate rest and sleep hygiene.[49] Pharmacologic interventions with stimulants have shown inconsistent results in the setting of ADT-induced fatigue.[51]
A critical management strategy for severe or intolerable fatigue is dose modification. Clinical data show that fatigue is a primary driver for dose reduction (affecting 13% of patients) and treatment discontinuation (6%).[48] This has spurred research into whether lower doses can maintain efficacy while improving tolerability. Emerging data on dose reduction represents a significant evolution in the clinical use of enzalutamide, shifting from a "one-dose-fits-all" model to a more personalized approach. Pharmacokinetic studies suggest that AR saturation may be achieved at doses lower than the standard 160 mg.[52] The NCT03927391 trial provided direct evidence for this, demonstrating that a reduced starting dose of 120 mg daily significantly lessened the severity of CNS side effects, including fatigue and cognitive decline, compared to the 160 mg dose. Crucially, this improvement in tolerability was achieved without compromising efficacy, as patients on the lower dose maintained therapeutic plasma concentrations and equivalent PSA response rates.[52] For frail, elderly patients or those experiencing significant CNS toxicity, a proactive dose reduction to 120 mg is an evidence-based strategy that can improve quality of life and help keep them on this life-prolonging therapy.
Seizure Risk: Management is centered on prevention through careful patient selection and education. The drug should be avoided in patients with a significant history of seizures or other major predisposing factors.[5] All patients must be counseled on the risk and advised to avoid activities where a sudden loss of consciousness could be dangerous (e.g., driving, operating heavy machinery).[5] If a seizure occurs, enzalutamide must be permanently discontinued.[5]
Hypertension: Regular blood pressure monitoring is essential for all patients starting enzalutamide.[49] Management of new or worsening hypertension should follow standard clinical guidelines, incorporating lifestyle modifications (e.g., low-sodium diet, exercise) and the initiation or titration of antihypertensive medications.[50]
Ischemic Heart Disease: Proactive management involves monitoring for signs and symptoms (e.g., chest pain, dyspnea on exertion) and aggressively managing underlying cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia.[21] For patients who develop severe (Grade 3-4) ischemic heart disease, treatment with enzalutamide should be discontinued.[21]
Falls and Fractures: Mitigating the high risk of falls and fractures requires a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach.
Gynecomastia: The development of breast enlargement and tenderness is a common and often distressing side effect, particularly when enzalutamide is used as a monotherapy.[1] The underlying pathophysiology is an imbalance between estrogen and androgen effects on breast tissue, where the potent AR blockade by enzalutamide allows unopposed estrogenic stimulation.[56]
Hot Flushes: This is a very common side effect of androgen deprivation. Management typically begins with lifestyle modifications, such as wearing layered clothing, maintaining a cool ambient temperature, and avoiding potential triggers like caffeine and alcohol.[49] For severe or bothersome hot flushes, various pharmacologic interventions can be considered.
The safe and effective use of enzalutamide requires strict adherence to recommended dosing, administration guidelines, and careful management of its complex drug interaction profile.
The standard recommended dosage of enzalutamide is 160 mg administered orally once daily.[5] This dose can be administered as four 40 mg capsules or two 80 mg tablets.[61] It should be taken at approximately the same time each day, but can be taken with or without food.[40] Patients must be instructed to swallow the capsules or tablets whole with water and to not chew, crush, dissolve, or open them.[21]
For most approved indications—specifically mCRPC, nmCRPC, and mCSPC—patients receiving enzalutamide should also receive a concomitant GnRH analog or have undergone a bilateral orchiectomy to maintain medical or surgical castration.[5] For the indication of nmCSPC with high-risk BCR, treatment may be administered with or without a GnRH analog, and intermittent therapy may be considered.[22]
The prescribing information provides clear guidelines for dose modification in response to toxicity or drug interactions.
The drug interaction profile of enzalutamide is complex and bidirectional. It is not only affected by other drugs that modulate its metabolism but also significantly affects the metabolism of a wide range of other medications. This makes a thorough medication review by a clinical pharmacist an essential safety measure before initiating and during therapy.
Enzalutamide as a Victim of Interactions: As detailed previously, enzalutamide is a substrate of CYP2C8 (major) and CYP3A4 (minor). Its plasma concentrations can be significantly increased by strong CYP2C8 inhibitors, necessitating a dose reduction, or decreased by strong CYP3A4 inducers, necessitating a dose increase.[21]
Enzalutamide as a Perpetrator of Interactions: Enzalutamide is a strong inducer of CYP3A4 and a moderate inducer of CYP2C9 and CYP2C19.[2] This means it can accelerate the metabolism of many co-administered drugs that are substrates for these enzymes, potentially leading to decreased plasma concentrations and loss of therapeutic efficacy.
Table 5: Clinically Significant Drug-Drug Interactions with Enzalutamide
Part A: Drugs Affecting Enzalutamide Concentrations | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Interacting Drug Class | Example Drug(s) | Effect on Enzalutamide | Recommended Management | Source(s) |
Strong CYP2C8 Inhibitors | Gemfibrozil | ↑ Enzalutamide levels, ↑ risk of toxicity | Avoid co-administration. If unavoidable, reduce enzalutamide dose to 80 mg/day. | 21 |
Strong CYP3A4 Inducers | Rifampin, Carbamazepine, Phenytoin, St. John's Wort | ↓ Enzalutamide levels, ↓ efficacy | Avoid co-administration. If unavoidable, increase enzalutamide dose to 240 mg/day. | 21 |
Part B: Enzalutamide Affecting Other Drug Concentrations | ||||
Affected Drug Class (Enzyme Substrate) | Example Drug(s) | Effect on Substrate | Recommended Management | Source(s) |
CYP3A4 Substrates | Midazolam, certain statins (e.g., simvastatin), certain calcium channel blockers, certain immunosuppressants (e.g., tacrolimus) | ↓ Substrate levels, ↓ efficacy | Avoid co-administration if possible. If necessary, may require dose increase of the substrate drug with careful monitoring. | 21 |
CYP2C9 Substrates | Warfarin, Phenytoin | ↓ Substrate levels, ↓ efficacy | Avoid co-administration if possible. For warfarin, conduct additional INR monitoring and adjust warfarin dose as needed. | 21 |
CYP2C19 Substrates | Omeprazole, Clopidogrel | ↓ Substrate levels, ↓ efficacy | Avoid co-administration if possible. Consider alternative agents that are not metabolized by CYP2C19. | 21 |
The regulatory history of enzalutamide is a compelling case study in successful, evidence-driven drug development. It illustrates a strategic and systematic approach to expanding a drug's utility, moving from a late-stage, refractory setting to an early-stage, preventative one, thereby transforming the standard of care at multiple points along the prostate cancer treatment continuum.
Enzalutamide was originally developed under the code MDV3100 by the biopharmaceutical company Medivation, Inc. In October 2009, Medivation entered into a major global collaboration agreement with Astellas Pharma Inc. to jointly develop and commercialize the drug.[13] Under the agreement, the companies collaborate on a comprehensive development program and jointly commercialize the product, now branded as Xtandi®, in the United States. Astellas holds the responsibility for manufacturing and for regulatory filings and commercialization outside the U.S..[13] Following Pfizer's acquisition of Medivation, the drug is now co-marketed by Astellas and Pfizer.[63]
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted a series of approvals for enzalutamide, each expanding its indicated patient population based on the results of landmark clinical trials.
Enzalutamide has also been approved by other major regulatory bodies worldwide. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) granted its initial marketing authorization on June 21, 2013, which has been followed by subsequent expansions of the indication to align with its proven efficacy in various prostate cancer settings.[4] Approvals were also secured from Health Canada (May 29, 2013) and Japan's Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) (March 24, 2014).[4]
The clinical development of enzalutamide continues to evolve, with current research focused on two primary frontiers: creating novel combination therapies to overcome resistance and further improve outcomes, and exploring its utility in new clinical settings, including earlier stages of prostate cancer and other malignancies. This research landscape reflects a broader trend in oncology where the goal is to attack cancer from multiple angles simultaneously to achieve deeper, more durable responses and delay the emergence of resistance.
While enzalutamide is a highly effective monotherapy (with ADT), resistance inevitably develops. The most active area of current research, therefore, involves combining it with agents that have different mechanisms of action.
Earlier Stages of Prostate Cancer: The ENACT trial (NCT02799745) explored the use of enzalutamide in a preventative setting for men with low- or intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer who were undergoing active surveillance (AS).[74] The results of this phase II study perfectly illustrate the therapeutic index dilemma of moving effective but potentially toxic therapies into earlier, less-lethal disease states. The trial demonstrated that one year of enzalutamide monotherapy significantly reduced the risk of pathological or therapeutic disease progression by 46% compared to AS alone.[75] However, this delay in progression came at the cost of a significant side effect burden, including fatigue in 55% of patients and gynecomastia in 37%.[76] This raises a critical clinical question: is a delay in progression worth the guaranteed toxicity and impact on quality of life in a population where the primary goal of AS is to
avoid treatment and its associated side effects? For now, these findings suggest enzalutamide is unlikely to become a standard of care in the AS population, but they open the door for future research into lower, better-tolerated doses or intermittent therapy schedules in this setting.
Other Malignancies: The utility of enzalutamide is also being investigated beyond prostate cancer. Since some breast cancers express the androgen receptor, a phase II trial (NCT01889238) was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of enzalutamide in patients with advanced, AR-positive, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a subtype with limited targeted therapy options.[7]
Enzalutamide has unequivocally established itself as a highly potent, second-generation androgen receptor signaling inhibitor and a cornerstone of modern therapy for advanced prostate cancer. Its clinical value is supported by a wealth of high-level evidence from a series of landmark clinical trials that have systematically proven its efficacy across the entire disease continuum. From delaying the onset of metastases in non-metastatic disease to significantly extending overall survival in metastatic, castration-sensitive, and castration-resistant settings, enzalutamide consistently delivers clinically meaningful benefits.
Its current position in the therapeutic armamentarium is that of a foundational agent. The choice between enzalutamide and other novel hormonal agents, such as abiraterone or the newer ARPIs darolutamide and apalutamide, is increasingly driven by a careful, individualized assessment of the patient's specific clinical scenario. This includes consideration of disease characteristics (e.g., metastatic volume), prior therapies, and, critically, the patient's comorbidities and tolerance for specific side effect profiles. The distinct toxicities of enzalutamide—dominated by a clinically significant fatigue-fall-fracture cascade, cardiovascular risks, and neurological effects like seizure potential—must be weighed against the mineralocorticoid-related and hepatic toxicities of other agents. Proactive, vigilant management of these adverse events is paramount to maximizing the benefit of enzalutamide. The emerging evidence supporting dose reduction as a viable strategy to mitigate CNS toxicity without compromising efficacy represents a key evolution in its clinical application, allowing for a more personalized approach that can improve quality of life and treatment persistence.
The future trajectory of enzalutamide is firmly rooted in rational combination therapies. While it will remain a powerful agent in its approved indications, the most exciting frontiers involve its use as a synergistic backbone for novel treatments. The promising data from trials combining enzalutamide with radioligand therapy (ENZA-p), PARP inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates (FOR46) signal a clear path forward. These combinations aim to attack prostate cancer through multiple, complementary mechanisms, with the goal of overcoming intrinsic and acquired resistance, deepening therapeutic responses, and further extending survival for patients. As our understanding of prostate cancer biology and resistance pathways continues to grow, enzalutamide is poised to remain a central component of increasingly effective and personalized treatment regimens for years to come.
Published at: July 11, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.