QLS-31905 is an investigational bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) antibody developed by Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., engineered to target two distinct proteins: Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2), a tumor-associated antigen, and CD3, a component of the T-cell receptor complex.[1] This dual-targeting mechanism is designed to physically link a patient's own cytotoxic T-cells to cancer cells expressing CLDN18.2, thereby inducing potent, targeted tumor cell lysis. The development of QLS-31905 is strategically positioned within a therapeutic landscape recently validated by the regulatory approval of zolbetuximab (Vyloy), the first-in-class monoclonal antibody targeting CLDN18.2.
The clinical development program for QLS-31905 is spearheaded by the Phase 1 monotherapy trial, NCT05278832, which has provided crucial proof-of-concept data in a heavily pre-treated population of patients with advanced solid tumors. Updated results presented at the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting demonstrated encouraging anti-tumor activity. Among 33 evaluable CLDN18.2-positive patients, the objective response rate (ORR) was 18.2%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was a notable 87.9%. Efficacy was particularly pronounced in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, who achieved an ORR of 25.0%.[3] These results are complemented by a manageable safety profile. A key concern for T-cell engaging therapies, Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS), occurred in 21.5% of patients, but severe (Grade
≥3) events were infrequent (3.8%), and all cases were reversible. Critically, a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached, suggesting a favorable therapeutic window.[3]
Building on these findings, Qilu Pharmaceutical has advanced QLS-31905 into a Phase 1b/2 combination therapy trial, NCT06041035. This study is designed to evaluate QLS-31905 alongside standard-of-care chemotherapy regimens as a first-line treatment for CLDN18.2-positive gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer, pancreatic cancer, and other solid tumors.[5] This strategic pivot from the refractory to the front-line setting reflects an aggressive and pragmatic development pathway aimed at integrating QLS-31905 into current clinical practice.
The therapeutic landscape for CLDN18.2-positive cancers is intensely competitive. The approval of zolbetuximab has established a clinical benchmark, while a formidable pipeline of next-generation modalities, particularly antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) from major pharmaceutical companies, is rapidly advancing. QLS-31905's potential for differentiation lies in its potent T-cell redirecting mechanism, its promising efficacy signal in pancreatic cancer—an area of profound unmet need—and a safety profile that appears manageable. The forthcoming data from the combination therapy studies will be paramount in defining its ultimate role and commercial viability in this dynamic and high-value oncology market.
Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) is a 27-kilodalton quadruple transmembrane protein that serves as a critical structural component of tight junctions in epithelial cells.[2] It is the A2 isoform of the claudin-18 protein, a member of a larger family of proteins responsible for regulating the permeability of the paracellular space, thereby maintaining the barrier function and polarity of epithelial layers.[1]
The therapeutic attractiveness of CLDN18.2 stems from its highly restricted expression profile in healthy tissues. Under normal physiological conditions, CLDN18.2 expression is strictly confined to the short-lived, differentiated epithelial cells of the gastric mucosa.[1] Within these cells, the protein is localized to the apical side and is sequestered within the tight junction complexes between adjacent cells. This anatomical sequestration effectively "buries" the extracellular loops of the protein, rendering them inaccessible to circulating therapeutic antibodies administered intravenously.[6]
The central premise for targeting CLDN18.2 in oncology arises from a fundamental change that occurs during malignant transformation. As gastric cells become cancerous, the highly organized cellular architecture is disrupted, leading to a loss of cell polarity.[6] This disruption causes the tight junctions to break down, resulting in the aberrant exposure of CLDN18.2 epitopes across the entire surface of the tumor cell membrane.[6] This process transforms CLDN18.2 from a hidden structural protein into an exposed, highly specific tumor-associated antigen (TAA) that is readily accessible to therapeutic agents in the bloodstream. This cancer-specific surface presentation, coupled with its near-absence in other healthy tissues, creates an ideal therapeutic window, allowing for targeted destruction of cancer cells while minimizing potential on-target, off-tumor toxicity.[1]
The expression of CLDN18.2 is not limited to gastric cancer. Upon malignant transformation, it is ectopically expressed in a variety of other solid tumors, making it a target of broad interest. Significant expression has been documented in primary and metastatic lesions of gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma, pancreatic cancer (PAC), esophageal cancer, biliary tract cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, and ovarian cancer.[2]
Epidemiological data derived from the large-scale screening programs of the pivotal zolbetuximab clinical trials provide a robust estimate of the addressable patient population. Across both the SPOTLIGHT and GLOW trials, approximately 38% of screened patients with G/GEJ adenocarcinoma were found to have CLDN18.2-positive tumors.[13] For the purposes of these trials, positivity was defined by a stringent cutoff: moderate-to-strong membranous staining in
≥75% of tumor cells as determined by a validated immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay.[10] This specific cutoff is now linked to the approved companion diagnostic for zolbetuximab, the VENTANA CLDN18 (43-14A) RxDx Assay.[16]
The development of other CLDN18.2-targeted agents, however, suggests that this patient population could be expanded. Several clinical trials for investigational therapies, including antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and QLS-31905 itself, are utilizing more inclusive expression cutoffs. For instance, the Phase 1 trial of QLS-31905 defined positivity as expression in ≥1% of tumor cells, while trials for ADCs like IBI343 have explored cutoffs such as ≥40% or ≥60%.[3] This exploration of lower expression thresholds could significantly broaden the number of patients eligible for CLDN18.2-targeted therapies in the future. A crucial characteristic of CLDN18.2 as a biomarker is its stability during disease progression; expression is generally maintained between primary tumors and their metastatic sites, allowing for reliable assessment of eligibility from either tissue source.[8]
The clinical and commercial viability of targeting CLDN18.2 was definitively established with the development and subsequent regulatory approval of zolbetuximab (Vyloy, formerly IMAB362), a first-in-class chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody developed by Astellas Pharma.[10] Zolbetuximab functions by binding with high specificity to the exposed extracellular loops of CLDN18.2 on the surface of tumor cells. This binding event initiates two primary immune-mediated cell-killing mechanisms: antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), where immune effector cells like natural killer (NK) cells are recruited to lyse the tumor cell, and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), which involves the activation of the complement cascade to form pores in the tumor cell membrane.[6]
The validation of this approach was achieved in two landmark, global Phase 3 trials: SPOTLIGHT and GLOW. Both studies evaluated zolbetuximab in the first-line setting for patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic, HER2-negative, CLDN18.2-positive G/GEJ adenocarcinoma.
Based on these robust results, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved zolbetuximab on October 18, 2024, for this indication, concurrently approving the companion diagnostic assay.[17] This milestone not only provided a new standard of care but also cemented CLDN18.2 as a clinically validated and actionable biomarker in oncology. The approval of zolbetuximab serves both to de-risk the biological rationale for targeting CLDN18.2 and to establish a formidable clinical and commercial benchmark. This duality creates a complex strategic landscape for emerging agents like QLS-31905. The validation of the target significantly reduces the fundamental biological risk for Qilu Pharmaceutical's development program. However, it also defines the new standard of care for first-line CLDN18.2-positive G/GEJ cancer, against which all subsequent therapies will be measured. Consequently, QLS-31905 cannot succeed merely by demonstrating clinical activity; it must provide a compelling reason for clinicians to choose it over the established zolbetuximab regimen. This could be achieved through superior efficacy (a significantly higher response rate or longer survival), a more favorable safety and tolerability profile (e.g., less nausea and vomiting, which are common with zolbetuximab [27]), enhanced convenience, or potent activity in a distinct patient population where zolbetuximab is not yet approved, such as pancreatic cancer. This competitive context fundamentally reframes the interpretation of QLS-31905's clinical data, which must be viewed not in isolation but in direct comparison to the performance of the market incumbent.
QLS-31905 is explicitly defined as a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE), a sophisticated class of immunotherapy engineered to harness the cytotoxic potential of the patient's own immune system.[1] Unlike conventional monoclonal antibodies that have a single target, QLS-31905 possesses two distinct antigen-binding domains on a single molecular scaffold. One arm of the antibody is designed to bind with high specificity to the CLDN18.2 tumor-associated antigen on the surface of cancer cells. The other arm is engineered to bind to the CD3 epsilon (
CD3ϵ) subunit, a key component of the T-cell receptor (TCR) complex present on the surface of all T-cells.[1]
This dual-binding capability allows QLS-31905 to function as a molecular bridge, physically crosslinking a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) with a CLDN18.2-expressing tumor cell. This forced proximity creates an artificial immunological synapse that potently activates the T-cell. A critical feature of this mechanism is that T-cell activation occurs independently of the traditional signaling pathway, which requires T-cell receptor recognition of a specific peptide antigen presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules on the cancer cell. By directly engaging the CD3 complex, QLS-31905 bypasses this requirement, enabling polyclonal T-cell activation and redirecting any nearby T-cell to kill the targeted tumor cell. This leads to a cascade of downstream events, including T-cell proliferation, cytokine secretion, and the delivery of cytotoxic granules (perforin and granzymes) into the tumor cell, ultimately inducing apoptosis and cell lysis.[1]
The anti-tumor activity of QLS-31905 was rigorously evaluated in a series of preclinical studies, as reported at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting in 2022.[2]
In vitro experiments demonstrated that QLS-31905 exhibited potent cytotoxic activity against multiple CLDN18.2-positive cell lines. This included both engineered cell lines created to express the target (HEK293-hCLDN18.2) and established gastric cancer cell lines that endogenously express the protein (NCI-N87 CLDN18.2). These studies confirmed the molecule's ability to effectively mediate T-cell killing of target cells in a controlled laboratory setting.[2]
The promising in vitro results were subsequently translated into an in vivo setting. In a humanized mouse model bearing NCI-N87 CLDN18.2 tumors—a model in which mice are engrafted with human immune cells to better recapitulate the drug's mechanism of action—QLS-31905 demonstrated superior efficacy in controlling tumor growth. This finding was critical for confirming that the drug could effectively engage T-cells and mediate anti-tumor activity within a complex living biological system, providing a strong rationale for advancing into human clinical trials.[2]
Before human testing, the safety profile of QLS-31905 was assessed in a 4-week repeated-dose toxicology study conducted in cynomolgus monkeys, a standard non-human primate model for antibody therapeutics. The results of this study indicated that QLS-31905 was safe and well-tolerated at doses up to 10 mg/kg, providing an initial safety margin for the design of the first-in-human clinical trial.[2]
A particularly significant finding from the preclinical data package was a direct head-to-head comparison with AMG 910, another anti-CLDN18.2/CD3 bispecific antibody that was in development. While both molecules demonstrated similar efficacy in killing tumor cells, in vitro cytokine release assays revealed a key difference: QLS-31905 induced significantly lower levels of cytokine release compared to AMG 910.[2] This preclinical result suggests a deliberate "bio-better" development strategy by Qilu Pharmaceutical. A fast-follower approach in drug development necessitates a point of superiority over existing or competing molecules. The explicit benchmarking against AMG 910 in the AACR abstract indicates that Qilu's researchers identified excessive cytokine release as a primary clinical liability for this class of drugs. Cytokine release is the direct preclinical correlate of clinical CRS, a potentially severe and dose-limiting toxicity associated with T-cell engaging therapies. By engineering QLS-31905 to have a dampened cytokine induction profile while retaining potent efficacy, Qilu positioned the drug to potentially have a superior safety profile in humans. This foresight likely influenced the design of the Phase 1 trial, including starting dose selection and escalation schemes, with the strategic goal of establishing a wider therapeutic window and a key point of clinical differentiation.
The first-in-human evaluation of QLS-31905 was conducted in study QLS31905-101, a multi-center, open-label, Phase 1 clinical trial registered under the identifier NCT05278832.[28] The primary objectives of this study were to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of QLS-31905 monotherapy and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). A secondary objective was to evaluate preliminary anti-tumor efficacy.[4]
The trial enrolled patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced solid tumors who had experienced disease progression on, were intolerant to, or were otherwise not candidates for available standard therapies.[3] This eligibility criteria defined a heavily pre-treated patient population, which is characteristic of first-in-human oncology trials. Key inclusion criteria included an age of 18 years or older, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function.[28]
The study was structured in two main parts: a dose-escalation phase followed by a dose-expansion phase.[3]
The safety and tolerability of QLS-31905 have been reported at two key time points: an initial dataset presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Immuno-Oncology Congress in 2023 (data cutoff July 17, 2023; N=52) and a more mature, larger dataset presented at the ASCO Annual Meeting in 2025 (data cutoff July 26, 2024; N=79).[3]
A critical finding across both analyses was the favorable overall tolerability of the drug. No DLTs were observed during the dose-escalation phase, and consequently, the MTD was not reached, even at the highest dose level of 1200 µg/kg Q2W.[3] This indicates a wide therapeutic window and supports further evaluation of these higher dose levels.
According to the more mature ASCO 2025 data, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 100% of the 79 treated patients, which is expected in this patient population. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were reported in 34 patients (43.0%), an increase from the 40.4% rate reported in the smaller ESMO 2023 dataset, likely reflecting a larger patient cohort and longer duration of treatment exposure.[3] The most common Grade
≥3 TRAEs reported in the ASCO 2025 update were hematological in nature, including lymphocyte count decreased (21.5%) and neutrophil count decreased (3.8%), along with γ-glutamyl transferase increased (3.8%), anemia (3.8%), and CRS (3.8%).[3] Treatment was discontinued due to TRAEs in only two patients (2.5%), for abdominal pain and CRS, respectively, and no TRAEs led to death.[3]
Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS): As a T-cell engaging bispecific antibody, CRS is a key adverse event of special interest. The overall incidence of CRS (any grade) was 21.5% (17 of 79 patients) in the ASCO 2025 dataset.[3] Importantly, the rate of severe CRS was low. The ESMO 2023 report noted two patients with Grade
≥3 CRS, both in the 350 µg/kg QW cohort.[4] The comprehensive ASCO 2025 update confirmed a low incidence of severe events, with two patients experiencing Grade 3 CRS and one patient experiencing Grade 4 CRS, for a total Grade
≥3 rate of 3.8%. All patients who experienced CRS recovered, indicating that the events were manageable with appropriate supportive care.[3] This manageable rate of severe CRS is a clinically meaningful finding that directly corroborates the preclinical hypothesis of a dampened cytokine induction profile. For this class of drugs, CRS management is a significant clinical challenge that can limit dosing, require hospitalization, and restrict use to specialized academic centers. A low rate of severe CRS suggests that QLS-31905 may be safer and easier to administer, potentially allowing for its use in broader clinical settings, thereby establishing a tangible competitive advantage.
The preliminary efficacy of QLS-31905 monotherapy has shown a maturing and strengthening signal as more patients have been treated and followed for longer durations.
The initial data from ESMO 2023, based on 27 efficacy-evaluable patients, showed an ORR of 11.1% and a DCR of 63.0%. At this early stage, three patients had achieved a partial response (PR), including two with pancreatic cancer and one with gallbladder cancer, all of whom had moderate-to-high CLDN18.2 expression.[4]
The updated analysis from ASCO 2025, focusing on 33 evaluable CLDN18.2-positive patients from the expansion cohorts, demonstrated a more robust efficacy signal in this heavily pre-treated population (61.8% had received ≥2 prior lines of therapy) [3]:
When analyzed by specific tumor types within the higher-dose cohorts (350–1200 µg/kg Q2W), the data revealed distinct patterns of activity [3]:
The efficacy signal in pancreatic cancer is particularly noteworthy and may represent the most promising strategic path forward for QLS-31905. The current standard of care for metastatic pancreatic cancer offers limited efficacy, and it remains an area of profound unmet medical need.[12] Zolbetuximab is still in Phase 2 development for this indication, meaning there is no approved CLDN18.2-targeted therapy.[15] An ORR of 25% in a heavily pre-treated, refractory pancreatic cancer population is a very strong signal of clinical activity. This suggests that QLS-31905 could potentially establish a first-in-class or best-in-class position for CLDN18.2-positive pancreatic cancer, allowing it to build a market foothold in a high-value indication while circumventing a direct initial confrontation with zolbetuximab in the G/GEJ space. The inclusion of a dedicated pancreatic cancer arm in the ongoing combination trial confirms that Qilu is actively pursuing this strategic avenue.[5]
Patient Population | N | ORR (95% CI) | DCR (95% CI) | Median PFS (months, 95% CI) | Median OS (months, 95% CI) | Key Grade ≥3 TRAEs (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All CLDN18.2+ Patients | 33 | 18.2% (7.0, 35.5) | 87.9% (71.8, 96.6) | 4.21 (2.99, 5.55) | 9.53 (7.69, NE) | Lymphocyte count dec. (21.5%), CRS (3.8%), Neutrophil count dec. (3.8%) |
G/GEJ Cancer Patients | 19 | 15.8% | 89.5% | 4.40 | 9.20 | Specific rates for subgroup not reported |
Pancreatic Cancer Patients | 12 | 25.0% | 91.7% | 3.94 | Not Reached | Specific rates for subgroup not reported |
Table 1: Summary of Safety and Efficacy from the Phase 1 Monotherapy Trial (NCT05278832) - ASCO 2025 Data.3 CI = Confidence Interval; NE = Not Evaluable. |
Pharmacokinetics, the study of how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted (ADME), is a key component of early-phase clinical trials.[31] The protocols for the QLS-31905 trials included the collection of serial serum samples to characterize its PK profile, measuring parameters such as maximum concentration (
Cmax), time to maximum concentration (Tmax), and terminal elimination half-life (T1/2).[5]
The PK analysis from the updated Phase 1 data presented at ASCO 2025 yielded two important findings.[3] First, the exposure to QLS-31905, as measured by serum concentrations, was generally linear with the administered dosage. This means that as the dose was increased, the resulting drug levels in the body increased proportionally, indicating predictable and well-behaved pharmacokinetics. Second, there was no observed tendency for drug accumulation after multiple administrations on either the weekly or bi-weekly schedules. This finding is crucial for safety, as it suggests that the drug is cleared from the body effectively between doses, reducing the risk of toxicity from drug buildup over time and supporting the viability of the tested dosing regimens.[3]
Following the establishment of monotherapy proof-of-concept, the logical next step in the development of a novel oncology agent is to evaluate its potential in combination with existing standards of care. The scientific rationale for combining a T-cell engager like QLS-31905 with cytotoxic chemotherapy is multifaceted and aims for synergistic anti-tumor effects. Chemotherapy can provide a rapid debulking of the tumor, reducing the overall cancer burden that the immune system must address. Furthermore, chemotherapy-induced cell death can lead to the release of tumor antigens and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), which can enhance immune recognition. Some chemotherapeutic agents may also favorably modulate the tumor microenvironment by depleting immunosuppressive cells (e.g., regulatory T-cells or myeloid-derived suppressor cells), making it more permissive to the infiltration and function of the T-cells activated by QLS-31905.
Reflecting this strategy, Qilu Pharmaceutical initiated study QLS31905-201 (NCT06041035), a Phase 1b/2 clinical trial designed to assess the efficacy and safety of QLS-31905 administered concurrently with standard-of-care chemotherapy.[5] This study represents a critical strategic advancement, moving QLS-31905 from the heavily pre-treated, refractory setting of the monotherapy trial into the
first-line treatment setting for patients with CLDN18.2-positive advanced solid tumors.[5]
The trial employs an open-label, non-randomized, parallel assignment design to evaluate QLS-31905 with different chemotherapy backbones tailored to specific, high-priority cancer types. The study is divided into two parts: Part A is a dose-finding phase to establish the MTD and RP2D of QLS-31905 when given in combination with chemotherapy, and Part B is an expansion phase to evaluate the efficacy of the combination at the determined RP2D.[5] The study includes three primary experimental arms:
The primary endpoints for the study are MTD and RP2D for Part A, with efficacy measures such as ORR becoming primary in Part B. Key secondary endpoints include DCR, PFS, OS, and a detailed characterization of the pharmacokinetic profile of QLS-31905 in the combination setting.[5] This trial's design reveals a commercially astute and aggressive clinical development plan. By leapfrogging directly to the first-line setting and partnering with globally recognized standard-of-care chemotherapy backbones, Qilu is pursuing a pragmatic and capital-efficient path to market. This strategy aims to integrate QLS-31905 into existing clinical workflows, which, if successful, would facilitate faster physician adoption by adding the drug to familiar regimens. This approach mirrors the successful development strategy employed for zolbetuximab.[25]
Study Arm | Target Indication | Phase Part | QLS-31905 Dosing | Chemotherapy Regimen (Drug, Dose, Schedule) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Arm 1 | Pancreatic Cancer | Part A/B | Dose escalation (Part A), RP2D (Part B) | Nab-paclitaxel: 125 mg/m² IV (D1, D8, D15) Gemcitabine: 1000 mg/m² IV (D1, D8, D15) |
Arm 2 | G/GEJ Cancer | Part B | RP2D from Part A | Oxaliplatin: 85 mg/m² IV (D1, D15) Capecitabine: 1000 mg/m² PO BID (D1-7, D15-21) |
Arm 3 | Biliary Tract / Other | Part B | RP2D from Part A | Gemcitabine: 1000 mg/m² IV (D1, D8) Cisplatin: 25 mg/m² IV (D1, D8) |
Table 2: Design of the Phase 1b/2 Combination Therapy Trial (NCT06041035).5 IV = Intravenous; PO = Oral; BID = Twice Daily; D = Day; RP2D = Recommended Phase 2 Dose. |
The forward-looking clinical strategy for QLS-31905 is further illuminated by the registration of a future trial, NCT06942767.[33] This planned Phase 2 study will investigate a triplet combination for the first-line treatment of CLDN18.2-positive G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. The regimen will consist of QLS-31905, the XELOX chemotherapy backbone, and QL2107, another investigational agent from Qilu Pharmaceutical's pipeline. This indicates an intent to explore proprietary combinations, potentially creating more durable intellectual property and capturing greater value if the triplet regimen proves superior to the doublet.
The competitive environment for CLDN18.2-targeted therapies is defined by the presence of a first-to-market, approved agent: zolbetuximab (Vyloy).[27] Developed by Astellas Pharma following its $1.4 billion acquisition of Ganymed Pharmaceuticals, zolbetuximab is a monoclonal antibody that mediates tumor cell death through ADCC and CDC.[7] Its approval was based on the positive outcomes of the Phase 3 SPOTLIGHT and GLOW trials, which established a clear efficacy benchmark in first-line G/GEJ cancer, demonstrating median PFS improvements of approximately 2-3 months and median OS improvements of approximately 3 months when added to standard chemotherapy.[13]
Zolbetuximab has secured regulatory approvals in major global markets, including Japan, the United Kingdom, the European Union, South Korea, and the United States.[27] Its journey to market, however, was not without challenges. The FDA initially issued a Complete Response Letter (CRL) in January 2024, not due to concerns with the clinical data, but because of unresolved deficiencies at a third-party manufacturing facility.[24] The issues were subsequently addressed, leading to approval in October 2024, but this event underscores the critical importance of robust Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) in the successful development and launch of a biologic drug.[17]
The clinical validation of CLDN18.2 has catalyzed intense research and development activity, resulting in a crowded and highly competitive pipeline populated by multiple therapeutic modalities and major pharmaceutical players.[35] The landscape is rapidly evolving from the "first generation" of simple monoclonal antibodies to more potent "second-generation" approaches.
Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs): This class represents the most significant competitive threat to QLS-31905. ADCs are designed to act as "biological missiles," using a monoclonal antibody to selectively deliver a potent cytotoxic payload directly to tumor cells. Several high-profile ADC programs are advancing rapidly:
Other Bispecific Antibodies: QLS-31905 is not the only bispecific antibody in development. Other programs are exploring different co-targets to engage the immune system in alternative ways. These include Givastomig (TJ-CD4B/ABL111), which targets CLDN18.2 and the co-stimulatory molecule 4-1BB, and Q-1802, which targets CLDN18.2 and the immune checkpoint PD-L1.[37]
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR-T) Therapies: Representing a highly potent but complex therapeutic modality, several CAR-T cell therapies targeting CLDN18.2 are in early clinical development. Assets such as CT041 and LB1908 have demonstrated very high objective response rates in early-phase trials for gastric cancer.[11] However, CAR-T therapies face significant logistical challenges related to manufacturing (autologous cell collection, engineering, and re-infusion), cost, and the management of severe toxicities like CRS and neurotoxicity, which may limit their application to later lines of therapy in specialized centers.
Drug Name (Developer) | Modality | Mechanism of Action | Key Indication | Highest Development Phase | Key Reported Data |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zolbetuximab (Astellas) | Monoclonal Ab | ADCC / CDC | G/GEJ Cancer | Marketed | mPFS 10.6 mo (SPOTLIGHT) 13 |
QLS-31905 (Qilu) | Bispecific Ab | CD3 T-Cell Engager | Solid Tumors | Phase 1/2 | ORR 25% (PAC), 15.8% (G/GEJ) 3 |
CMG-901 (AstraZeneca) | ADC | MMAE Payload | Solid Tumors | Phase 3 | Encouraging early anti-tumor activity 40 |
SYSA1801 (Elevation) | ADC | MMAE Payload | Solid Tumors | Phase 1 | ORR 42.8% in enriched G/GEJ subset 47 |
RC118 (RemeGen) | ADC | Microtubule Inhibitor | Solid Tumors | Phase 1/2 | Favorable safety and tolerability 48 |
LM-302 (LaNova) | ADC | MMAE Payload | G/GEJ Cancer | Phase 3 | ORR 30.6% in refractory G/GEJ 51 |
Givastomig (I-Mab) | Bispecific Ab | 4-1BB Agonist | Solid Tumors | Phase 1 | PRs in 16.6% of patients 37 |
CT041 (CARsgen) | CAR-T | T-Cell Therapy | G/GEJ Cancer | Phase 2 | ORR 57.1% in gastric cancer 37 |
Table 3: Comparative Analysis of Key CLDN18.2-Targeted Therapies.3 Ab = Antibody; ADC = Antibody-Drug Conjugate; CAR-T = Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell. |
In this crowded and rapidly advancing field, QLS-31905 must establish a clear and compelling clinical differentiation. Its potential advantages are rooted in its mechanism, safety profile, and strategic indication selection. The T-cell engaging mechanism offers a mode of action distinct from both zolbetuximab's ADCC/CDC and the targeted chemotherapy delivery of ADCs. This could translate to deeper and more durable responses if T-cell memory is effectively established. The manageable CRS profile observed to date is a significant potential advantage over other T-cell engagers and could compare favorably to the systemic toxicities associated with ADC payloads (e.g., myelosuppression, neuropathy). Finally, the strong early efficacy signal in pancreatic cancer provides a clear strategic opportunity to pursue a first-in-class or best-in-class position in an indication with high unmet medical need, potentially securing a market niche before confronting competitors head-on in G/GEJ cancer.
However, the challenges are substantial. QLS-31905 faces direct competition from a wave of well-funded ADC programs backed by major pharmaceutical companies like AstraZeneca. The need to carefully manage CRS and other immune-related toxicities will remain a key focus in larger trials. Ultimately, the clinical data will determine its place. The central question is whether the direct T-cell engagement of a BiTE can outperform the cytotoxic payload delivery of an ADC in terms of the net clinical benefit, weighing both efficacy and long-term safety. The clinical outcomes for QLS-31905 will be a critical data point in determining the winning second-generation strategy for targeting CLDN18.2.
QLS-31905 emerges as a clinically promising, second-generation therapeutic agent targeting the validated antigen CLDN18.2. Its development program is underpinned by a series of strategic strengths but also faces considerable challenges and risks.
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
The future development of QLS-31905 is subject to several key risks that will require proactive management.
Based on the current clinical strategy, the most direct path to registration for QLS-31905 is through the ongoing first-line combination studies. A successful data readout from one of the arms in the NCT06041035 trial, demonstrating a significant improvement in a key endpoint like PFS or ORR over historical controls, would provide the necessary foundation to design and launch a pivotal Phase 3 randomized controlled trial.
Given the particularly strong efficacy signal and the less competitive landscape in pancreatic cancer, a dedicated pivotal trial in this indication appears to be the most strategically sound next step. A Phase 3 study randomizing first-line, CLDN18.2-positive metastatic pancreatic cancer patients to receive either QLS-31905 plus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel alone would directly address a major unmet need and could provide the fastest path to a first approval. For G/GEJ cancer, a pivotal trial would likely need to be designed as a head-to-head comparison against the zolbetuximab-plus-chemotherapy standard of care or demonstrate overwhelming efficacy in a subpopulation.
QLS-31905 is being developed by Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., a leading, fully integrated biopharmaceutical company based in China.[32] Qilu is not a small biotech but a large, established enterprise with comprehensive capabilities spanning research, development, manufacturing, and commercialization.[32] A critical asset for its global ambitions is its manufacturing infrastructure. The company operates facilities that have received certifications from major international regulatory bodies, including the U.S. FDA, the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the PMDA of Japan, the MHRA of the UK, and the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) of Australia.[57] This demonstrated compliance with global Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards is a crucial capability that de-risks the CMC aspect of development and will be vital for supplying global clinical trials and, eventually, commercial markets.
Qilu Pharmaceutical has been actively securing intellectual property rights for its CLDN18.2-targeted bispecific antibody platform. Patent application WO2023222135A1, for example, describes a method of treating solid tumors using a bispecific antibody comprising an anti-CLDN18.2 unit and a second antibody unit.[58] The claims in this application are notably broad, covering not only CD3 as the second target but also other immunomodulatory targets such as 4-1BB, PD-1, and PD-L1. This suggests that Qilu may be developing a broader platform of CLDN18.2-based multi-specific antibodies, of which QLS-31905 is the first to enter the clinic.
These patent applications have been filed in key global jurisdictions, including the United States, Europe, Japan, China, and Australia, with their legal status currently listed as pending.[58] This indicates a concerted effort to establish a robust and global patent estate to protect its innovation and support future commercialization.
QLS-31905 is a well-designed, second-generation bispecific T-cell engager that has demonstrated compelling proof-of-concept in early clinical trials. It targets the validated antigen CLDN18.2 with a potent mechanism of action, and its development is proceeding rapidly under a pragmatic clinical strategy. The monotherapy data are encouraging, highlighted by a manageable safety profile with a low incidence of severe Cytokine Release Syndrome and a particularly strong efficacy signal in heavily pre-treated pancreatic cancer—a key potential differentiator.
The ultimate success of QLS-31905, however, will be determined by its performance in the crucible of late-stage clinical trials and a fiercely competitive market. It must navigate a landscape defined by the approved standard of care, zolbetuximab, and a formidable pipeline of next-generation antibody-drug conjugates that are attracting massive investment. The forthcoming results from the first-line combination therapy trial (NCT06041035) will be a critical inflection point, providing the first glimpse of its efficacy and safety when integrated with standard chemotherapy. QLS-31905's ability to maintain its favorable safety profile while delivering superior or differentiated efficacy, especially in pancreatic cancer, will be the ultimate arbiter of its place in the future of CLDN18.2-targeted cancer therapy.
Published at: September 28, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.