Small Molecule
C9H19BN2O3
149682-77-9
Talabostat (DrugBank ID: DB06182), an investigational, orally active small molecule, represents a compelling case study in drug development, marked by initial clinical failures and a strategic rebirth based on an evolved understanding of its mechanism. Initially known by its chemical shorthand, Val-boro-Pro, and later as PT-100, the compound is now being developed by BioXcel Therapeutics under the code BXCL701. Its core pharmacological identity is that of a non-selective dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP) inhibitor, exhibiting potent, low-nanomolar activity against DPP-IV, DPP8, DPP9, and Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP). This broad inhibitory profile is the key differentiator from selective DPP-4 inhibitors used in diabetes.
The initial clinical development of Talabostat in the mid-2000s focused on its FAP-inhibiting properties and resulted in a series of high-profile trial discontinuations for indications including non-small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer, due to a lack of efficacy and a challenging safety profile. However, subsequent research unveiled a novel and powerful mechanism of action: the inhibition of cytosolic DPP8 and DPP9 triggers inflammasome activation and a pro-inflammatory form of programmed cell death called pyroptosis, specifically in myeloid cells. This discovery provided a new therapeutic hypothesis, recasting Talabostat not as a direct anti-cancer agent, but as a potent innate immune activator.
Leveraging this new understanding, BioXcel Therapeutics has revived the drug as BXCL701, positioning it as an immuno-oncology agent designed to "heat up" immunologically "cold" tumors. The current clinical strategy focuses on combining BXCL701 with immune checkpoint inhibitors to overcome resistance in aggressive cancers. Recent Phase II trials in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, particularly the small cell neuroendocrine subtype, have yielded promising overall survival data. Supported by Fast Track and Orphan Drug designations from the U.S. FDA, Talabostat's journey exemplifies how deeper mechanistic insight can resurrect a failed asset, offering new hope for patients with treatment-refractory malignancies.
Talabostat is identified by a variety of names and codes that reflect its chemical nature and development history. Its official generic name is Talabostat.[1] Systematically, it is namedpyrrolidin-2-yl]boronic acid.[2]
Throughout its research and clinical history, it has been referred to by several common synonyms and development codes. "Val-boro-Pro" is a chemical shorthand describing its structure as a valine residue linked to a boronic acid-modified proline analog.[3] "PT-100" was its initial development code, while "BXCL701" is its current designation under development by BioXcel Therapeutics.[4] Key database and regulatory identifiers for the active free base form include DrugBank ID DB06182 and CAS Number 149682-77-9.[1] The clinically utilized mesylate salt form is identified by CAS Number 150080-09-4.[4]
Talabostat is classified as an amino boronic dipeptide analog, specifically L-valinyl-L-boroproline.[9] Its structure is composed of a natural L-valine amino acid amide-linked to an L-proline analog. The defining feature of this structure is the replacement of the proline's carboxyl group with a boronic acid moiety ($B(OH)_2$).[2] This boronic acid group is not merely a structural component but the reactive functional group, or "warhead," that underpins its entire pharmacological profile. Serine proteases, the primary targets of Talabostat, utilize a catalytic serine residue for peptide bond hydrolysis. The electrophilic boron atom in Talabostat's boronic acid group forms a stable, yet reversible, covalent bond with the hydroxyl group of this catalytic serine. This interaction creates a tetrahedral intermediate that mimics the transition state of peptide hydrolysis, effectively blocking the enzyme's active site and conferring its potent inhibitory activity.[9]
The molecular formula of the free base is $C_9H_{19}BN_2O_3$, with a corresponding molecular weight of 214.07 g/mol.[2] The molecule possesses two defined stereocenters, designated (2R) at the proline-analog ring and (2S) at the valine alpha-carbon, confirming that it is a specific, single enantiomer.[2] This precise stereochemistry is critical for its high-affinity binding to the catalytic sites of its target proteases.
For clinical use, Talabostat is formulated as a mesylate (methanesulfonate) salt to enhance its stability and solubility for oral administration.[3] The chemical formula for Talabostat mesylate is $C_{10}H_{23}BN_2O_6S$, and its molecular weight is 310.18 g/mol.[10] Key structural identifiers include its SMILES string, CC(C)[C@@H](C(=O)N1CCC[C@H]1B(O)O)N, and its InChIKey, FKCMADOPPWWGNZ-YUMQZZPRSA-N.[2]
Talabostat exhibits physicochemical properties consistent with an orally administered small molecule. It has a high predicted water solubility of 59.2 mg/mL, a key attribute for its oral bioavailability.[1] It is also reported to be soluble in common laboratory solvents like DMSO.[12] The molecule is hydrophilic, with low predicted lipophilicity (logP values of -0.3 and -0.2), which aligns with its high water solubility.[1]
With both a strongly acidic group ($pKa$ ~8.88) and a strongly basic group ($pKa$ ~8.27), Talabostat is predicted to exist predominantly as a cation (Physiological Charge: +1) at physiological pH.[1] Predictive models indicate that the molecule adheres to Lipinski's Rule of Five and the Ghose Filter criteria, suggesting favorable oral drug-like properties. However, it fails Veber's Rule, likely due to its peptide-like structure, which confers a higher number of rotatable bonds and a relatively large polar surface area ($86.79 Å^2$).[1]
| Table 1: Summary of Chemical and Physicochemical Properties of Talabostat | |
|---|---|
| Property | Value / Identifier |
| Generic Name | Talabostat |
| DrugBank ID | DB06182 1 |
| CAS Number (Free Base) | 149682-77-9 7 |
| CAS Number (Mesylate Salt) | 150080-09-4 8 |
| Molecular Formula (Free Base) | $C_9H_{19}BN_2O_3$ 2 |
| Molecular Weight (Free Base) | 214.07 g/mol 2 |
| Molecular Formula (Mesylate Salt) | $C_{10}H_{23}BN_2O_6S$ 10 |
| Molecular Weight (Mesylate Salt) | 310.18 g/mol 10 |
| InChIKey (Free Base) | FKCMADOPPWWGNZ-YUMQZZPRSA-N 2 |
| Water Solubility | 59.2 mg/mL 1 |
| logP | -0.3 1 |
| pKa (Strongest Acidic) | 8.88 1 |
| pKa (Strongest Basic) | 8.27 1 |
| Physiological Charge | +1 1 |
| Rule of Five | Yes 1 |
Talabostat is characterized as a potent, non-selective inhibitor of post-proline-cleaving serine proteases, a family of enzymes that includes several dipeptidyl peptidases (DPPs).[14] Its inhibitory activity is particularly potent against DPP-IV (also known as the T-cell antigen CD26), DPP8, and DPP9, with half-maximal inhibitory concentrations ($IC_{50}$) in the low nanomolar range.[4] This broad-spectrum activity against multiple DPP family members is the central feature that distinguishes Talabostat from the highly selective DPP-4 inhibitors ("gliptins") used for managing type 2 diabetes. In addition to these primary targets, Talabostat also inhibits other related enzymes, such as Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP), quiescent cell proline dipeptidase (QPP), and prolyl endopeptidase (PEP), albeit with slightly lower potency.[4]
| Table 2: Inhibitory Profile of Talabostat against Key Serine Proteases | ||
|---|---|---|
| Target Enzyme | $IC_{50}$ (nM) | $K_i$ (nM) |
| DPP-IV (DPP-4) | < 4 8 | 0.18 8 |
| DPP8 | 4 8 | 1.5 1 |
| DPP9 | 11 8 | 0.76 8 |
| FAP | 560 8 | N/A |
| QPP (DPP-2 / DPP-7) | 310 4 | N/A |
| PEP | 390 10 | N/A |
While Talabostat was initially investigated for its effects on FAP and DPP-IV, a more profound and mechanistically distinct pathway was later discovered to be the primary driver of its immunostimulatory properties. This novel mechanism involves the inhibition of two cytosolic serine proteases: DPP8 and DPP9.[14] In resting myeloid cells, DPP8 and DPP9 function as a critical intracellular checkpoint, actively suppressing the spontaneous activation of the inflammasome sensor proteins NLRP1 and CARD8.[1]
By inhibiting DPP8 and DPP9, Talabostat removes this suppressive control, leading to the activation of NLRP1 and CARD8.[12] This, in turn, triggers the activation of pro-caspase-1, a key inflammatory caspase, through a pathway that is notably independent of the common inflammasome adaptor protein ASC.[16] The activated caspase-1 then cleaves its primary substrate, Gasdermin D (GSDMD). The N-terminal fragment of cleaved GSDMD oligomerizes and inserts into the cell membrane, forming large pores that disrupt the osmotic gradient and lead to cell lysis.[4] This specific form of lytic, pro-inflammatory programmed cell death is known as pyroptosis. This entire cascade is highly selective for monocytes and macrophages, explaining the targeted nature of the immune stimulation observed in preclinical and clinical studies.[4]
The discovery of this pathway recasts the pharmacological profile of Talabostat. Its non-selectivity is not a liability but rather the source of its unique therapeutic potential in oncology. Selective DPP-4 inhibitors used in diabetes are designed to avoid DPP8/9 inhibition and are consequently immunologically neutral.[18] In contrast, Talabostat's co-inhibition of DPP8/9 confers a pro-inflammatory "gain of function," making it a first-in-class pyroptosis-inducing agent.
Talabostat was the first inhibitor of Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) to enter clinical trials.[13] FAP is a type II transmembrane serine protease that is highly expressed on the surface of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) within the tumor stroma of most epithelial cancers, yet it is largely absent from normal adult tissues.[21] FAP plays a critical role in cancer progression by remodeling the extracellular matrix, promoting angiogenesis, and suppressing anti-tumor immune responses, thereby creating a supportive niche for tumor growth and invasion.[23]
By directly inhibiting the enzymatic activity of FAP on CAFs, Talabostat can modulate the tumor microenvironment.[15] This action has been investigated for its potential to disrupt the tumor-stroma interaction, thereby impeding tumor growth and enhancing the penetration of other therapeutic agents.[14] While the pyroptosis-inducing mechanism is now understood to be the dominant driver of its systemic immune effects, the local, intratumoral inhibition of FAP remains a relevant component of its overall anti-cancer profile.
Talabostat's inhibition of DPP enzymes leads to a powerful, multi-faceted stimulation of the immune system. This occurs through a dual mechanism: direct modulation of the tumor stroma via FAP inhibition and a systemic, pyroptosis-driven upregulation of inflammatory mediators.[9] The pyroptotic death of monocytes and macrophages results in the massive release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Preclinical in vivo studies have confirmed that Talabostat treatment leads to the transcriptional upregulation of key immune signaling molecules, including Interleukin-1 beta ($IL-1β$), Interleukin-6 ($IL-6$), Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF), and the chemokine CXCL1/KC, within both the tumor and its draining lymph nodes.[9]
This induced cytokine storm serves as a powerful recruitment signal, attracting innate effector cells (like natural killer cells) and adaptive immune cells (T-cells) into the tumor microenvironment.[3] This process effectively converts an immunologically "cold," non-inflamed tumor into a "hot," inflamed tumor that is visible to the immune system and susceptible to immune-mediated attack.[25] This provides a strong mechanistic basis for its current clinical evaluation in combination with T-cell-activating therapies like immune checkpoint inhibitors. Furthermore, the upregulation of hematopoietic factors like G-CSF explains the hematopoiesis-stimulating activity observed with Talabostat, a potentially beneficial side effect in patients undergoing myelosuppressive cancer treatments.[3]
The pharmacodynamic effects of Talabostat have been extensively characterized in both in vitro and in vivo models. In vitro, the compound has been shown to induce the upregulation of cytokines and chemokines in human bone marrow stromal cells and to trigger caspase-1-dependent pyroptotic cell death in monocyte and macrophage cell lines, such as THP-1.[10]
In preclinical in vivo studies, oral administration of Talabostat to mice bearing syngeneic tumors (including fibrosarcoma, lymphoma, and melanoma) led to significant inhibition of tumor growth.[4] In several models, treatment resulted in complete tumor regression and the establishment of long-term, protective immunological memory, as demonstrated by the rejection of a subsequent tumor rechallenge.[4] This anti-tumor effect was found to be dependent on tumor-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs). While the effect was diminished in immunodeficient mice, a significant degree of tumor inhibition remained, highlighting the contribution of both the innate and adaptive immune systems.[4] Furthermore, Talabostat was shown to augment the anti-tumor activity of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies like rituximab and trastuzumab in xenograft models, likely by enhancing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) through the activation of innate effector cells.[4]
Talabostat is an orally active and bioavailable small molecule.[3] Clinical pharmacokinetic studies have provided insights into its absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) profile.
The observation of a long plasma half-life due to irreversible protein binding presents a complex pharmacokinetic profile. While this property could support less frequent dosing schedules, it also carries significant risks. Irreversible binding means the drug is not readily cleared from circulation, which can lead to drug accumulation with repeated dosing. If adverse events occur, the drug's effects may persist long after administration has ceased, complicating toxicity management. This property may have contributed to the severe toxicities observed in early clinical trials and likely informs the intermittent dosing schedules (e.g., treatment for several consecutive days followed by a rest period) employed in current trials for BXCL701 as a strategy to mitigate the risk of cumulative toxicity.[28]
The initial clinical development of Talabostat in the 2000s was marked by a series of significant setbacks across multiple cancer types, ultimately leading to the cessation of its development by its original sponsor.
The clinical trajectory of Talabostat is a quintessential example of how the evolution of scientific understanding can redefine a drug's therapeutic potential. Its initial development was rooted in the early 2000s paradigm of targeted therapy, aiming to directly inhibit a tumor-associated enzyme (FAP) to achieve an anti-cancer effect. This approach failed because inhibiting FAP alone was not sufficient to induce meaningful tumor regression, and the required doses were associated with significant toxicity.
Following these failures, the drug was acquired by BioXcel Therapeutics, which repurposed it as an immuno-oncology agent under the new code, BXCL701.[25] This strategic pivot was not merely a rebranding but was founded on the new mechanistic understanding of Talabostat as a potent innate immune activator via DPP8/9 inhibition and pyroptosis induction. The new therapeutic hypothesis is to use BXCL701 not to kill cancer cells directly, but to "inflame the tumor microenvironment".[25] This strategy aims to convert immunologically "cold," non-responsive tumors into "hot," inflamed tumors that are infiltrated with immune cells, thereby sensitizing them to the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs).[25]
Under its new identity as BXCL701, the drug is being evaluated in a series of clinical trials focused on its synergy with CPIs.
The extensive clinical history of Talabostat/BXCL701, spanning nearly two decades, is summarized below.
| Table 3: Summary of Major Clinical Trials for Talabostat/BXCL701 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT Identifier | Phase | Status | Indication(s) | Intervention(s) | Key Findings / Status |
| N/A | III | Terminated | Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Talabostat + Chemotherapy | Failed to meet primary endpoints for progression-free survival.1 |
| N/A | II | Completed | Metastatic Colorectal Cancer | Talabostat Monotherapy | Minimal clinical activity; no objective responses. Provided proof-of-concept for FAP inhibition.20 |
| NCT00489710 | II | Completed | Metastatic Kidney Cancer | Talabostat Monotherapy | Study completed; focused on response rate and toxicity.38 |
| N/A | II | Terminated | Pancreatic Cancer | Talabostat + Gemcitabine | Failed to meet primary endpoint.6 |
| NCT03910660 | I/II | Active, not recruiting | mCRPC (SCNC and Adenocarcinoma) | BXCL701 + Pembrolizumab | Positive overall survival data reported; median OS of 13.6 months in SCNC cohort.26 |
| NCT04171219 | II | Active, not recruiting | Advanced Solid Tumors | Talabostat + Pembrolizumab | Evaluating safety and efficacy in patients who have failed standard therapies, including prior CPIs.36 |
| NCI-2023-01302 | I | Recruiting | Relapsed/Refractory AML/MDS | BXCL701 Monotherapy | Dose-finding study to determine MTD and RP2D in hematologic malignancies.28 |
Across its clinical development, Talabostat has demonstrated a consistent pattern of adverse events (AEs) that are directly related to its mechanism of action. The most frequently reported AEs in multiple trials include edema (observed in 28% to 47% of patients), fatigue (24% to 54%), pyrexia (fever), nausea/vomiting, and anorexia.[27] Hypotension is another common toxicity, reported in approximately 23% of patients in a recent combination trial.[39] Due to its potent inhibition of DPP-IV, which plays a role in glucose homeostasis by degrading incretin hormones, hypoglycemia has also been reported as an AE, particularly in patients concurrently taking anti-diabetic medications.[27]
The primary dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of Talabostat stem from excessive, systemic immune stimulation. In an early Phase II trial in mCRC, an initial starting dose of 400 µg twice daily was associated with a grade 5 (fatal) case of acute renal failure, which occurred in a clinical context consistent with a systemic "cytokine storm".[30] This severe event led to a protocol amendment reducing the starting dose to 200 µg twice daily. Grade 4 hypotension has also been identified as a DLT in more recent trials.[39] Other reported grade 3 or higher toxicities that have led to dose reductions include severe edema, headache/syncope, and abnormalities in liver function tests (alkaline phosphatase and transaminases).[30] Hematologic toxicities, such as grade 3/4 anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, have also been observed, although often in the context of combination therapy with myelosuppressive chemotherapeutic agents.[27]
The safety profile of Talabostat is a direct reflection of its potent, pro-inflammatory mechanism. The common AEs of edema, fever, fatigue, and hypotension, as well as the severe risk of a cytokine storm, are all predictable consequences of the systemic upregulation of cytokines and chemokines driven by DPP8/9 inhibition and subsequent myeloid cell pyroptosis. This indicates a narrow therapeutic index, where the dose required for a potential anti-tumor effect as a monotherapy is very close to the dose that causes unacceptable systemic toxicity.
The current combination strategy with CPIs may succeed by creating a wider therapeutic window. The goal is no longer to achieve tumor killing with Talabostat alone, but rather to use a lower, safer dose to induce just enough local inflammation within the tumor to attract T-cells. The CPI can then activate these newly recruited T-cells. This synergistic approach may achieve efficacy while avoiding the dose-limiting systemic toxicities. Clinical trial designs have incorporated several risk mitigation strategies, including lower starting doses, intra-patient dose escalation based on tolerability, and intermittent dosing schedules (e.g., days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle) to provide "washout" periods and prevent drug accumulation.[28]
| Table 4: Frequency of Common and Grade ≥3 Adverse Events in Key Clinical Trials | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Adverse Event | mCRC Trial (Monotherapy) 30 | CLL Trial (w/ Rituximab) 27 | Pancreatic Cancer Trial (w/ Gemcitabine) 31 |
| Fatigue | 54% (All Grades) | 24% (All Grades) | Not specified |
| Edema | 46% (All Grades) | 47% (All Grades) | 28.3% (All Grades) |
| Nausea/Vomiting | 36% (All Grades) | Not specified | Consistent with Gemcitabine |
| Anorexia | 39% (All Grades) | Not specified | Not specified |
| Pyrexia (Fever) | Grade 2 reported | 35% (All Grades) | Not specified |
| Dyspnea | Not specified | 24% (All Grades); 2 pts Grade 3 | Not specified |
| Grade ≥3 Hematologic | Not specified | 1 pt Grade 4 Thrombocytopenia | 2 pts each Grade 3 Anemia, Neutropenia |
| Grade ≥3 Other | Hypotension/Renal Failure (Grade 5), Headache/Syncope, Edema, LFTs | 1 pt Grade 4 Hypoglycemia | 2 pts each Grade 3 Hyponatremia, Hyperbilirubinemia, Alk Phos |
The renewed development of Talabostat as BXCL701 has been supported by several favorable regulatory designations from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The agency has granted Orphan Drug Designation for multiple indications, including pancreatic cancer, acute myeloid leukemia, malignant melanoma, and soft tissue sarcoma.[6] This designation provides significant incentives for development, including market exclusivity and tax credits.
More recently, in February 2024, the FDA granted Fast Track Designation to BXCL701 for use in combination with a CPI for the treatment of metastatic Small Cell Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer (SCNC).[25] This important designation is intended to facilitate the development and expedite the review of drugs that treat serious conditions and fill an unmet medical need. It allows for more frequent interactions with the FDA and eligibility for accelerated approval and priority review. This regulatory strategy, focusing on a niche indication with a high unmet need, is a shrewd approach to de-risk and accelerate the development of a drug with a history of prior failures. Following the positive overall survival data from its Phase II trial, BioXcel Therapeutics is actively engaging with the FDA to define a clear registration path for BXCL701.[6]
It is critical to distinguish Talabostat from the "gliptin" class of drugs (e.g., sitagliptin, vildagliptin), which are also DPP inhibitors. While both classes target DPP-IV, their pharmacological profiles, therapeutic applications, and mechanisms are fundamentally different.
The synthesis of Talabostat as a single enantiomer has been described in patents (e.g., U.S. Patent No. 6,825,169) and scientific literature, with various pharmaceutical compositions and formulations also being the subject of patent applications.[16]
The primary challenge for the future development of Talabostat lies in managing its on-target toxicity. Optimizing the dose and schedule in combination therapies to maximize the therapeutic window between desired local immune activation and dose-limiting systemic toxicity will be paramount. The identification of predictive biomarkers—either genetic or proteomic—that can identify patients most likely to respond or those at high risk for severe AEs would be a major advance.
Despite these challenges, the opportunities are significant. Talabostat's unique mechanism as an innate immune activator holds the potential to overcome primary and acquired resistance to CPIs in a wide range of immunologically "cold" tumors. Beyond its promising results in prostate cancer, its potential applicability to other high-grade neuroendocrine tumors, such as small cell lung cancer, represents a logical next step for development.[26] Furthermore, innovative drug delivery strategies, such as encapsulating Talabostat in nanoparticles designed to target FAP-expressing cells in fibrotic tissues, are being explored preclinically and could offer a future path to enhance local drug delivery, increase efficacy, and dramatically reduce systemic toxicity.[46]
Talabostat's developmental journey is a testament to the dynamic nature of pharmacological science. Initially abandoned after failing to meet expectations as a targeted anti-cancer agent, it has been successfully resurrected as BXCL701, a first-in-class innate immune activator with a novel and compelling mechanism of action. Its unique ability to induce pyroptosis in myeloid cells via DPP8/9 inhibition, thereby converting immunologically inert tumors into inflamed environments susceptible to T-cell attack, places it at the forefront of new strategies in immuno-oncology.
The drug's unique value proposition lies in this multi-pronged mechanism, combining direct stromal modulation through FAP inhibition with potent, pyroptosis-driven immune priming. While its past is defined by failure, its future, guided by a deeper mechanistic understanding and a strategic clinical focus on combination therapy, appears promising. Critical questions regarding optimal dosing, patient selection, and long-term safety remain. However, if ongoing and future trials continue to yield positive results, Talabostat has the potential to become a vital component of the immuno-oncology armamentarium, offering a new therapeutic option for patients with aggressive, treatment-resistant cancers.
Published at: October 17, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.