Small Molecule
C29H34N8O2
2376146-48-2
Azenosertib (also known as ZN-c3) is an investigational, orally bioavailable, small molecule drug being developed by Zentalis Pharmaceuticals as a potentially first-in-class and best-in-class inhibitor of WEE1 kinase. The primary mechanism of action involves the targeted inhibition of WEE1, a critical regulator of the G2/M cell cycle checkpoint. This inhibition abrogates the cell's ability to arrest and repair DNA damage before mitosis, leading to a cascade of events including increased replication stress, premature mitotic entry, and ultimately, cancer cell death via mitotic catastrophe. This therapeutic strategy is particularly effective in tumors characterized by high genomic instability, such as those with p53 mutations or, most notably, overexpression of Cyclin E1, which has emerged as a key predictive biomarker for Azenosertib sensitivity.
The clinical development program for Azenosertib is extensive, evaluating the agent as both a monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy, PARP inhibitors, and other molecularly targeted agents across a range of solid tumors. The program's strategy has been significantly refined by pharmacokinetic studies that established an optimized intermittent dosing schedule (400 mg daily, 5 days on, 2 days off), which more than doubles drug exposure while improving tolerability compared to continuous dosing.
Pivotal clinical data has demonstrated compelling anti-tumor activity, particularly in heavily pretreated gynecologic malignancies. In the Phase 2 DENALI trial, Azenosertib monotherapy achieved a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) of 34.9% in response-evaluable patients with Cyclin E1-positive, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Similarly, promising efficacy signals have been observed in uterine serous carcinoma. The safety profile is characterized primarily by manageable hematologic and gastrointestinal adverse events.
The regulatory path for Azenosertib is supported by a Fast Track Designation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for its use in Cyclin E1-positive ovarian cancer. While the program faced a temporary partial clinical hold in 2024 due to two patient deaths, the hold was lifted without required changes to the clinical development plan, suggesting regulatory confidence in the drug's manageable risk-benefit profile. With no currently approved WEE1 inhibitors, Azenosertib is positioned as a leading candidate to address a significant unmet medical need in biomarker-defined patient populations with difficult-to-treat cancers.
Azenosertib, also known by its developmental code ZN-c3, is a clinical-stage, small molecule therapeutic candidate representing a new frontier in precision oncology.[1] Developed by Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, it is engineered as a potent, selective, and orally bioavailable inhibitor of WEE1 G2 checkpoint kinase (WEE1).[2] The agent is being strategically advanced for the treatment of various advanced solid tumors and hematological malignancies, with a particular focus on cancers where existing therapies have limited efficacy.[4] Azenosertib is positioned as a potentially first-in-class therapeutic, as there are currently no FDA-approved drugs targeting the WEE1 kinase, and has been designed with the goal of achieving a best-in-class profile through superior selectivity and optimized pharmacokinetic properties.[1]
A foundational principle of cancer biology is the accumulation of genetic mutations and the resulting genomic instability that drives tumor development and progression.[3] Many of the most aggressive and difficult-to-treat cancers, such as high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) and uterine serous carcinoma (USC), are defined by this characteristic.[1] A common feature of these genomically unstable tumors is the loss of function of key tumor suppressor genes, most notably
TP53.[7]
The p53 protein is a primary guardian of the genome, and one of its critical functions is to regulate the G1/S cell cycle checkpoint. This checkpoint serves as a crucial decision point, halting the cell cycle to allow for the repair of DNA damage before it is replicated in the S phase. When p53 is mutated or lost, this G1 checkpoint is often abrogated.[7] Consequently, these cancer cells become critically dependent on the remaining G2/M checkpoint to pause the cell cycle and repair DNA damage accumulated during replication, thereby preventing lethal errors during mitosis. This dependency creates a specific vulnerability, as the G2/M checkpoint becomes the sole gatekeeper of genomic integrity for the cancer cell—a vulnerability that is not present in normal, healthy cells with intact G1 checkpoints.[7]
The G2/M checkpoint is masterfully controlled by the WEE1 kinase, a serine/threonine-protein kinase that functions as a pivotal negative regulator of cell cycle progression.[2] The primary function of WEE1 is to phosphorylate and thereby inactivate Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 1 (CDK1, also known as Cdc2) and Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 (CDK2).[1] This inhibitory phosphorylation prevents the activation of the CDK1/Cyclin B complex, which is the master switch that triggers a cell's entry into mitosis.[7] By holding CDK1 in an inactive state, WEE1 effectively enforces the G2/M checkpoint, providing a critical window for the DNA Damage Response (DDR) network to repair any genetic lesions before cell division proceeds.[1]
The reliance of p53-deficient cancer cells on this single checkpoint for survival forms the basis of a therapeutic strategy known as synthetic lethality. In this context, the loss of p53 function is not lethal on its own, and the inhibition of WEE1 is generally tolerated by normal cells that can rely on their G1 checkpoint. However, in a cancer cell lacking the G1 checkpoint, the pharmacological inhibition of WEE1 becomes synthetically lethal. By removing the final stop sign, WEE1 inhibition forces the cancer cell to proceed into mitosis with a high burden of unrepaired DNA damage, leading to catastrophic cell division and death.[7] Therefore, targeting WEE1 with an inhibitor like Azenosertib is a highly rational approach to selectively kill cancer cells while sparing healthy tissue.
Azenosertib is a small molecule drug with a precisely defined chemical structure and identity.[1] Its International Nonproprietary Name (INN), Azenosertib, was formally proposed in 2022, while it is most frequently referred to in scientific literature and clinical development by its code, ZN-c3.[2] The molecule's structure is complex, reflected in its systematic IUPAC name: (R)-2-allyl-1-(7-ethyl-7-hydroxy-6,7-dihydro-5H-cyclopenta[b]pyridin-2-yl)-6-((4-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)phenyl)amino)-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-3-one.[8] This name describes a core pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine structure with several key functional substitutions that are responsible for its potent and selective binding to the WEE1 kinase.
The molecular formula of Azenosertib is C29H34N8O2, corresponding to a molecular weight of approximately 526.63 g/mol.[8] As an orally active agent, its physicochemical properties have been optimized for bioavailability.[3] For research and preclinical use, Azenosertib is typically supplied as a light yellow to yellow solid powder.[9] It demonstrates good solubility in organic solvents such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).[11] For in vivo animal studies, specific formulation protocols have been developed to achieve adequate solubility and exposure, for instance, using a vehicle of 10% DMSO, 40% PEG300, 5% Tween-80, and 45% saline.[11] The compound is stable under standard storage conditions, with long-term storage of the powder recommended at -20°C.[8]
The following table provides a consolidated summary of Azenosertib's key identifiers and properties.
Table 1: Summary of Azenosertib's Chemical and Physical Properties
Property | Value | Source(s) |
---|---|---|
Official Name | Azenosertib | 2 |
Developmental Code | ZN-c3 | 8 |
DrugBank ID | DB18028 | |
CAS Number | 2376146-48-2 | 8 |
Drug Type | Small Molecule | 1 |
Molecular Formula | C29H34N8O2 | 8 |
Molecular Weight | 526.63 g/mol | 10 |
IUPAC Name | (R)-2-allyl-1-(7-ethyl-7-hydroxy-6,7-dihydro-5H-cyclopenta[b]pyridin-2-yl)-6-((4-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)phenyl)amino)-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-3-one | 8 |
InChIKey | OXTSYWDBUVRXFF-GDLZYMKVSA-N | 2 |
SMILES Code | O=C1N(CC=C)N(C2=CC=C(CC[C@@]3(CC)O)C3=N2)C4=NC(NC5=CC=C(N6CCN(C)CC6)C=C5)=NC=C41 | 8 |
The WEE1 kinase is an indispensable component of the cellular machinery that maintains genomic integrity. It functions as the primary gatekeeper of the G2/M transition, one of the most critical checkpoints in the cell division cycle.[1] In response to DNA damage detected during the S or G2 phases, the DDR network activates WEE1. The activated WEE1 kinase then carries out its inhibitory function by phosphorylating specific tyrosine residues on its key substrates, CDK1 and CDK2.[1] This phosphorylation event, particularly at the Tyr15 residue of CDK1, prevents the formation of an active CDK1/Cyclin B complex, which is the master engine that drives the cell into mitosis.[3] By effectively applying this brake, WEE1 enforces a cell cycle arrest, providing the cell with the necessary time to recruit repair machinery and correct any DNA lesions before the high-risk process of chromosome segregation begins.[1]
Azenosertib has demonstrated highly potent and specific inhibition of the WEE1 kinase. In biochemical assays, it exhibits a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of approximately 3.9 nM, indicating very strong binding to its target.[10] This potency is a critical attribute for achieving a therapeutic effect at clinically manageable doses.
Beyond potency, a key feature that supports Azenosertib's potential best-in-class profile is its high degree of selectivity.[1] In a broad kinase panel screen against 476 kinases, Azenosertib showed significant inhibition of only five, with WEE1 being the primary target.[6] A particularly important point of differentiation is its selectivity over Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1), another key mitotic regulator. Off-target inhibition of PLK1 has been associated with significant toxicities, including neutropenia and bone marrow suppression.[6] Azenosertib is approximately 60-fold more potent against WEE1 (
IC50 = 3.8 nM) than against PLK1 (IC50 = 227 nM). Furthermore, cellular assays confirmed this selectivity, showing no substantial functional inhibition of PLK1 activity at concentrations where WEE1 is fully inhibited.[6] This superior selectivity profile is designed to minimize off-target toxicities and widen the therapeutic window of the drug.
Evidence of direct target engagement within cancer cells has been robustly demonstrated. Treatment with Azenosertib leads to a marked reduction in the levels of phosphorylated CDK1 at tyrosine 15 (pY15-CDK1), the direct downstream substrate of WEE1. This reduction serves as a pharmacodynamic biomarker, confirming that the drug is effectively inhibiting its intended target in a cellular context.[3]
The pharmacological inhibition of WEE1 by Azenosertib sets off a lethal chain of events in vulnerable cancer cells. First, it abrogates the G2/M checkpoint, forcing cells to enter mitosis prematurely, even in the presence of significant, unrepaired DNA damage.[1] Second, Azenosertib exacerbates the underlying genomic instability by inducing further replication stress. This is achieved by causing aberrant firing of DNA replication origins and depleting the cellular pools of nucleotides required for DNA synthesis, leading to an even greater burden of DNA damage.[1]
The convergence of these two effects—forcing division while simultaneously increasing the damage to be divided—is catastrophic for the cell. As the cell attempts to segregate its damaged and broken chromosomes during mitosis, it fails, leading to a terminal cellular state known as mitotic catastrophe. This process ultimately triggers apoptosis, or programmed cell death, resulting in the elimination of the cancer cell.[1] This multi-pronged mechanism of action—disrupting checkpoints, increasing DNA damage, and forcing lethal cell division—underpins the potent antitumor activity of Azenosertib.
The therapeutic hypothesis for Azenosertib has been extensively validated in preclinical settings, where it has demonstrated robust and broad antitumor activity. In numerous cancer cell line and xenograft models, Azenosertib has shown potent inhibition of tumor growth.[6] For instance, in a xenograft model using A427 lung cancer cells, daily oral administration of Azenosertib at 80 mg/kg for 28 days resulted in significant tumor growth inhibition.[9] A notable finding from these studies is the durability of the response; Azenosertib has been shown to be highly effective at delaying the duration of tumor regrowth even after the cessation of treatment, suggesting that it induces a profound and lasting cytotoxic effect rather than a temporary cytostatic one.[6] This broad preclinical activity provided a strong foundation for its advancement into clinical trials across multiple solid tumor indications.
Azenosertib was rationally designed to possess superior pharmacokinetic (PK) properties suitable for an oral anti-cancer agent.[1] Preclinical studies confirmed these favorable characteristics. In a beagle dog model, a 10 mg/kg oral dose yielded a maximum plasma concentration (
Cmax) of 2.1 μM, a plasma half-life (T1/2) of 2.3 hours, and an exceptional oral bioavailability (F) of 142%, indicating efficient absorption and systemic exposure.[9]
In the clinical setting, the optimization of the dosing regimen proved to be a pivotal step in unlocking the drug's full therapeutic potential. Initial studies explored a continuous daily dosing schedule. However, data from the Phase 1 ZN-c3-001 dose optimization trial revealed that an intermittent dosing schedule was superior.[16] The company established a recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) for monotherapy of 400 mg administered once daily on a 5 days on, 2 days off weekly schedule. This intermittent regimen achieved a remarkable outcome: it more than doubled the steady-state drug exposure compared to continuous dosing, while simultaneously improving the drug's safety and tolerability profile. This finding was critical, as it demonstrated that higher, more efficacious drug levels could be achieved without a corresponding increase in treatment-related discontinuations, thereby widening the therapeutic index.[16]
A cornerstone of the Azenosertib clinical development program is the identification and validation of Cyclin E1 as a predictive biomarker of response. The CCNE1 gene, which encodes the Cyclin E1 protein, is a known oncogenic driver in numerous solid tumors, including a significant subset of HGSOC.[1] High levels of Cyclin E1, which can result from gene amplification or other mechanisms, are strongly associated with resistance to conventional chemotherapy and poor patient outcomes.[1]
The biological rationale linking Cyclin E1 to WEE1 inhibitor sensitivity is compelling. Cyclin E1 partners with CDK2 to drive the cell cycle through the G1/S transition. Overexpression of Cyclin E1 leads to hyperactivation of CDK2, which causes uncontrolled and premature firing of DNA replication origins. This results in a state of chronic, high-level replication stress and an accumulation of DNA damage.[1] To survive this self-inflicted genomic stress, these cancer cells become exceptionally dependent on the WEE1-mediated G2/M checkpoint to pause the cell cycle and attempt repairs.
This hypothesis was confirmed in preclinical studies, which showed a significant association between high Cyclin E1 protein expression and sensitivity to Azenosertib.[4] This translational insight was then carried into the clinic, where retrospective analyses of trial data showed that patients with Cyclin E1-positive tumors derived the greatest benefit from Azenosertib, both as a monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy.[17] This validation of Cyclin E1 as a predictive biomarker has enabled a focused, biomarker-driven clinical strategy, allowing for the selection of patients most likely to respond and de-risking the path to potential regulatory approval.
The clinical development of Azenosertib is being pursued through a multifaceted strategy, investigating its potential in three distinct therapeutic settings: as a monotherapy, in combination with traditional chemotherapies, and in combination with other molecularly targeted agents.[1] This broad approach aims to maximize the drug's utility across a wide range of oncologic indications with high unmet need.
The monotherapy program is heavily focused on tumors with intrinsic genomic instability, where the synthetic lethal relationship with WEE1 inhibition is most pronounced.
The rationale for combination therapy is to enhance the cytotoxic effects of DNA-damaging agents by preventing cancer cells from repairing the damage induced.
Not all investigational paths have proceeded as planned, reflecting the dynamic nature of clinical development and strategic resource allocation.
The following table provides a consolidated overview of the key clinical trials in the Azenosertib development program.
Table 2: Detailed Overview of Key Azenosertib Clinical Trials
Trial Name / ID | NCT Number | Phase | Indication(s) | Intervention | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DENALI | NCT05128825 | 2 | Platinum-Resistant Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer (Cyclin E1 driven) | Azenosertib Monotherapy | Active |
TETON | NCT04814108 | 2 | Recurrent/Persistent Uterine Serous Carcinoma | Azenosertib Monotherapy | Active |
ZN-c3-001 | NCT04158336 | 1 | Advanced Solid Tumors | Azenosertib Monotherapy | Active |
MAMMOTH | NCT05198804 | 1/2 | PARP-Resistant Ovarian Cancer | Azenosertib Monotherapy & Combination with Niraparib | Active (Monotherapy); Discontinued (Combination) |
ZN-c3-003 | NCT04833582 | 1/2 | Relapsed/Refractory Osteosarcoma | Azenosertib + Gemcitabine | Active |
NCT04516447 | NCT04516447 | 1b/2 | Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer | Azenosertib + Chemotherapy (Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, etc.) | Active |
ZN-c3-016 | NCT05743036 | 1/2 | BRAF V600E-mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer | Azenosertib + Encorafenib + Cetuximab | Terminated |
NCT05431582 | NCT05431582 | 1 | Metastatic Solid Tumors (CCNE1 amplified, TP53 mutant) | Azenosertib + Bevacizumab ± Pembrolizumab | Withdrawn |
Clinical data from the Azenosertib program have demonstrated meaningful and encouraging anti-tumor activity, particularly in heavily pretreated patient populations with high unmet needs.
Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer (PROC): The most compelling efficacy data to date comes from the monotherapy trials in PROC, especially when enriching for the Cyclin E1 biomarker.
Combination with Chemotherapy in PROC: Azenosertib has also shown strong synergistic activity with standard chemotherapy.
Uterine Serous Carcinoma (USC):
Azenosertib has been administered to over 500 patients in monotherapy trials and has been described as generally well-tolerated, with a manageable safety profile, particularly with the optimized intermittent dosing schedule.[22] The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) are consistent with the mechanism of action and are primarily hematologic and gastrointestinal in nature.[22]
The following table summarizes key efficacy and safety outcomes from the most informative clinical trials.
Table 3: Summary of Efficacy and Safety Outcomes from Pivotal Trials
Trial (Cohort) | Indication | N | Efficacy Outcome(s) | Key Grade ≥3 TRAEs (%) | Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DENALI (Part 1b) | Cyclin E1+ PROC | 43 (evaluable) | ORR: 34.9%; mDOR: ~5.5 mos | Fatigue (15.7%), Thrombocytopenia (11.8%), Neutropenia (10.8%) | 18 |
ZN-c3-001 | PROC & USC (intermittent dose) | 19 | ORR: 36.8%; mPFS: 6.5 mos | Not specified in detail | 16 |
ZN-c3-001 (USC Cohort) | Uterine Serous Carcinoma | 9 (evaluable) | ORR: 33.3%; DCR: 88.9% | Not specified in detail | 35 |
NCT04516447 | Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer | Not specified | ORR (w/ Paclitaxel): 50.0%; ORR (w/ Carboplatin): 35.7% | Neutropenia (25.5%), Thrombocytopenia (27.5%), Anemia (15.7%) | 17 |
The clinical development of Azenosertib has been marked by significant regulatory interactions with the U.S. FDA, reflecting both the promise and the challenges of this novel agent.
In January 2025, the FDA granted Fast Track Designation to Azenosertib for the treatment of patients with Cyclin E1-positive, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.[41] This designation is a critical milestone, as it is intended to facilitate the development and expedite the review of drugs that treat serious conditions and fill an unmet medical need. It underscores the agency's recognition of the high unmet need in this patient population and the potential of Azenosertib, guided by its biomarker strategy, to provide a meaningful clinical benefit.[41]
However, the program also faced a significant challenge in June 2024, when the FDA placed a partial clinical hold on three monotherapy studies: ZN-c3-001, DENALI (NCT05128825), and TETON (NCT04814108).[22] The hold was initiated following reports of two patient deaths in the DENALI trial, which were attributed to presumed sepsis.[40] This action halted new patient enrollment in these trials while the company worked with the agency to conduct a comprehensive safety review.
In a strong positive signal for the program, the FDA lifted the partial clinical hold in September 2024.[44] Zentalis announced that after reviewing the company's complete response, the agency cleared the resumption of enrollment in all ongoing studies with no required changes to the clinical development plan.[45] The successful and relatively swift resolution of the hold without mandated protocol modifications suggests that the FDA was satisfied with the existing safety data and risk mitigation strategies. This outcome, while originating from a negative event, may ultimately reinforce confidence in the manageability of Azenosertib's safety profile when administered to the appropriate patient population with careful monitoring.
Azenosertib is advancing in a competitive but still nascent field. Crucially, there are no FDA-approved WEE1 inhibitors on the market, giving Azenosertib a clear opportunity to be the first-in-class agent to gain approval.[1]
The most notable historical competitor in the WEE1 inhibitor class is adavosertib (AZD1775). While adavosertib has demonstrated clinical activity in various settings, its development has been challenged by a significant toxicity burden, particularly when combined with chemotherapy, which has hampered its progress.[47] Zentalis has explicitly designed Azenosertib to have advantages over other investigational therapies, citing superior selectivity and pharmacokinetic properties.[1] Indeed, clinical data from Zentalis suggests that Azenosertib combinations have achieved higher response rates and longer progression-free survival compared to historical data for adavosertib combinations in similar patient populations.[17] The superior selectivity of Azenosertib, particularly its weak activity against PLK1, is a key molecular feature intended to translate into a better safety profile and a wider therapeutic window, which could be a decisive competitive advantage.[6]
Zentalis Pharmaceuticals has outlined a clear path forward for the Azenosertib program, with several key milestones anticipated in the near to medium term. The company's strategy is heavily focused on advancing the agent toward a registration-enabling data readout.
The Azenosertib development program is built on several key strengths that position it for potential success. The foremost of these is its clear, biologically-driven biomarker strategy centered on Cyclin E1 overexpression. By focusing on a defined patient population with a high unmet need (platinum-resistant ovarian cancer) and a strong biological rationale for response, the program significantly increases its probability of demonstrating a meaningful clinical benefit. This precision-medicine approach is highly favored in modern oncology development and by regulatory agencies.
A second major strength is the successful optimization of the dosing schedule. The transition to an intermittent regimen that enhances both exposure and tolerability represents a critical clinical pharmacology achievement. It appears to have unlocked a more favorable therapeutic index, enabling the administration of a more effective dose while managing toxicity—a common hurdle that has limited other drugs in this class. Finally, as a leading candidate with no approved competitors, Azenosertib has a clear first-in-class opportunity, supported by an expedited regulatory path via its Fast Track Designation. The drug's broad potential for synergistic combinations with a variety of anti-cancer agents, including chemotherapy and potentially antibody-drug conjugates, presents a significant long-term opportunity to expand its use into other indications and lines of therapy.[48]
Despite its promise, the Azenosertib program faces significant risks and challenges. The primary risk remains its safety and tolerability profile. The mechanism of action, which involves disrupting a fundamental cellular process, inherently carries the risk of on-target toxicity, particularly myelosuppression (neutropenia, thrombocytopenia). The two deaths from sepsis that led to the clinical hold are a stark reminder of this risk. While the hold was lifted, successful clinical adoption will depend on the ability of clinicians to carefully monitor patients and proactively manage these hematologic toxicities to prevent severe infections. The therapeutic window, while improved with intermittent dosing, may still be narrow.
Another challenge lies in the execution of the biomarker strategy. The commercial success of Azenosertib in its lead indication will depend on the co-development and regulatory approval of a reliable and accessible companion diagnostic test for Cyclin E1 protein expression. The logistics of implementing this testing in routine clinical practice could present a barrier to uptake. Finally, as with any new targeted therapy, demonstrating a clear and substantial benefit over existing standards of care, which are often less expensive generic chemotherapies, will be essential for securing favorable reimbursement and achieving widespread clinical use.
Azenosertib stands as one of the most promising investigational agents in the field of DNA Damage Response. It is built upon a robust scientific foundation, targeting a validated vulnerability in genomically unstable cancers. The development program, managed by Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, has been characterized by strategic agility, particularly in its pivot to a biomarker-driven approach with Cyclin E1 and its successful optimization of the dosing regimen to enhance the drug's therapeutic index.
The future trajectory of Azenosertib hinges on the successful execution of its late-stage clinical trials. The upcoming registration-intent DENALI Part 2 study will be the ultimate test of its efficacy and safety in the target population of Cyclin E1-positive ovarian cancer. Continued vigilant management of its significant but seemingly predictable safety profile will be paramount.
In conclusion, Azenosertib is a leading candidate to become the first WEE1 inhibitor to reach the market. If the promising efficacy observed in early trials is confirmed in its registrational study, and its safety profile remains manageable in broader use, Azenosertib has the potential to become a transformative new standard of care for a well-defined population of patients with aggressive, difficult-to-treat gynecologic malignancies. Its development serves as a compelling example of modern, biomarker-driven drug development aimed at delivering a highly targeted therapy to the patients most likely to benefit.
Published at: September 19, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.