C22H29FN3O9P
1190307-88-0
Chronic Hepatitis C - Genotype 3, Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1, Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection, Chronic hepatitis C genotype 1a, Chronic hepatitis C genotype 2, Chronic hepatitis C genotype 5, Genotype 4 Chronic Hepatitis C, Genotype 6 chronic hepatitis C infection
Sofosbuvir represents a paradigm shift in the treatment of chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection, a global public health threat responsible for significant liver-related morbidity and mortality. As a first-in-class, direct-acting antiviral (DAA), Sofosbuvir is a highly potent, pan-genotypic nucleotide analog inhibitor of the HCV non-structural protein 5B (NS5B) RNA-dependent RNA polymerase.[1] Its development heralded the era of interferon-free, all-oral therapeutic regimens, fundamentally transforming the management of HCV from a chronic, difficult-to-treat condition to a curable disease.
The clinical success of Sofosbuvir is rooted in its sophisticated prodrug design, which facilitates efficient oral absorption and targeted delivery to hepatocytes, the site of viral replication.[2] Once intracellularly activated to its triphosphate form, it acts as a chain terminator, halting viral RNA synthesis with a high barrier to the development of resistance.[1] This mechanism underpins the remarkable efficacy of Sofosbuvir-based combination therapies, which consistently achieve sustained virologic response (SVR) rates exceeding 90-95%, effectively curing the infection.[1] These regimens offer a dramatically improved safety profile and shorter treatment durations compared to older interferon-based therapies.[1]
Recognized for its profound therapeutic impact, Sofosbuvir is listed on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines.[3] However, its introduction was also marked by significant socioeconomic controversy surrounding its unprecedented launch price, which ignited a global debate on drug value, intellectual property, and equitable access to transformative medicines.[1] This report provides a comprehensive monograph on Sofosbuvir, detailing its physicochemical properties, pharmacology, clinical application, safety profile, regulatory history, and broader societal impact.
The fundamental chemical and physical characteristics of Sofosbuvir are essential for understanding its formulation, stability, and behavior in biological systems. As a small molecule prodrug, its structure is precisely engineered to balance stability, solubility, and membrane permeability. These properties are summarized in Table 1.
Property | Value | Source(s) |
---|---|---|
Chemical Formula | C22H29FN3O9P | 1 |
Molecular Weight (Average) | 529.458 g/mol | 1 |
Monoisotopic Mass | 529.162544687 Da | 1 |
IUPAC Name | propan-2-yl (2S)-2-methoxy-phenoxyphosphoryl]amino]propanoate | 3 |
Appearance | White to off-white crystalline solid or powder | 13 |
Solubility | Soluble in Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), Dimethylformamide (DMF), and Ethanol. Solubility of ≥ 2 mg/mL across pH range 2-7.7 at 37 °C. Sparingly soluble in Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at pH 7.2. | 12 |
SMILES | C[C@@H](C(=O)OC(C)C)N[P@](=O)(OC[C@@H]1[C@H]([C@@]([C@@H](O1)N2C=CC(=O)NC2=O)(C)F)O)OC3=CC=CC=C3 | 3 |
InChIKey | TTZHDVOVKQGIBA-IQWMDFIBSA-N | 3 |
Log P (Partition Coefficient) | 1.62 | 13 |
pKa | 9.3 | 13 |
The therapeutic efficacy of Sofosbuvir is derived from a sophisticated mechanism involving intracellular activation to a potent viral polymerase inhibitor. This process is a hallmark of modern rational drug design.
Sofosbuvir's design as a phosphoramidate prodrug, a technology often referred to as "ProTide," is central to its clinical success. This strategy addresses a long-standing challenge in antiviral therapy: the efficient delivery of charged nucleotide analogues into target cells.[2] Nucleotide analogues are inherently potent inhibitors of viral polymerases, but their negatively charged phosphate groups prevent them from being absorbed orally or from easily crossing cell membranes.
The ProTide design circumvents this barrier by masking the phosphate's negative charge with two lipophilic groups: a phenoxy group and an L-alanine isopropyl ester.[3] This modification renders the entire molecule neutral, enabling its efficient absorption from the gastrointestinal tract and subsequent passive diffusion into hepatocytes.[2]
Once inside the target liver cell, Sofosbuvir undergoes a rapid, multi-step metabolic activation to release and activate the nucleotide [2]:
This elegant intracellular activation cascade ensures that the active antiviral agent is concentrated at the site of HCV replication, maximizing its potency while minimizing systemic exposure to the active form.
The active metabolite, GS-461203, is the key effector molecule. It functions by mimicking the natural substrate (uridine triphosphate) for the HCV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, an enzyme known as non-structural protein 5B (NS5B).[1] NS5B is absolutely essential for the replication of the viral RNA genome.
GS-461203 acts as a competitive inhibitor, binding to the GDD active site motif of the NS5B polymerase.[2] Following its incorporation into the growing viral RNA strand, it functions as a
chain terminator, definitively halting further elongation of the RNA chain.[4] This termination of RNA synthesis prevents the production of new viral genomes, thereby blocking the assembly of new, infectious viral particles.[4]
The mechanism of chain termination is attributed to the unique stereochemistry of the modified ribose sugar in Sofosbuvir. Although the molecule retains a 3'-hydroxyl group, which would typically allow for the next nucleotide to be added, the presence of the 2'-fluoro and, critically, the bulky 2'-methyl groups creates a steric clash. This spatial hindrance physically prevents the proper positioning and binding of the next incoming nucleotide, effectively terminating the polymerization process.[3]
A defining feature of Sofosbuvir is its pan-genotypic activity, demonstrating efficacy against all major HCV genotypes (1 through 6).[1] This broad spectrum of activity is possible because the catalytic site of the NS5B polymerase, the drug's target, is highly conserved across all HCV genotypes.[2] This contrasts with earlier DAAs, such as protease inhibitors, which often had activity limited to specific genotypes.
Furthermore, Sofosbuvir exhibits a high barrier to the development of resistance, a crucial advantage that contributes to its high cure rates.[1] The primary resistance-associated substitution (RAS) identified for Sofosbuvir is the
S282T mutation in the NS5B polymerase gene.[13] However, this mutation comes at a significant cost to the virus. While the S282T substitution can reduce susceptibility to Sofosbuvir by 2- to 18-fold, it simultaneously impairs the function of the polymerase, reducing the virus's replication capacity (viral fitness) by as much as 89-99%.[13] This severe fitness cost makes the resistant variant less likely to emerge during therapy and less able to persist and cause treatment relapse. In pivotal clinical trials, no viral resistance to Sofosbuvir was detected among patients who relapsed after completing therapy.[21]
The pharmacokinetic profile of Sofosbuvir is characterized by rapid absorption and conversion of the parent prodrug, extensive metabolism to an inactive but persistent primary metabolite, and efficient targeting of the active moiety to the liver.
Sofosbuvir is administered orally as a 400 mg once-daily tablet, which can be taken with or without food.[22] Following oral administration, the parent drug is absorbed rapidly, with peak plasma concentrations (Tmax) reached between 0.5 and 2 hours post-dose.[3] The administration of a single dose with a standardized high-fat meal slows the rate of absorption but increases the total exposure (Area Under the Curve, or AUC) to Sofosbuvir by approximately 1.8-fold, with little effect on the peak concentration (Cmax).[24] However, this food effect is not considered clinically significant for the primary inactive metabolite, GS-331007, whose exposure is not altered by a high-fat meal.[24]
Sofosbuvir is moderately bound to human plasma proteins, with estimates ranging from 61% to 85%.[3] In contrast, its primary circulating metabolite, GS-331007, shows minimal protein binding.[3] Sofosbuvir is a substrate of the efflux drug transporters P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP), which can influence its intestinal absorption.[3] A key feature of its distribution is the efficient uptake by the liver, its intended site of action. Sofosbuvir undergoes high first-pass hepatic extraction (estimated to be >70%), leading to intrahepatic concentrations of the active triphosphate metabolite that are many-fold higher than plasma levels and far exceed the concentrations required for effective viral inhibition.[17]
As described previously, Sofosbuvir is a prodrug that is extensively metabolized, primarily within hepatocytes, to form its pharmacologically active triphosphate metabolite, GS-461203.[2] This metabolic activation does not involve cytochrome P450 (CYP) or UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes, reducing the potential for certain types of drug-drug interactions.[24] The predominant drug-related material circulating in the plasma is the
pharmacologically inactive nucleoside metabolite, GS-331007 (also known as PSI-6206). This inactive metabolite accounts for over 90% of the total systemic drug-related exposure.[24]
The distinction between the transient parent drug and the persistent inactive metabolite is fundamental to understanding Sofosbuvir's clinical pharmacology. While plasma concentrations of the parent drug are fleeting, the therapeutic effect is driven by the sustained intracellular concentrations of the active triphosphate in the liver. The inactive GS-331007 metabolite in the plasma serves as a marker of overall drug exposure but is not a direct measure of antiviral activity. This explains why once-daily dosing is effective despite the short half-life of the parent drug and why initial concerns about renal impairment were focused on the accumulation of the inactive, renally cleared GS-331007.
The primary route of elimination for Sofosbuvir and its metabolites is renal. Following a single 400 mg oral dose, approximately 80% of the dose is recovered in the urine. This is composed almost entirely of the inactive metabolite GS-331007 (78% of the dose), with only a minor fraction excreted as the unchanged parent drug (3.5%).[3] A smaller portion, approximately 14% of the dose, is recovered in the feces.[3]
The elimination half-lives of the parent drug and its main metabolite differ dramatically. The parent drug, Sofosbuvir, is cleared from the plasma very rapidly, with an elimination half-life (t1/2) of approximately 0.4 hours.[3] In stark contrast, the inactive metabolite GS-331007 has a much longer elimination half-life of approximately
27 hours, which supports the once-daily dosing regimen.[3]
Parameter | Sofosbuvir (Parent Prodrug) | GS-331007 (Inactive Metabolite) | Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|
Tmax (Time to Peak Concentration) | 0.5–2 hours | 2–4 hours | 3 |
Plasma Protein Binding | 61–85% | Minimal | 3 |
Elimination Half-life (t1/2) | ~0.4 hours | ~27 hours | 3 |
Primary Route of Excretion | Hepatic metabolism | Renal (urine) | 3 |
Sofosbuvir is the cornerstone of modern HCV therapy, used exclusively in combination regimens that have redefined the standard of care.
Sofosbuvir is indicated as a component of a combination antiviral regimen for the treatment of chronic HCV infection across all major genotypes (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6).[1] It is approved for a wide range of patient populations, including:
Monotherapy with Sofosbuvir is not an approved or effective treatment and is not recommended.[21] It must always be co-administered with other antiviral agents, such as ribavirin, peginterferon alfa (in older regimens), ledipasvir, or velpatasvir.[15]
The approval of Sofosbuvir was supported by a robust Phase 3 clinical trial program that demonstrated its superiority or non-inferiority to previous standards of care. Key trials included NEUTRINO, FISSION, POSITRON, and FUSION.[2] The primary endpoint in these studies was Sustained Virologic Response 12 weeks after the completion of therapy (SVR12), defined as undetectable HCV RNA, which is considered a virologic cure.[1]
The development of fixed-dose combinations further simplified treatment and improved outcomes:
The recommended dosing for Sofosbuvir-containing regimens is as follows:
The specific combination of drugs and the duration of therapy are determined by HCV genotype, cirrhosis status, and prior treatment history, as summarized in Table 3.
Patient Population (Adults) | Recommended Regimen | Duration | Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|
Genotypes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 | |||
Treatment-naïve & treatment-experienced, without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis | Epclusa® (Sofosbuvir 400 mg / Velpatasvir 100 mg) | 12 weeks | 28 |
Genotypes 1, 4, 5, or 6 | |||
Treatment-naïve & treatment-experienced, without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis | Harvoni® (Sofosbuvir 400 mg / Ledipasvir 90 mg) | 8, 12, or 24 weeks* | 23 |
Genotype 2 | |||
Treatment-naïve & treatment-experienced | Sovaldi® (Sofosbuvir 400 mg) + Ribavirin | 12 weeks | 22 |
Genotype 3 | |||
Treatment-naïve & treatment-experienced | Sovaldi® (Sofosbuvir 400 mg) + Ribavirin | 24 weeks | 22 |
Decompensated Cirrhosis (Any Genotype) | |||
All patients | Epclusa® + Ribavirin | 12 weeks | 28 |
*Duration depends on treatment history, cirrhosis status, and baseline viral load. |
Sofosbuvir-based regimens are generally well-tolerated, representing a significant improvement over the toxicities associated with older interferon-based treatments.[1]
The adverse effect profile is largely dependent on the combination agents used with Sofosbuvir.
Adverse Reaction | Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin (24 weeks) | Sofosbuvir + Peg-IFN + Ribavirin (12 weeks) | Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir (12 weeks) |
---|---|---|---|
Fatigue | 30% | 59% | 22% |
Headache | 30% | 36% | 22% |
Nausea | 13% | 34% | 8% |
Insomnia | 16% | 25% | 5% |
Anemia | 10% | 21% | <2% |
Pruritus | 27% | 17% | <2% |
Diarrhea | 12% | 12% | 5% |
Incidence data compiled from product labels and clinical trial reports.21 |
Despite its favorable safety profile, there are critical warnings associated with the use of Sofosbuvir-containing regimens.
The potential for drug-drug interactions with Sofosbuvir primarily involves drugs that affect the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transporter. Interactions with co-formulated agents (e.g., velpatasvir) must also be considered.
Sofosbuvir is a substrate of the intestinal drug efflux transporter P-gp.[3] Co-administration with potent intestinal P-gp inducers can dramatically increase the efflux of Sofosbuvir back into the gut lumen, thereby significantly decreasing its absorption and plasma concentrations. This can lead to a loss of therapeutic effect and virologic failure.[3] Consequently, co-administration with the following potent P-gp inducers is
not recommended or is contraindicated:
For example, co-administration with carbamazepine has been shown to decrease the Sofosbuvir AUC by 48%.[36]
The interaction profile of the fixed-dose combination product must be considered. For example, in Epclusa® (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir), the solubility of velpatasvir is pH-dependent.
Interacting Drug/Class | Mechanism of Interaction | Clinical Effect | Management Recommendation |
---|---|---|---|
Amiodarone | Pharmacodynamic interaction (mechanism unknown) | Risk of serious symptomatic bradycardia | Co-administration is not recommended. If unavoidable, requires inpatient cardiac monitoring. |
Potent P-gp Inducers (Rifampin, St. John's Wort, Carbamazepine, Phenytoin) | Induction of intestinal P-gp transporter | Decreased absorption and plasma concentration of Sofosbuvir, leading to potential loss of efficacy. | Co-administration is not recommended. |
Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) (e.g., Omeprazole) | Increased gastric pH, reducing solubility of Velpatasvir | Decreased absorption and concentration of Velpatasvir (component of Epclusa®/Vosevi®), potentially reducing efficacy. | Not recommended unless medically necessary. If required, administer Epclusa® with food 4 hours before omeprazole. |
Digoxin | P-gp inhibition by Velpatasvir | May increase digoxin concentrations. | Therapeutic concentration monitoring of digoxin is recommended. |
Statins (e.g., Rosuvastatin) | BCRP/OATP inhibition by Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir | May significantly increase statin concentrations, increasing the risk of myopathy. | Use with caution and at reduced doses, or consider alternative statins. |
The story of Sofosbuvir is one of rapid clinical development, regulatory success, and profound socioeconomic consequence.
Sofosbuvir's journey from laboratory discovery to market was remarkably swift, facilitated by its clear therapeutic benefit and regulatory mechanisms designed to accelerate access to breakthrough medicines.
Date | Milestone/Event | Significance |
---|---|---|
2007 | Discovery | Sofosbuvir (then PSI-7977) was discovered by Michael Sofia at Pharmasset.3 |
2011 | Acquisition | Gilead Sciences acquired Pharmasset for approximately $11 billion, gaining the rights to Sofosbuvir.3 |
April 2013 | NDA Submission | Gilead submitted the New Drug Application (NDA) for Sofosbuvir to the U.S. FDA.26 |
June 2013 | Priority Review | The FDA granted Priority Review designation to Sofosbuvir.26 |
Nov 22, 2013 | EMA Recommendation | The EMA's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) issued a positive opinion, recommending marketing authorization.21 |
Dec 6, 2013 | U.S. FDA Approval | Sofosbuvir was approved by the FDA under the brand name Sovaldi®.6 |
Oct 2014 | Harvoni® Approval | The fixed-dose combination of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (Harvoni®) was approved by the FDA.1 |
June/July 2016 | Epclusa® Approval | The pan-genotypic fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (Epclusa®) was approved by the FDA and EMA.41 |
2017-2021 | Pediatric Expansion | Approvals were expanded to include pediatric populations as young as 3 years old.26 |
The clinical triumph of Sofosbuvir was immediately met with a global firestorm over its price. At its launch in the United States, the wholesale acquisition cost was set at $1,000 per tablet, equating to $84,000 for a standard 12-week course of treatment.[1] This unprecedented price for a curative small-molecule drug sparked intense controversy among patients, payers, and policymakers worldwide.
The high cost created significant access barriers, forcing public and private payers to implement strict rationing criteria, often limiting treatment to only those patients with the most advanced liver disease.[3] This situation led to U.S. congressional inquiries, high-profile patent litigation between Gilead and Merck, and a global debate on the definition of drug value.[3]
This drug's story illustrates a fundamental paradox of modern medicine: the development of a near-perfect scientific cure whose societal benefit was initially constrained by its economic model. The justification for the price was based on the immense R&D investment (including the $11 billion acquisition of Pharmasset) and the long-term healthcare savings from preventing the costly complications of chronic HCV, such as cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver transplantation.[3] However, the immediate, massive budget impact was unsustainable for most healthcare systems.
The ensuing crisis forced a global reckoning and spurred innovative access strategies. In response to immense international pressure, Gilead established tiered pricing structures and entered into voluntary licensing agreements with generic pharmaceutical manufacturers in India and other countries. These agreements enabled the production and sale of high-quality, low-cost generic versions of Sofosbuvir in over 90 developing nations, with prices dropping to as low as $300 per 12-week course.[3] The Sofosbuvir pricing saga has left a lasting legacy, permanently altering the dynamics of pharmaceutical pricing negotiations, empowering payers, and serving as the primary case study in ongoing global discussions about health equity and access to innovative medicines.
The broad-spectrum potential of Sofosbuvir, rooted in its targeting of a conserved viral polymerase, has led to investigation beyond its approved indication for HCV.
The NS5B polymerase of HCV belongs to a family of enzymes found in other viruses of the Flaviviridae family. This shared biology provides a strong rationale for exploring Sofosbuvir's activity against related pathogens.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, existing antiviral drugs were screened for activity against SARS-CoV-2. The RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) of coronaviruses is a key therapeutic target.
Sofosbuvir is unequivocally a landmark achievement in modern medicine and a triumph of rational drug design. Its development and deployment as the backbone of simple, safe, and highly effective all-oral regimens transformed chronic hepatitis C from a progressively debilitating disease into a curable condition for the vast majority of patients. By targeting the conserved NS5B polymerase with a cleverly designed prodrug, Sofosbuvir provided a pan-genotypic solution with a high barrier to resistance, setting a new gold standard for antiviral therapy.
The legacy of Sofosbuvir, however, is twofold. Its clinical success is mirrored by the profound and ongoing debate it ignited regarding the value, pricing, and accessibility of innovative medicines. The controversy surrounding its initial cost challenged healthcare systems globally and forced a paradigm shift in market access strategies, including the widespread use of voluntary licensing to enable affordable generic production in low- and middle-income countries.
Looking forward, the lessons from the Sofosbuvir experience continue to resonate. It serves as a powerful case study for policymakers, pharmaceutical companies, and public health advocates on balancing innovation with affordability. The scientific success of its prodrug strategy continues to inform the development of new nucleotide-based therapies, while its potential as a broad-spectrum antiviral against other challenging pathogens like yellow fever warrants further rigorous investigation. Ultimately, Sofosbuvir's story is a defining narrative of the 21st century, illustrating both the remarkable power of science to conquer disease and the complex societal challenges that must be overcome to ensure that such breakthroughs benefit all of humanity.
Published at: July 22, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.