Dafiro, Diovan, Diovan Hct, Entresto, Exforge, Exforge Hct, Exforge HCT, Amlodipine / Valsartan Mylan, Dafiro HCT, Copalia, Copalia HCT
Small Molecule
C24H29N5O3
137862-53-4
Cardiovascular Mortality, Diabetic Nephropathy, Heart Failure, Hypertension, Moderate Essential Hypertension, Chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (NYHA Class II), Chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (NYHA Class III), Chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (NYHA Class IV), Hospitalization due to cardiac failure
Valsartan is a nonpeptide, orally active small molecule pharmacologically classified as an Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB).[1] Since its patenting in 1990 and introduction to medical use in 1996, it has become a cornerstone therapy in cardiovascular medicine, primarily for the management of hypertension, heart failure, and the reduction of cardiovascular risk following a myocardial infarction.[1] As a testament to its widespread clinical utility and established safety profile, valsartan was the 117th most commonly prescribed medication in the United States in 2022, accounting for over 5 million prescriptions.[1]
The development and clinical adoption of valsartan and other ARBs represented a significant therapeutic advance. These agents provided a highly effective alternative for patients who were unable to tolerate Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, a preceding class of drugs that, while effective, are associated with a notable incidence of a dry, irritating cough.[4] This key difference in tolerability is a direct result of valsartan's more specific mechanism of action within the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.[2]
Valsartan is available as a single-agent therapy and as a critical component in several widely used combination products that enhance efficacy and patient convenience. Monotherapy formulations are marketed under brand names such as Diovan® and, previously, Prexxartan®, an oral solution that has since been discontinued.[7] Its role has been further expanded through fixed-dose combinations with other antihypertensive agents, including the calcium channel blocker amlodipine (Exforge®) and the thiazide diuretic hydrochlorothiazide (Diovan HCT®).[4] Most notably, its combination with the neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril (Entresto®) has revolutionized the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.[11]
Table 1: Key Drug Identifiers for Valsartan
| Identifier/Name | Value | Source(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Drug Name | Valsartan | 1 |
| DrugBank ID | DB00177 | 1 |
| CAS Number | 137862-53-4 | 1 |
| Type | Small Molecule | 1 |
| UNII | 80M03YXJ7I | 1 |
| IUPAC Name | (S)-3-methyl-2-(N-{[2'-(2H-1,2,3,4-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl]methyl}pentanamido)butanoic acid | 1 |
| Synonyms | CGP 48933 | 13 |
| Monotherapy Brands | Diovan®, Prexxartan® (discontinued) | 7 |
| Combination Brands | Diovan HCT®, Exforge®, Exforge HCT®, Entresto®, Byvalson®, Valturna® | 4 |
Valsartan is a synthetic organic compound with the molecular formula C24H29N5O3 and a molecular weight of approximately 435.5 g/mol.[13] Its chemical architecture is precisely engineered to achieve its specific pharmacological effect. The structure incorporates three key moieties that dictate its activity and properties [17]:
In its pure form, valsartan is a white to off-white, microcrystalline, and hygroscopic powder, a property that necessitates storage under dry conditions to maintain stability.[17] It is formulated for oral administration as immediate-release tablets in various strengths (40 mg, 80 mg, 160 mg, and 320 mg), as capsules, and as an extemporaneously prepared liquid suspension for pediatric or other patients unable to swallow tablets.[4]
The solubility of valsartan is a critical determinant of its oral absorption and is highly dependent on pH. The molecule contains two weakly acidic functional groups, the tetrazole ring and the carboxylic acid, with pKa values of approximately 3.9 and 4.7, respectively.[19] This results in very poor aqueous solubility under acidic conditions, such as those found in the stomach (reported as 84.99 mg/L at 25°C).[17] As the pH increases towards neutral, as in the small intestine, the molecule deprotonates to form a more soluble dianion salt, causing its solubility to increase by a factor of approximately 1,000.[19] This pH-dependent solubility profile is central to its complex absorption kinetics.
This complexity is reflected in a notable discrepancy in its Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) designation. Some sources classify valsartan as a BCS Class III drug (high solubility, low permeability), while others classify it as BCS Class II (low solubility, high permeability).[17] This apparent contradiction arises from the definition of "high" versus "low" solubility. The BCS system typically assesses solubility at the lowest value within the physiological pH range of 1.2 to 6.8. Given valsartan's poor solubility at acidic pH, it would logically fall into a low-solubility category (Class II or IV). However, if its much higher solubility at the neutral pH of the intestine is considered, it could be argued to be a high-solubility compound (Class I or III). Its relatively low absolute bioavailability of ~25% supports the "low permeability" aspect of the Class III designation.[2] This dual character suggests that valsartan's absorption is likely dissolution rate-limited in the stomach and permeability-limited in the intestine. This nuanced behavior helps explain the significant negative food effect, where co-administration with food can decrease total drug exposure (AUC) by 40% and peak concentration (
Cmax) by 50%, as well as the high inter-subject variability in its pharmacokinetics.[2]
Table 2: Chemical and Physical Properties of Valsartan
| Property | Value | Source(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Molecular Formula | C24H29N5O3 | 13 |
| Molecular Weight | 435.52 g/mol | 16 |
| Physical Form | White to tan, hygroscopic, microcrystalline powder | 17 |
| Melting Point | 97-117 °C (range from various sources) | 17 |
| pKa | 3.9 and 4.7 | 19 |
| Water Solubility | 84.99 mg/L (at 25°C, unbuffered) | 17 |
| LogP | 1.2–2.8 (pH dependent); XLogP: 5.79 | 14 |
| BCS Class | Class III (High Solubility, Low Permeability) or Class II (Low Solubility, High Permeability) | 17 |
| Stability | Stable under dry conditions; hygroscopic | 17 |
Valsartan exerts its therapeutic effects through potent and highly specific antagonism of the Angiotensin II Type 1 (AT1) receptor.[2] The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is a critical hormonal cascade that regulates blood pressure and fluid balance. Its principal effector, Angiotensin II (Ang II), is a powerful vasoconstrictor that acts on AT1 receptors in various tissues, including vascular smooth muscle and the adrenal glands, to raise blood pressure.[2] Ang II also stimulates the synthesis and release of aldosterone, which promotes renal sodium and water retention, further increasing blood volume and pressure.[2]
By selectively blocking the binding of Ang II to the AT1 receptor, valsartan effectively inhibits these pressor and volume-expanding effects, leading to vasodilation, reduced aldosterone secretion, and a lowering of blood pressure.[2] This blockade is highly selective; valsartan has an affinity for the AT1 receptor that is approximately 20,000 times greater than its affinity for the Angiotensin II Type 2 (AT2) receptor, ensuring its effects are targeted specifically to the pressor arm of the RAAS.[2]
This mechanism distinguishes valsartan and other ARBs from the earlier class of ACE inhibitors. ACE inhibitors work "upstream" by blocking the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), which catalyzes the conversion of Angiotensin I to the active Ang II.[2] While effective, ACE also degrades bradykinin, a peptide that promotes vasodilation but can also mediate inflammatory responses in the airway. The accumulation of bradykinin is the primary cause of the persistent dry cough and, in rare cases, angioedema associated with ACE inhibitor therapy. Because valsartan acts directly at the receptor and does not inhibit ACE (also known as kininase II), it does not interfere with bradykinin metabolism. This fundamental mechanistic difference is responsible for the significantly improved tolerability of valsartan with respect to cough, making it a preferred alternative for patients who experience this side effect with ACE inhibitors.[2]
The pharmacodynamic effects of valsartan are a direct consequence of AT1 receptor blockade. An oral dose of 80 mg can inhibit the pressor response to an infusion of Ang II by approximately 80% at peak effect, with significant inhibition persisting for 24 hours.[2] The onset of antihypertensive activity occurs within approximately 2 hours of a single oral dose, and the maximum reduction in blood pressure is achieved within 6 hours.[2] During chronic therapy, the antihypertensive effect is substantially present within two weeks, with the maximal effect generally attained after four weeks of continuous dosing.[2]
Blockade of the AT1 receptor also leads to a reactive increase in circulating plasma levels of Ang II as part of a negative feedback loop. This elevated Ang II may then stimulate the unblocked AT2 receptors.[2] The physiological role of AT2 receptor stimulation is complex but is generally considered to be counter-regulatory to AT1 receptor effects, potentially contributing to vasodilation, antiproliferation, and other cardioprotective actions.[28]
Following oral administration, valsartan is rapidly absorbed, with peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) being reached in 2 to 4 hours.[2] However, its absolute bioavailability is low and exhibits significant variability, averaging about 25% with a range of 10% to 35% for the tablet formulation.[2] As noted previously, co-administration with food significantly impairs absorption, decreasing both the AUC and
Cmax by approximately 40% and 50%, respectively.[2]
A critical pharmacokinetic consideration is the substantial difference in bioavailability between the tablet and oral suspension formulations. Official prescribing information explicitly warns that the two dosage forms are not substitutable on a milligram-per-milligram basis because the systemic exposure (AUC) from the oral suspension is 1.6 times (or 60%) higher than that from the tablet.[21] This is not a minor formulation variance but a clinically crucial distinction. The low bioavailability of the solid tablet is largely due to its poor, pH-dependent solubility, which makes the rate of dissolution in the gastrointestinal tract a limiting factor for absorption. The oral suspension, in contrast, presents the drug as fine particles, bypassing the slow tablet disintegration and dissolution steps. This leads to a much more efficient and complete absorption process, resulting in significantly higher total drug exposure. This difference has profound safety implications, as an inadvertent switch between formulations without appropriate dose adjustment could lead to significant underdosing (risking loss of efficacy) or overdosing (increasing the risk of adverse effects like hypotension and hyperkalemia). This risk is particularly acute in the pediatric population, for whom the suspension is primarily intended and dosing is most sensitive.[30]
Once absorbed, valsartan is extensively bound to plasma proteins, with a binding fraction of 94% to 97%, primarily to serum albumin.[5] It has a relatively small steady-state volume of distribution of approximately 17 liters, indicating that the drug is largely confined to the plasma and extracellular fluid compartments rather than distributing extensively into tissues.[17]
Valsartan undergoes very limited biotransformation in the body. The only significant metabolite identified is valeryl 4-hydroxy valsartan, which accounts for less than 10% of the dose.[23] This metabolite is pharmacologically inactive, with an affinity for the AT1 receptor that is approximately 200 times lower than that of the parent compound.[2] This minimal reliance on hepatic metabolism, particularly the cytochrome P450 system, gives valsartan a lower potential for metabolic drug-drug interactions compared to other ARBs like losartan, which is a prodrug requiring CYP-mediated activation.[29]
Valsartan is eliminated from the body following bi-exponential decay kinetics, with a terminal elimination half-life reported to be between 6 and 9 hours.[2] The primary route of elimination is via biliary excretion into the feces, which accounts for approximately 83% of the dose being eliminated as unchanged drug. The remaining portion, about 13%, is excreted in the urine.[17] The total plasma clearance is approximately 2 L/h, while renal clearance is only 0.62 L/h, confirming that non-renal pathways dominate its elimination.[2] Because of this predominantly hepatic/biliary clearance, no initial dosage adjustment is typically required for patients with mild-to-moderate renal impairment.[2]
Valsartan is an established therapy with robust evidence supporting its use across a spectrum of cardiovascular conditions. Its FDA-approved indications include hypertension, heart failure, and post-myocardial infarction risk reduction.[33]
Valsartan is indicated for the treatment of high blood pressure in adults and pediatric patients aged one year and older.[7] Its primary goal in this setting is to lower blood pressure, thereby reducing the long-term risk of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events, particularly strokes and myocardial infarctions.[33] Clinical guidelines recognize valsartan and other ARBs as a reasonable first-line treatment option for most patients with hypertension, on par with ACE inhibitors, thiazide diuretics, and calcium channel blockers.[1] Its efficacy is dose-dependent over the approved range of 80 mg to 320 mg once daily, and it has demonstrated consistent blood pressure-lowering effects in a wide variety of patient populations, including the elderly and those with comorbidities like diabetes and chronic kidney disease.[6]
Valsartan is indicated for the treatment of heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] Class II-IV) to decrease the need for hospitalization.[1] Early studies demonstrated its ability to reduce rates of mortality and hospitalization for heart failure.[1] However, the role of valsartan in heart failure has been fundamentally redefined by its combination with the neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril in the product Entresto®.
This combination represents a paradigm shift in the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). For decades, the cornerstone of HFrEF therapy was RAAS inhibition with an ACE inhibitor or an ARB. The development of Entresto introduced a novel, dual-mechanism approach. Sacubitril works by inhibiting neprilysin, an enzyme responsible for the breakdown of beneficial endogenous natriuretic peptides. These peptides promote vasodilation, natriuresis, and diuresis, and inhibit adverse cardiac remodeling. By blocking their degradation, sacubitril enhances these protective cardiovascular effects. However, neprilysin also degrades Ang II; therefore, inhibiting it alone would lead to a harmful accumulation of Ang II. The innovation of Entresto lies in pairing sacubitril with valsartan. The valsartan component specifically blocks the AT1 receptor, preventing the deleterious effects of the increased Ang II levels that result from neprilysin inhibition.
The landmark PARADIGM-HF clinical trial compared the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan against the previous gold-standard ACE inhibitor, enalapril, in over 8,000 HFrEF patients.[1] The trial was stopped early due to the overwhelming superiority of the sacubitril/valsartan arm, which demonstrated a significant reduction in the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure.[12] This transformative result led to a rapid update in clinical practice guidelines, which now recommend an Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI) like sacubitril/valsartan as a first-line, foundational therapy for eligible patients with symptomatic HFrEF, elevating valsartan from a standalone ARB to an indispensable component of a next-generation treatment.[11]
Valsartan is also indicated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular mortality in clinically stable adult patients who have experienced a heart attack and have subsequent left ventricular failure or dysfunction.[3] The clinical evidence for this indication was primarily established in the VALIANT (Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial), which showed that valsartan was as effective as the ACE inhibitor captopril in improving survival in this high-risk population.[28] This established valsartan as a critical therapeutic alternative for post-MI patients, especially those who cannot tolerate ACE inhibitors.
While not a formal FDA-approved indication for valsartan specifically, its renoprotective effects are well-documented, and it is frequently used off-label for this purpose in patients with Type 2 diabetes.[1] By mitigating the effects of Ang II on glomerular hemodynamics, valsartan has been shown to decrease the rate of progression of albuminuria (a key marker of kidney damage), promote regression to normal albumin levels, and potentially slow the progression toward end-stage kidney disease.[1] These benefits make it an important component of comprehensive risk management in hypertensive patients with diabetes.
The dosing of valsartan must be carefully tailored to the specific indication, patient age, and clinical response, with additional considerations for renal and hepatic function. It may be administered with or without food, though consistent administration with respect to meals is advisable.[27]
As previously detailed, the oral tablet and oral suspension formulations are not bioequivalent and cannot be substituted on a milligram-for-milligram basis without appropriate dose adjustment.[21] The oral suspension is typically prepared from tablets by a pharmacist using specified suspending and sweetening vehicles like Ora-Plus® and Ora-Sweet SF®.[27]
Table 3: Valsartan Dosing and Administration Summary
| Indication | Patient Population | Starting Dose | Titration / Dose Range | Target / Maximum Dose |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypertension | Adults | 80 mg or 160 mg once daily | 80–320 mg once daily | 320 mg once daily |
| Pediatrics (1–5 years) | 1 mg/kg once daily (suspension) | Titrate up to 4 mg/kg once daily | 4 mg/kg once daily (max 160 mg) | |
| Pediatrics (6–16 years) | 1.3 mg/kg once daily (max 40 mg) | Titrate up to 2.7 mg/kg once daily | 2.7 mg/kg once daily (max 160 mg) | |
| Heart Failure | Adults | 40 mg twice daily | Titrate as tolerated | 160 mg twice daily |
| Post-Myocardial Infarction | Adults | 20 mg twice daily (as early as 12h post-MI) | Titrate over 7 days to 40 mg BID, then to target | 160 mg twice daily |
Sources: [21]
Dosage Adjustments in Special Populations:
The safety and tolerability of valsartan are well-characterized, with an adverse effect profile that varies depending on the indication and patient comorbidities.[1]
Valsartan carries a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Boxed Warning, the most serious type of warning, regarding its use during pregnancy.[30]
Valsartan has numerous potential drug interactions, with the most clinically significant involving synergistic effects on blood pressure, renal function, and potassium levels.[17]
In July 2018, the landscape for valsartan and other ARBs was irrevocably altered by the discovery of carcinogenic impurities in certain manufactured batches, leading to a massive global recall.[39] This event highlighted significant vulnerabilities in the global pharmaceutical supply chain and prompted a fundamental re-evaluation of manufacturing quality control and regulatory oversight.
The initial recall was triggered by the detection of N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), a substance classified as a probable human carcinogen, in valsartan API supplied by a specific manufacturer, Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co. in China.[39] The recall was soon expanded to include another nitrosamine impurity, N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA), and other ARBs, including losartan and irbesartan, sourced from various manufacturers in China and India.[39]
The root cause of the contamination was traced back to changes in the chemical synthesis process used to manufacture the API. These modifications, likely implemented to improve yield or reduce costs, inadvertently created the right chemical conditions for the formation of these nitrosamine byproducts. Because these impurities were not expected products of the synthesis, standard quality control tests were not designed to detect them, allowing contaminated API to be distributed and formulated into finished drug products for several years before the issue was discovered.[39]
The regulatory response was swift and widespread. The FDA, along with health authorities in Europe and Canada, issued alerts and coordinated voluntary recalls from numerous generic drug manufacturers whose products contained the contaminated API.[41] The FDA published lists of affected and unaffected products to guide clinicians and patients, conducted its own laboratory testing to quantify the level of impurities, and performed risk assessments to estimate the potential cancer risk to patients.[42] While these assessments concluded that the increased lifetime cancer risk from short-term exposure was likely low for the majority of patients, the event caused significant disruption and anxiety, forcing millions of patients to switch medications.[41]
The long-term consequences of the recall are profound. Legally, it has spawned extensive litigation, with over 1,300 lawsuits consolidated into a multi-district litigation (MDL) in New Jersey. Plaintiffs in these cases allege that prolonged use of the contaminated drugs caused various forms of cancer, including liver, gastric, and colorectal cancer, with the first bellwether trials scheduled to begin in 2025.[39]
More broadly, the ARB recall served as a critical inflection point for the pharmaceutical industry and its regulators. It exposed the risks inherent in a complex, globalized supply chain where API from a single source can be used by dozens of manufacturers worldwide. This has led to a permanent and necessary shift in regulatory focus. There is now heightened scrutiny on the entire lifecycle of API synthesis, requiring manufacturers to proactively assess their processes for the potential to form mutagenic impurities and to implement more sophisticated analytical methods to detect them. This has fundamentally increased the complexity and cost of ensuring drug quality and safety, a lasting legacy of the valsartan contamination event.
While all ARBs share the same fundamental mechanism of action, there are subtle differences in their pharmacokinetic profiles and ancillary effects that may influence drug selection in specific clinical scenarios.
The comparison between the ARB and ACE inhibitor classes is one of the most well-studied in cardiovascular medicine.
Valsartan has firmly established its place as an effective, generally well-tolerated, and versatile therapeutic agent in the armamentarium against cardiovascular disease. For over two decades, it has served as a cornerstone therapy for hypertension and post-myocardial infarction risk reduction, offering a critical alternative to ACE inhibitors with a clear advantage in tolerability that fosters better patient adherence.
The legacy of valsartan, however, is dual-faceted and continues to evolve. On one hand, its role has been dramatically elevated through its incorporation into the breakthrough ARNI combination, Entresto. This has shifted the paradigm of heart failure management, establishing a new standard of care and cementing valsartan's importance not just as a standalone drug but as an indispensable component of a next-generation therapy.
On the other hand, valsartan's name is now inextricably linked to the 2018 nitrosamine contamination crisis. This event serves as a powerful and cautionary tale, exposing the inherent vulnerabilities of a globalized pharmaceutical supply chain and forcing a necessary and permanent evolution in regulatory oversight and manufacturing quality standards worldwide.
In final analysis, the clinical value and overwhelmingly positive risk-benefit profile of valsartan remain intact. Its story encapsulates both the remarkable triumphs of modern pharmacological innovation and the critical, ongoing importance of vigilance in ensuring the quality and safety of medicines.
Published at: July 14, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.