Raludotatug deruxtecan (R-DXd), also known by its development code DS-6000, is an investigational, potential first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) representing a significant advancement in targeted oncology.[1] It is being jointly developed by Daiichi Sankyo and Merck & Co. (known as MSD outside the United States and Canada) to treat solid tumors that express Cadherin-6 (CDH6), a protein implicated in the progression and poor prognosis of cancers such as ovarian and renal cell carcinoma.[1]
The therapeutic is constructed on Daiichi Sankyo's clinically and commercially successful DXd ADC technology platform. This platform combines a humanized anti-CDH6 IgG1 monoclonal antibody (raludotatug) with a highly potent topoisomerase I inhibitor payload, deruxtecan (DXd), via a stable, tumor-selective, enzymatically cleavable linker.[1] A key feature of this design is a high drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) of 8, which, combined with the membrane-permeable nature of the DXd payload, facilitates a powerful "bystander effect," enabling the destruction of adjacent tumor cells that may not express the target antigen.[6]
Clinical development is anchored by the first-in-human Phase 1 trial (NCT04707248), which has demonstrated compelling preliminary efficacy signals.[8] In a heavily pretreated cohort of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, a population with high unmet medical need, raludotatug deruxtecan achieved a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) of 46% and a median duration of response (DoR) of 11.2 months.[10] An even more pronounced ORR of 72.2% was observed in a smaller group of patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer, suggesting potent activity.[12]
Despite this promising efficacy, the program's primary challenge is its safety profile, which is characterized by a significant, dose-dependent risk of treatment-related interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis, a known class effect for DXd ADCs.[10] The occurrence of two fatal (Grade 5) ILD events at the 8.0 mg/kg dose level was a pivotal finding that led to the discontinuation of that dose and fundamentally reshaped the drug's development path.[10]
The current clinical strategy reflects a direct response to this benefit-risk challenge. The pivotal REJOICE-Ovarian01 trial (NCT06161025) has been designed as a Phase 2/3 study that incorporates a critical dose-optimization phase to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lower doses (4.8, 5.6, and 6.4 mg/kg) before advancing to a randomized Phase 3 comparison against standard-of-care chemotherapy.[14] The ultimate viability of raludotatug deruxtecan is contingent upon the results of this dose-finding stage. If a therapeutic window can be established that preserves a high degree of clinical efficacy while substantially mitigating the risk of severe or fatal ILD, raludotatug deruxtecan is well-positioned to become a transformative, first-in-class therapy for CDH6-expressing cancers. Conversely, failure to define such a window would present a significant obstacle to regulatory approval and open the door for competing CDH6-targeted agents.
Raludotatug deruxtecan is an exemplar of Daiichi Sankyo's proprietary DXd ADC technology, a platform that has achieved significant clinical and commercial success.[6] This platform has served as the foundation for multiple approved and late-stage development ADCs, including the highly successful trastuzumab deruxtecan (Enhertu) and the recently approved datopotamab deruxtecan (Datroway).[17] The consistent application of this technology across a portfolio of assets provides a deep reservoir of manufacturing, clinical, and regulatory experience. This established expertise de-risks the technological aspects of drug development, allowing the focus to shift to the unique biology of the novel target—in this case, CDH6—and the precise definition of the therapeutic window for the new conjugate. While this approach provides a known roadmap for development and toxicity management, it also sets a high bar, as the recognized risks of the platform, most notably interstitial lung disease (ILD), must be demonstrably outweighed by substantial clinical efficacy.
The DXd platform is characterized by three core components:
Raludotatug deruxtecan (CAS Number: 2610074-57-0) is an ADC that integrates the three core components of the DXd platform.[1] It consists of raludotatug, a humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody engineered to target CDH6, which is covalently attached to the deruxtecan (DXd) payload (also referred to as MAAA-1181a) via the GGFG cleavable linker.[1]
The therapeutic effect of raludotatug deruxtecan is achieved through a precise, multi-step process designed to selectively deliver its cytotoxic payload to cancer cells.[7]
Preclinical investigations have validated this mechanistic pathway. Treatment of CDH6-expressing cancer cells with raludotatug deruxtecan led to the observed phosphorylation of Chk1, a key marker of the DNA damage response, and the appearance of cleaved caspase-3, a definitive marker of apoptosis execution.[2]
A defining characteristic of the DXd payload, and a key differentiator for the entire platform, is its high cell-membrane permeability.[2] After being released inside a CDH6-positive target cell, the DXd payload is not confined to that cell. It can diffuse across the cell membrane into the surrounding tumor microenvironment and subsequently enter adjacent tumor cells, inducing apoptosis in them as well. This phenomenon is known as the "bystander effect".[2]
The strategic importance of this bystander effect cannot be overstated. A primary challenge in cancer therapy, and a common mechanism of resistance to targeted agents, is tumor heterogeneity. Within a single tumor, the expression of a target antigen like CDH6 can vary significantly from one cell to another. An ADC with a non-permeable payload can only eliminate cells that express the target, leaving a population of antigen-negative cells untouched, which can then proliferate and drive disease recurrence. The bystander effect of DXd directly addresses this challenge. By creating a "kill zone" that extends beyond the initially targeted CDH6-positive cells, raludotatug deruxtecan can eradicate neighboring antigen-negative tumor cells. This capability likely contributes significantly to the high objective response rates observed in clinical trials and suggests that the drug may be effective even in tumors with mixed or moderate levels of CDH6 expression, thereby broadening its potential clinical utility and overcoming a major hurdle for targeted cancer therapies.
The selection of a suitable target antigen is arguably the most critical determinant of an ADC's success. The ideal target is highly expressed on the surface of tumor cells but has minimal or no expression in vital healthy tissues. Cadherin-6 (CDH6) largely fits this profile, making it an attractive target for ADC development.[2]
CDH6, also known as K-cadherin, is a member of the type II classical cadherin family of calcium-dependent transmembrane glycoproteins.[4] These proteins are fundamental mediators of cell-cell adhesion, playing essential roles in embryonic development, tissue morphogenesis, and the maintenance of normal tissue architecture.[5]
CDH6 is not merely a passive surface marker on cancer cells; it is functionally implicated in tumor progression and aggression. Multiple independent analyses have established a significant correlation between high CDH6 expression and adverse clinical outcomes, including advanced tumor stage and poor patient survival in both ovarian and renal cancers.[4] This makes CDH6 a negative prognostic biomarker.
The biological basis for this prognostic significance lies in its role in promoting metastasis. Research has shown that CDH6 can activate integrin signaling pathways, such as α2β1 and αIIbβ3, which in turn trigger downstream signaling cascades involving kinases like AKT and SRC.[4] These pathways are known to regulate critical cellular processes that drive metastasis, including cell adhesion, migration, and invasion.[4] Silencing CDH6 expression in preclinical models has been shown to result in a significant loss of these pro-metastatic traits.[4]
This functional role elevates CDH6 from being just a "docking site" for an ADC to an active participant in the disease process. This implies that an ADC targeting CDH6, such as raludotatug deruxtecan, may exert a dual anti-tumor effect. The primary effect is the targeted delivery of the cytotoxic DXd payload, leading to direct tumor cell killing. A potential secondary effect could be the disruption of CDH6's pro-metastatic signaling function through antibody binding and internalization. This dual mechanism strengthens the therapeutic rationale for raludotatug deruxtecan, suggesting it could not only eliminate existing tumor cells but also inhibit the very processes that lead to disease dissemination and progression, potentially resulting in more profound and durable clinical responses.
The preclinical development program for raludotatug deruxtecan provided a robust proof-of-concept, validating its potential before advancing to human trials. In vitro studies using a panel of human cancer cell lines confirmed that the cytotoxic activity of the ADC was directly dependent on the level of CDH6 expression on the cell surface, demonstrating target-specific killing.[2]
The most compelling preclinical evidence came from in vivo studies using patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. In these models, human tumors from patients with ovarian and renal cancer were implanted into immunodeficient mice. Treatment with raludotatug deruxtecan resulted in significant and often complete tumor regression across multiple PDX models, providing strong evidence of its potent anti-tumor activity in a setting that more closely mimics human disease.[2]
Pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses in mice revealed a predictable, dose-dependent plasma concentration profile, which is essential for determining appropriate dosing schedules for clinical trials.[2]
Crucially, toxicology studies were conducted in non-human primates (cynomolgus monkeys) to assess the safety profile of raludotatug deruxtecan. These studies were reported to show a "favorable" and "acceptable" safety profile, and a highest non-severely toxic dose (HNSTD) of 30 mg/kg was established.[2] This preclinical safety package was deemed sufficient to support the initiation of first-in-human clinical trials.
However, the transition from preclinical models to human subjects revealed a significant translational gap. While the non-human primate studies were described as favorable, they did not predict the severity of the interstitial lung disease (ILD) that was later observed in patients. This discrepancy is a well-recognized challenge in the development of novel therapeutics, particularly ADCs and other immunomodulatory agents. Non-human primate models, while valuable, do not always fully recapitulate complex, human-specific, immune-mediated toxicities like ILD. This underscores the limitations of preclinical toxicology for this class of drugs and reinforces the absolute necessity of meticulous safety monitoring, careful dose escalation, and adaptive trial designs in early-phase human studies. Ultimately, it is the clinical data, not the preclinical data, that defines the true therapeutic window and ultimate viability of an ADC.
The clinical development of raludotatug deruxtecan is being pursued through a structured and adaptive program designed to systematically evaluate its safety and efficacy, from initial dose-finding to pivotal registration-enabling studies. The program is anchored by a foundational Phase 1 trial, which has informed the design of subsequent, more definitive trials in key indications.
Table 1: Overview of Key Clinical Trials for Raludotatug Deruxtecan
Trial ID (NCT) | Phase | Title/Acronym | Status | Primary Indication(s) | Key Objectives/Design |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCT04707248 | 1 | A Study of DS-6000a in Subjects With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma and Ovarian Tumors | Closed to Accrual | Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC), Ovarian Cancer (OVC) | Dose-escalation and expansion to determine Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and Recommended Dose for Expansion (RDE).8 |
NCT06161025 | 2/3 | REJOICE-Ovarian01 | Recruiting | Platinum-Resistant Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube Cancer | Part A: Dose-optimization of 3 dose levels. Part B: Randomized comparison of selected R-DXd dose vs. investigator's choice chemotherapy.1 |
NCT06660654 | 2 | REJOICE-PanTumor01 | Recruiting | Gynecologic (Endometrial, Cervical, non-HGSOC) and Genitourinary (Urothelial, ccRCC) Cancers | Signal-seeking "basket" trial to evaluate R-DXd in various CDH6-expressing solid tumors.44 |
The journey of raludotatug deruxtecan into the clinic began with the first-in-human study, NCT04707248. This was a two-part, multicenter, open-label trial that ultimately enrolled 179 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and ovarian cancer (OVC) for whom standard therapies were no longer effective.[8]
The first part of the study was a dose-escalation phase. This phase followed a standard 3+3 design, where small cohorts of patients were treated with progressively increasing doses of raludotatug deruxtecan, starting at 1.6 mg/kg and escalating up to 9.6 mg/kg.[8] The primary objectives were to assess the safety and tolerability of the drug, identify any dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or the recommended dose for expansion (RDE).[8]
The second part was a dose-expansion phase. Once a safe and potentially effective dose range was identified, larger cohorts of patients with OVC and RCC were enrolled to receive raludotatug deruxtecan at these selected doses. This phase was designed to gather more robust data on the safety profile and to obtain a preliminary assessment of the drug's anti-tumor activity.[8]
Informed by the promising efficacy signals and the critical safety findings from the Phase 1 study, the developers initiated the REJOICE-Ovarian01 trial. This global, randomized, open-label Phase 2/3 study is the cornerstone of the drug's registration strategy and is designed to definitively establish the benefit-risk profile of raludotatug deruxtecan in patients with platinum-resistant, high-grade ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer who have received between one and three prior lines of systemic therapy.[1]
The trial's innovative design incorporates two distinct parts:
The Phase 3 part is powered for two primary endpoints: ORR and progression-free survival (PFS), both of which will be assessed by a blinded independent central review (BICR) to ensure objectivity.[16]
To explore the full potential of raludotatug deruxtecan beyond its lead indications, the REJOICE-PanTumor01 study was initiated. This is a Phase 2 "basket" trial, a signal-seeking study designed to efficiently evaluate the activity of a single drug across multiple different cancer types that share a common biomarker—in this case, the potential for CDH6 expression.[44]
The trial is enrolling separate cohorts of patients with various advanced gynecologic and genitourinary tumors, including endometrial cancer, cervical cancer, non-high-grade serous ovarian cancer, urothelial cancer, and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).[44] All patients in this study will receive raludotatug deruxtecan at a dose of 5.6 mg/kg.[45] The primary objective is to assess the ORR in each tumor-specific cohort to identify new areas where the drug may have meaningful clinical benefit and warrant further, more focused development.[45]
The overall clinical strategy for raludotatug deruxtecan is both deliberate and reactive. The Phase 1 trial successfully achieved its goal of identifying a strong efficacy signal but also uncovered a critical, dose-dependent safety liability. In response, the development team has prudently integrated a formal dose-optimization phase directly into the pivotal trial design. This risk-mitigation strategy is intended to prospectively identify the optimal therapeutic index before committing the substantial resources required for a large-scale Phase 3 study. The parallel pan-tumor basket trial represents a standard and effective life-cycle management approach, aiming to maximize the asset's potential value by exploring its activity in additional indications. The entire program's fate now rests on the outcome of REJOICE-Ovarian01 Part A. A successful outcome will validate a specific dose and provide a clear path toward potential regulatory approval, while a failure to identify a dose with a favorable benefit-risk profile would likely lead to the program's termination.
The initial first-in-human Phase 1 trial (NCT04707248) of raludotatug deruxtecan has yielded highly encouraging preliminary efficacy data, particularly in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. These results, presented at major oncology congresses such as the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO), have established CDH6 as a viable therapeutic target and raludotatug deruxtecan as a potent agent.[9]
Table 2: Efficacy of Raludotatug Deruxtecan in the Phase 1 Trial (NCT04707248)
Patient Cohort | Dose(s) (mg/kg) | N | Confirmed ORR (95% CI) | DCR (%) | Median DoR (months, 95% CI) | Median PFS (months, 95% CI) | Data Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ovarian Cancer (Platinum-Resistant, Measurable) | 4.8–8.0 | 50 | 46% (32–61) | 98% | 11.2 (3.0–NE) | 7.9 (4.4–12.4) | 9 |
Ovarian Cancer (Platinum-Sensitive, Measurable) | 4.8–6.4 | 18 | 72.2% (46.5–90.3) | 88.9% | 5.7 (4.2–NE) | 8.1 (4.2–NE) | 12 |
Renal Cell Carcinoma | 1.6-9.6 | - | Early signals of efficacy reported | - | - | - | 9 |
Abbreviations: N, number of patients; ORR, objective response rate; CI, confidence interval; DCR, disease control rate; DoR, duration of response; NE, not estimable; PFS, progression-free survival. |
The most robust efficacy data to date have emerged from the ovarian cancer cohorts. In a subgroup of 50 patients with measurable, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer who had been heavily pretreated (median of 4 prior lines of therapy), treatment with raludotatug deruxtecan at doses ranging from 4.8 to 8.0 mg/kg produced a confirmed ORR of 46%.[9] This result is highly clinically meaningful, as it substantially exceeds the typical ORRs of 6-13% observed with standard-of-care single-agent chemotherapies in this challenging treatment setting.[48] The responses included one complete response (CR) and 22 partial responses (PRs).[10]
Beyond the response rate, the durability of these responses was particularly noteworthy. The median DoR was 11.2 months, and the median PFS was 7.9 months.[10] This suggests that for the nearly half of patients who respond, the clinical benefit can be sustained for a prolonged period, a significant improvement over existing options. Furthermore, the disease control rate (DCR), which includes patients with stable disease in addition to those with responses, was an impressive 98%, indicating that nearly all patients derived some measure of disease stabilization from the treatment.[10]
In a separate, smaller subgroup analysis of 18 patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer, the efficacy signal was even more striking. This cohort demonstrated a confirmed ORR of 72.2%, comprised entirely of partial responses.[12] While these data are preliminary due to the small sample size, such a high response rate in a pretreated population suggests that raludotatug deruxtecan could be a highly active agent if developed for earlier lines of therapy, provided a safe and tolerable dose can be established.
The initial Phase 1 trial was designed to enroll patients with both advanced ovarian cancer and renal cell carcinoma.[8] Early reports from the trial indicated that raludotatug deruxtecan suggested early clinical activity in both tumor types.[9] However, detailed efficacy metrics for the RCC cohort, such as ORR or PFS, have not been publicly disclosed in the available materials. The continued investigation of raludotatug deruxtecan in RCC, specifically the inclusion of a clear cell RCC (ccRCC) cohort in the new REJOICE-PanTumor01 basket trial, strongly implies that the developers observed a sufficient signal of anti-tumor activity in the Phase 1 study to warrant further exploration in this indication.[44]
The safety profile of raludotatug deruxtecan is a critical component of its overall clinical profile and has been the primary driver of its development strategy. While generally described as manageable and consistent with the known toxicities of other DXd ADCs, the data from the Phase 1 trial (NCT04707248) revealed a significant, dose-dependent risk of interstitial lung disease (ILD) that has become the program's central challenge.[10]
In the safety analysis of patients with ovarian cancer, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade were common, occurring in 95% of patients.[13] The most frequently reported TEAEs were primarily gastrointestinal and constitutional, including nausea (58.3%), fatigue (45.0%), and vomiting (33.3%).[9] Hematologic toxicities were also common, including anemia (28.3%) and decreased neutrophil count (25.0%).[13]
Grade 3 or higher TEAEs were reported in 51.7% of patients.[13] The most common severe events were hematologic, with Grade 3 or higher anemia occurring in 18.3% of patients and decreased neutrophil count in 11.7%.[10] These events are generally manageable with supportive care, dose interruptions, or dose reductions.
The dose-escalation portion of the Phase 1 trial identified a clear toxicity threshold. Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs)—one case of Grade 3 febrile neutropenia and one case of Grade 4 thrombocytopenia—were observed at the 9.6 mg/kg dose level.[9] This finding established that 9.6 mg/kg exceeded the maximum tolerated dose (MTD).
More consequentially, the 8.0 mg/kg dose level was discontinued in October 2022 following the observation of two fatal cases of treatment-related ILD.[10] This severe safety signal was a pivotal event for the program, leading to a strategic pivot to explore lower, potentially safer doses in subsequent clinical development.
Interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis represents the most significant and life-threatening safety risk associated with raludotatug deruxtecan and is a recognized class-effect toxicity of the DXd ADC platform.[10]
The clinical data for raludotatug deruxtecan present a classic drug development challenge where high efficacy appears to be correlated with significant toxicity. The 8.0 mg/kg dose, while likely a major contributor to the strong efficacy signals observed, proved to be unacceptably toxic due to the fatal ILD cases. The central question for the program's future is whether the lower doses now under investigation in the REJOICE-Ovarian01 trial (4.8, 5.6, and 6.4 mg/kg) can maintain a clinically meaningful and competitive level of anti-tumor activity while reducing the incidence and severity of ILD to a level deemed acceptable by patients, physicians, and regulatory agencies. The observation of Grade 2 ILD even at these lower doses indicates that the risk is not eliminated, but rather potentially mitigated. Therefore, the success of raludotatug deruxtecan is not merely a matter of demonstrating efficacy; it is about establishing a superior benefit-risk profile compared to existing and emerging therapies. The dose-optimization phase of the pivotal trial is explicitly designed to answer this question, and its outcome will be the most critical determinant of the drug's future.
Raludotatug deruxtecan is being developed for indications with significant unmet medical needs, particularly platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC).
While raludotatug deruxtecan is the most clinically advanced CDH6-targeted therapy, it is not without competition. Several other companies are developing ADCs against the same target, creating a race to define the best-in-class agent.
Table 3: Competitive Landscape of CDH6-Targeted ADCs
Drug Name | Developer(s) | Payload | Linker | DAR | Key Indications | Development Phase | Key Clinical Data/Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Raludotatug deruxtecan (R-DXd) | Daiichi Sankyo / Merck & Co. | DXd (Topo I inhibitor) | Cleavable (GGFG) | 8 | Ovarian Cancer, Renal Cell Carcinoma | Phase 2/3 | Confirmed ORR of 46% in PROC 1 |
CUSP06 | OnCusp Therapeutics / Multitude Therapeutics | Exatecan (Topo I inhibitor) | Cleavable | 8 | Ovarian Cancer, Solid Tumors | Phase 1b | Confirmed ORR of 36% in HGSOC; FDA Fast Track Designation 37 |
SIM0505 | Simcere Zaiming / NextCure | TOPOi payload | Proprietary | N/A | Solid Tumors | Phase 1 (China); US Phase 1 planned Q3 2025 | Preclinical data shows robust anti-tumor activity 53 |
Abbreviations: ADC, antibody-drug conjugate; DAR, drug-to-antibody ratio; Topo I, topoisomerase I; ORR, objective response rate; PROC, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer; HGSOC, high-grade serous ovarian cancer; FDA, U.S. Food and Drug Administration. |
Raludotatug deruxtecan currently holds a significant first-mover advantage, being the only CDH6-directed ADC to have advanced into a pivotal Phase 2/3 trial. However, this lead is challenged by its known safety liability. The emergence of competitors like CUSP06 is particularly notable. CUSP06 employs a very similar ADC construct, featuring an exatecan payload and a high DAR of 8.[51] It has already secured FDA Fast Track Designation for PROC, a regulatory milestone that can expedite development and review, and which may suggest a more favorable early safety profile that garnered regulatory support.[52] While the preliminary ORR of 36% reported for CUSP06 in high-grade serous ovarian cancer is lower than the 46% reported for R-DXd, direct comparisons are difficult due to differences in patient populations, dose levels, and trial designs.[51] Another contender, SIM0505, is in early-stage development but also utilizes a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload and is backed by a partnership between Simcere and NextCure for development outside of China.[53]
This competitive dynamic creates a scenario where the market for CDH6-targeted therapies will likely not be won on efficacy alone. Raludotatug deruxtecan's ILD risk creates a distinct vulnerability and a clear opening for a competitor. An agent that can demonstrate a superior safety profile—specifically, lower rates of severe ILD—while maintaining robust clinical activity could ultimately emerge as the best-in-class therapy, even if it is second or third to market. The benefit-risk balance will be the paramount consideration for clinicians and regulators.
In October 2023, Daiichi Sankyo entered into a major global development and commercialization agreement with Merck & Co. for three of its DXd ADC candidates, including raludotatug deruxtecan.[1] This collaboration is a powerful endorsement of the asset's potential. The partnership provides not only substantial financial backing to support the extensive and costly clinical trials required for approval but also access to Merck's formidable global expertise in oncology clinical development, regulatory affairs, and commercialization. This strategic alliance significantly enhances the program's probability of technical and regulatory success, assuming the clinical data ultimately support a favorable benefit-risk profile.
A noteworthy aspect of raludotatug deruxtecan's development is the apparent absence of any expedited regulatory designations from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), such as Fast Track or Breakthrough Therapy Designation, based on the available information.[10] This stands in contrast to its direct competitor, CUSP06, which was granted Fast Track Designation for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.[52]
The lack of such a designation for raludotatug deruxtecan is a telling data point. Expedited programs are granted to drugs that treat serious conditions and demonstrate the potential to address an unmet medical need, based on promising early clinical data. It is plausible that while the efficacy data from the Phase 1 trial were indeed promising, the severe ILD safety signal, including the two patient deaths, may have given regulators pause. The FDA may be exercising caution, preferring to see a more robust characterization of the safety profile at lower, optimized doses before granting a designation that implies an accelerated path to approval. This suggests that the regulatory bar for raludotatug deruxtecan may be higher, and the developers will need to present an exceptionally clean and compelling dataset from the REJOICE-Ovarian01 dose-optimization phase to gain full regulatory support.
The design of the pivotal trial, which includes stratification based on tumor CDH6 expression (high vs. low), indicates that a biomarker strategy is integral to the drug's development.[16] While the potent bystander effect may confer activity in tumors with lower antigen expression, the greatest clinical benefit is anticipated in the CDH6-high population. Defining this patient population precisely will be key to maximizing the drug's benefit-risk ratio and securing regulatory approval.
Raludotatug deruxtecan stands as a pioneering, potential first-in-class ADC that has demonstrated a remarkably high ceiling for efficacy in difficult-to-treat cancers with significant unmet medical need. Its mechanism of action is well-rationalized, its DXd platform technology is validated, and its target, CDH6, is biologically relevant and prognostically significant.
However, the program's trajectory has been defined by the dose-dependent ILD toxicity observed in the Phase 1 trial. The future of raludotatug deruxtecan is now entirely dependent on the outcome of the dose-optimization phase of the REJOICE-Ovarian01 study. This phase represents a critical inflection point for the program.
If a dose within the 4.8 mg/kg to 6.4 mg/kg range is proven to be both substantially more effective than standard chemotherapy and to possess a manageable safety profile with a significantly reduced risk of severe ILD, raludotatug deruxtecan is strongly positioned to become a new standard of care for CDH6-expressing malignancies. The backing of Daiichi Sankyo and Merck provides the commercial strength to establish it as a market leader.
Conversely, if the lower doses fail to maintain a compelling efficacy advantage, or if the risk of severe ILD remains unacceptably high, the program faces a high probability of failure. Such an outcome would cede the promising CDH6-targeted therapeutic space to emerging competitors who may be able to achieve a more favorable balance between efficacy and safety. The clinical data generated over the next 12-24 months will be the ultimate arbiter of whether raludotatug deruxtecan fulfills its potential as a breakthrough therapy or becomes a cautionary tale of a potent drug constrained by its own toxicity.
Published at: June 24, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.