C30H38N2O2
722533-56-4
Advanced Breast Cancer, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Elacestrant, marketed under the brand name Orserdu, represents a significant advancement in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. As the first-in-class orally bioavailable Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader (SERD), it addresses key limitations of previous endocrine therapies. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of Elacestrant, covering its physicochemical properties, pharmacology, clinical evidence, and regulatory status. Its mechanism of action is dual in nature, involving both competitive antagonism of the estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and induction of its degradation through the proteasomal pathway. This dual action is particularly effective against tumors that have developed resistance to aromatase inhibitors via acquired mutations in the estrogen receptor 1 gene (ESR1). The pivotal Phase III EMERALD trial demonstrated Elacestrant's superiority over standard-of-care endocrine monotherapy in patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−), advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had progressed on prior endocrine therapy, including a CDK4/6 inhibitor. The clinical benefit was most pronounced in the subgroup of patients with activating ESR1 mutations, leading to a statistically significant improvement in Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (Hazard Ratio 0.55; P=0.0005).[1] This finding established Elacestrant as a new standard of care for this specific patient population and led to its approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The safety profile of Elacestrant is well-characterized and manageable, with the most common adverse events being gastrointestinal effects (nausea, vomiting) and dyslipidemia (increased cholesterol and triglycerides), which are typically low-grade. Elacestrant's approval, coupled with a companion diagnostic for
ESR1 mutation testing, marks a critical step forward in the era of precision oncology for breast cancer, offering a targeted, oral therapeutic option for a defined molecular subtype of endocrine-resistant disease. Ongoing research is further exploring its potential in combination therapies and in earlier stages of breast cancer.
Elacestrant, sold under the brand name Orserdu, is a novel, non-steroidal, small molecule antineoplastic agent developed for the treatment of specific subtypes of breast cancer.[2] It is a member of the tetralin class of compounds and functions as a potent antiestrogen.[3] Its development and subsequent approval represent a landmark achievement in endocrine therapy, as it is the first orally bioavailable Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader (SERD) to receive regulatory approval for clinical use.[2] This oral formulation provides a significant advantage in convenience and patient adherence over the first-approved SERD, fulvestrant, which requires intramuscular injection.[4] Elacestrant was discovered by Eisai and subsequently developed by Radius Health, Takeda, and later Stemline Therapeutics, a subsidiary of the Menarini Group.[5]
Elacestrant is chemically defined as a substituted 1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene.[3] Its structure features a hydroxy group at position 2 and a complex 2-(ethyl{4-[2-(ethylamino)ethyl]benzyl}amino)-4-methoxyphenyl group at the 6R position.[3] This specific stereochemistry and molecular architecture are critical for its high-affinity binding to the estrogen receptor.
The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) name for the compound is (6R)-6-{2-[Ethyl({4-[2-(ethylamino)ethyl]phenyl}methyl)amino]-4-methoxyphenyl}-5,6,7,8-tetrahydronaphthalen-2-ol.[5] It has a molecular formula of
C30H38N2O2 and a molar mass of approximately 458.65 g·mol⁻¹.[5] In its solid form, it is typically a white to off-white powder.[9]
For precise identification in scientific, clinical, and regulatory contexts, Elacestrant is associated with a range of unique identifiers. These are consolidated in Table 1 to provide a comprehensive reference profile for the molecule.
Table 1: Key Drug Identifiers and Physicochemical Properties of Elacestrant
Property | Value | Source Snippet(s) |
---|---|---|
Generic Name | Elacestrant | 2 |
Brand Name | Orserdu | 2 |
DrugBank ID | DB06374 | 2 |
CAS Number | 722533-56-4 | 3 |
Type/Modality | Small Molecule | 2 |
Chemical Formula | C30H38N2O2 | 2 |
Molecular Weight (Average) | 458.646 g·mol⁻¹ | 2 |
Molecular Weight (Monoisotopic) | 458.293328472 | 2 |
IUPAC Name | (6R)-6-{2-[Ethyl({4-[2-(ethylamino)ethyl]phenyl}methyl)amino]-4-methoxyphenyl}-5,6,7,8-tetrahydronaphthalen-2-ol | 5 |
ATC Code | L02BA04 | 3 |
Other Names/Development Codes | RAD-1901; ER-306323 | 5 |
Physical Form | White to off-white solid | 9 |
Elacestrant belongs to the therapeutic class of Selective Estrogen Receptor Degraders (SERDs), also known as estrogen receptor antagonists (ERAs).[2] This class of drugs is designed specifically to target the estrogen receptor (ER), a key driver of tumor growth in the majority of breast cancers.[11] The mechanism of SERDs is distinct from other classes of endocrine therapy. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs), such as anastrozole and letrozole, function by blocking the peripheral conversion of androgens to estrogens, thereby reducing the circulating levels of estrogen available to stimulate the ER.[2] Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs), like tamoxifen, act as competitive antagonists at the ER in breast tissue but can have partial agonist (estrogen-like) effects in other tissues, such as the uterus and bone.[2] In contrast, SERDs like Elacestrant and fulvestrant are pure antagonists that not only block ER signaling but also actively promote the destruction of the receptor protein itself.[2]
Elacestrant exerts its potent antitumor effects through a dual mechanism that combines receptor antagonism with receptor degradation, providing a comprehensive blockade of the ER signaling pathway.[13]
Elacestrant binds with high affinity and selectivity to the estrogen receptor, primarily the alpha isoform (ERα), which is the predominant form expressed in breast tumors.[2] By occupying the ligand-binding domain of the receptor, Elacestrant competitively prevents the endogenous ligand, 17β-estradiol, from binding and activating it.[2] This blockade prevents the receptor from undergoing the necessary conformational changes required for dimerization, nuclear translocation, and interaction with coactivator proteins. As a result, the transcription of estrogen-responsive genes that drive cell cycle progression, proliferation, and survival is inhibited.[2]
The defining characteristic of Elacestrant as a SERD is its ability to induce the degradation of the ERα protein.[1] Upon binding, Elacestrant forces the receptor into an unstable conformation. This altered structure is recognized by the cell's protein quality control machinery, specifically the ubiquitin-proteasome system.[2] Ubiquitin ligases are recruited to the destabilized Elacestrant-ER complex, tagging the receptor with a chain of ubiquitin molecules. This polyubiquitination serves as a signal for the proteasome, the cell's primary protein degradation complex, to recognize and destroy the receptor.[1] This process leads to a profound and sustained downregulation of total
ERα protein levels within the cancer cell, effectively eliminating the primary target of estrogen signaling and rendering the cell less responsive to hormonal growth signals.[13]
A significant challenge in the long-term management of ER+ metastatic breast cancer is the development of acquired resistance to endocrine therapies.[11] Elacestrant's mechanism of action is uniquely suited to address one of the most common drivers of this resistance.
The gene encoding ERα, known as ESR1, can acquire mutations during the course of treatment, particularly under the selective pressure of AIs.[4] These mutations, which are detected in up to 40% of patients with metastatic disease after progression on endocrine therapy, typically occur in the ligand-binding domain of the receptor.[4] The resulting mutant
ERα protein is constitutively active, meaning it can signal for cell growth and proliferation even in the absence of estrogen.[16] This ligand-independent activity renders AIs, which work by depleting estrogen, completely ineffective.[19]
Elacestrant was specifically designed to be effective against both wild-type and mutated forms of the ER.[1] It demonstrates strong binding affinity for these mutated receptors, allowing it to exert its antagonistic and degradative effects.[18] While AIs fail because the mutated receptor no longer requires estrogen, Elacestrant succeeds because it targets the receptor protein itself. By inducing the degradation of the constitutively active mutant receptor, Elacestrant directly removes the engine of resistance-driven tumor growth.[12] This is not merely an alternative therapeutic strategy but a direct and logical countermeasure to the primary mechanism of AI resistance. This explains why its clinical efficacy, as demonstrated in the EMERALD trial, is so markedly superior in the
ESR1-mutated patient population.[1]
The clinical development of Elacestrant was supported by robust preclinical data. In vitro studies using ER+ breast cancer cell lines, such as MCF-7, demonstrated that Elacestrant potently inhibits ERα expression in a dose-dependent manner, with a half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) of 0.6 nM.[10] It also effectively antagonized estradiol-stimulated cell proliferation, with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (
IC50) of 4.2 nM.[10] Elacestrant showed high selectivity for ERα over ERβ, with
IC50 values of 48 nM and 870 nM, respectively.[10] In vivo studies using patient-derived xenograft models confirmed its potent antitumor activity, including in models that were resistant to fulvestrant and CDK4/6 inhibitors, as well as those harboring
ESR1 mutations.[2]
A notable pharmacological feature that distinguishes Elacestrant from fulvestrant is its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier.[2] This property was demonstrated in preclinical models and has significant clinical implications, as the brain is a common site of metastasis for breast cancer.[22] The central nervous system penetration of Elacestrant suggests it may have therapeutic activity against existing brain metastases and could potentially play a role in preventing their formation, an area of active clinical investigation.[11]
The pharmacokinetic profile of Elacestrant, which describes its absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME), has been well-characterized in clinical studies and supports its once-daily oral dosing regimen.
Elacestrant is administered orally and exhibits low absolute bioavailability, estimated to be approximately 10%.[3] Following oral administration, the time to reach peak plasma concentration (
Tmax) ranges from 1 to 4 hours.[3] The drug's exposure, measured by maximum concentration (
Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC), increases in a more than dose-proportional manner, suggesting potential saturation of clearance mechanisms at higher doses.[3] At the recommended dose of 345 mg once daily, Elacestrant reaches steady-state concentrations by day 6, with a mean accumulation ratio of approximately 2-fold.[3]
A significant food effect has been observed. Administration with a high-fat meal (800 to 1000 calories, 50% fat) increases the Cmax by 42% and the AUC by 22% compared to administration in a fasted state.[3] This finding is clinically important, as it forms the basis for the recommendation to take Elacestrant with food to enhance its absorption and bioavailability, while also helping to mitigate gastrointestinal side effects like nausea.[26]
Elacestrant is extensively distributed throughout the body tissues, as indicated by its large apparent volume of distribution (Vd) of 5800 L.[3] It is highly bound to plasma proteins, with a binding fraction exceeding 99%, which is independent of the drug concentration.[2] This high degree of protein binding limits the amount of free, pharmacologically active drug in circulation but contributes to its long duration of action.
Elacestrant is primarily cleared via hepatic metabolism, mediated by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system.[2] The major metabolic pathway involves the CYP3A4 isoenzyme.[5] To a lesser extent, CYP2A6 and CYP2C9 also contribute to its metabolism.[5] The drug undergoes N-dealkylation, N-demethylation, and various oxidations.[24] The heavy reliance on CYP3A4 for its clearance is the underlying reason for the clinically significant drug-drug interactions with strong inhibitors and inducers of this enzyme.
The elimination of Elacestrant and its metabolites occurs predominantly through the feces. Following a single radiolabeled oral dose, approximately 82% of the dose was recovered in the feces (with 34% as unchanged drug), while only a small fraction (~7.5%) was recovered in the urine (with less than 1% as unchanged drug).[3] Elacestrant has a long terminal elimination half-life, ranging from 30 to 50 hours, which supports the convenience of a once-daily dosing schedule.[2]
Table 2: Summary of Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Elacestrant
Parameter | Value | Notes/Source Snippet(s) |
---|---|---|
Route of Administration | Oral | 5 |
Bioavailability | ~10% | 3 |
Tmax (Time to Peak Concentration) | 1–4 hours | 3 |
Food Effect (High-Fat Meal) | ↑ Cmax by 42%, ↑ AUC by 22% | 3 |
Plasma Protein Binding | >99% | 5 |
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd) | 5800 L | 3 |
Primary Metabolism | Hepatic, CYP3A4 (major), CYP2A6/2C9 (minor) | 5 |
Elimination Half-Life | 30–50 hours | 2 |
Route of Excretion | Feces (~82%), Urine (~7.5%) | 3 |
Steady State | Achieved by Day 6 | 3 |
The regulatory approvals of Elacestrant were based on the robust efficacy and safety data from the pivotal EMERALD trial (NCT03778931), a landmark study that established its role in the treatment of ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer.
EMERALD was a Phase III, international, multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of Elacestrant with standard-of-care (SOC) endocrine monotherapy.[1]
The trial enrolled 477 postmenopausal women and adult men with ER+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer.[1] A critical inclusion criterion was disease progression after one or two prior lines of endocrine therapy for advanced disease. Furthermore, all patients were required to have received prior treatment with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor in combination with either an AI or fulvestrant.[1] This ensured that the study population was representative of the modern, heavily pre-treated clinical setting where endocrine resistance is a major challenge. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two arms, with a median age of 63 years, a high rate of visceral metastases (~70%), and nearly half of the patients (47.8%) having detectable
ESR1 mutations in their circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at baseline.[31]
Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Elacestrant at a dose of 345 mg orally once daily or investigator's choice of SOC endocrine monotherapy.[29] The SOC arm consisted of fulvestrant or an AI (anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane), reflecting real-world treatment options after progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor.[30] Randomization was stratified based on three key factors:
ESR1 mutational status (detected vs. not detected), prior treatment with fulvestrant (yes vs. no), and the presence of visceral metastases (yes vs. no).[29]
The EMERALD trial was designed with two co-primary endpoints to assess efficacy in both a broad and a targeted population:
The trial successfully met both of its primary endpoints, demonstrating the superiority of Elacestrant over SOC endocrine therapy.
In the overall population of 477 patients, treatment with Elacestrant resulted in a statistically significant improvement in PFS. Elacestrant reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 30% compared to the SOC arm (Hazard Ratio 0.70; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.55 to 0.88; P=0.002).[16] The median PFS was 2.8 months for patients receiving Elacestrant versus 1.9 months for those receiving SOC.[35]
The clinical benefit of Elacestrant was substantially more pronounced in the subgroup of 228 patients with detectable ESR1 mutations. In this biomarker-defined population, Elacestrant reduced the risk of progression or death by an impressive 45% (HR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77; P=0.0005).[1] The median PFS was doubled, reaching 3.8 months with Elacestrant compared to 1.9 months with SOC.[1]
Landmark analyses further underscored the durable benefit for a subset of these patients. At 12 months, the rate of PFS was more than three times higher in the Elacestrant arm, with 26.8% of patients remaining progression-free compared to only 8.2% in the SOC arm.[35] Regulatory agencies, including the FDA, concluded that the overall benefit observed in the ITT population was primarily driven by these strong results in the
ESR1-mutated subgroup, which ultimately led to the specific, biomarker-guided indication for the drug.[1]
Table 3: Baseline Characteristics of the EMERALD Phase III Trial Population
Characteristic | Elacestrant (n=239) | Standard of Care (n=238) |
---|---|---|
Median Age, years (range) | 63 (33-89) | 63 (24-89) |
ESR1 Mutation Status, n (%) | 115 (48.1) | 113 (47.5) |
Visceral Metastases, n (%) | 163 (68.2) | 169 (71.0) |
Prior Lines of Endocrine Therapy, n (%) | ||
1 line | 135 (56.5) | 135 (56.7) |
2 lines | 103 (43.1) | 104 (43.7) |
Prior Chemotherapy for Advanced Disease, n (%) | 50 (20.9) | 56 (23.5) |
Source Data: 31 |
Table 4: Key Efficacy Outcomes from the EMERALD Trial
Endpoint | Subgroup | Elacestrant | Standard of Care | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Median PFS (months) | ITT Population (n=477) | 2.8 | 1.9 | 0.70 (0.55–0.88) | 0.002 |
Median PFS (months) | ESR1-Mutated (n=228) | 3.8 | 1.9 | 0.55 (0.39–0.77) | 0.0005 |
12-Month PFS Rate (%) | ITT Population | 22.3 | 9.4 | N/A | N/A |
12-Month PFS Rate (%) | ESR1-Mutated | 26.8 | 8.2 | N/A | N/A |
Source Data: 1 |
Further analyses of the EMERALD trial data provided deeper understanding into which patients derive the most substantial benefit from Elacestrant, reinforcing its role in a precision medicine framework.
One of the most clinically significant findings from a post-hoc analysis of the EMERALD trial was the strong correlation between the duration of prior treatment with a CDK4/6 inhibitor and the magnitude of benefit from Elacestrant.[4] This observation suggests that the length of time a patient's cancer was controlled by a prior endocrine-based therapy serves as a powerful clinical indicator of underlying endocrine sensitivity.
The logic follows that patients who experience a prolonged benefit from a CDK4/6 inhibitor combined with an AI or fulvestrant have tumors that are fundamentally dependent on, or "addicted to," the estrogen receptor signaling pathway for their growth and survival. Even after developing an ESR1 mutation that confers resistance to the initial therapy, their cancer's core biology remains ER-driven. Conversely, patients who progress very quickly on a first-line CDK4/6 inhibitor regimen may have tumors with primary endocrine resistance, driven by alternative signaling pathways.
For these endocrine-sensitive tumors, a potent and next-generation ER-targeting agent like Elacestrant is exceptionally effective. The data from EMERALD strongly supports this. In the subgroup of patients with ESR1 mutations who had been treated with a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor for 12 months or longer, the efficacy of Elacestrant was striking. The median PFS in this group reached 8.6 months, compared to only 1.9 months for those receiving SOC (HR 0.41; 95% CI, 0.26-0.63).[29] This finding refines patient selection beyond simply identifying an
ESR1 mutation; it suggests that the ideal candidate for Elacestrant is a patient with an ESR1 mutation who has also demonstrated a durable response to previous endocrine-based strategies.
This benefit was consistent across various clinical scenarios within this subgroup. For instance, among patients with bone metastases and a prior CDK4/6i duration of ≥12 months, median PFS was 9.1 months with Elacestrant versus 1.9 months with SOC. For those with more aggressive disease, such as three or more metastatic sites, the median PFS was 10.8 months versus 1.8 months, respectively.[29]
Post-hoc analyses also directly compared Elacestrant to the individual components of the SOC arm, primarily fulvestrant and AIs. Fulvestrant was the investigator's choice of therapy for 69% of patients in the control arm, making it the most relevant comparator.[30] In a head-to-head comparison within the
ESR1-mutated population, Elacestrant demonstrated clear superiority, reducing the risk of progression or death by 50% compared to fulvestrant (HR=0.504).[35] This result was particularly noteworthy, as it established Elacestrant as the first oral SERD to show superior efficacy over the injectable standard in a pivotal Phase III trial.[35] Similarly, Elacestrant demonstrated improved PFS compared to the AI subgroup as well.[30]
The clinical utility of an effective anticancer agent is contingent upon a manageable safety profile that allows for sustained treatment. Elacestrant has demonstrated a predictable and generally well-tolerated safety profile, consistent with its mechanism as an endocrine therapy.
In the EMERALD trial, the majority of adverse events (AEs) associated with Elacestrant were Grade 1 or 2 in severity and were considered manageable with supportive care or dose modification.[15] Treatment-related Grade 3 or higher AEs were infrequent, occurring in 7.2% of patients receiving Elacestrant compared to 3.1% in the SOC arm.[33] Permanent discontinuation of treatment due to an adverse reaction was also low, at 6% for Elacestrant and 4% for SOC.[33]
The most frequently reported AEs are primarily gastrointestinal and systemic in nature. Nausea was the most common AE, reported in 35% of patients on Elacestrant, though the vast majority of cases were Grade 1 or 2.[12] In clinical trials, most patients who experienced nausea were able to manage it without requiring anti-nausea medication.[4] Other common AEs (occurring in ≥10% of patients) included musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, vomiting, decreased appetite, diarrhea, headache, constipation, abdominal pain, and hot flushes.[5]
Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities were also observed, most notably dyslipidemia. Increased total cholesterol and increased triglycerides were common findings, along with elevations in liver transaminases (AST and ALT) and decreased hemoglobin.[15]
Table 5: Summary of Adverse Reactions (≥10% Incidence) from the EMERALD Trial
Adverse Reaction | Elacestrant (n=239) - All Grades (%) | Elacestrant - Grade 3/4 (%) | Standard of Care (n=238) - All Grades (%) | Standard of Care - Grade 3/4 (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Musculoskeletal pain | 41 | 2.9 | 39 | 2.1 |
Nausea | 35 | 2.5 | 19 | 0.4 |
Increased Cholesterol | 30 | 0.9 | 17 | 0.4 |
Increased AST | 29 | 2.9 | 34 | 4.3 |
Increased Triglycerides | 27 | 2.2 | 16 | 1.3 |
Fatigue | 26 | 1.7 | 27 | 2.1 |
Decreased Hemoglobin | 26 | 2.1 | 22 | 2.1 |
Vomiting | 19 | 0.8 | 9 | 0.4 |
Increased ALT | 17 | 2.9 | 23 | 2.6 |
Decreased Appetite | 15 | 0.4 | 10 | 0.4 |
Diarrhea | 13 | 0 | 14 | 0.4 |
Headache | 12 | 0.4 | 9 | 0 |
Constipation | 12 | 0 | 7 | 0 |
Abdominal Pain | 11 | 0.8 | 8 | 0.4 |
Hot Flush | 11 | 0 | 8 | 0 |
Source Data: 5 |
The prescribing information for Elacestrant includes specific warnings and precautions that require clinical attention:
A structured approach for managing AEs is outlined in the prescribing information. For Grade 1 toxicity, treatment can continue at the current dose. For Grade 2, a temporary interruption may be considered. For Grade 3 or 4 toxicities, treatment should be interrupted until resolution, and then resumed at a reduced dose level.[38] The standard 345 mg daily dose can be reduced first to 258 mg (three 86-mg tablets) and then to 172 mg (two 86-mg tablets). If further dose reduction is required, the drug should be permanently discontinued.[38]
Elacestrant's metabolism via CYP3A4 makes it susceptible to significant drug-drug interactions.
Table 6: Clinically Significant Drug-Drug Interactions with Elacestrant
Interacting Agent Class | Example Drugs | Effect on Elacestrant/Other Drug | Clinical Recommendation |
---|---|---|---|
Strong/Moderate CYP3A4 Inhibitors | Itraconazole, Clarithromycin, Fluconazole, Ketoconazole | Increases Elacestrant exposure and risk of toxicity | Avoid concomitant use |
Strong/Moderate CYP3A4 Inducers | Rifampin, Carbamazepine, Phenytoin, St. John's Wort | Decreases Elacestrant exposure and efficacy | Avoid concomitant use |
P-gp/BCRP Substrates | Digoxin, Rosuvastatin, Dabigatran, Afatinib | Elacestrant increases exposure of the substrate drug | Use with caution; consider dose reduction of the substrate drug per its prescribing information |
Source Data: 2 |
Elacestrant has received marketing authorization from major regulatory bodies in North America and Europe, solidifying its role as a new therapeutic option for a specific subset of breast cancer patients.
Recognizing the significant unmet need and the positive results of the EMERALD trial, the FDA granted Elacestrant both Priority Review and Fast Track designations during its development.[17]
Following a review of the EMERALD data, the EMA's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) adopted a positive opinion on July 20, 2023, recommending marketing authorisation.[40]
The slight divergence in the wording of the FDA and EMA indications warrants consideration. The EMERALD trial, which served as the evidence base for both approvals, exclusively enrolled patients who had received prior therapy with a CDK4/6 inhibitor.[29] Therefore, there is no Phase III evidence supporting the use of Elacestrant in a CDK4/6 inhibitor-naïve population. The EMA's label is a more precise reflection of this evidence base, explicitly stating the requirement of prior CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy. The FDA's indication, while not technically incorrect (as a CDK4/6i regimen is a line of endocrine therapy), is broader and could be interpreted as supporting use in the rare clinical scenario of a patient progressing on an AI alone without ever having received a CDK4/6 inhibitor. This regulatory nuance underscores the importance for clinicians to base treatment decisions on the specific clinical trial data that underpins an approval, with the EMA's language providing a clearer guide to the proven clinical context for Elacestrant's use.
The integration of Elacestrant into clinical practice requires careful patient selection, adherence to specific administration guidelines, and proactive monitoring for potential toxicities.
The use of Elacestrant is highly specific and guided by both clinical and molecular criteria:
Proper administration is key to optimizing the efficacy and tolerability of Elacestrant:
Patients receiving Elacestrant require routine monitoring to manage potential side effects and assess treatment response:
While Elacestrant has established a new standard of care in the second-line setting for ESR1-mutated metastatic breast cancer, its full potential is still being explored. The current research landscape is focused on two primary strategic directions: evaluating its role in combination therapies to enhance efficacy and delay resistance, and moving its use into earlier stages of the disease to prevent recurrence.
The future of metastatic breast cancer treatment lies in rational combination strategies. Several ongoing trials are investigating Elacestrant as a backbone endocrine therapy combined with other targeted agents.
The ultimate goal in breast cancer therapy is to prevent metastatic recurrence. Given its efficacy in the advanced setting, Elacestrant is now being evaluated as an adjuvant therapy for patients with early-stage disease.
Table 7: Summary of Key Ongoing Clinical Trials Investigating Elacestrant
Trial Name (Identifier) | Phase | Patient Population | Intervention(s) | Primary Endpoint(s) | Status (as of late 2024) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELEVATE (NCT05563220) | 1b/2 | ER+/HER2- mBC | Elacestrant + Alpelisib, Everolimus, CDK4/6i, or Capivasertib | Recommended Phase 2 Dose (Ph 1b); Objective Response Rate (Ph 2) | Recruiting |
ELECTRA (NCT05386108) | 1b/2 | ER+/HER2- mBC (including brain metastases) | Elacestrant + Abemaciclib | Recommended Phase 2 Dose (Ph 1b); PFS (Ph 2) | Recruiting |
ELEGANT (NCT06492616) | 3 | High-Risk, Node-Positive ER+/HER2- Early BC (post 2-5 yrs adjuvant ET) | Elacestrant vs. Standard ET | Invasive Breast Cancer-Free Survival (IBCFS) | Recruiting |
TREAT ctDNA (NCT05512364) | 3 | ER+/HER2- BC with ctDNA Relapse | Elacestrant vs. Standard ET | Invasive Disease-Free Survival | Not yet recruiting |
ELONA (NCT05618613) | 1/2 | ER+/PR+/HER2- mBC with ESR1 mutation | Elacestrant + Onapristone | Safety, Tolerability, Recommended Phase 2 Dose | Recruiting |
Source Data: 6 |
Elacestrant (Orserdu) represents a paradigm shift in the management of ER-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. As the first orally available Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, it provides a convenient and more potent alternative to the injectable SERD fulvestrant. Its dual mechanism of action—combining ER antagonism with proteasomal degradation—offers a comprehensive blockade of the estrogen-driven signaling pathway that fuels tumor growth.
The pivotal contribution of Elacestrant to oncology lies in its proven efficacy against tumors harboring acquired ESR1 mutations, a common and challenging mechanism of resistance to first-line aromatase inhibitors. The results of the Phase III EMERALD trial unequivocally established its superiority over standard-of-care endocrine therapy in this specific, biomarker-defined population, significantly improving progression-free survival. This has cemented its role as a new standard of care and a prime example of precision medicine in action, where a therapeutic agent is matched to a specific molecular driver of resistance.
The clinical utility of Elacestrant is further enhanced by a manageable safety profile, with predictable and predominantly low-grade adverse events that can be managed with supportive care and dose modifications. Subgroup analyses from the EMERALD trial have provided valuable clinical insights, suggesting that the greatest benefit is observed in patients with demonstrated prior endocrine sensitivity, as indicated by a longer duration of benefit from previous CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy.
The journey of Elacestrant is far from over. Its approval has opened new avenues of research, with a robust pipeline of ongoing clinical trials. These studies are poised to define its role in combination with other targeted agents to further improve outcomes in the metastatic setting, and critically, to evaluate its potential as an adjuvant therapy to prevent recurrence in patients with high-risk early-stage breast cancer. Elacestrant is not merely a new drug; it is a foundational agent upon which future therapeutic strategies for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer will be built.
Published at: September 5, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.