C82H103ClN18O16
214766-78-6
Advanced Prostate Cancer
Degarelix is a third-generation, synthetic decapeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist used as a cornerstone therapy in the management of advanced, hormone-dependent prostate cancer.[1] Classified as a small molecule, its therapeutic effect is derived from a direct and competitive blockade of GnRH receptors located in the pituitary gland.[1] This mechanism of action immediately halts the downstream signaling cascade responsible for the secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), leading to a rapid and profound suppression of testicular testosterone production.[1]
A key clinical advantage of Degarelix, which distinguishes it from the more traditional GnRH agonist class of drugs (e.g., leuprolide), is the complete absence of an initial testosterone surge upon administration.[2] This surge, characteristic of agonists, can precipitate a "clinical flare" of symptoms in patients with advanced disease. By avoiding this phenomenon, Degarelix provides a faster and more predictable reduction in both testosterone and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, making it a particularly valuable option for patients requiring urgent disease control.[7]
The safety profile of Degarelix is well-characterized, with the most common adverse events being directly related to its mode of administration and its intended hormonal effects. These include injection site reactions (pain, erythema, swelling), hot flashes, and weight gain.[1] Of significant clinical importance, androgen deprivation therapy as a class, including Degarelix, is associated with a risk of prolonging the QT interval on an electrocardiogram, necessitating caution in patients with pre-existing cardiac conditions or those on concomitant QT-prolonging medications.[2]
Long-term clinical data have demonstrated that Degarelix provides durable disease control, with evidence suggesting it may delay progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer more effectively than GnRH agonists.[11] However, the hypothesis that its distinct mechanism might confer a superior cardiovascular safety profile remains unresolved. The prospective PRONOUNCE trial, designed to investigate this question, was terminated prematurely and failed to demonstrate a statistically significant difference between Degarelix and leuprolide.[13] Consequently, Degarelix is firmly established as a first-line androgen deprivation therapy, valued for its rapid and direct action, while the debate over its relative cardiovascular risk continues.
Degarelix is a synthetic, linear decapeptide amide classified as a small molecule therapeutic agent.[1] Its complex structure is fundamental to its biological function and pharmacokinetic profile.
Degarelix is supplied commercially as a sterile, lyophilized powder for injection that requires reconstitution with Sterile Water for Injection (WFI) immediately prior to use.[19] As a third-generation GnRH antagonist, its formulation possesses advantages over earlier compounds in its class. It exhibits improved aqueous solubility and, notably, has significantly weaker histamine-releasing properties.[2] This latter characteristic is a critical pharmaceutical improvement, as it mitigates the risk of systemic hypersensitivity and anaphylactoid reactions that were a concern with first-generation antagonists like abarelix.[9]
The formulation is specifically designed for subcutaneous administration into the abdomen.[20] Upon injection, the drug precipitates and forms a gel-like depot, from which the active peptide is slowly and continuously released into systemic circulation.[1] This depot-forming property is central to the drug's pharmacokinetic profile, enabling a long-acting effect that supports a monthly maintenance dosing schedule. The concentration of the reconstituted solution is a key variable, differing for the initial loading dose (40 mg/mL) and the subsequent maintenance doses (20 mg/mL). This carefully designed difference in concentration allows for the rapid establishment of therapeutic drug levels with the starting dose, followed by sustained maintenance of those levels with the lower-concentration monthly dose.[19]
Table 1: Physicochemical and Structural Properties of Degarelix
Parameter | Value | Source(s) |
---|---|---|
DrugBank ID | DB06699 | 1 |
Type | Small Molecule, Peptide | 1 |
CAS Number | 214766-78-6 (free base) | 4 |
Chemical Formula | C82H103ClN18O16 | 1 |
Average Weight | 1632.29 Da | 1 |
Monoisotopic Weight | 1630.7488 Da | 1 |
IUPAC Name | (4S)-N-amino]-3-(4-chlorophenyl)propanoyl]amino]-3-pyridin-3-ylpropanoyl]amino]-3-hydroxypropanoyl]amino]-3-carbamoyl]pyrrolidin-1-yl]-1-oxo-6-(propan-2-ylamino)hexan-2-yl]amino]-1-oxo-5-ureidopentan-2-yl]amino]-2-oxoethyl]carbamoyl]phenyl]-2,3-dihydro-orotamide | 17 |
Peptide Sequence | Ac-D-2Nal-D-Phe(4-Cl)-D-3Pal-Ser-Phe(4-S-dihydroorotamido)-D-Phe(4-ureido)-Leu-Lys(iPr)-Pro-D-Ala-NH2 | 17 |
InChIKey | MEUCPCLKGZSHTA-XYAYPHGZSA-N | 17 |
Degarelix exerts its therapeutic effect through a well-defined and direct pharmacological mechanism.
Target and Action: The primary molecular target of Degarelix is the Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GnRHR), a G-protein coupled receptor located on the surface of gonadotroph cells in the anterior pituitary gland.[1] Degarelix functions as a high-affinity, competitive, and reversible antagonist at this receptor.[1] By binding to the GnRHR with an IC50 of approximately 0.58-3 nM, it physically obstructs the binding of endogenous GnRH, which is released in a pulsatile manner from the hypothalamus.[16]
Downstream Hormonal Suppression: This blockade of the GnRH-GnRHR interaction immediately interrupts the physiological signaling pathway that governs the reproductive axis. The pituitary gonadotrophs are prevented from secreting Luteinizing Hormone (LH) and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) into the circulation.[1] The reduction in LH secretion is the pivotal event for androgen deprivation therapy. LH is the primary signal that stimulates the Leydig cells in the testes to produce and release testosterone. By inhibiting LH release, Degarelix causes a rapid, profound, and sustained suppression of serum testosterone to castrate levels (typically defined as
<50 ng/dL or <1.7 nmol/L).[1] This medical castration is the ultimate goal, as most prostate cancers are hormone-dependent and rely on testosterone for growth and proliferation.[4]
The "No-Surge" Phenomenon: A defining pharmacodynamic characteristic that separates GnRH antagonists like Degarelix from GnRH agonists (e.g., leuprolide, goserelin) is the absence of an initial testosterone surge.[2] GnRH agonists work by initially overstimulating the GnRHR, which paradoxically causes a transient spike in LH and testosterone levels for several weeks before the receptor becomes desensitized and downregulated. This initial surge can lead to a "clinical flare," a dangerous exacerbation of symptoms such as bone pain, ureteral obstruction, or even spinal cord compression in patients with metastatic disease.[4] Degarelix, as a direct blocker, bypasses this initial stimulation entirely. It induces testosterone suppression immediately, without a surge, thereby eliminating the risk of clinical flare and the associated need for co-administration of an antiandrogen for protection.[4]
Preclinical and In Vitro Evidence: This mechanism is well-supported by preclinical data. In animal models, such as rats, subcutaneous administration of Degarelix results in a dose-dependent and rapid suppression of plasma LH and testosterone levels.[15] Furthermore, intriguing in vitro studies have suggested a potential dual mechanism of action. When applied to various human prostate cell lines (including normal, hyperplastic, and cancerous cells), Degarelix was shown to directly reduce cell viability by inducing apoptosis, as measured by increased caspase activity. This direct cytotoxic effect was not observed with the GnRH agonists leuprolide and goserelin, suggesting that Degarelix may possess anti-tumor properties that are independent of its systemic testosterone-lowering effects.[15]
The pharmacokinetic profile of Degarelix is characterized by its sustained-release formulation and peptide-based metabolism, which together define its dosing schedule and interaction potential.
Absorption: Degarelix is administered exclusively by subcutaneous injection. Following administration, it forms a depot at the injection site, from which the drug is slowly absorbed into the systemic circulation.[1] This depot formation is the rate-limiting step for its absorption and is responsible for its sustained-release characteristics. Maximum plasma concentrations (
Cmax) are typically reached approximately 2 days after injection.[22] The pharmacokinetics are concentration-dependent, meaning the higher concentration of the starting dose leads to a more rapid achievement of therapeutic levels compared to the lower concentration of the maintenance dose.[23]
Distribution: Degarelix is extensively distributed throughout the body, as indicated by a very large apparent volume of distribution (Vd) of over 1000 L.[10] In the bloodstream, it is highly bound to plasma proteins, with a binding fraction of approximately 90%.[1]
Metabolism: As a peptide, Degarelix is metabolized primarily through common peptidic degradation. It undergoes hydrolysis by proteases, mainly during its passage through the hepatobiliary system, breaking it down into smaller, inactive peptide fragments and constituent amino acids.[1] A critically important metabolic feature is that Degarelix is not a substrate, inducer, or inhibitor of the human cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzyme system.[1] This lack of involvement with the CYP450 pathway, which is responsible for the metabolism of a vast number of other drugs, means that the potential for clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions is very low.[10]
Excretion: The elimination of Degarelix and its metabolites follows a biphasic pattern.[23] The primary route of elimination is fecal. Approximately 70-80% of an administered dose is excreted via the hepatobiliary system into the feces.[1] A smaller fraction, around 20-30%, is excreted in the urine, largely as unchanged drug.[1]
Half-Life: Owing to its slow, continuous release from the subcutaneous depot, Degarelix has a very long duration of action. The terminal elimination half-life is reported to be in the range of 41.5 to 70.2 days, with some sources citing an average of 53 days.[1] This long half-life is what makes the 28-day maintenance dosing interval feasible.
Table 2: Summary of Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Parameter | Value / Description | Source(s) |
---|---|---|
Administration Route | Subcutaneous injection only | 19 |
Absorption Mechanism | Slow release from a subcutaneous depot | 1 |
Time to Cmax | ~2 days | 22 |
Protein Binding | ~90% | 1 |
Volume of Distribution (Vd) | >1000 L | 10 |
Metabolism Pathway | Peptide hydrolysis (hepatobiliary system); no CYP450 involvement | 1 |
Excretion Routes | Fecal: 70-80%; Renal (unchanged): 20-30% | 1 |
Terminal Half-life | 41.5 - 70.2 days (average ~53 days) | 1 |
The direct antagonistic mechanism of Degarelix is inextricably linked to its primary safety advantage over GnRH agonists. The initial stimulation of the GnRH receptor by agonists leads to a testosterone surge, which can cause a dangerous clinical flare in patients with advanced, symptomatic disease.[4] By directly blocking the receptor without any initial stimulation, Degarelix completely averts this risk.[4] This makes it an inherently safer choice for patients where a flare could have catastrophic consequences, such as those with vertebral metastases and impending spinal cord compression, and it eliminates the need for concomitant antiandrogen therapy solely for flare protection. This connection between molecular action and clinical safety represents a significant paradigm shift in how androgen deprivation is initiated.
Furthermore, the metabolic profile of Degarelix provides a substantial clinical benefit. Patients with advanced prostate cancer are often elderly and present with numerous comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes, resulting in polypharmacy.[13] The cytochrome P450 system is the most common pathway for drug metabolism and, therefore, the most frequent source of drug-drug interactions. The fact that Degarelix is metabolized by simple peptide hydrolysis and completely bypasses the CYP450 system means that the risk of it affecting, or being affected by, other medications is exceptionally low.[1] This simplifies prescribing, reduces the potential for adverse drug events, and lowers the monitoring burden for clinicians managing these complex patients.
The regulatory approvals for Degarelix reflect its established role in androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer.
The foundation of Degarelix's approval was the pivotal Phase III randomized controlled trial (CS21), which compared its efficacy and safety against the GnRH agonist leuprolide.[7]
The trial unequivocally demonstrated the rapid and effective testosterone suppression achieved by Degarelix. By Day 3 of treatment, 96% of patients in the Degarelix arms had reached medical castration levels (serum testosterone ≤0.5 ng/mL). In stark contrast, zero patients in the leuprolide arm had achieved castration by this time point. Instead, the leuprolide group experienced the characteristic testosterone surge, with a median increase of 65% from baseline, before finally reaching castration levels by Day 28.[9]
This rapid hormonal control translated directly to a faster reduction in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA), a key biomarker for monitoring prostate cancer activity. By Day 14, the median PSA level had decreased by approximately 64% in the Degarelix group, compared to only an 18% decrease in the leuprolide group. This significant difference was maintained, with an 85% PSA reduction for Degarelix versus 68% for leuprolide by Day 28.[9]
To assess the durability of these effects, the CS21A extension study followed patients for up to 5 years, providing crucial long-term data.[11]
This extension trial confirmed that Degarelix was effective and well-tolerated over the long term. Patients who continued on Degarelix maintained consistent and profound suppression of both testosterone and PSA for a median observation time of 42 months.[11]
One of the most significant findings from the long-term data relates to disease control, as measured by PSA progression-free survival (PFS). The analysis showed that the significant benefit in PSA-PFS that was established for Degarelix over leuprolide during the first year of treatment was maintained consistently over 5 years.[12] This durable superiority in preventing PSA failure suggests a more robust and sustained control of the underlying disease process.
Perhaps the most compelling piece of evidence came from the cohort of patients who were initially treated with leuprolide for one year and then crossed over to receive Degarelix in the extension study. In this group, the hazard rate for PSA progression or death decreased significantly after switching to Degarelix (from 0.20 to 0.09; P=0.002). This effect was also observed in the high-risk subgroup of patients with a baseline PSA >20 ng/mL (hazard rate drop from 0.38 to 0.19; P=0.019).[11]
The sustained superiority in PSA-PFS observed with Degarelix in both the 1-year pivotal trial and the 5-year extension study points toward a clinically meaningful conclusion: Degarelix may be more effective at delaying the inevitable progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) when compared to GnRH agonists.[7] Since rising PSA is a primary indicator of disease progression and the development of resistance to hormonal therapy, the ability to keep PSA levels suppressed for longer may translate into a longer duration of hormone sensitivity. This potential to delay the onset of the more aggressive and difficult-to-treat CRPC stage represents a major long-term clinical benefit.
Furthermore, the crossover data from the extension study provides powerful evidence that the choice of ADT agent matters even after therapy has been initiated.[11] The observation that patients whose disease was progressing on leuprolide experienced a significant reduction in their risk of progression after switching to Degarelix challenges the notion that all forms of medical castration are equivalent once achieved. It suggests that the
mechanism of testosterone suppression is important. The complete and continuous blockade of the GnRH receptor by an antagonist may provide superior long-term disease control compared to the receptor desensitization mechanism of agonists, which may permit small "microsurges" of testosterone that could stimulate tumor growth over time.[7] This finding provides a strong clinical rationale for considering a switch to Degarelix in patients who show early signs of biochemical progression while on a GnRH agonist.
The development of Degarelix was driven by the goal of overcoming the inherent limitations of GnRH agonists, the long-standing standard of care for ADT. A direct comparison highlights fundamental differences in their pharmacology, efficacy profile, and safety considerations.
The most profound difference lies in their interaction with the GnRH receptor and the resulting hormonal kinetics.
Beyond testosterone, the two drug classes have a differential impact on FSH levels. Clinical trial data consistently show that Degarelix leads to a much deeper and more sustained suppression of FSH compared to GnRH agonists.[9] In the pivotal CS21 study, FSH levels at the end of one year had fallen by 88.5% with Degarelix, whereas the reduction with leuprolide was only 54.8%.[9] The clinical relevance of this deeper FSH suppression is an active area of investigation. FSH receptors have been identified on various cell types, including prostate cancer cells and endothelial cells, suggesting that FSH may have roles in tumor growth signaling and cardiovascular pathophysiology that are independent of testosterone.
A major point of debate has been the relative cardiovascular (CV) safety of GnRH antagonists versus agonists.
Table 3: Comparative Efficacy and Safety: Degarelix vs. Leuprolide (from pivotal trials)
Parameter | Degarelix (GnRH Antagonist) | Leuprolide (GnRH Agonist) | Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|
Mechanism | Direct, competitive blockade of GnRH receptors | Initial stimulation, then receptor downregulation | 2 |
Onset of Testosterone Suppression | Rapid (within 3 days) | Delayed (by Day 28) | 9 |
Testosterone Surge | No | Yes (Median 65% increase) | 4 |
Clinical Flare Risk | Avoided | Present; requires antiandrogen co-therapy in at-risk patients | 4 |
Speed of PSA Reduction | Significantly faster (64% reduction by Day 14) | Slower (18% reduction by Day 14) | 9 |
PSA-PFS (1-Year & 5-Year) | Superior; significantly lower risk of PSA failure | Inferior | 7 |
FSH Suppression (1-Year) | Profound and sustained (~89% reduction) | Partial (~55% reduction) | 9 |
Primary Site of Adverse Event | Injection site reactions (~40%) | Systemic hormonal effects | 9 |
CV Safety (PRONOUNCE) | No significant difference observed (inconclusive trial) | No significant difference observed (inconclusive trial) | 13 |
The inconclusive result of the PRONOUNCE trial represents a critical chapter in the story of Degarelix. Despite a strong mechanistic rationale and supportive observational data suggesting a cardiovascular benefit, the prospective randomized trial failed to confirm this hypothesis. This outcome serves as a crucial reminder of the limitations of relying on surrogate markers and observational studies in clinical medicine and reinforces the indispensable value of large-scale, prospective trials to definitively answer clinical questions. One hypothesis for the null result is that the proactive management of all trial participants by cardiologists may have optimized background CV care in both arms, potentially mitigating the underlying risk and masking a true difference between the drugs.[31]
The safety profile of Degarelix is well-established from extensive clinical trial data and post-marketing experience. Adverse events are primarily driven by its subcutaneous depot administration and its potent androgen-depriving effects.
The prescribing information for Degarelix includes several important contraindications and warnings that guide its safe use.
The potential for drug-drug interactions with Degarelix is low from a pharmacokinetic standpoint but significant from a pharmacodynamic perspective.
Table 4: Summary of Key Adverse Events (>5% Incidence) and Warnings
Category | Adverse Event | Incidence (%) | Key Warnings Summary |
---|---|---|---|
Injection Site Reactions | Pain, Erythema, Swelling, Induration | 28% (Pain), 17% (Erythema) | Hypersensitivity: Anaphylaxis, urticaria, angioedema reported. Discontinue if serious reaction occurs. |
Hormonal Effects | Hot Flashes, Weight Gain, Fatigue | 26% (Hot Flashes), 11% (Weight Gain) | QT Prolongation: ADT may prolong QT interval. Use caution in at-risk patients and with other QT-prolonging drugs. Monitor ECG/electrolytes. |
Laboratory Abnormalities | Increased Liver Transaminases (ALT, AST, GGT) | >10% | Bone Density Loss: Long-term ADT increases osteoporosis risk. |
General / Systemic | Hypertension, Arthralgia, Back Pain | 1-10% | Metabolic Changes: Increased risk of diabetes, obesity, and dyslipidemia. |
Incidence data from pivotal trials.1 Warnings compiled from.2 |
Table 5: Clinically Significant Drug-Drug Interactions
Risk Category | Interacting Drug Classes / Examples | Management Recommendation | Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|
Increased QTc Prolongation | Class IA Antiarrhythmics (e.g., Quinidine) Class III Antiarrhythmics (e.g., Amiodarone, Sotalol) Macrolide & Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics Many Antipsychotics & Antidepressants Azole Antifungals | Avoid combination if possible. If necessary, use with extreme caution and perform baseline and periodic ECG and electrolyte monitoring. | 1 |
Increased Methemoglobinemia Risk | Local Anesthetics (e.g., Benzocaine, Lidocaine, Prilocaine) | Monitor for signs and symptoms of methemoglobinemia (e.g., cyanosis, headache, tachycardia). | 1 |
Increased Thrombosis Risk | Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (e.g., Erythropoietin, Darbepoetin alfa) | Monitor for signs and symptoms of thromboembolic events. | 1 |
The proper dosing and administration of Degarelix are critical for achieving rapid and sustained androgen deprivation. The regimen is designed with an initial loading dose to quickly reach therapeutic concentrations, followed by regular maintenance doses.
Strict adherence to the preparation and administration instructions is necessary to ensure patient safety and drug efficacy.
Ongoing monitoring is essential to confirm the therapeutic effect and manage potential risks.
Beyond its primary indication, Degarelix is the subject of extensive clinical research aimed at optimizing its use in prostate cancer and exploring its potential in novel therapeutic areas.
The current landscape of prostate cancer clinical trials reveals that Degarelix is widely accepted as a modern ADT backbone for combination therapies. Its predictable and surge-free kinetics make it an ideal partner for evaluating novel agents where a clean and rapid hormonal suppression is desired.
Investigational research has explored the use of Degarelix's potent testosterone-suppressing effects outside of oncology.
Table 6: Overview of Major Clinical Trials for Degarelix
Trial Identifier | Phase | Purpose / Brief Description | Status | Key Finding / Implication |
---|---|---|---|---|
CS21 | 3 | Pivotal trial comparing Degarelix vs. leuprolide for testosterone suppression in advanced prostate cancer. | Completed | Demonstrated faster testosterone/PSA suppression and no testosterone surge with Degarelix. |
CS21A | 3 (Extension) | 5-year follow-up of CS21, assessing long-term efficacy and safety, including a leuprolide-to-Degarelix crossover arm. | Completed | Confirmed durable PSA-PFS benefit over 5 years. Showed improved PFS in patients crossing over from leuprolide. |
NCT02663908 (PRONOUNCE) | 3 | To compare cardiovascular safety of Degarelix vs. leuprolide in patients with pre-existing CV disease. | Terminated | Inconclusive. No significant difference in MACE was observed due to early termination and low event rate. |
NCT01512472 (FIT) | 4 | To compare 4 months vs. 10 months of Degarelix induction for intermittent ADT. | Completed | No difference found in the off-treatment interval, questioning the need for long induction periods in iADT. |
NCT02324998 | 1 | To study the combination of Olaparib with or without Degarelix before prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer. | Completed | Demonstrates use as a backbone for combination therapy with PARP inhibitors in earlier disease stages. |
Swedish Pedophilia Study | 2 | Placebo-controlled trial of Degarelix to reduce pedophilic thoughts and sexual desire. | Completed | Showed significant reduction in pedophilic ideation but raised serious safety concerns (suicidal ideation). |
Degarelix was developed and is marketed globally by a single pharmaceutical company and is known by a consistent brand name.
Degarelix has firmly established itself as a vital and distinct therapeutic option within the armamentarium for androgen deprivation therapy in men with advanced prostate cancer. Its position as a first-line treatment is secured by a robust body of evidence demonstrating effective, rapid, and sustained suppression of testosterone and PSA.[7]
The primary clinical advantages of Degarelix stem directly from its unique mechanism as a GnRH antagonist. The immediate onset of action and, most importantly, the complete avoidance of an initial testosterone surge and subsequent clinical flare, represent its key differentiators from the long-standing GnRH agonist class.[4] This makes Degarelix a particularly compelling and often preferred choice for patients presenting with symptomatic metastatic disease, a high tumor burden, or other risk factors where a transient worsening of the disease could lead to significant morbidity.[4] Furthermore, long-term data from the 5-year extension trial provide compelling evidence of a durable benefit in PSA progression-free survival, suggesting a potential to delay the onset of castration resistance more effectively than leuprolide.[11]
However, the profile of Degarelix is not without its limitations. The high incidence of local injection site reactions is a practical drawback that can affect patient comfort and adherence, although these reactions are typically manageable and diminish over time.[9] More significantly, the question of its relative cardiovascular safety remains unresolved. The premature termination of the PRONOUNCE trial left the clinical community without a definitive, high-level evidence-based answer, meaning that a claim of superior cardiovascular safety over GnRH agonists cannot be made.[13] This remains a critical area of debate and clinical judgment.
Looking forward, the therapeutic landscape for Degarelix continues to evolve. Its predictable and clean pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile has positioned it as a preferred ADT backbone in a multitude of clinical trials investigating novel combination therapies with PARP inhibitors, next-generation antiandrogens, and radioligands. The future of advanced prostate cancer treatment lies in these combinations, and Degarelix will be a central player in their development. Further research into optimizing intermittent therapy schedules may also offer pathways to improve patients' quality of life without compromising oncologic outcomes. Finally, while the exploration of non-oncological uses, such as in paraphilic disorders, is scientifically intriguing, it is shadowed by profound safety and ethical concerns that will require extensive and cautious investigation before any potential clinical role can be considered. In summary, Degarelix represents a significant and successful evolution in androgen deprivation therapy, and its clinical story will continue to be written through its integral role in the next generation of prostate cancer treatments.
Published at: July 25, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.