C20H24N4O4
155270-99-8
Parkinson's Disease (PD)
Istradefylline, marketed under the brand names Nourianz® and Nouriast®, is a first-in-class, selective adenosine A2A receptor antagonist.[1] It represents a novel, non-dopaminergic therapeutic strategy for the management of Parkinson's Disease (PD). The medication is indicated as an adjunctive treatment to levodopa/carbidopa for adult patients with PD who experience "off" episodes—debilitating periods of recurrent motor and non-motor symptoms that occur as the effects of levodopa diminish.[3]
The mechanism of action of istradefylline is distinct from all other classes of anti-Parkinsonian drugs. It selectively targets and blocks overactive adenosine A2A receptors, which are densely expressed in the basal ganglia. This action primarily modulates the indirect striatopallidal ("no-go") pathway, reducing excessive inhibitory GABAergic output and helping to restore a more functional balance within the brain's motor control circuitry.[5]
The clinical efficacy of istradefylline has been established through an extensive development program. Pivotal trials have demonstrated a modest but statistically significant reduction in daily "off" time and a corresponding increase in "on" time without troublesome dyskinesia when compared to placebo.[8] However, the overall clinical data package is characterized by a notable heterogeneity in outcomes across multiple large-scale studies, a factor that has profoundly influenced its global regulatory reception.[10]
The safety profile of istradefylline is well-characterized. The most frequently reported adverse reactions include dyskinesia, dizziness, constipation, nausea, hallucinations, and insomnia.[11] The prescribing information includes specific warnings regarding the potential to cause or exacerbate dyskinesia and psychosis, and to precipitate impulse control disorders.[2] Recent comparative meta-analyses suggest that istradefylline possesses a generally favorable safety and tolerability profile relative to other adjunctive PD therapies, such as amantadine extended-release and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors.[13]
Istradefylline holds a unique and divergent global regulatory status. It was first approved in Japan in 2013 and subsequently in the United States in 2019.[15] In contrast, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) refused marketing authorisation in 2021, citing concerns over the inconsistent efficacy demonstrated across the clinical trial program.[17] This disparity underscores differing regulatory philosophies in the evaluation of complex clinical data for neurodegenerative diseases.
Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the profound loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta.[6] This dopamine deficiency disrupts the intricate circuitry of the basal ganglia, leading to the cardinal motor symptoms of bradykinesia, rigidity, resting tremor, and postural instability. For decades, the cornerstone of symptomatic treatment has been levodopa, a dopamine precursor that remains the most effective therapy for motor control.[5]
However, long-term levodopa therapy is almost universally complicated by the emergence of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. After several years of treatment, the therapeutic window narrows, and patients begin to experience "wearing-off" phenomena, where the benefits of a levodopa dose diminish before the next is due. This leads to the re-emergence of Parkinsonian symptoms in predictable end-of-dose "off" episodes or unpredictable "on-off" fluctuations.[5] These "off" periods are a primary source of disability and significantly impair patients' quality of life, representing a major unmet need in the management of advanced PD.[1]
The limitations of purely dopaminergic strategies, which primarily aim to increase or mimic dopamine signaling, have driven research toward alternative therapeutic targets. It has become clear that the motor deficits in PD arise not just from dopamine loss but from the downstream dysregulation of the entire basal ganglia network, involving multiple neurotransmitter systems. One of the most promising of these is the purinergic signaling system, mediated by adenosine.[18]
Adenosine acts as a key neuromodulator in the striatum, where it functionally opposes the actions of dopamine. This concept is supported by robust epidemiological evidence showing that habitual caffeine intake—caffeine being a non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist—is associated with a significantly reduced risk of developing PD.[10] This observation provided a strong scientific rationale for developing selective antagonists of the adenosine A2A receptor, which is the primary adenosine receptor subtype implicated in motor control, as a novel therapeutic strategy for PD.[18]
Istradefylline, initially developed under the code KW-6002 by the Japanese pharmaceutical company Kyowa Hakko Kirin, is the culmination of decades of research into this non-dopaminergic pathway.[15] The development program was a persistent, high-risk endeavor predicated on the hypothesis that modulating a parallel neurotransmitter system could provide clinical benefit for PD patients. This multi-decade journey involved extensive preclinical modeling and a large-scale clinical trial program spanning thousands of patients.[21]
The eventual approval of istradefylline in the United States marked a significant milestone, as it was the first non-dopaminergic drug to be approved for PD in over two decades.[21] This achievement represented more than the introduction of a new medication; it served as a critical validation of a novel therapeutic paradigm. For years, PD drug development had been largely confined to the dopaminergic system. Istradefylline's success demonstrated that targeting parallel, non-dopaminergic pathways could yield clinically meaningful benefits for patients struggling with the motor complications of long-term levodopa therapy. This regulatory endorsement has helped de-risk and encourage further pharmaceutical investment into other non-dopaminergic targets, potentially heralding a new era of innovation aimed at treating the complex motor and non-motor symptoms of PD that are inadequately addressed by current therapies.
Istradefylline is a small molecule drug belonging to the oxopurine and xanthine derivative chemical classes.[18] It is identified by a comprehensive set of chemical and regulatory codes to ensure unambiguous classification.
The chemical structure of istradefylline is precisely defined by its systematic nomenclature and molecular formula.
Istradefylline exhibits physical and chemical properties consistent with its formulation as an oral solid dosage form.
The following table provides a consolidated reference for the key chemical and physical identifiers of istradefylline.
Table 3.1: Chemical and Physical Identifiers for Istradefylline
Property | Value | Source(s) |
---|---|---|
Generic Name | Istradefylline | 19 |
Brand Names | Nourianz (US), Nouriast (Japan) | 1 |
DrugBank ID | DB11757 | 15 |
CAS Number | 155270-99-8 | 1 |
IUPAC Name | 8-[(E)-2-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)vinyl]-1,3-diethyl-7-methyl-3,7-dihydro-1H-purine-2,6-dione | 1 |
Molecular Formula | C20H24N4O4 | 19 |
Average Molecular Weight | 384.436 g/mol | 1 |
InChIKey | IQVRBWUUXZMOPW-PKNBQFBNSA-N | 1 |
Appearance | Pale Green Solid | 18 |
Melting Point | 189-193°C | 18 |
The therapeutic effect of istradefylline in Parkinson's Disease is achieved through a mechanism of action that is fundamentally different from and independent of traditional dopaminergic pathways.[5]
Istradefylline is a potent and highly selective antagonist of the adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR).[19] These receptors are densely concentrated in the striatum, a critical nucleus of the basal ganglia that governs motor control.[6] Specifically, A2A receptors are co-localized with dopamine D2 receptors on the surface of GABAergic medium spiny neurons. These neurons are the origin of the "indirect" or "no-go" striatopallidal pathway, a neural circuit that functions to suppress or inhibit movement.[7]
In the dopamine-depleted state of Parkinson's Disease, there is a relative overactivity of this indirect pathway. Endogenous adenosine, acting on A2A receptors, stimulates these neurons, further potentiating the pathway's activity.[2] This leads to an excessive inhibitory (GABAergic) output from the basal ganglia to the thalamus and cortex, which manifests clinically as the poverty of movement (bradykinesia) characteristic of PD.[2]
Istradefylline exerts its therapeutic effect by competitively blocking the A2A receptor. This antagonism prevents adenosine from stimulating the indirect pathway, thereby reducing its overactive state.[5] The net result is a decrease in the downstream inhibitory GABAergic signaling, which helps to restore a more normal balance between the movement-promoting "go" (direct) pathway and the movement-suppressing "no-go" (indirect) pathway. This rebalancing facilitates motor output and alleviates Parkinsonian motor symptoms.[6] This mechanism is often described metaphorically as "releasing the brake" that adenosine normally applies to motor control circuits.[2]
Istradefylline demonstrates a high binding affinity for the human A2A receptor, with a reported inhibitor constant (Ki) of 2.2 nM in experimental models.[18] A key pharmacodynamic feature is its high selectivity. It possesses a 56- to 70-fold greater affinity for the A2A receptor compared to the adenosine A1 receptor.[19] This selectivity is clinically important, as it minimizes the potential for off-target effects associated with A1 receptor antagonism (e.g., cardiovascular effects) that are seen with non-selective antagonists like caffeine.[6]
The mechanism of istradefylline is further refined by its interaction with the dopamine system at the receptor level. Within the striatum, A2A receptors and dopamine D2 receptors are known to form functional complexes called heterotetramers.[1] In this configuration, adenosine binding to the A2A receptor exerts a negative allosteric modulatory (NAM) effect on the D2 receptor, effectively dampening dopamine's signaling capacity. By blocking the A2A receptor, istradefylline is believed to relieve this inhibitory cross-talk. This action disinhibits the D2 receptor, thereby enhancing the motor-promoting effects of both endogenous dopamine and exogenous levodopa.[1]
The pharmacokinetic profile of istradefylline is characterized by oral absorption, extensive distribution, significant hepatic metabolism, and a very long elimination half-life that supports once-daily administration.
Following oral administration, istradefylline is absorbed and reaches a peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of 181.1 ng/mL at a median time (Tmax) of approximately 2.0 hours. It can be administered with or without food, as food does not have a clinically significant effect on its absorption.[11]
Istradefylline exhibits a large apparent volume of distribution (Vd), ranging from 448 to 557 L, which indicates extensive distribution into tissues beyond the plasma compartment.[19] It is highly bound to plasma proteins (~98%), primarily to serum albumin and alpha-1-acid glycoprotein.[1] Importantly, it readily crosses the blood-brain barrier to reach its site of action in the central nervous system.[18]
Istradefylline undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism into multiple metabolites. The primary enzymes responsible for its biotransformation are cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms CYP1A1 and CYP3A4/5. A number of other CYP enzymes, including CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C18, and CYP2D6, contribute to its metabolism to a lesser extent.[15] The primary active metabolite identified in plasma and urine is M1 (4'-O-monodesmethyl istradefylline).[15]
The elimination of istradefylline and its metabolites occurs primarily through the feces (~68%) with a smaller fraction excreted in the urine (~18%).[1] Unchanged istradefylline accounts for a very small percentage of the excreted dose, reflecting its extensive metabolism.[19]
A defining pharmacokinetic characteristic of istradefylline is its very long terminal elimination half-life, which ranges from 64 to 83 hours.[1] This long half-life is the basis for its convenient once-daily dosing regimen. Due to this slow elimination, steady-state plasma concentrations are not achieved until approximately two weeks after initiating treatment or adjusting the dose.[8]
The table below summarizes the key pharmacokinetic parameters for istradefylline.
Table 4.1: Summary of Key Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Istradefylline
Parameter | Value | Source(s) |
---|---|---|
Time to Peak Concentration (Tmax) | 2.0 hours | 19 |
Peak Plasma Concentration (Cmax) | 181.1 ng/mL | 19 |
Area Under the Curve (AUC) | 11,100 ng*h/mL | 19 |
Volume of Distribution (Vd) | 448 - 557 L | 19 |
Plasma Protein Binding | ~98% | 1 |
Primary Metabolizing Enzymes | CYP1A1, CYP3A4, CYP3A5 | 1 |
Elimination Half-life (t1/2) | 64 - 83 hours | 1 |
Route of Elimination | Feces (~68%), Urine (~18%) | 1 |
The clinical development program for istradefylline was extensive, comprising eight major randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2b and Phase 3 trials. These studies collectively enrolled over 2,700 patients with moderate to severe Parkinson's Disease who were experiencing motor fluctuations despite being on a stable regimen of levodopa/carbidopa.[9] The primary objective across this program was to evaluate the efficacy of istradefylline, typically administered at doses of 20 mg or 40 mg once daily, in reducing "off" time.[10]
The efficacy of istradefylline was assessed using well-defined clinical endpoints, primarily based on patient-completed 24-hour diaries.
The primary efficacy measure in these trials was the change from baseline in the total number of hours spent in the "off" state during the waking day.[8] Pooled analyses of the clinical trial data demonstrated that treatment with istradefylline resulted in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction in daily "off" time compared to placebo.[9] A comprehensive pooled analysis of eight trials found that 12 weeks of istradefylline treatment reduced "off" time associated with dyskinesia by a mean of 0.38 to 0.45 hours relative to placebo.[9]
A critical secondary endpoint was the change from baseline in "on" time without troublesome dyskinesia, often referred to as "good on time." Istradefylline was consistently associated with a significant increase in this measure. The same pooled analysis showed an increase in "good on time" of 0.33 to 0.40 hours.[9] Data from the four pivotal trials that formed the basis of the U.S. approval showed that the 40 mg dose increased "on" time without troublesome dyskinesia by a range of 1.08 to 1.45 hours from baseline, an improvement that was statistically superior to placebo.[8]
In addition to diary-based measures, istradefylline also demonstrated improvements in clinician-assessed motor function. Several studies reported a significant improvement in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III (Motor Examination) score compared to placebo, indicating a reduction in the severity of motor symptoms during the "on" state.[9]
A defining characteristic of the istradefylline development program is the heterogeneity of its results. While several of the large, well-controlled trials successfully met their primary endpoints, a number of others failed to demonstrate a statistically significant separation from placebo.[10] This inconsistency became a central issue in its regulatory evaluation and is the primary reason for its divergent approval status globally.
This situation presents a compelling case study in regulatory science. The clinical data for istradefylline suggests a drug with a modest, yet for many patients clinically relevant, effect size. The challenge lies in consistently demonstrating this benefit against the backdrop of a high placebo response rate, which is a notorious feature of Parkinson's Disease clinical trials.[10] The differing regulatory decisions ultimately stemmed from fundamentally different philosophies in interpreting such a complex data package. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adopted a pragmatic "balance of evidence" approach. In their review, they acknowledged the presence of negative studies but concluded that the positive results from four large, adequate, and well-controlled trials constituted "substantial evidence" of effectiveness, particularly given the drug's novel mechanism of action and the clear unmet need for non-dopaminergic treatment options.[25]
Conversely, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) took a more conservative stance, viewing the inconsistency itself as a critical flaw. The EMA's refusal was explicitly based on the mixed results, the modest magnitude of the effect, and a perceived lack of efficacy in the subset of trials that included patients from European Union populations.[17] This highlights a stricter requirement for consistent and robust demonstration of benefit across an entire clinical program. This divergence illustrates that for drugs with modest efficacy profiles, the interpretation of the totality of evidence can vary dramatically between major regulatory bodies, leading to starkly different outcomes for global patient access.
To better understand the drug's effects, post-hoc pooled analyses of the entire clinical trial database have been conducted. A key finding from this work was that the efficacy of istradefylline in reducing "off" time was consistent and not dependent on whether patients had pre-existing dyskinesia at the start of the trial.[9] This suggests the drug is a viable option for a broad range of patients with motor fluctuations.
More recently, the ISTRA ADJUST PD study provided novel evidence regarding istradefylline's role in long-term treatment strategy. This open-label, randomized study found that the addition of istradefylline to a stable levodopa regimen significantly reduced the need for subsequent levodopa dose escalation over a 36-week period compared to a control group. This finding suggests a potential "levodopa-sparing" effect, which could be valuable in managing the long-term motor complications of PD.[26]
The safety and tolerability of istradefylline have been extensively evaluated in placebo-controlled clinical trials. The most frequently observed adverse reactions are primarily related to the central nervous system and gastrointestinal system. The table below details the incidence of common adverse reactions that occurred in at least 5% of patients treated with istradefylline and at a higher rate than placebo.
Table 6.1: Incidence of Common Adverse Reactions (≥5% and >Placebo) in Pooled Placebo-Controlled Trials
Adverse Reaction | NOURIANZ 20 mg (%) | NOURIANZ 40 mg (%) | Placebo (%) | Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dyskinesia | 15 | 17 | 8 | 11 |
Dizziness | 3 | 6 | 4 | 11 |
Constipation | 5 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
Nausea | 4 | 6 | 5 | 11 |
Hallucination | 2 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
Insomnia | 1 | 6 | 4 | 11 |
The prescribing information for istradefylline includes several important warnings and precautions regarding clinically significant risks.
When used as an adjunctive therapy with levodopa, istradefylline can cause new-onset dyskinesia or exacerbate pre-existing dyskinesia. In clinical trials, the incidence was dose-related, occurring in 15-17% of istradefylline-treated patients compared to 8% of those on placebo. The risk of treatment-emergent dyskinesia is higher in patients taking higher baseline doses of levodopa.[9] Despite its frequency, dyskinesia was generally mild to moderate, and led to treatment discontinuation in only 1% of patients.[11]
Istradefylline can cause hallucinations (visual, auditory, or somatic) and other psychotic-like behaviors, including paranoid ideation, delusions, confusion, and agitation. The incidence of hallucinations was 2-6% in the istradefylline groups versus 3% in the placebo group.[11] Due to the risk of exacerbating psychosis, istradefylline should not be used in patients with a major psychotic disorder. If a patient develops hallucinations or psychotic behaviors during treatment, a dosage reduction or discontinuation of the medication should be considered.[2]
A well-recognized risk associated with many anti-Parkinsonian medications, patients treated with istradefylline may experience intense and uncontrollable urges. These can manifest as pathological gambling, increased sexual urges (hypersexuality), compulsive spending, and binge or compulsive eating.[2] Clinicians should specifically monitor patients for the development of these behaviors, and consider dose reduction or discontinuation if they occur.[4]
In pre-licensure trials, istradefylline was associated with a low rate of mild-to-moderate, asymptomatic, and self-limited serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations (4-11% vs. 5-6% for placebo).[5] Clinically significant elevations (greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal) were rare (<1%). To date, istradefylline has not been linked to cases of clinically apparent liver injury with jaundice.[5] Discontinuation is rarely required but is recommended if ALT levels rise above 5 times the upper limit of normal or if elevations are accompanied by symptoms.[5]
Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses have compared the safety profile of istradefylline to other commonly used adjunctive therapies for PD, providing valuable context for its relative tolerability. These analyses consistently show that istradefylline is associated with a generally favorable safety profile.[13]
Analysis of real-world safety data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database has largely corroborated the safety profile observed in clinical trials. A disproportionality analysis identified strong reporting signals for nervous system and psychiatric disorders, such as dyskinesia and hallucinations.[28] These findings underscore the importance of continued post-marketing surveillance to monitor and validate the safety profile of istradefylline in a broader patient population over longer periods of use.[28]
The dosing regimen for istradefylline is straightforward and designed for ease of use in the target patient population.
Dosage adjustments are necessary for certain patient populations to account for altered pharmacokinetics.
Istradefylline's metabolism via the CYP3A4 pathway makes it susceptible to significant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. Given the high prevalence of polypharmacy in elderly patients with PD, careful management of these interactions is critical for safe and effective use.
The following table provides an actionable clinical guide for managing the most significant drug-drug interactions with istradefylline.
Table 7.1: Guide to Istradefylline Drug-Drug Interactions
Interacting Agent Class | Examples | Effect on Istradefylline / Other Drug | Clinical Recommendation | Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Strong CYP3A4 Inhibitors | Ketoconazole, Itraconazole, Clarithromycin | Increases Istradefylline exposure 2.5-fold | Reduce maximum Istradefylline dosage to 20 mg once daily. | 3 |
Strong CYP3A4 Inducers | Rifampin, Carbamazepine, Phenytoin, St. John's wort | Decreases Istradefylline exposure by ~81% | Avoid concomitant use. | 3 |
CYP3A4 Substrates | Atorvastatin, Midazolam, Alprazolam | Istradefylline (40 mg) may increase substrate exposure | Monitor for increased adverse effects of the substrate drug. Consider substrate dose reduction. | 24 |
P-gp Substrates | Digoxin, Dabigatran | Istradefylline may increase substrate exposure | Monitor for increased adverse effects of the substrate drug. | 24 |
Istradefylline was first granted regulatory approval anywhere in the world in Japan. The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare approved the drug on March 25, 2013, for improving the "wearing-off" phenomenon in PD patients. It is marketed in Japan under the brand name Nouriast®.[15] This approval was a landmark event, establishing the adenosine A2A receptor antagonist class as a viable therapeutic option for Parkinson's Disease.
The regulatory journey of istradefylline in the United States was protracted and complex.
Kyowa Hakko Kirin first submitted a New Drug Application (NDA) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2007. However, in February 2008, the agency issued a "Not Approvable" letter.[16] The primary reason for this initial rejection was the FDA's assessment that the clinical benefit demonstrated in the trials submitted at that time was modest and the data were not sufficiently persuasive.[13]
Following the initial rejection, the company conducted additional clinical trials to strengthen the evidence base. A new NDA was resubmitted, and on August 27, 2019, more than a decade after the initial submission, the FDA granted approval for istradefylline, now branded as Nourianz®.[16] The final approval was based on a comprehensive review of the entire development program, with the FDA concluding that the totality of evidence from four key positive pivotal trials was sufficient to establish efficacy and safety.[25]
In stark contrast to the outcome in the U.S., istradefylline failed to gain approval in the European Union.
Kyowa Kirin's Marketing Authorisation Application (MAA) for Nouryant was validated for review by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in January 2020.[37] However, in July 2021, the EMA's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) adopted a negative opinion, recommending that the drug not be approved.[35]
The company requested a re-examination of the opinion, but in November 2021, the CHMP confirmed its negative recommendation. The formal decision to refuse marketing authorisation was finalized in January 2022.[17]
The EMA's detailed public assessment report outlined the key reasons for the refusal. The agency's primary concerns centered on the inconsistency of the efficacy data across the eight main clinical trials. They noted that only four of the studies showed a clear, statistically significant benefit in reducing "off" time. The EMA considered the magnitude of the effect to be modest and concluded that this modest benefit was not reliably and consistently demonstrated across the full clinical program. A particularly critical point for the EMA was the observation that no significant effect was seen in the two studies that included patients from EU populations. Based on this assessment, the agency concluded that the overall benefit-risk balance for istradefylline was not positive.[17]
The divergent regulatory decisions in the United States and Europe regarding istradefylline are not merely a reflection on the drug itself, but rather a profound illustration of differing regulatory philosophies. The same core data package, containing a mix of positive and negative studies, was presented to both agencies. The FDA's approval reflects a flexible "totality of the evidence" framework. The agency's review acknowledged the inconsistent data but ultimately concluded that the positive results from a subset of large, well-conducted trials constituted "substantial evidence" of effectiveness.[25] This decision likely took into account the drug's novel mechanism and the significant unmet need for non-dopaminergic options in PD. In contrast, the EMA's refusal highlights a more conservative and stringent evidentiary standard. The agency viewed the inconsistency not as a nuance to be weighed, but as a fundamental flaw that undermined the reliability of the efficacy claim. This demonstrates a lower tolerance for variability in clinical trial results and a strict requirement for consistent demonstration of benefit across an entire development program. This case serves as a critical lesson for global drug development, showing how a single data package can result in full market access in one major region and complete rejection in another, based on differing regulatory interpretations of what constitutes sufficient proof of efficacy.
Istradefylline has been established as a novel, first-in-class adjunctive therapy for Parkinson's Disease, offering a unique non-dopaminergic mechanism of action. By selectively antagonizing adenosine A2A receptors in the basal ganglia, it modulates overactive inhibitory motor pathways, providing a complementary approach to standard levodopa treatment. Its clinical profile is defined by a modest but statistically significant efficacy in reducing daily "off" time and increasing "good on time" in patients with motor fluctuations. Key attributes that define its clinical value include its convenient once-daily oral dosing, a long half-life, and a well-characterized safety profile that, according to comparative analyses, appears generally favorable relative to some other adjunctive therapies.
In clinical practice, istradefylline represents an important additional option in the armamentarium for managing motor fluctuations in PD. It is a valuable choice for patients who are experiencing "wearing-off" and may not be suitable candidates for, have failed, or have experienced intolerable side effects with other adjunctive agents like COMT inhibitors, MAO-B inhibitors, or dopamine agonists. Its non-dopaminergic mechanism makes it a particularly attractive option for clinicians seeking to improve motor control without directly increasing the overall dopaminergic tone, which can be beneficial for patients who are sensitive to the dopaminergic side effects of other medications. Furthermore, emerging evidence from studies like ISTRA ADJUST PD, which suggests a potential "levodopa-sparing" effect, may support its use earlier in the course of motor fluctuations to help manage the long-term levodopa dosage.[26]
While istradefylline's role in managing motor symptoms is established, several important questions remain, pointing toward promising avenues for future research.
Published at: September 4, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.