C2H6O3S2
3375-50-6
Hemorrhagic cystitis caused by cyclophosphamide, Hemorrhagic cystitis caused by ifosfamide
Coenzyme M, known pharmacologically by its generic name Mesna, is a small molecule synthetic thiol compound identified chemically as 2-mercaptoethanesulfonic acid.[1] Its application in modern medicine represents a significant achievement in targeted supportive care, particularly in oncology. The primary and critical clinical function of Mesna is the prophylaxis of hemorrhagic cystitis, a severe and dose-limiting toxicity induced by the oxazaphosphorine class of chemotherapeutic agents, which includes ifosfamide and high-dose cyclophosphamide.[1]
The pharmacological utility of Mesna is predicated on a unique and elegant mechanism of "regional detoxification." Following administration, the active Mesna is rapidly oxidized in the systemic circulation to its inactive disulfide metabolite, dimesna. This inactive form is then filtered by the kidneys and subsequently reduced back to active Mesna within the renal tubules. This process delivers a high concentration of the active, free-thiol compound directly to the bladder, where it is needed most. Here, it chemically neutralizes acrolein, the primary urotoxic metabolite of oxazaphosphorine chemotherapy, forming a stable, non-toxic conjugate that is safely excreted.[3] This pharmacokinetic-driven localization minimizes systemic interactions while maximizing protection at the target site.
While Mesna's name derives from its natural identity as a coenzyme involved in methyl-group transfer in methanogenic archaea, this biochemical role is entirely distinct from its pharmacological application, which is based purely on its chemical properties as a sulfhydryl donor.[2] Clinically, Mesna is indispensable; its use has enabled the administration of higher, more effective doses of ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide, thereby improving treatment outcomes for a range of malignancies. The agent is available in both intravenous and oral formulations, with precise dosing schedules designed to synchronize its availability in the bladder with the excretion of toxic metabolites. Despite a generally favorable safety profile, Mesna is associated with important risks, most notably severe systemic hypersensitivity and dermatologic reactions, which require vigilant clinical monitoring.[7] This monograph provides an exhaustive analysis of Mesna, from its fundamental chemical properties to its complex clinical applications, safety profile, and place in therapy.
A foundational understanding of Mesna begins with its precise chemical identity, nomenclature, and physical characteristics. This section consolidates these details from various technical, commercial, and regulatory sources.
The compound is known by several names depending on the context. Its formal chemical name is 2-mercaptoethanesulfonic acid.[9] In the context of its natural biological role, it is referred to as Coenzyme M.[2] For its pharmaceutical application, the International Nonproprietary Name (INN) is Mesna, which is commonly used in clinical and regulatory literature.[1] The name "Mesna" itself is an acronym derived from its chemical structure: 2-
mercaptoethane sulfonate Na (representing the sodium salt form).[12]
Numerous synonyms are used in scientific and commercial databases, including:
The distinction between the names "Coenzyme M" and "Mesna" is particularly important. While they refer to the same molecule, the names signify two entirely separate contexts and functions. Coenzyme M is a naturally occurring cofactor essential for the metabolism of primitive microorganisms like methanogenic archaea, where it participates in enzymatic methyl group transfer reactions.[2] Its biosynthesis in these organisms is a well-defined biological pathway. In stark contrast, Mesna is a synthetically manufactured pharmaceutical agent.[2] Its clinical utility does not derive from any coenzymatic function in humans but is entirely dependent on the non-enzymatic chemical reactivity of its thiol group as a scavenger of toxic electrophilic molecules. This distinction is critical for clinicians to avoid incorrect assumptions about its mechanism of action or the existence of an endogenous human analogue.
Mesna is an organosulfonic acid characterized by a simple but functionally critical structure: an ethyl backbone connecting a thiol (sulfhydryl, -SH) group at one end and a sulfonic acid (-SO3H) group at the other.[2] This bifunctional nature is key to its properties; the thiol group is the main site of its chemical reactivity and protective action, while the highly polar sulfonic acid group confers excellent solubility in aqueous media, which is essential for its administration and renal excretion.[9] The molecular formula of the acid form is
C2H6O3S2.[2]
Standardized identifiers are used to uniquely define Mesna across various databases. These, along with its key physicochemical properties, are summarized in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1: Summary of Coenzyme M (Mesna) Identifiers and Physicochemical Properties
Attribute | Value | Source(s) |
---|---|---|
DrugBank ID | DB09110 | 1 |
CAS Number (Acid Form) | 3375-50-6 | 9 |
CAS Number (Sodium Salt) | 19767-45-4 | 14 |
FDA UNII | VHD28S0H7F | 10 |
IUPAC Name | 2-sulfanylethanesulfonic acid | 2 |
Common Synonyms | Mesna, Coenzyme M, HS-CoM, 2-Mercaptoethanesulfonate | 1 |
Molecular Formula | C2H6O3S2 | 2 |
Molecular Weight (Acid) | 142.20 g/mol | 2 |
Molecular Weight (Na Salt) | 164.18 g/mol | 14 |
Appearance | Colorless to light yellow powder | 10 |
Density | 1.25 g/mL (at 20 °C) | 10 |
pKa | pK1; pK2: 9.5 (at 20°C) | 10 |
Solubility | Soluble in water and DMSO | 9 |
The manufacturing process for the acid form, as described in the literature, involves the ammonolysis of β-S-thiuronium ethanesulfonate, followed by purification using ion exchange resin to yield β-mercaptoethanesulfonic acid.[10]
The biological and pharmacological characteristics of Mesna are distinct. Its natural biochemical role is confined to microbial metabolism, while its pharmacological profile in humans is defined by its unique mechanism of action and the pharmacokinetic properties that enable it.
In the realm of biochemistry, Coenzyme M (HS-CoM) is recognized as the smallest known organic cofactor.[6] Its function is central to the energy metabolism of methanogenic archaea, a group of ancient microorganisms. In these organisms, Coenzyme M serves as a crucial carrier of methyl groups in the terminal step of methanogenesis, the biological production of methane.[2] It is also implicated in the metabolism of alkenes in certain bacteria, where it is involved in aliphatic epoxide carboxylation.[6] The biosynthesis of Coenzyme M within these microorganisms is a complex, multi-enzyme process involving proteins such as cysteate synthase, sulfopyruvate decarboxylase, and L-sulfolactate dehydrogenase.[6] It is critical to reiterate that this biological pathway and function are not present in humans; the use of the name "Coenzyme M" for the pharmaceutical agent is a historical artifact of its initial discovery context.
As a pharmaceutical agent, Mesna functions as a cytoprotective or chemoprotective agent, specifically a uroprotectant.[1] Its mechanism is not biological in the sense of interacting with enzymes or receptors to elicit a response, but rather a direct chemical neutralization of toxic metabolites produced by chemotherapy.
The oxazaphosphorine alkylating agents, ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide, are prodrugs that are metabolized by the liver into active anticancer compounds. This metabolic process also yields highly reactive and toxic byproducts, most notably acrolein.[1] Acrolein is not effectively detoxified systemically and is excreted via the kidneys, leading to its accumulation and concentration in the bladder. In the bladder, acrolein exerts a potent urotoxic effect by causing direct damage to the urothelial cells. This damage stimulates a cascade of inflammation, characterized by the release of mediators like interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), upregulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and subsequent mucosal edema, capillary fragility, and ulceration, which clinically manifests as hemorrhagic cystitis.[1]
Mesna's primary protective mechanism is to intercept and neutralize acrolein before it can damage the bladder lining. The free thiol (-SH) group of Mesna is a strong nucleophile that readily attacks the electrophilic β-carbon of acrolein, an α,β-unsaturated aldehyde. This reaction, a classic Michael addition, forms a stable and inert thioether conjugate.[5] This new compound is non-toxic and is safely excreted in the urine, effectively detoxifying the urinary tract.[5] In addition to acrolein, Mesna has also been shown to bind and detoxify 4-hydroxy-ifosfamide, another urotoxic metabolite of ifosfamide, further contributing to its protective effect.[1]
Beyond this direct chemical scavenging, evidence suggests a potential secondary mechanism that contributes to Mesna's uroprotective efficacy. Acrolein-induced inflammation involves the enzyme lactoperoxidase (LPO). It has been proposed that Mesna's sulfhydryl group can bind to the LPO enzyme at its thiocyanate binding site, inhibiting its function.[3] This action would result in a direct reduction and regulation of the local inflammatory effects within the bladder mucosa. This potential dual action—acting as both a chemical antagonist to the toxin and an inhibitor of the subsequent inflammatory response—may explain its high degree of clinical efficacy.
The clinical success and favorable safety profile of Mesna are entirely dependent on its unique pharmacokinetic properties, which effectively create a targeted drug delivery system without the need for advanced formulation technology. The process can be understood as a form of "reverse prodrug" strategy: the drug is administered in its active form, is systemically and reversibly inactivated for safe transport, and is then locally reactivated at its specific site of action.
Absorption: Following oral administration, Mesna is well absorbed. The average oral bioavailability is approximately 58% for the active free Mesna and 89% for total Mesna (which includes the inactive dimesna metabolite).[1] Peak plasma concentrations (
Cmax) of free Mesna are achieved within 1.5 to 4 hours, while total Mesna peaks later, between 3 and 7 hours.[1] The presence of food does not significantly impact the urinary availability of Mesna, allowing for flexibility in administration relative to meals.[1]
Distribution: After intravenous administration, Mesna has an apparent volume of distribution (Vd) of approximately 0.65 L/kg, suggesting it distributes throughout the body's total water volume.[1] It exhibits low plasma protein binding (around 28% for total mesna), meaning most of the drug is free in the circulation and available for metabolism and excretion.[1] Critically, Mesna does not readily cross the blood-brain barrier, limiting its potential for central nervous system effects.[16]
Metabolism and Regional Activation: The metabolic pathway of Mesna is the cornerstone of its regional detoxification mechanism. In the bloodstream, Mesna is subject to rapid auto-oxidation. Its reactive thiol group is quickly oxidized to form its major metabolite, mesna disulfide, also known as dimesna.[1] Dimesna is a pharmacologically inert and stable molecule. This rapid systemic inactivation is crucial, as it prevents the reactive Mesna from interacting with systemic proteins and enzymes, thereby avoiding potential systemic toxicity.
Excretion and Reactivation: Dimesna, along with any remaining free Mesna, is efficiently filtered by the glomeruli of the kidneys and enters the renal tubules for excretion.[1] During its passage through the renal tubules, a significant portion of the inactive dimesna is acted upon by enzymes on the luminal membrane of the tubular cells, such as glutathione dihydrogenase.[1] These enzymes reduce the disulfide bond of dimesna, regenerating the active, free-thiol form of Mesna.[1] This reactivated Mesna is then excreted directly into the bladder urine, precisely where the urotoxic metabolites of chemotherapy are accumulating. This elegant process ensures that a high concentration of the protective agent is delivered specifically to the target organ, while systemic exposure to the reactive form is minimized.
The elimination half-life (t1/2) reflects this rapid process. The half-life of active Mesna is very short, reported as 0.36 hours (approximately 22 minutes), while the half-life of the inactive dimesna is longer at 1.17 hours.[1] Other studies have reported an even faster initial half-life for IV Mesna of just 9 to 11 minutes, consistent with its rapid oxidation.[17] This pharmacokinetic profile necessitates the fractionated dosing schedules used in clinical practice to ensure a sustained protective concentration in the bladder throughout the period of acrolein excretion.
Table 3.1: Key Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Mesna and its Metabolite Dimesna
Parameter | Mesna (Active Form) | Dimesna (Inactive Metabolite) | Source(s) |
---|---|---|---|
Oral Bioavailability | ~58% (free) / 89% (total) | N/A | 1 |
Time to Peak (Oral) | 1.5 - 4 hours | 3 - 7 hours | 1 |
Elimination Half-life (t1/2) | 0.36 hours | 1.17 hours | 1 |
Volume of Distribution (Vd) | 0.652 L/kg (IV) | N/A | 1 |
Plasma Clearance | 1.23 L/h/kg | N/A | 1 |
Renal Excretion (% of IV dose in 24h) | ~32% | ~33% | 1 |
Mesna's clinical utility is firmly established in oncology supportive care, with a specific approved indication and widespread off-label use. Furthermore, its unique chemical properties have prompted investigation into novel therapeutic applications beyond uroprotection.
The primary clinical role of Mesna is to mitigate the urotoxicity of oxazaphosphorine chemotherapy.
FDA-Approved Indication: Mesna is officially approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a prophylactic agent to reduce the incidence of ifosfamide-induced hemorrhagic cystitis.[3] The prescribing information explicitly states a limitation of use: Mesna is not indicated to reduce the risk of hematuria resulting from other pathological conditions, such as chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia.[3]
Established Off-Label Use: While its formal approval is tied to ifosfamide, Mesna's use with high-dose cyclophosphamide is a universally accepted standard of care and is recommended in numerous clinical guidelines.[3] The underlying mechanism of toxicity (acrolein production) and protection is identical for both drugs, making its application with cyclophosphamide a logical and necessary extension of its approved use.[1] It is an essential component of high-dose cyclophosphamide regimens used in bone marrow transplantation and for various rheumatologic and malignant conditions.[19]
The clinical trial landscape for Mesna reveals two distinct roles: its ubiquitous function as an "enabling" agent that is essential for the safety of other drugs, and its emerging potential as a primary "therapeutic" agent for new indications.
Mesna as an Enabling Agent in Oncology Trials: In the vast majority of clinical trials involving Mesna, it is not the drug under investigation. Instead, it serves as a mandatory component of supportive care, enabling the safe administration of ifosfamide or cyclophosphamide. Its presence is a prerequisite for evaluating the efficacy of the primary antineoplastic regimen. Examples of this role are seen across a wide spectrum of cancers:
Mesna as an Investigational Therapeutic Agent: A smaller but growing body of research is exploring new therapeutic uses for Mesna that leverage its chemical properties beyond simple acrolein scavenging.
The correct administration of Mesna is paramount to its efficacy. The dosage and timing are meticulously designed to ensure that protective concentrations of the active drug are present in the bladder concurrently with the excretion of urotoxic chemotherapy metabolites.
Mesna is commercially available in two primary formulations:
The most widely recognized brand name in the United States is Mesnex®, marketed by Baxter Healthcare.[31] In Canada and Europe, it is also sold as
Uromitexan®.[12] The market includes numerous generic versions from manufacturers such as Fresenius Kabi, Hikma, and Sagent Pharmaceuticals.[31] Combination products containing both ifosfamide and Mesna are available under the brand name
Ifex/Mesnex.[27]
Mesna dosage is always calculated based on the dose of the accompanying oxazaphosphorine agent (ifosfamide or cyclophosphamide) and is expressed as a percentage of the chemotherapy dose by weight (w/w). The chosen dosing schedule must be repeated on each day that chemotherapy is administered.[7] The specific timing of the doses is not arbitrary but is a critical clinical application of pharmacokinetic principles. Given Mesna's very short half-life of approximately 22 minutes [1], a single dose would be cleared from the body long before all the urotoxic acrolein is generated and excreted. The fractionated dosing schedules are therefore essential to maintain a continuous protective concentration of active Mesna in the urine throughout the entire period of risk.
Two standard dosing schedules are approved and widely used, as detailed in Table 5.1.
Table 5.1: Comparison of Standard Mesna Dosing Regimens
Time Point | All-Intravenous Regimen (Dose as % of Ifosfamide) | IV/Oral Regimen (Dose as % of Ifosfamide) | Route |
---|---|---|---|
0 Hours | 20% | 20% | Intravenous (IV) |
2 Hours | - | 40% | Oral (PO) |
4 Hours | 20% | - | Intravenous (IV) |
6 Hours | - | 40% | Oral (PO) |
8 Hours | 20% | - | Intravenous (IV) |
Total Daily Dose | 60% | 100% | Mixed |
Source: 7 |
Key Administration Considerations:
Proper handling of Mesna is essential for safety and efficacy.
The safety profile of Mesna is generally considered favorable, but it is associated with specific risks that require careful management. A nuanced understanding of its adverse effects requires differentiating events caused by Mesna itself from those confounded by the highly toxic chemotherapy agents with which it is co-administered.
A sophisticated analysis of Mesna's safety profile can be achieved by comparing adverse event data from trials where it was given with chemotherapy to data from studies in healthy volunteers who received Mesna alone.
Adverse Effects Likely Confounded by Concomitant Chemotherapy:
In clinical trials where Mesna is given with ifosfamide or cyclophosphamide, a high incidence of adverse events is reported. However, the majority of these are classic and expected toxicities of the alkylating agents themselves. These include 1:
While these are listed in Mesna's prescribing information, it is clinically understood that Mesna does not cause myelosuppression or alopecia; these effects are attributable to the chemotherapy.
Adverse Effects More Directly Attributable to Mesna:
Studies in healthy volunteers and consistent post-marketing reports have helped to isolate the adverse effects of Mesna itself. These include 3:
Contraindications:
Mesna is strictly contraindicated in patients with a known history of a hypersensitivity reaction to Mesna or any other thiol-containing compound (e.g., amifostine).7 It is also contraindicated in those with a known hypersensitivity to any excipients in the formulation, such as the benzyl alcohol preservative found in multidose vials.7
Warnings and Precautions:
Mesna does not have extensive drug-drug interactions, but its chemical nature can lead to significant interference with common laboratory tests.
Mesna's establishment as the standard of care for preventing oxazaphosphorine-induced hemorrhagic cystitis is the result of demonstrated superiority over alternative strategies. It occupies a specific therapeutic niche where its combination of targeted efficacy, favorable safety, and practical application has proven superior to competitors.
N-acetylcysteine (NAC) was one of the first systemic agents employed for uroprotection. Like Mesna, it is a thiol-containing compound capable of neutralizing acrolein. However, clinical evidence has decisively shown Mesna to be the superior agent. A landmark comparative study in patients with refractory germ cell tumors treated with ifosfamide-based chemotherapy provided definitive results. In this trial, the incidence of hematuria was significantly lower in patients receiving Mesna (4.2%) compared to those receiving oral NAC (27.9%), a highly statistically significant difference (p<0.0001).[42]
Furthermore, Mesna demonstrated better tolerability. Oral NAC was associated with poor taste and gastrointestinal side effects like nausea and vomiting, which compromised patient compliance.[43] Most critically, Mesna was more effective at preserving the planned chemotherapy dose intensity. Dose reductions of ifosfamide due to urotoxicity were required in 11 patients in the NAC group, whereas no patients in the Mesna group required such a reduction.[42] This ability to allow the full, intended dose of chemotherapy to be delivered safely is a key component of Mesna's clinical value.
Amifostine is a broad-spectrum cytoprotective agent with a fundamentally different mechanism and clinical application compared to Mesna. Amifostine is a prodrug that is dephosphorylated in tissues to its active thiol metabolite, WR-1065. This conversion occurs preferentially in normal tissues due to higher alkaline phosphatase activity, providing selective protection of multiple organ systems (e.g., kidneys, bone marrow, oral mucosa) from the toxicities of a wide range of chemotherapy agents (like cisplatin) and radiation.[44]
While preclinical studies in rats have shown that amifostine can be as effective as Mesna in preventing cyclophosphamide-induced bladder damage [45], their clinical roles have remained distinct. Mesna's regional detoxification is a highly specialized and targeted solution for the specific problem of acrolein in the bladder. Amifostine, with its systemic action and broader protective effects, is reserved for different clinical scenarios, such as preventing cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity or radiation-induced xerostomia (dry mouth).[44] For the focused task of preventing oxazaphosphorine urotoxicity, Mesna's localized mechanism is generally preferred as it avoids the potential for systemic side effects associated with amifostine.
Forced diuresis through aggressive intravenous hyperhydration is a non-pharmacologic strategy to reduce hemorrhagic cystitis by diluting the concentration of toxic metabolites in the bladder and decreasing their contact time with the urothelium. While adequate hydration is a mandatory and complementary component of care for any patient receiving oxazaphosphorines [34], multiple studies have shown that Mesna provides a more reliable and superior level of protection, particularly with high-dose chemotherapy.
Animal studies have demonstrated that while both methods are effective, Mesna is significantly better than hyperhydration at preventing bladder edema and reducing the severity of histopathological lesions.[49] While some clinical trials in specific settings, such as bone marrow transplantation, have suggested equivalent efficacy between Mesna and hyperhydration [20], the broader consensus and standard practice is that the direct chemical neutralization offered by Mesna provides a more robust and dependable safeguard. Hyperhydration alone may not be sufficient to prevent toxicity from the high doses of ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide used in many modern protocols. Mesna provides a direct chemical antidote, adding a layer of security that dilution alone cannot match.
The development of Mesna was a direct response to a critical unmet need in oncology. The powerful alkylating agent ifosfamide, developed by investigators at Asta-Werke in Germany, showed great promise but was severely limited by its profound urotoxicity.[51] This dose-limiting hemorrhagic cystitis spurred research into protective agents. Mesna was developed by the same group in the 1970s and early 1980s with the specific goal of achieving "regional detoxification" of the urinary tract.[10]
It was first introduced into widespread clinical practice in the 1980s.[53] In the United States, the injectable formulation of Mesna (as Mesnex®) received its initial FDA approval on December 30, 1988.[1] The oral tablet formulation was subsequently approved on March 21, 2002, providing a more convenient option for outpatient administration.[31]
The original developer and marketer of the brand name Mesnex® is Baxter Healthcare.[31] Following patent expirations, the market has become competitive, with several companies now manufacturing and marketing generic Mesna in both injectable and oral forms. Key players in the generic market include Fresenius Kabi USA, Gland Pharma, Hikma Pharmaceuticals, and Sagent Pharmaceuticals.[31]
Coenzyme M, in its pharmaceutical form Mesna, stands as a cornerstone of supportive care in modern oncology. Its journey from discovery to standard of care is a compelling example of rational drug development, where a precise understanding of a specific, dose-limiting chemotherapy toxicity led to the creation of a highly effective and targeted antidote. The agent's value does not lie in treating cancer itself, but in its critical enabling role: by mitigating the risk of severe hemorrhagic cystitis, Mesna permits the safe and effective use of potent, often life-saving, doses of ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide.
The pharmacological elegance of Mesna resides in its mechanism of regional detoxification, a process driven entirely by its intrinsic pharmacokinetic properties. The rapid systemic oxidation to an inactive metabolite, followed by renal filtration and local reactivation in the urinary tract, represents a highly efficient and targeted drug delivery system that minimizes systemic risk while maximizing local protection. This unique profile has established its superiority over less effective (N-acetylcysteine), less targeted (amifostine), and less reliable (hyperhydration alone) uroprotective strategies.
For the practicing clinician, this monograph underscores two critical points. First is the absolute necessity of adhering to the precisely timed, weight-based dosing schedules. The efficacy of Mesna is inextricably linked to the synchronization of its presence in the bladder with the excretion of acrolein; failure to follow the prescribed schedule negates its protective benefit. Second is the need for vigilant monitoring for its most serious adverse effects: severe systemic hypersensitivity and dermatologic reactions. An awareness of the heightened risk in patients with pre-existing autoimmune disorders is essential for proactive risk management.
Looking forward, the story of Mesna may not be complete. While its role in uroprotection is secure, ongoing investigational studies into its antioxidant and mucolytic properties suggest the potential for new therapeutic applications, for example in mitigating anthracycline-induced toxicities or preventing post-procedural inflammation. Thus, a molecule first identified as a cofactor in ancient microbes and later synthesized to solve a specific chemotherapy problem may yet find new ways to improve patient outcomes across a broader medical landscape.
Published at: July 28, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.