C49H55N9O7
1370468-36-2
Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1, Chronic hepatitis C genotype 1a, Genotype 4 Chronic Hepatitis C
Elbasvir (DrugBank ID: DB11574) is a highly potent, second-generation direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agent that has become a cornerstone in the curative treatment of chronic Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. It is not administered as a monotherapy but serves as a critical component of the oral, once-daily, fixed-dose combination product Zepatier®, where it is co-formulated with the HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitor grazoprevir.[1] Elbasvir functions as a selective inhibitor of the HCV Nonstructural Protein 5A (NS5A), a multifunctional phosphoprotein essential for both viral RNA replication and the assembly of new virions. By targeting this protein, elbasvir effectively halts the viral lifecycle at two critical junctures.[3]
Clinically, the elbasvir/grazoprevir combination is indicated for the treatment of chronic HCV genotypes 1 and 4 in adults and pediatric patients aged 12 years and older or weighing at least 30 kg.[5] The regimen has demonstrated exceptionally high rates of sustained virologic response (SVR)—defined as undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks after completion of therapy and considered a virologic cure—with SVR rates consistently ranging from 94% to 100% in pivotal clinical trials.[1]
A defining feature of the elbasvir/grazoprevir regimen is its established efficacy and safety in difficult-to-treat patient populations. Its pharmacokinetic profile, characterized by minimal renal excretion, makes it a preferred therapeutic option for patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD), including those requiring hemodialysis—a population with historically limited treatment options.[7] Furthermore, extensive clinical data support its use in patients with compensated cirrhosis, prior treatment failure with interferon-based regimens, and those with HCV/HIV co-infection.[7]
Despite its high efficacy, the clinical application of elbasvir is subject to specific limitations. Its activity is primarily restricted to genotypes 1 and 4, making it less versatile than newer pangenotypic agents. A significant clinical consideration is the impact of baseline NS5A resistance-associated polymorphisms (RAPs) in patients with genotype 1a, which necessitates pre-treatment viral genetic testing to guide the therapeutic strategy, potentially extending treatment duration and requiring the addition of ribavirin.[5] From a safety perspective, all DAA regimens containing elbasvir carry an FDA black box warning regarding the risk of Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) reactivation in co-infected patients. The regimen is also contraindicated in patients with moderate-to-severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh B or C) due to risks associated with the grazoprevir component.[6]
Elbasvir is a complex organic heterotetracyclic small molecule that has been systematically characterized to ensure precise identification for research, clinical, and regulatory purposes.[3] Developed by Merck, it was initially identified by the developmental code MK-8742.[1]
The definitive identity of elbasvir is established through a collection of unique identifiers and structural descriptors. Its formal IUPAC name is Dimethyl N,N'-(benzoxazine-3,10-diyl]bis{1H-imidazole-5,2-diyl-(2S)-pyrrolidine-2,1-diyl})biscarbamate.[2] For computational chemistry and database interoperability, its structure is represented by the InChIKey BVAZQCUMNICBAQ-PZHYSIFUSA-N.[2] The molecule's chemical formula is
C49H55N9O7, corresponding to an average molecular weight of 882.035 g·mol⁻¹ and a monoisotopic mass of 881.422445147 Da.[1]
Elbasvir typically presents as a white to off-white crystalline solid.[12] Its solubility profile is characteristic of a large, lipophilic molecule, showing good solubility in organic solvents such as dimethylformamide (DMF) at 25-33 mg/ml, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at 20 mg/ml, and ethanol at 25-33 mg/ml. Conversely, it has very poor aqueous solubility, as demonstrated by its low solubility in a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and ethanol mixture (0.33 mg/ml).[11] For long-term preservation, the compound should be stored in a dry, dark environment at -20°C, though it is stable enough for shipment at ambient temperatures.[10]
From a safety and handling perspective, powdered elbasvir is noted to have the potential to form an explosive dust-air mixture during processing or handling.[15] Furthermore, it is classified as very toxic to aquatic life with long-lasting effects (GHS hazard statement H410), requiring appropriate disposal procedures.[13]
Table 1: Key Identifiers and Physicochemical Properties of Elbasvir
Property/Identifier | Value | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|
DrugBank ID | DB11574 | 1 |
CAS Number | 1370468-36-2 | 1 |
Synonyms / Codes | MK-8742, MK8742, MK 8742 | 1 |
Chemical Formula | C49H55N9O7 | 1 |
Average Molecular Weight | 882.035 g·mol⁻¹ | 1 |
Monoisotopic Mass | 881.422445147 Da | 1 |
IUPAC Name | Dimethyl N,N'-(benzoxazine-3,10-diyl]bis{1H-imidazole-5,2-diyl-(2S)-pyrrolidine-2,1-diyl})biscarbamate | 2 |
InChIKey | BVAZQCUMNICBAQ-PZHYSIFUSA-N | 2 |
Appearance | White to off-white solid | 12 |
Solubility (DMSO) | 20 mg/ml | 11 |
Solubility (Ethanol) | 33 mg/ml | 11 |
Storage | -20°C (long-term) | 10 |
Elbasvir is classified as a direct-acting antiviral (DAA) that exerts its therapeutic effect through potent and selective inhibition of the Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Nonstructural Protein 5A (NS5A).[1] NS5A is a large, zinc-binding phosphoprotein with a complex, multifunctional role in the viral lifecycle. It is an essential component of the HCV replication complex—a structure often referred to as the "membranous web"—where viral RNA synthesis occurs. Beyond its role in replication, NS5A is also critically involved in the downstream processes of virion assembly and release from the host cell.[3]
Elbasvir's mechanism of action involves direct binding to the NS5A protein, which leads to a profound disruption of these viral processes. While the exact molecular interactions are complex, the functional consequences include the potent and early blockade of the formation of new viral replicase complexes, effectively preventing the virus from creating the machinery needed to copy its own genome.[11] Additionally, elbasvir is thought to interfere with essential NS5A-mediated signaling pathways and alter the protein's normal subcellular distribution, further crippling the virus's ability to propagate.[1] This dual inhibition of both replication and assembly makes NS5A an exceptionally effective antiviral target.[4]
The potency of elbasvir is remarkable, with in vitro studies demonstrating activity at picomolar to low nanomolar concentrations against susceptible HCV genotypes. For instance, an EC50 value of 2.2 pM has been reported in cell culture systems expressing an HCV genotype 1a derivative, highlighting its profound intrinsic activity.[11] Elbasvir demonstrates potent inhibitory activity against a broad range of genotypes in laboratory settings, including 1a, 1b, 2a, 3a, 4a, 5a, and 6a.[11] However, its clinical development and regulatory approval have focused on its high efficacy against genotypes 1 and 4.[1]
The high potency of elbasvir also underlies its primary clinical challenge: viral resistance. The efficacy of the drug can be significantly compromised by the presence of specific pre-existing amino acid substitutions in the NS5A protein, known as resistance-associated polymorphisms (RAPs).[7] For patients with HCV genotype 1a, polymorphisms at positions 28, 30, 31, or 93 are of particular concern.[5] The presence of these RAPs at baseline can reduce the probability of achieving SVR with a standard 12-week course of therapy. This direct link between molecular virology and clinical outcome has led to a key recommendation in the drug's prescribing information: all patients with genotype 1a infection should undergo baseline testing for the presence of these NS5A RAPs. The results of this test directly inform the treatment strategy, with patients harboring these RAPs being recommended for a longer, 16-week regimen that includes the addition of ribavirin to overcome the reduced susceptibility.[5]
The pharmacokinetic profile of elbasvir is well-characterized and supports a convenient once-daily oral dosing schedule. Its ADME properties are also fundamental to understanding its clinical utility in specific populations and its potential for drug-drug interactions.
Absorption: Following oral administration, elbasvir reaches peak plasma concentrations (Tmax) within a window of 3 to 6 hours.[1] Its absolute bioavailability is estimated to be 32%, indicating that a significant portion of the oral dose does not reach systemic circulation.[1] While administration with a high-fat meal can increase the peak concentration (
Cmax) by approximately 1.5-fold, this change is not considered clinically significant, allowing the fixed-dose combination tablet (Zepatier) to be taken with or without food.[1] With once-daily dosing, elbasvir achieves steady-state plasma concentrations in approximately 6 days.[2]
Distribution: Elbasvir is extensively bound to plasma proteins, with over 99.9% of the drug in circulation associated with human serum albumin and α1-acid glycoprotein.[1] This high degree of protein binding limits the amount of free, pharmacologically active drug. It has a large apparent volume of distribution (
Vd) of 680 liters, which suggests that the drug distributes widely into tissues beyond the plasma compartment, including its primary site of action in the liver.[1]
Metabolism: Elbasvir is partially metabolized in the liver. The primary metabolic pathway is oxidative metabolism mediated by the cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A4) enzyme system.[1] A key finding from human studies is the absence of any detectable circulating metabolites in plasma, which indicates that the parent drug is the sole active moiety responsible for the antiviral effect.[1] This reliance on CYP3A4 for metabolism is the direct cause of its extensive and clinically significant drug-drug interaction profile, making it susceptible to altered plasma levels when co-administered with potent inducers or inhibitors of this enzyme.
Excretion: The elimination of elbasvir occurs predominantly through the hepatobiliary system. Over 90% of an administered dose is excreted in the feces, likely as a combination of unchanged drug and metabolites. In contrast, renal excretion is a negligible pathway, with less than 1% of the drug eliminated in the urine.[1] This pharmacokinetic property is of paramount clinical importance, as it means that renal impairment, regardless of its severity, does not significantly impact the drug's clearance. This is the fundamental reason why elbasvir is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with severe CKD, including those on dialysis. The geometric mean apparent terminal half-life (
t1/2) of elbasvir in HCV-infected patients is approximately 24 hours, which provides the rationale for its once-daily dosing regimen.[1]
Table 2: Summary of Elbasvir Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Parameter | Value | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|
Route of Administration | Oral | 2 |
Absolute Bioavailability | 32% | 1 |
Time to Peak Plasma Conc. (Tmax) | 3–6 hours | 1 |
Food Effect | Not clinically relevant | 1 |
Time to Steady State | ~6 days | 2 |
Plasma Protein Binding | >99.9% | 1 |
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd) | 680 L | 1 |
Primary Metabolic Enzyme | CYP3A4 | 2 |
Primary Route of Excretion | Feces (>90%) | 1 |
Renal Excretion | <1% | 1 |
Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) | ~24 hours | 1 |
The clinical development of elbasvir was conducted exclusively as part of a fixed-dose combination with grazoprevir, marketed as Zepatier®. This strategic pairing was designed to deliver a highly effective, all-oral regimen with a high barrier to resistance.
The rationale for combining elbasvir with grazoprevir is rooted in fundamental virology. By targeting two distinct and essential viral proteins—NS5A (elbasvir) and the NS3/4A protease (grazoprevir)—the regimen attacks the HCV lifecycle at multiple points simultaneously.[4] This synergistic approach dramatically reduces the probability of the virus developing resistance mutations that could lead to treatment failure, a common issue with early DAA monotherapies.[2] The Zepatier tablet contains a fixed dose of 50 mg of elbasvir and 100 mg of grazoprevir and is administered as a single tablet once daily.[6] The extensive clinical development program, encompassing numerous Phase II and III trials such as C-EDGE, C-WORTHY, C-SURFER, and C-SALVAGE, was designed to evaluate this combination across a broad and diverse spectrum of HCV-infected patients.[21]
The primary endpoint in all pivotal trials was SVR12, which serves as the benchmark for a virologic cure. Across these studies, the elbasvir/grazoprevir regimen demonstrated consistently high efficacy for its indicated genotypes. Pooled analyses show SVR rates of 94-97% for genotype 1 and 97-100% for genotype 4 following a 12-week treatment course.[1]
A key strength of the elbasvir/grazoprevir clinical program was its deliberate focus on patient populations with significant unmet medical needs. This strategic emphasis not only proved the regimen's versatility but also carved out a distinct clinical niche for Zepatier in a competitive market.
Table 3: Summary of Efficacy (SVR12 Rates) of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir from Key Phase III Clinical Trials
Trial Name | Patient Population | Regimen | Overall SVR12 Rate (%) | Key Subgroup SVR12 Rate (%) | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C-EDGE TN | Treatment-Naïve, GT1/4/6, +/- Cirrhosis | EBR/GZR for 12 weeks | 95% | GT1a: 92%, GT1b: 99%, GT4: 100% | 7 |
C-EDGE TE | PegIFN/RBV-Experienced, GT1/4, +/- Cirrhosis | EBR/GZR +/- RBV for 12/16 weeks | 92-97% | GT4 + RBV: 100% | 5 |
C-SALVAGE | PI-Experienced, GT1, +/- Cirrhosis | EBR/GZR + RBV for 12 weeks | 96% | N/A | 7 |
C-SURFER | GT1 with Stage 4/5 CKD (incl. dialysis) | EBR/GZR for 12 weeks | 99% (modified analysis) | N/A | 7 |
C-EDGE Coinfection | Treatment-Naïve, GT1/4/6 with HIV Co-infection | EBR/GZR for 12 weeks | 96.3% | Cirrhotic: 100% | 7 |
The elbasvir/grazoprevir regimen is generally well-tolerated, with a safety profile that compares favorably to older interferon-based therapies and other DAA regimens. However, it is associated with specific risks and contraindications that require careful patient selection and monitoring.
In placebo-controlled clinical trials, the most frequently reported adverse reactions with Zepatier were generally mild and included fatigue (11%), headache (10%), and nausea (5%).[1] When the regimen includes ribavirin, the adverse event profile is dominated by the known side effects of ribavirin. In these cases, the most common moderate or severe adverse reactions were anemia (8%) and headache (6%). A predictable decrease in hemoglobin levels (mean change of approximately -2.2 g/dL) was observed in patients receiving ribavirin, which typically resolved after treatment completion.[5]
The prescribing information for Zepatier includes several critical warnings and contraindications designed to mitigate the risk of serious adverse outcomes.
The potential for clinically significant drug-drug interactions is a major consideration when prescribing Zepatier. These interactions are primarily driven by the fact that both elbasvir and grazoprevir are substrates of the CYP3A enzyme and the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transporter. Additionally, grazoprevir is a substrate of the organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B (OATP1B) transporter.[7]
Co-administration of Zepatier with drugs that strongly induce or inhibit these pathways can lead to altered plasma concentrations of elbasvir and grazoprevir, potentially resulting in loss of efficacy or increased toxicity.
Table 4: Clinically Significant Drug-Drug Interactions with Elbasvir/Grazoprevir
Drug Class | Interacting Drug(s) | Effect on Zepatier | Clinical Recommendation | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Anticonvulsants | Carbamazepine, Phenytoin | Significantly decreased plasma concentrations | Contraindicated | 2 |
Antimycobacterials | Rifampin | Significantly decreased plasma concentrations | Contraindicated | 6 |
Herbal Products | St. John's Wort | Significantly decreased plasma concentrations | Contraindicated | 2 |
HIV Antiretrovirals | Efavirenz | Significantly decreased plasma concentrations | Contraindicated | 2 |
Atazanavir, Lopinavir, Saquinavir, Tipranavir | Significantly increased grazoprevir concentrations | Contraindicated | 6 | |
Immunosuppressants | Cyclosporine | Significantly increased grazoprevir concentrations | Contraindicated | 6 |
Tacrolimus | Increased tacrolimus concentrations | Monitor tacrolimus levels and adjust dose | 5 | |
Antifungals (Azoles) | Ketoconazole (strong CYP3A inhibitor) | Increased elbasvir/grazoprevir concentrations | Co-administration not recommended | 5 |
HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors (Statins) | Atorvastatin, Rosuvastatin, Simvastatin, Lovastatin | Increased statin concentrations | Dose limitations and monitoring for myopathy required | 5 |
Elbasvir was developed and is marketed by Merck & Co. (known as MSD outside the United States and Canada) as part of the fixed-dose combination product Zepatier.[2] The regulatory and commercial strategy for Zepatier was shaped by the highly competitive landscape of HCV therapeutics in the mid-2010s.
As part of its approval, the FDA required Merck to conduct post-marketing studies. These commitments included deferred pediatric studies to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy in younger age groups and to conduct detailed phenotypic analyses of elbasvir against specific NS5A resistance mutations to further refine the understanding of viral resistance patterns.[20]
Zepatier entered a market that was already transformed by the arrival of highly effective DAAs, most notably Gilead Sciences' Sovaldi (sofosbuvir) and Harvoni (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir) and AbbVie's Viekira Pak.[27] Merck's strategy to gain market share was twofold. First, it competed aggressively on price, launching Zepatier with a list price of $54,600 for a 12-week course, which was substantially lower than the approximately $94,000 for Harvoni and $83,000 for Viekira Pak. This move initiated a price war that helped to increase patient access and reduce the overall cost burden of HCV treatment.[27]
Second, Merck leveraged the robust clinical data from its development program to establish a clear niche of clinical superiority in specific patient populations. The compelling results of the C-SURFER trial, in particular, positioned Zepatier as the standard of care for patients with HCV and severe chronic kidney disease.[7] While Zepatier's narrower genotypic coverage was a competitive disadvantage against later pangenotypic regimens like Mavyret (glecaprevir/pibrentasvir) and Epclusa (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir), its strong evidence base in difficult-to-treat populations and its competitive pricing secured it a durable and important place in the HCV treatment armamentarium.[26]
Elbasvir, as an integral component of the fixed-dose combination Zepatier, represents a significant advancement in the treatment of chronic Hepatitis C. Its development and clinical application exemplify the era of direct-acting antivirals, which have transformed HCV from a chronic, difficult-to-manage illness into a curable disease for the vast majority of patients.
The primary strengths of elbasvir lie in its high potency against its target, the HCV NS5A protein, which translates into excellent clinical efficacy. When combined with grazoprevir, it achieves cure rates well over 90% for genotypes 1 and 4. Its simple, once-daily oral administration and generally favorable tolerability profile have greatly improved the patient experience compared to older interferon-based regimens. The most defining strength of the elbasvir/grazoprevir regimen is its proven safety and efficacy in patient populations with high unmet needs, particularly those with severe chronic kidney disease (including on dialysis) and individuals with HIV co-infection. Its pharmacokinetic profile, with negligible renal clearance, makes it uniquely suited for these groups.
However, in the rapidly evolving landscape of HCV therapy, elbasvir's limitations have become more apparent. Its activity is largely confined to genotypes 1 and 4, which is a significant disadvantage compared to the simplicity and broad utility of pangenotypic regimens that are now widely available. Furthermore, the need for baseline NS5A resistance testing in genotype 1a patients adds a layer of complexity and cost to the treatment algorithm, a step that is not required for most other modern DAA regimens.
In conclusion, the place of elbasvir in contemporary clinical practice has become more specialized. While pangenotypic regimens such as glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir are now considered the first-line standard of care for most patients due to their convenience and broad coverage, the elbasvir/grazoprevir combination retains a vital role. It remains an excellent, evidence-based, and often preferred option for patients with genotype 1 or 4 infection who also have severe renal impairment or for whom other agents may be contraindicated due to drug interactions. Historically, its entry into the market was also pivotal, as its competitive pricing strategy helped to disrupt the high cost of DAA therapy, thereby broadening access to curative treatment for millions of patients worldwide.
Published at: September 2, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.