C20H31NO4
794466-70-9
Atrial Fibrillation
Vernakalant is a novel, small-molecule antiarrhythmic agent developed for the rapid pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF).[1] Classified as an atypical Class III antiarrhythmic, its mechanism of action is distinguished by a relatively atrial-selective blockade of multiple cardiac ion channels, which underlies both its therapeutic efficacy and its specific safety profile.[1] The primary indication for its intravenous formulation, marketed as Brinavess, is the conversion of recent-onset AF to normal sinus rhythm in specific adult populations: non-surgery patients with AF of seven days or less duration, and post-cardiac surgery patients with AF of three days or less duration.[1]
The pharmacodynamic profile of vernakalant is characterized by a multi-channel blockade that preferentially targets atrial tissue. It potently inhibits atrial-specific potassium currents, such as the ultra-rapid delayed rectifier current (IKur) and the acetylcholine-activated potassium current (IKACh), which prolongs the atrial action potential and refractory period.[1] Crucially, this is combined with a frequency-dependent blockade of sodium channels, an effect that is enhanced at the rapid heart rates characteristic of AF, thereby slowing conduction in a pathology-selective manner.[2] This unique combination of actions allows for rapid termination of the reentrant circuits that sustain AF, with minimal effects on ventricular repolarization, theoretically reducing the risk of Torsade de Pointes associated with other Class III agents.[1]
Clinical trials have consistently demonstrated the rapid efficacy of intravenous vernakalant. Pivotal studies, including ACT I and ACT III, showed conversion rates of approximately 51% within 90 minutes, compared to approximately 4% for placebo.[7] The head-to-head AVRO trial further established its superiority over the standard-of-care agent amiodarone in achieving rapid cardioversion, with a median time to conversion of approximately 11 minutes in responders.[9]
Despite this proven efficacy, the clinical use of vernakalant is strictly defined by significant safety considerations. The most prominent adverse events are hemodynamic, including hypotension and bradycardia, which are more frequent in patients with underlying heart failure.[2] Although rare, serious events including ventricular arrhythmia and a case of fatal cardiogenic shock have been reported and have heavily influenced its regulatory assessment.[12]
This complex risk-benefit profile has led to a notable divergence in global regulatory status. While vernakalant is approved for use in the European Union, Canada, and over 40 other countries, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has repeatedly declined to approve the drug, citing unresolved safety concerns.[12] Consequently, vernakalant remains a potent but niche therapeutic option, whose application is reserved for carefully selected patients in highly monitored clinical settings.
Vernakalant is classified as a small molecule drug, specifically an alcohol and a member of the phenol chemical class.[1] For clinical and research applications, it is often formulated as Vernakalant Hydrochloride, a salt form that confers enhanced aqueous solubility and stability compared to the free base.[16] The development of this agent has been complex, involving multiple corporate entities over time, including Cardiome Pharma, Astellas Pharma, and Merck, which is reflected in its various code designations such as RSD1235 and MK-6621.[14] This protracted development history is indicative of the significant clinical and regulatory challenges encountered, particularly related to the drug's safety profile, which has shaped its path to market.
The chemical structure of vernakalant consists of several key functional moieties: a 3,4-dimethoxyphenyl group connected via an ethoxy linker to a (1R,2R)-cyclohexyl ring, which in turn is substituted with a (3R)-pyrrolidin-3-ol group.[1] The precise stereochemistry of the molecule is critical for its biological activity. The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) name for the free base is (3R)-1-cyclohexyl]pyrrolidin-3-ol.[1]
The molecular formula of the vernakalant free base is C20H31NO4, corresponding to an average molecular weight of approximately 349.47 g/mol and a monoisotopic weight of 349.2253 Da.[1] The hydrochloride salt has the molecular formula
C20H32ClNO4, with an average molecular weight of approximately 385.9 g/mol.[17] A comprehensive list of its various chemical and regulatory identifiers is provided in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1: Chemical and Regulatory Identifiers for Vernakalant
| Identifier | Value (Vernakalant Free Base) | Value (Vernakalant Hydrochloride) | Source(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DrugBank ID | DB06217 | DBSALT002376 (Salt) | 1 |
| CAS Number | 794466-70-9 | 748810-28-8 | 1 |
| IUPAC Name | (3R)-1-cyclohexyl]pyrrolidin-3-ol | (3R)-1-cyclohexyl]pyrrolidin-3-ol hydrochloride | 1 |
| Molecular Formula | C20H31NO4 | C20H32ClNO4 | 1 |
| Average Weight | 349.471 g/mol | 385.93 g/mol | 1 |
| Monoisotopic Weight | 349.225308482 Da | 385.2019862 Da | 1 |
| UNII | 9G468C8B13 | 7G4J1ZD9UQ | 3 |
| ChEMBL ID | CHEMBL2111112 | CHEMBL2107383 | 3 |
| PubChem CID | 9930049 | 9930048 | 3 |
| Synonyms | RSD1235, Kynapid, Brinavess, Vemakalant, vernakalantum | RSD1235 hydrochloride, Brinavess, Vernakalant HCl | 1 |
| ATC Code | C01BG11 | - | 3 |
Vernakalant exerts its antiarrhythmic effect through a complex and relatively unique mechanism involving the blockade of multiple cardiac ion channels, with a preferential effect on atrial tissue.[1] This action targets key electrophysiological processes in all phases of the atrial action potential, leading to a prolongation of the atrial effective refractory period (ERP) and a rate-dependent slowing of impulse conduction, which are critical for terminating the reentrant electrical activity that sustains atrial fibrillation.[1] While often categorized as a Class III antiarrhythmic, its potent effects on sodium channels give it significant Class I characteristics, making it a hybrid multi-channel blocker that does not fit neatly into the traditional Vaughan Williams classification.[1] This hybrid nature helps explain both its rapid onset of action, a feature more typical of Class I drugs, and its effects on repolarization.
The therapeutic action of vernakalant arises from its ability to modulate several distinct ion currents.
The blockade of specific potassium channels is the primary mechanism by which vernakalant prolongs atrial repolarization and refractoriness, a hallmark of Class III antiarrhythmic activity. Its atrial selectivity is largely derived from its affinity for K+ channels that are predominantly expressed in the atria.
In addition to its effects on potassium channels, vernakalant exhibits a potent and clinically crucial blockade of voltage-gated sodium channels (Nav1.5, encoded by SCN5A), which is a characteristic of Class I antiarrhythmics.[1]
The preferential action of vernakalant on the atria is not due to a single mechanism but is rather the synergistic result of several properties. First, it targets ion channels (IKur, IKACh) that are functionally specific to or predominantly expressed in atrial myocytes.[1] Second, it exploits the unique electrophysiological environment of fibrillating atria—namely, a more depolarized resting membrane potential and extremely rapid activation rates—which enhances its state-dependent blockade of sodium channels.[1] Third, its relative sparing of the ventricular
IKr current minimizes its impact on ventricular repolarization.[1]
However, this atrial selectivity is relative, not absolute. The potent sodium channel blockade, which is central to its efficacy, is also the likely source of its most significant dose-limiting toxicity. While the effect is more pronounced in the atria, the blockade of sodium channels in the ventricles can still occur, leading to negative inotropy (reduced contractility) and slowed ventricular conduction. In vulnerable patients, particularly those with pre-existing systolic dysfunction or severe outflow obstruction, this effect can manifest as clinically significant hypotension and, in rare cases, cardiogenic shock.[12] This direct link between the drug's most potent therapeutic mechanism and its most dangerous adverse effect is fundamental to understanding its narrow therapeutic window and the stringent contraindications for its use.
The pharmacokinetic profile of vernakalant is characterized by its intravenous route of administration, rapid distribution, metabolism dependent on genetic polymorphism, and a relatively short elimination half-life, which are all well-suited for its use as an acute-care therapeutic agent.[2]
Vernakalant is administered exclusively as an intravenous infusion over a 10-minute period; it is not intended for administration as an intravenous push or bolus.[11] This method ensures complete bioavailability and allows for precise dose control, with the ability to immediately terminate the infusion if adverse hemodynamic effects occur. Following administration, the drug undergoes rapid and extensive distribution throughout the body.[2] It exhibits low to moderate plasma protein binding, with the unbound (free) fraction in human serum ranging from 53% to 63%.[1] This high free fraction means a substantial portion of the administered dose is pharmacologically active and available to interact with its target ion channels.
The primary route of elimination for vernakalant is hepatic metabolism, a process that is critically influenced by a common genetic polymorphism in the cytochrome P450 enzyme system.[1]
This difference in metabolic pathways based on genotype has a direct and significant impact on the drug's elimination rate and duration of action.
Following metabolism, the metabolites of vernakalant are primarily eliminated from the body via renal excretion.[1] The drug's elimination half-life (
T1/2) is directly dependent on the patient's CYP2D6 metabolizer status. In extensive metabolizers, the elimination half-life is approximately 3 hours.[1] In contrast, poor metabolizers exhibit a significantly longer elimination half-life of approximately 5.5 hours.[1] The typical total body clearance of vernakalant has been estimated to be 0.41 L/hr/kg.[1]
This nearly twofold difference in half-life between EMs and PMs has important clinical implications. While no specific dose adjustments are recommended based on genotype, the prolonged exposure in poor metabolizers suggests a longer duration of potential risk for adverse events such as hypotension and bradycardia. If such an event were to occur in a PM patient, its resolution might be delayed compared to an EM patient, adding a layer of pharmacokinetic variability to the drug's overall risk profile.
Table 4.1: Key Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Vernakalant
| Parameter | Value | Population / Condition | Source(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Administration Route | Intravenous Infusion | All | 14 |
| Protein Binding | 47-37% (53-63% free fraction) | Human Serum | 1 |
| Primary Metabolism | CYP2D6 O-demethylation (EMs); Glucuronidation (PMs) | Hepatic | 1 |
| Elimination Half-Life (T1/2) | ~3 hours | CYP2D6 Extensive Metabolizers (EMs) | 1 |
| Elimination Half-Life (T1/2) | ~5.5 hours | CYP2D6 Poor Metabolizers (PMs) | 1 |
| Total Body Clearance | 0.41 L/hr/kg | Typical | 1 |
| Cmax (Single IV Dose) | 2.98 µg/mL | 3 mg/kg dose in Homo sapiens | 23 |
| AUC (Single IV Dose) | 0.686 µg·h/mL | 0.5 mg/kg dose in Homo sapiens | 23 |
The clinical development program for intravenous vernakalant has robustly established its efficacy for the rapid conversion of recent-onset AF. The program was built upon several pivotal Phase III trials, including placebo-controlled studies and a key active-comparator trial, which collectively defined its therapeutic profile. Additionally, investigations into an oral formulation for the prevention of AF recurrence were conducted, though this formulation did not proceed to market.[28]
The Atrial Arrhythmia Conversion Trials (ACT) I and III were foundational in demonstrating the efficacy of vernakalant. These were large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies involving patients with symptomatic, recent-onset AF (duration of 3 hours to 7 days).[7] The primary efficacy endpoint in these trials was the proportion of patients who converted from AF to sinus rhythm for at least one minute within 90 minutes of the start of the drug infusion.[13]
The results were statistically significant and clinically compelling. In the ACT I trial, 51.7% of patients treated with vernakalant achieved the primary endpoint, compared to only 4.0% of patients in the placebo group (p<0.0001).[7] The ACT III trial produced nearly identical results, with a conversion rate of 51.2% in the vernakalant arm versus 3.6% in the placebo arm (
p<0.0001).[7] A key secondary finding across these studies was the remarkable speed of action; for patients who responded, the median time to conversion was between 8 and 11 minutes.[8]
To establish the clinical utility of vernakalant relative to existing therapies, the AVRO (A Vernakalant vs. Amiodarone) trial was conducted.[9] This randomized, double-blind, head-to-head superiority trial compared intravenous vernakalant to intravenous amiodarone, a widely used but slower-acting antiarrhythmic, in patients with recent-onset AF (duration 3 to 48 hours).[10] The primary endpoint was again conversion to sinus rhythm within 90 minutes.
The AVRO trial decisively demonstrated the superiority of vernakalant in achieving rapid cardioversion. The primary endpoint was met by 51.7% of patients in the vernakalant group, compared to just 5.2% in the amiodarone group (p<0.0001).[9] This result solidified vernakalant's primary clinical advantage: its ability to restore sinus rhythm far more quickly than amiodarone, a critical factor in the acute management of symptomatic AF.
The consistency of the ~51% conversion rate across the ACT I, ACT III, and AVRO trials is striking. This suggests a potential pharmacological ceiling effect, where approximately half of the selected patient population with recent-onset AF are "responders" whose arrhythmia is susceptible to termination by vernakalant's mechanism. The other half appear to be resistant within the 90-minute timeframe. This predictability has important clinical implications, as it allows clinicians to anticipate a roughly 50% success rate for rapid conversion while necessitating a clear contingency plan, such as electrical cardioversion, for the expected non-responders.
Postoperative AF is a common complication of cardiac surgery, and vernakalant is specifically indicated for this patient population (AF duration ≤3 days).[1] Its efficacy was evaluated in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT00125320) in patients who developed AF after coronary artery bypass graft and/or valvular surgery.[35] In this study, vernakalant was significantly more effective than placebo, converting 47% of patients to sinus rhythm within 90 minutes, compared to 14% in the placebo group (
p<0.001).[35] The median time to conversion was 12 minutes. Notably, the trial found that vernakalant was not effective for the conversion of postoperative atrial flutter.[35]
Subsequent meta-analyses have reinforced the findings from individual trials. A 2022 systematic review confirmed that vernakalant was significantly superior to placebo (Odds Ratio for conversion: 14.94), flecainide (OR: 2.44), and amiodarone (OR: 17.42) for converting recent-onset AF within 90 minutes.[36] Real-world data from post-marketing registries in Europe have reported high conversion rates, ranging from 65% to over 80% in some studies, confirming its effectiveness in clinical practice and its role in facilitating early hospital discharge.[8]
An oral formulation of vernakalant was also investigated for the long-term prevention of AF recurrence. A Phase II study (NCT00526136) found that a 500 mg twice-daily dose significantly delayed the time to AF recurrence compared to placebo and was well-tolerated.[28] However, further clinical development of the oral formulation was ultimately halted.[6] The clinical development program also saw the termination of a Phase 3b study (ACT V, NCT00989001) following a single serious adverse event of cardiogenic shock, which underscored the safety concerns that have shadowed the drug.[2]
Table 5.1: Summary of Efficacy Outcomes from Pivotal Intravenous Vernakalant Trials
| Trial Name / Identifier | Comparator | Patient Population (AF Duration) | N (Vernakalant) | Conversion Rate (Vernakalant) | Conversion Rate (Comparator) | Median Time to Conversion | Source(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACT I | Placebo | Short duration (3h to 7d) | ~145 | 51.7% | 4.0% | 11 minutes | 7 |
| ACT III | Placebo | Short duration (3h to 7d) | - | 51.2% | 3.6% | 8 minutes | 7 |
| AVRO (NCT00668759) | Amiodarone | Recent onset (3h to 48h) | 116 | 51.7% | 5.2% | 11 minutes | 9 |
| Post-Op (NCT00125320) | Placebo | Post-cardiac surgery (3h to 72h) | 100 | 47.0% | 14.0% | 12 minutes | 35 |
The clinical utility of vernakalant is sharply defined by its safety profile. While it offers rapid efficacy, its use is associated with a distinct set of adverse events, particularly cardiovascular, that necessitate careful patient selection and rigorous monitoring. The balance between its benefits and risks is the central issue that has shaped its clinical application and divergent regulatory history.
The adverse events associated with vernakalant can be categorized into common, transient effects and less common but more serious cardiovascular events.
Due to the risk of severe adverse events, vernakalant is strictly contraindicated in several patient populations where the risk of hemodynamic collapse or proarrhythmia is unacceptably high.
This extensive list of contraindications creates a significant treatment paradox: many of the patients who are most symptomatic and in greatest need of rapid cardioversion due to underlying cardiac disease are the very patients for whom the drug is deemed too dangerous. This effectively limits its use to a healthier, more stable subset of the AF population, who may have other viable, albeit potentially slower, treatment options.
To mitigate the known risks, the use of vernakalant is governed by stringent warnings and precautions.
The potential for drug-drug interactions with vernakalant must be carefully considered, particularly given its use in an acute setting where patients may be on multiple concomitant medications. Interactions can be broadly categorized as pharmacodynamic (additive effects on cardiac function) or pharmacokinetic (alterations in drug metabolism). Of these, the immediate pharmacodynamic interactions are of the most critical clinical concern.
These interactions involve the additive effects of vernakalant and other drugs on cardiac electrophysiology and hemodynamics.
These interactions primarily involve the CYP2D6 metabolic pathway.
Table 7.1: Clinically Significant Drug Interactions with Vernakalant
| Interacting Drug/Class | Potential Effect | Mechanism | Management Recommendation | Source(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class I & III Antiarrhythmics (IV) | Increased risk of proarrhythmia, conduction defects | Additive pharmacodynamic effects | Contraindicated within 4 hours before or after Vernakalant | 2 |
| QTc Prolonging Agents | Increased risk of Torsade de Pointes | Additive pharmacodynamic effect on cardiac repolarization | Avoid co-administration; requires careful ECG monitoring if use is unavoidable | 1 |
| Potent CYP2D6 Inhibitors | Increased Vernakalant exposure and half-life | Pharmacokinetic (inhibition of metabolism) | Use with caution; monitor closely for adverse events like hypotension and bradycardia | 1 |
| Beta-blockers, Digoxin | Increased risk of arrhythmogenic activities, bradycardia | Additive pharmacodynamic effects (e.g., on AV conduction) | Use with caution; monitor heart rate and ECG closely | 1 |
The regulatory journey of vernakalant is a compelling case study in differing risk-benefit assessments by global health authorities, leading to its approval in many parts of the world but repeated rejection in the United States. This divergence highlights the profound impact of its safety profile on its perceived clinical value.
This divergence likely reflects a fundamental difference in regulatory philosophy. The EMA's decision suggests a willingness to approve a highly effective but risky drug for a niche indication, trusting that strict labeling and professional practice can manage the risk. The FDA's repeated rejections indicate a lower tolerance for such risks, particularly for a non-life-threatening condition, and perhaps a greater concern that in a large and diverse healthcare system like the U.S., the necessary restrictions on use might not be consistently followed in real-world practice.
Where it is approved, vernakalant occupies a specific niche in the management of AF. Its primary role is as a first-line agent for the rapid pharmacological cardioversion of hemodynamically stable patients with recent-onset AF who have no significant structural heart disease or other contraindications.[2] Its principal advantage is speed. The ability to restore sinus rhythm in a median time of around 11 minutes offers rapid symptom relief and has been shown to facilitate earlier discharge from the emergency department, potentially avoiding hospital admission and reducing healthcare costs.[9]
However, its utility is constrained by its extensive list of contraindications and the absolute requirement for administration in a fully monitored environment with resuscitation capabilities.[8] The predictable failure rate of approximately 50% also means that clinicians must always be prepared to proceed to alternative strategies, such as electrical cardioversion, in a timely manner.
In conclusion, vernakalant is a potent and innovative antiarrhythmic agent whose unique, atrial-selective mechanism provides a clear efficacy benefit in a specific clinical scenario. Its story underscores the critical balance between efficacy and safety in drug development and regulation. While its rapid action is a significant advantage, the potential for severe hemodynamic adverse events has rightfully limited its application to a narrow population of patients in whom the benefits are judged to clearly outweigh the risks. The contrasting decisions of the EMA and FDA serve as a powerful reminder that the definition of an acceptable risk-benefit profile can vary, ultimately shaping the availability of therapeutic options for patients worldwide.
Published at: September 13, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.