2097104-58-8
Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP)
Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, severe, and chronic autoinflammatory skin disease that is both genetically and clinically distinct from the more common plaque psoriasis.[1] The condition is characterized by the sudden and widespread eruption of painful, sterile pustules that form on an erythematous base, often covering large areas of the body.[3] These flares are frequently accompanied by systemic inflammation, manifesting as fever, chills, intense pruritus, debilitating fatigue, myalgia, and joint pain.[3] The immunopathology of GPP is primarily driven by the dysregulation and hyperactivity of the interleukin-36 (IL-36) signaling pathway, a key component of the innate immune system.[6]
The clinical burden of GPP is profound. Flares are unpredictable and can be life-threatening, with the potential for severe complications including sepsis, hypocalcemia, cardiovascular failure, and multi-organ failure if left untreated.[2] This places an immense physical and emotional toll on patients and a significant burden on healthcare systems, often requiring hospitalization for management.[1] Prior to the advent of targeted therapies, the therapeutic landscape for GPP was fraught with challenges. There were no globally approved treatments developed specifically for GPP, forcing clinicians to rely on off-label use of systemic agents such as retinoids, cyclosporine, and methotrexate.[5] The evidence supporting these traditional therapies was limited, primarily derived from small case series and retrospective studies, and their use often resulted in unsatisfactory or only partial control of the disease, coupled with significant toxicity profiles.[11] This created a critical and long-standing unmet medical need for a safe, effective, and evidence-based therapy that could specifically target the underlying drivers of GPP.
Spesolimab, marketed under the brand name Spevigo®, represents a landmark therapeutic advance and a paradigm shift in the management of GPP.[14] It is a novel, humanized, selective monoclonal antibody that functions as an interleukin-36 receptor (IL-36R) antagonist.[14] As the first therapy to be specifically developed, rigorously studied in randomized controlled trials, and approved for the treatment of GPP, it directly targets the core of the disease's pathogenesis.[1]
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recognized the novelty and significance of this agent by designating it a first-in-class medication.[14] This status underscores the profound innovation Spesolimab brings to a therapeutic area that previously lacked any approved targeted options, heralding a new era of precision medicine for patients suffering from this devastating condition.
A comprehensive understanding of Spesolimab begins with its fundamental identifiers and physicochemical properties, which are essential for its classification and use in clinical, research, and regulatory contexts.
Table 1: Spesolimab (Spevigo®) - Key Drug Identifiers
Property | Details | Source(s) |
---|---|---|
Generic Name | Spesolimab; Spesolimab-sbzo | 17 |
Brand Name | Spevigo® | 14 |
DrugBank ID | DB15626 | 14 |
Type | Biotech, Protein-Based Therapy, Monoclonal Antibody (mAb) | 14 |
CAS Number | 2097104-58-8 | 14 |
Other Names / Synonyms | BI-655130; BI655130; Immunoglobulin G1, anti-(human interleukin 36 receptor) | 17 |
Drug Class | Interleukin Inhibitor; Interleukin-36 Receptor Antagonist | 17 |
Source | Humanized; Produced in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells via recombinant DNA technology | 17 |
Chemical Formula | C6480H9988N1736O2012S46 | 14 |
Approx. Average Weight | 145,500 - 146,000 Da | 17 |
Spesolimab is a precisely engineered biologic agent. It is classified as a humanized, antagonistic immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody.[17] The "humanized" designation indicates that the antibody, originally derived from a non-human species (mouse), has been genetically modified to replace most of its protein sequences with human ones, thereby reducing its potential for immunogenicity in patients.[23] Some sources further specify its structure as an IgG1k (kappa light chain) antibody.[23] The entire molecule is produced using advanced recombinant DNA technology within a well-established mammalian expression system, specifically Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells.[17] This controlled manufacturing process ensures a high degree of purity and consistency, which is critical for a therapeutic protein of this nature.
The therapeutic efficacy of Spesolimab is rooted in its highly specific interruption of a key inflammatory pathway central to the pathophysiology of GPP.
The scientific consensus identifies the dysregulation of the interleukin-36 (IL-36) signaling pathway as the principal driver of GPP.[6] The IL-36 family includes three pro-inflammatory cytokine members—IL-36α, IL-36β, and IL-36γ—which act as agonists.[17] These cytokines bind to the IL-36 receptor (IL-36R), a heterodimeric complex on the surface of various immune and epithelial cells. This receptor complex is composed of a primary binding subunit, IL-1RL2 (also known as IL-36R), and a co-receptor, IL-1RAcP, which is necessary for signal transduction.[17] The binding of IL-36 agonists to this receptor initiates a cascade of downstream intracellular signaling events, activating pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic pathways.[17] This leads to the upregulation and release of other inflammatory mediators, the robust recruitment of neutrophils into the epidermis, and the subsequent formation of the sterile pustules that are the clinical hallmark of GPP.[17]
The critical role of this pathway is powerfully substantiated by genetic evidence. A significant proportion of patients with GPP, particularly those with familial or early-onset disease, carry loss-of-function mutations in the IL36RN gene.[6] This gene encodes the natural IL-36 receptor antagonist (IL-36Ra), a protein that normally functions as a "brake" on the pathway by competing with the IL-36 agonists for receptor binding.[6] The absence or dysfunction of this natural antagonist leads to unchecked, pathological autoinflammation driven by unopposed IL-36 signaling.[6] Furthermore, mutations in other genes associated with the IL-36 axis, such as
CARD14, AP1S3, and SERPINA3, have also been identified in GPP patients, reinforcing the centrality of this pathway in the disease's pathogenesis.[6]
Spesolimab was rationally designed to act as a direct and potent antagonist of this aberrant signaling. Its mechanism of action is highly specific: it binds with high affinity to the human IL-36 receptor, specifically targeting the IL-1RL2 subunit.[17] This binding event physically obstructs the receptor's binding site, thereby preventing the cognate IL-36 ligands (IL-36α, IL-36β, and IL-36γ) from docking and activating the receptor complex.[17]
By blocking the initial step of ligand-receptor interaction, Spesolimab effectively shuts down the entire downstream inflammatory cascade before it can be amplified. This targeted inhibition leads to a rapid and sustained amelioration of inflammation.[17] Pharmacodynamic studies have confirmed that this blockade results in the normalization of key biomarkers associated with the innate immune system, the Th1/Th17 inflammatory axes, and neutrophil-related pathways, thereby calming the hyper-inflammatory state that characterizes a GPP flare.[23]
This precise mechanism of action provides a clear biological rationale for the broad efficacy of Spesolimab observed in clinical trials. The trials have consistently shown that the drug is effective in GPP patients regardless of their IL36RN gene mutation status.[6] This can be understood by considering the different ways the IL-36 pathway can become dysregulated. In patients with an
IL36RN mutation, the problem can be conceptualized as having "no brakes" on the inflammatory pathway, as the natural antagonist is absent or non-functional. In other patients, the issue may be an overexpression of the IL-36 ligands or mutations in other pathway components, which is akin to "pressing too hard on the accelerator".[6] Spesolimab's point of intervention is downstream of these initial defects. It does not attempt to replace the missing antagonist or reduce ligand levels; instead, it directly blocks the receptor that both of these scenarios ultimately act upon.[17] By blocking the receptor itself, Spesolimab is effective whether the underlying problem is a lack of inhibition or an excess of stimulation. This makes it a universally applicable targeted therapy for GPP that is driven by the IL-36 axis. This crucial aspect has significant clinical implications, as it obviates the need for genetic testing for
IL36RN status as a prerequisite for treatment, thereby simplifying and accelerating the decision-making process for clinicians managing this acute and severe disease.
The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of Spesolimab—encompassing its absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination—provides the scientific foundation for its approved dosing regimens and distinct routes of administration for different clinical scenarios in GPP. Data have been derived from a series of Phase I studies in healthy volunteers as well as population PK modeling incorporating data from GPP patients.[28]
The route of administration profoundly influences the absorption kinetics and subsequent plasma concentration profile of Spesolimab.
The distinct pharmacokinetic profiles of the two administration routes are not a limitation but rather a strategic advantage that allows the therapy to be precisely tailored to different clinical needs. A GPP flare is an acute, severe, and potentially life-threatening inflammatory storm that demands rapid and decisive therapeutic intervention.[3] The IV route, delivering a high initial
Cmax almost instantaneously, is ideally suited to quickly saturate IL-36R targets throughout the body and quell the flare. Pharmacokinetic modeling shows that a 900 mg IV dose achieves a peak plasma concentration approximately seven times higher than a 600 mg SC dose.[31] This PK profile aligns perfectly with the clinical outcome observed in the Effisayil™ 1 trial, where a single IV dose led to rapid pustular clearance within one week.[1] In contrast, the goal of maintenance therapy is the long-term prevention of flares, which requires sustained, steady therapeutic drug levels rather than a high initial peak.[33] The SC route, with its slower absorption, lower
Cmax, and longer Tmax, provides this exact profile, creating a sustained drug exposure suitable for prophylaxis.[29] This rationale underpins the design of the Effisayil™ 2 prevention trial, which successfully utilized SC maintenance dosing.[34] Therefore, the availability of both IV and SC formulations allows clinicians to deploy Spesolimab strategically: IV for acute rescue and SC for chronic prevention.
Table 2: Summary of Key Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Spesolimab (IV and SC)
Parameter | Intravenous (IV) Administration | Subcutaneous (SC) Administration | Clinical Implication |
---|---|---|---|
Bioavailability | 100% (complete) | ~50% - 70% (dose-dependent) | IV route ensures full and immediate drug delivery for acute situations. |
Time to Max. Conc. (Tmax) | Near-instantaneous | ~5.5 - 7 days | IV provides rapid onset of action for flares; SC provides gradual absorption for maintenance. |
Max. Concentration (Cmax) | High peak concentration (e.g., ~7.5x higher for 300 mg IV vs. SC) 31 | Lower, flatter peak concentration | High IV peak is ideal for rapid receptor saturation during a flare. |
Area Under Curve (AUC) | Higher initial exposure | Lower initial exposure, but can be sustained with maintenance dosing | IV provides greater total drug exposure in the critical initial phase of flare treatment. |
Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) | ~20 - 35 days (3 - 5 weeks) | ~21 - 28 days (3 - 4 weeks) | Long half-life for both routes supports infrequent dosing, especially the every-4-week SC schedule. |
Data sourced from.[29]
The clinical development program for Spesolimab, most notably the Effisayil™ trials, has provided robust, high-level evidence establishing its efficacy in both the acute treatment and long-term prevention of GPP flares. This body of evidence was pivotal for its regulatory approvals worldwide.
The Effisayil™ 1 trial (NCT03782792) was a landmark study, representing the first and largest randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled investigation of a targeted therapy for patients actively experiencing a GPP flare.[6]
This multicenter Phase II trial enrolled 53 adult patients who were presenting with a moderate-to-severe GPP flare. A flare was defined by specific criteria, including a GPPGA total score of ≥3 and pustulation covering at least 5% of body surface area.[26] Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive a single 900 mg intravenous dose of Spesolimab (n=35) or a matching placebo (n=18).[14] The primary and key secondary efficacy endpoints were assessed at the end of Week 1, a time point chosen to evaluate the rapidity of the drug's effect.[26] Patients in either group whose symptoms persisted at Day 8 had the option to receive an open-label dose of Spesolimab.[14]
Table 3: Key Efficacy Outcomes of the Effisayil™ 1 Trial (Week 1)
Endpoint | Spesolimab (n=35) | Placebo (n=18) | Treatment Difference (95% CI) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
GPPGA Pustulation Subscore of 0 (No Visible Pustules) | 54% | 6% | 49% (21 to 67) | <0.001 |
GPPGA Total Score of 0 or 1 (Clear/Almost Clear Skin) | 43% | 11% | 32% (2.2 to 52.7) | 0.02 |
Data sourced from.[6]
Building on the success of Effisayil™ 1, the Effisayil™ 2 trial (NCT04399837) was designed to investigate a different but equally critical question: whether long-term maintenance therapy with Spesolimab could prevent the recurrence of GPP flares.[33]
Effisayil™ 2 was a 48-week, Phase IIb, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. It enrolled 123 patients, including adolescents (from age 12) and adults, who had a history of GPP but were in a non-flaring state (clear or almost clear skin) at baseline.[34] Participants were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive one of three different subcutaneous (SC) Spesolimab dosing regimens or placebo for the duration of the study.[33] The high-dose arm, which corresponds to the now-approved maintenance regimen, consisted of a 600 mg SC loading dose followed by 300 mg SC every 4 weeks.[42]
The combined results of the Effisayil™ 1 and 2 trials demonstrate the dual role of Spesolimab in GPP management. The first trial established its credentials as a potent and rapid rescue therapy for acute flares, while the second proved its efficacy as a highly effective long-term prophylactic agent. This represents a fundamental evolution in the therapeutic approach to GPP. Previously, management was entirely reactive, focused on controlling devastating flares as they occurred, leaving patients in a state of constant anxiety about the next unpredictable event.[2] The evidence from Effisayil™ 2 supports a paradigm shift towards proactive, preventative disease control. Clinicians now have an evidence-based tool to not only treat flares but to prevent them from happening in the first place, offering patients the potential for sustained remission and the ability to regain control over their lives. This dual efficacy was the cornerstone of the FDA's decision to grant Spesolimab an expanded approval for both acute and chronic GPP management.[3]
The evidence base for Spesolimab is further supported by early-phase and real-world data. The initial signal of efficacy came from a Phase I open-label, proof-of-concept study (NCT02978690) involving seven patients with active GPP flares. In this small cohort, a single IV dose of Spesolimab led to 71% of patients achieving clear or almost clear skin by Week 1, providing the foundational evidence to proceed with larger trials.[6] Since its approval, a growing number of real-world case series have been published, corroborating the rapid and profound efficacy of IV Spesolimab in diverse patient populations, including elderly patients and those who have previously failed multiple other systemic therapies.[4]
The successful targeting of the IL-36 pathway in GPP has also spurred interest in the potential role of Spesolimab in other neutrophilic or autoinflammatory conditions. The drug has been formally investigated in clinical trials for Palmoplantar Pustulosis (PPP), Ulcerative Colitis, and Hidradenitis Suppurativa, suggesting that the therapeutic scope for this mechanism of action may extend beyond GPP.[18]
A comprehensive assessment of any therapeutic agent, particularly a novel biologic, requires a meticulous evaluation of its safety and tolerability profile. Data from the comprehensive clinical development program for Spesolimab provide a clear picture of its associated risks.
Across its clinical trials, Spesolimab has been generally well-tolerated.[11] During the acute one-week treatment period in the Effisayil™ 1 trial, the overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was comparable between the Spesolimab and placebo groups (66% vs. 56%, respectively).[9]
While generally well-tolerated, Spesolimab is associated with several important risks that require careful management and monitoring.
To mitigate the identified risks, specific risk management strategies are mandated.
Table 5: Adverse Reactions Reported in Pivotal Clinical Trials (Spesolimab vs. Placebo)
Adverse Reaction | Effisayil™ 1 (IV Flare Treatment - Week 1) | Effisayil™ 2 (SC Prevention - Exposure-Adjusted Rate per 100 Patient-Years) |
---|---|---|
Spesolimab (n=35) | Placebo (n=18) | |
Any Infection | 14% - 17% | 6% |
Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) | ≥5% | <5% |
Asthenia / Fatigue | ≥5% | <5% |
Nausea / Vomiting | ≥5% | <5% |
Headache | ≥5% | <5% |
Pruritus / Prurigo | ≥5% | <5% |
Injection Site Reaction | N/A (IV) | N/A (IV) |
Arthralgia | <5% | <5% |
Data sourced from.[1] N/A = Not Applicable.
The clinical significance of Spesolimab is reflected in its rapid and widespread regulatory approval across major global markets, often accompanied by special designations that expedite its review and recognize its importance for a rare disease.
The approved dosing and administration schedules for Spesolimab are precisely tailored to its two distinct clinical indications—acute flare treatment and chronic flare prevention—a strategy directly informed by the drug's pharmacokinetic properties.
Table 6: Recommended Dosing and Administration for Spesolimab (Spevigo®)
Indication | Patient Population | Route of Administration | Dosage and Schedule | Available Dosage Forms |
---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment of GPP Flares | Adults and pediatric patients ≥12 years of age and weighing ≥40 kg | Intravenous (IV) Infusion | A single dose of 900 mg administered as an IV infusion over 90 minutes. If flare symptoms persist, a second 900 mg dose may be administered one week after the first dose. | Solution for infusion in a vial (e.g., 450 mg/7.5 mL) |
Prevention of GPP Flares (Maintenance Therapy) | Adults and pediatric patients ≥12 years of age and weighing ≥40 kg | Subcutaneous (SC) Injection | A loading dose of 600 mg (administered as four 150 mg injections or two 300 mg injections), followed by a maintenance dose of 300 mg every 4 weeks. | Solution for injection in a prefilled syringe (e.g., 150 mg/mL or 300 mg/2 mL) |
Data sourced from.[6]
To fully appreciate the impact of Spesolimab, it must be positioned within the broader therapeutic landscape for GPP. A critical comparative analysis reveals its unique advantages and helps define its role in managing this complex disease.
The introduction of Spesolimab has fundamentally altered the standards for GPP management by establishing a new and significantly higher benchmark for efficacy and evidence. It is the first and only therapy to gain regulatory approval for GPP based on the strength of large, robust, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials.[10] In contrast, all other systemic therapies—including traditional agents like retinoids, cyclosporine, and methotrexate, as well as other biologics developed for plaque psoriasis—are used off-label for GPP. The evidence supporting their use is derived largely from lower-quality sources such as case reports, small case series, and retrospective studies, which are inherently limited by small sample sizes, lack of control groups, and potential for bias.[5]
The Effisayil™ 1 and 2 trials provide high-level, Level 1 evidence for Spesolimab, demonstrating a degree of efficacy that was previously unattainable. The ability to render 54% of patients with an acute flare completely free of pustules within one week and to reduce the risk of future flares by 84% over a year sets a new standard.[2] This transition from an empirical, often trial-and-error approach to an evidence-based, targeted strategy is the most significant contribution of Spesolimab to the field. Consequently, it is now positioned as a first-line therapy for GPP in treatment guidelines and recommendations from major dermatological societies.[56]
While Spesolimab has proven highly effective for GPP, emerging evidence suggests that its role may be more nuanced in patients with complex, overlapping psoriatic phenotypes.
Several case reports and series have observed that while IV Spesolimab is exceptionally effective at resolving the pustular component of GPP, its efficacy for the chronic, scaly plaque component in patients with a mixed GPP/PsO phenotype may be suboptimal.[13] In some of these reported cases, patients who had an incomplete response to Spesolimab subsequently achieved significant improvement or resolution of both pustules and plaques after being switched to an IL-17 inhibitor, such as ixekizumab or secukinumab.[13]
This clinical observation points toward a potential dichotomy in the pathogenic drivers of the two disease manifestations. While the IL-36 pathway appears to be the dominant driver of the acute neutrophilic inflammation and pustulation characteristic of GPP, the IL-23/Th17 axis is well-established as the primary driver of the chronic T-cell-mediated inflammation and keratinocyte hyperproliferation that defines classic plaque psoriasis. In a patient with a mixed phenotype, it is plausible that both pathways are pathologically active, but one may be more dominant than the other. The clinical observation that an IL-36R antagonist excels at treating pustules while an IL-17 inhibitor may be superior for treating the accompanying plaques strongly supports this hypothesis of distinct, albeit overlapping, pathogenic mechanisms.
This has critical implications for the future of personalized medicine in psoriatic disease. For a patient presenting with "pure" GPP or a GPP flare with minimal plaque psoriasis, Spesolimab is the clear, evidence-based choice. However, for a patient with severe, established plaque psoriasis who develops a GPP flare, the optimal long-term maintenance strategy might involve an IL-17 or IL-23 inhibitor to control the dominant plaque phenotype, with Spesolimab potentially reserved for the acute rescue of any breakthrough pustular flares. This nuanced approach requires further investigation but is a vital consideration for clinicians tailoring therapy to the individual patient's specific disease presentation.
Table 7: Comparative Overview of GPP Treatment Modalities
Treatment Class / Agent | Mechanism of Action | Key Efficacy Evidence (for GPP) | Speed of Onset | Major Safety/Tolerability Concerns | GPP-Specific Approval Status (US/EU) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spesolimab (IL-36R Inhibitor) | Blocks the IL-36 receptor, inhibiting the central inflammatory pathway of GPP. | High-level evidence from RCTs (Effisayil™ 1 & 2): 54% pustule-free at Wk 1; 84% flare risk reduction. | Rapid (hours to days for flares). | Infections, hypersensitivity/infusion reactions (incl. rare DRESS), potential for TB reactivation. | Yes, for treatment and prevention of GPP flares. |
IL-17 Inhibitors (e.g., Secukinumab, Ixekizumab) | Inhibit IL-17A, a key cytokine in neutrophil recruitment and inflammation. | Evidence from open-label studies and case series; effective in some patients, especially with concomitant PsO. | Rapid (days to weeks). | Infections (esp. mucocutaneous candidiasis), risk of IBD onset/exacerbation, potential for TB reactivation. | No (Approved for plaque psoriasis). |
TNF-α Inhibitors (e.g., Infliximab) | Block TNF-α, a broad pro-inflammatory cytokine. | Evidence from case series and retrospective studies; infliximab noted for rapid action. | Rapid (days), especially infliximab. | Serious infections, potential for TB reactivation, heart failure exacerbation, demyelinating disease, paradoxical induction of GPP. | No (Approved for plaque psoriasis). |
Systemic Retinoids (Acitretin) | Modulate epidermal differentiation and proliferation; anti-inflammatory effects. | Evidence from retrospective studies and case reports; slow onset. | Slow (weeks to months). | Teratogenicity (absolute contraindication in pregnancy), hyperlipidemia, hepatotoxicity, mucocutaneous dryness. | No. |
Cyclosporine | Potent, broad immunosuppressant (calcineurin inhibitor). | Evidence from case reports and retrospective studies; used for rapid control of severe flares. | Rapid (days to weeks). | Nephrotoxicity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, increased risk of infections and malignancy. Not for long-term use. | No. |
Methotrexate | Broad immunosuppressant (folate antagonist). | Limited evidence for GPP specifically; slow onset. | Slow (months). | Hepatotoxicity, myelosuppression, pulmonary fibrosis, teratogenicity. | No. |
Data sourced from.[5]
The profound success of targeting the IL-36 pathway in GPP has logically spurred further investigation into the role of Spesolimab and this mechanism in other diseases characterized by neutrophilic or autoinflammatory features. Clinical trials have been conducted to explore the efficacy of Spesolimab in conditions such as palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP), ulcerative colitis (UC), and hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), signaling a potential expansion of its therapeutic utility beyond GPP.[9] The long-term safety and efficacy in GPP continue to be monitored in open-label extension studies, such as Effisayil™ ON, which will provide invaluable data on the durability of response and the risk profile over many years of treatment.[16]
Spesolimab (Spevigo®) represents a transformative and rationally designed therapeutic agent that has fundamentally reshaped the management of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis. Its development was a direct result of a sophisticated understanding of the disease's core molecular driver—the interleukin-36 inflammatory axis. As the first-in-class and first specifically approved therapy for GPP, Spesolimab has unequivocally established a new, evidence-based standard of care.
This new standard is supported by an exceptionally robust body of evidence from the pivotal Effisayil™ clinical trial program. These trials have demonstrated not only a rapid and profound efficacy in the treatment of acute, life-threatening flares but also a remarkable ability to prevent their recurrence with long-term maintenance therapy. The drug's targeted mechanism of action, combined with a manageable and generally favorable safety profile, positions it as a clearly superior option to the older, non-specific, and more toxic immunosuppressants that were previously the mainstay of treatment.
While important clinical questions remain, particularly concerning its optimal role in patients with mixed GPP and plaque psoriasis phenotypes, its impact on the management of GPP is undeniable. Spesolimab has successfully shifted the entire treatment paradigm from a reactive, often desperate, management of symptoms to a proactive, evidence-based strategy of long-term disease control. For the first time, it offers patients with this devastating disease the realistic potential for a life free from the constant fear and burden of unpredictable flares.
Published at: August 13, 2025
This report is continuously updated as new research emerges.
Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.
© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.